search
Back to results

Promoting Adaptive Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Primary Purpose

Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Soterix Medical Inc. tDCS unit
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Soterix Medical Inc. tDCS unit
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Mild Cognitive Impairment focused on measuring Aging, Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia, Cognitive Disorders, Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, transcranial direct current stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 88 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

General inclusion criteria (all patients):

  • All medications stable for approximately 2-3 months;
  • No history of severe mental illness;
  • No current untreated alcohol or substance abuse/dependence;
  • English as native and preferred language;
  • MRI-compatible if taking part in fMRI studies
  • Able to give informed consent.

MCI Inclusion Criteria:

- Diagnosis of amnestic MCI based on criteria set forth by Petersen (2004). Additionally, other potential causes of cognitive deficit ruled out by the referring physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological disease or injury
  • History of severe mental illness
  • Current untreated alcohol or substance abuse
  • Other conditions may exclude; please discuss with contact

Sites / Locations

  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

active tDCS + mnemonic strategy training

sham tDCS + mnemonic strategy training

active tDCS + autobiographical memory recall

sham tDCS + autobiographical memory recall

Arm Description

Group receives active brain stimulation plus memory rehabilitation

Group receives sham brain stimulation plus memory rehabilitation

Group receives active brain stimulation plus reminiscence training

Group receives sham brain stimulation plus reminiscence training

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Face-name Memory Test Performance
Raw number of face-name pairs correctly recalled with a maximum of 15 points; higher values are better at each time point. Change at post-session 5 (day 5 after baseline)) calculated relative to baseline performance (positive differences indicate improvement; negative values indicate decline).
Object Location Association Memory Test Performance - Cued Recall Condition
Performance measured using deviation from target position (in centimeters). Higher values indicate worse performance. Change at post-session 5 (day 5 after baseline) calculated relative to baseline performance (positive differences indicate decline; negative values indicate improvement).
fMRI Betaweight Change
Changes in task related blood oxygen dependent signal (BOLD) activation for the face-name (novel post > novel pre) contrast in the left inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis, pars orbitalis, pars opercularis). Data are preliminary betaweights for the above noted contrast. Positive values reflect increased BOLD signal while negative values represent reduced BOLD signal. Not all participants were able to complete fMRI, which explains sample size discrepancies with other outcome measures.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Prose Memory
Performance on the Ecological Memory Simulations- Medical Instructions subtest. Raw points where higher values reflect better performance at each time point (0-15 possible points at each time point). Reported values reflect change from baseline (i.e., post-session day 5 vs. baseline) where positive values represent improvement and negative values represent decline.
MMQ - Strategy Subscale
Changes on the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire - strategy subscale. Raw points where higher values reflect better performance at each time point (0-76 possible points at each time point). Reported values reflect change from baseline (i.e., post-session day 5 vs. baseline) where positive values represent improvement and negative values represent decline.
Spatial Navigation
Performance on Ecological Memory Simulations routes subtest (serial order). Higher values indicate better performance at each time point (0-9 possible points at each time point). Change from baseline is reported (post-session day 5 vs. baseline) so higher values indicate better recall while negative values indicate decline.

Full Information

First Posted
May 29, 2014
Last Updated
August 10, 2022
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02155946
Brief Title
Promoting Adaptive Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Official Title
Promoting Adaptive Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aging US population threatens to overwhelm our healthcare infrastructure, especially since the rate of Alzheimer's disease (AD) alone is expected to triple in the coming decades. Memory cause functional impairment, reduced quality of life, increased caregiver burnout, and eventual institutionalization. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) identifies those with memory deficits but who remain relatively independent in everyday life. MCI provides a window for interventions that target memory functioning. The proposed study focuses specifically on a groundbreaking combination of mnemonic rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation. The main idea is that brain stimulation can enhance functioning in the specific brain regions/networks, thereby increasing the patients' ability to benefit from different types of memory rehabilitation. This will be a randomized, double-blind study (active vs. fake brain stimulation), that provides multiple treatment session. Outcome will be examined using both laboratory-based and real-world memory testing as well as brain imaging. This first-of-its-kind study has the potential to meaningfully translate more "basic" science findings into neuroanatomically targeted and functionally meaningful treatments for our aging population.
Detailed Description
Enrollment and interactions/interventions are temporarily paused due to COVID-19 and are expected to resume in the future. This is not a suspension of IRB approval. The proposed study focuses specifically on a groundbreaking combination of mnemonic rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation. The main idea is that brain stimulation can enhance functioning in the specific brain regions/networks, thereby increasing the patients' ability to benefit from memory rehabilitation. This will be a randomized, double-blind study (active vs. fake brain stimulation), that provides multiple treatment session. Outcome will be examined using both laboratory-based and real-world memory testing as well as brain imaging. This first-of-its-kind study has the potential to meaningfully translate more "basic" science findings into neuroanatomically targeted and functionally meaningful treatments for our aging population. The general purpose of this study is to examine the effects of two types of treatments for memory impairment in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). One form of treatment is cognitive rehabilitation, which involves teaching new ways to learn and remember information. The second form of treatment uses a type of electrical brain stimulation called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to increase activity in certain brain areas that may be involved with memory. We will use brain imaging to see whether these treatments changed how individuals learn and remember information. We will also use cognitive tests and questionnaires to examine whether memory (and related abilities) changed because of treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease
Keywords
Aging, Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia, Cognitive Disorders, Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, transcranial direct current stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
107 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
active tDCS + mnemonic strategy training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group receives active brain stimulation plus memory rehabilitation
Arm Title
sham tDCS + mnemonic strategy training
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group receives sham brain stimulation plus memory rehabilitation
Arm Title
active tDCS + autobiographical memory recall
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group receives active brain stimulation plus reminiscence training
Arm Title
sham tDCS + autobiographical memory recall
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group receives sham brain stimulation plus reminiscence training
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Soterix Medical Inc. tDCS unit
Intervention Description
Active brain stimulation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Soterix Medical Inc. tDCS unit
Intervention Description
Sham (placebo)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Face-name Memory Test Performance
Description
Raw number of face-name pairs correctly recalled with a maximum of 15 points; higher values are better at each time point. Change at post-session 5 (day 5 after baseline)) calculated relative to baseline performance (positive differences indicate improvement; negative values indicate decline).
Time Frame
change from baseline to post session 5 (day 5 after baseline)
Title
Object Location Association Memory Test Performance - Cued Recall Condition
Description
Performance measured using deviation from target position (in centimeters). Higher values indicate worse performance. Change at post-session 5 (day 5 after baseline) calculated relative to baseline performance (positive differences indicate decline; negative values indicate improvement).
Time Frame
change from baseline to post session 5 (day 5 after baseline)
Title
fMRI Betaweight Change
Description
Changes in task related blood oxygen dependent signal (BOLD) activation for the face-name (novel post > novel pre) contrast in the left inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis, pars orbitalis, pars opercularis). Data are preliminary betaweights for the above noted contrast. Positive values reflect increased BOLD signal while negative values represent reduced BOLD signal. Not all participants were able to complete fMRI, which explains sample size discrepancies with other outcome measures.
Time Frame
change from baseline to post session 5 (day 5 after baseline)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prose Memory
Description
Performance on the Ecological Memory Simulations- Medical Instructions subtest. Raw points where higher values reflect better performance at each time point (0-15 possible points at each time point). Reported values reflect change from baseline (i.e., post-session day 5 vs. baseline) where positive values represent improvement and negative values represent decline.
Time Frame
change from baseline to post Session 5 (day 5 after baseline)
Title
MMQ - Strategy Subscale
Description
Changes on the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire - strategy subscale. Raw points where higher values reflect better performance at each time point (0-76 possible points at each time point). Reported values reflect change from baseline (i.e., post-session day 5 vs. baseline) where positive values represent improvement and negative values represent decline.
Time Frame
change from baseline to post session 5 (day 5 after baseline)
Title
Spatial Navigation
Description
Performance on Ecological Memory Simulations routes subtest (serial order). Higher values indicate better performance at each time point (0-9 possible points at each time point). Change from baseline is reported (post-session day 5 vs. baseline) so higher values indicate better recall while negative values indicate decline.
Time Frame
change from baseline to post session 5 (day 5 after baseline)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Planned (Tertiary) Analyses of Patient-specific Characteristics That Affect Treatment Outcome
Description
Planned analyses to examine patient specific characteristics that affect treatment efficacy and would be vital for clinical translation at the individual patient level. Effect of level of cognitive functioning, measured via neuropsychological test performance at baseline, will be evaluated on magnitude of change at post-treatment and 3 month follow-up. Scores range from -3 to +3 standard deviations.
Time Frame
change from baseline post treatment (within ~ 96 hours of session 5)
Title
Electric Field Effects
Description
Finite element model based measurement of electric field in the targeted brain regions (Values range from 0 to no theoretical upper limit with higher values reflecting more electrical current; most values will be under 0.5 V/m)
Time Frame
Electrical field is estimated using baseline MRI T1 scan.
Title
Brain Morphology
Description
Magnetic Resonance Imaging based measure of brain volume (in percent of intracranial volume; higher values reflect larger brain size)
Time Frame
Measured at baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
88 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: General inclusion criteria (all patients): All medications stable for approximately 2-3 months; No history of severe mental illness; No current untreated alcohol or substance abuse/dependence; English as native and preferred language; MRI-compatible if taking part in fMRI studies Able to give informed consent. MCI Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of amnestic MCI based on criteria set forth by Petersen (2004). Additionally, other potential causes of cognitive deficit ruled out by the referring physician Exclusion Criteria: History of neurological disease or injury History of severe mental illness Current untreated alcohol or substance abuse Other conditions may exclude; please discuss with contact
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin M. Hampstead, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48105
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Promoting Adaptive Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs