search
Back to results

Finding an Optimal Latency for Paired Associative Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Magstim)
Sponsored by
University of Minnesota
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Stroke focused on measuring PAS, TMS, Stroke, Paired Associative Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) of greater than 6 months duration
  • impairment in the paretic hand
  • over 18 years old
  • male or female
  • on mini mental status exam must have score of 22 or higher
  • must have elicitable motor evoked potential (MEP)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • seizure within the past two years
  • receptive aphasia
  • epileptogenic medication
  • major psychiatric disorder
  • other interfering comorbidities
  • pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Latency minus 3ms

Latency minus 5ms

Latency minus 7ms

Latency plus 100ms

Arm Description

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 3ms) where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 5ms) where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 7ms) where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" + 100ms), known to have no effect, where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in cortical excitability using single TMS pulses
Assess average size of 20 motor evoked potentials via electromyography (EMG) signal resulting from single TMS pulses to the motor cortex. Measurements taken before and after paired associative stimulation treatment at each session.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2014
Last Updated
February 23, 2016
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02188420
Brief Title
Finding an Optimal Latency for Paired Associative Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke
Official Title
Effect of Different Interpulse Intervals of Paired Associative Stimulation on Cortical Excitability in People With Chronic Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Minnesota

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
After a stroke, there is an exaggerated inhibitory influence from the non-stroke hemisphere to the stroke hemisphere. Brain stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the non-stroke hemisphere can decrease this inhibition. Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) may be a more effective way to produce this same inhibition, as shown in healthy subjects. However, it is not known whether this will translate to people with stroke. PAS consists of a peripheral nerve stimulus paired a short time later with a cortical stimulus to change the excitability within the brain. Thus the investigators will apply PAS to people with stroke, but the investigators need to first determine the most effective interpulse interval (IPI) between the peripheral and cortical stimuli. Our research question is which of three different IPIs is most effective in changing the excitability of the brain. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal IPI between a peripheral nerve pulse and a cortical stimulus that will be most effective in changing excitability of the brain in people with chronic stroke. The investigators hypothesize that the cortical excitability of the nonstroke hemisphere will be most inhibited with the latency-5ms condition.
Detailed Description
Numerous PAS studies have been done in healthy subjects and all have been done safely. The proper interpulse interval in healthy individuals between the peripheral nerve stimulus and the cortical stimulus is known to be "latency-5ms." However, this may be different in individuals with stroke. Specific Aim: what is the optimal interpulse interval to achieve the maximum inhibitory effect in the nonstroke hemisphere? We will recruit three subjects with chronic stroke. Electroencephalography (EEG) will be used to determine the latency between the peripheral nerve stimulus and the sensory evoked potential in each subject. We will then assess the following IPIs on each subject in a random order: "latency" - 3ms, -5ms and -7ms. There will be a fourth condition of "latency" + 100ms (known to have no effect) to be used as a control. The washout period will be at least one week between each of these conditions. The optimal IPI will be determined from these tests by comparing single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures for cortical excitability. Prior to each treatment, each subject will receive 20 single pulse cortical stimuli to serve as pretest data. The post tests for each condition will consist of 20 single pulse cortical stimuli at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the PAS condition. Data analysis will consist of a single-subject analysis with the two standard deviation bandwidth method of each post-test compared to pre-test. We hypothesize that there will be no adverse advents and that this optimal IPI will be "latency"-5ms.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
PAS, TMS, Stroke, Paired Associative Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
3 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Latency minus 3ms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 3ms) where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.
Arm Title
Latency minus 5ms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 5ms) where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.
Arm Title
Latency minus 7ms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 7ms) where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.
Arm Title
Latency plus 100ms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" + 100ms), known to have no effect, where "latency" refers to the amount of time for the arrival of a sensory evoked potential as determined by EEG.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Magstim)
Other Intervention Name(s)
TMS, Magstim
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in cortical excitability using single TMS pulses
Description
Assess average size of 20 motor evoked potentials via electromyography (EMG) signal resulting from single TMS pulses to the motor cortex. Measurements taken before and after paired associative stimulation treatment at each session.
Time Frame
Change from pretest (immediately prior to PAS application) to posttest which will occur over the 60 minutes that follow PAS application.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) of greater than 6 months duration impairment in the paretic hand over 18 years old male or female on mini mental status exam must have score of 22 or higher must have elicitable motor evoked potential (MEP) Exclusion Criteria: seizure within the past two years receptive aphasia epileptogenic medication major psychiatric disorder other interfering comorbidities pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kate Frost, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Minnesota
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55414
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Finding an Optimal Latency for Paired Associative Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs