BEnefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit (BEST-MSU)
Primary Purpose
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mobile Stroke Unit Management
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Ischemic Stroke focused on measuring stroke, tpa, emergency medical service, ems, mobile, ct scan
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Last seen normal within 4hr 30 min of symptom onset
- History and physical/neurological examination consistent with acute stroke
- No tPA exclusions per guidelines, prior to CT scan or baseline labs
- Informed consent obtained from patient (if competent) or legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
-None
Sites / Locations
- University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
No Intervention
Arm Label
Mobile Stroke Unit Management
Standard Management
Arm Description
Acute ischemic stroke patients treated in the Mobile Stroke Unit
Acute ischemic stroke patients receiving standard management
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS) from baseline to 90 days
Comparing patients found eligible for tPA (based on a blinded review of the patient's chart, regardless of whether they were treated or not) on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks. With a sample size of 693 total tPA-eligible patients (446 MSU and 247 SM patients, assuming 10% lost to follow-up), the study will have 80% power with a 0.05 Type I error rate to detect a difference between groups of 0.09 in the mean uw-mRS using a two-sample t-test.At total of 693 tPA treated patients will allow 85% power to detect a 25 min decrease in time to treatment between the two groups using a one- sided alpha level of 0.05
Agreement between on scene Vascular Neurologist vs. Remote (Telemedicine) Vascular Neurologist
The agreement between a VN remotely assessing a suspected stroke patient via TM in the MSU and in-person assessment by a VN in the MSU will be assessed by using the Kappa statistic. We anticipate that the estimated sample size of 162 is needed to allow us 90 % power to detect 90% agreement between the in-person assessment and the TM.
Cost Effectiveness (N.B. The BEST-MSU study including measurement of heatlhcare utilization is funded by PCORI. The cost-effectiveness measures are not covered by PCORI funding and will be reported separately)
Cost Effectiveness as measured by average patient QALYs, post-stroke healthcare utilization, incremental fixed costs associated with MSU and the per-patient incremental fixed cost due the ambulance outfitting, CT, other equipment, telemedicine technology and staffing requirements.
Secondary Outcome Measures
90 day Modified Rankin Score
90 day Modified Rankin Score 0,1 vs 2-6, and ordinal shift analysis, of patients treated with tPA within 60 minutes of symptom onset according to published guidelines on either MSU or SM weeks, compared to similar patients treated 61-270 minutes after onset, adjusting for any imbalances in stroke severity (baseline NIHSS) between the groups at the time of treatment.
90 day Modified Rankin Score
90 day Modified Rankin Score 0,1 vs 2-6, and ordinal shift analysis, of all patients meeting published guidelines for treatment with tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset (whether eventually treated or not) on MSU weeks compared to patients meeting the same criteria (whether treated or not) on SM weeks, adjusting for any imbalances in stroke severity (baseline NIHSS) between the groups at the time of treatment.
Time from symptom onset to tPA treatment
The time from LSN to tPA treatment on all patients treated within 4.5 hours of LSN on MSU weeks compared to similarly eligible patients on SM weeks.
Time from symptom onset to Endovascular treatment
The time from LSN and from ED arrival to start of endovascular procedure (intra-arterial thrombectomy-IAT) in patients who meet pre-specified criteria for IAT on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks.
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality
The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality in tPA treated patients on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks (Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage defined as any intracranial blood accumulation associated with a clinical deterioration of 4 points of the NIHSS for which the hemorrhage has been identified as the dominating cause of the neurologic deterioration)
Stroke mimics
The incidence of stroke mimics and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in tPA treated patients on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02190500
First Posted
July 10, 2014
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Sponsor
Memorial Hermann Health System
Collaborators
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Baylor College of Medicine, CHI St. Luke's Health, Texas, City of Houston Fire Department, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, West University Fire Department, City of Bellaire Fire Department, Ben Taub Hospital, Harris Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02190500
Brief Title
BEnefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit
Acronym
BEST-MSU
Official Title
BEnefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit Compared to Standard Management by Emergency Medical Services:The BEST-MSU Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Memorial Hermann Health System
Collaborators
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Baylor College of Medicine, CHI St. Luke's Health, Texas, City of Houston Fire Department, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, West University Fire Department, City of Bellaire Fire Department, Ben Taub Hospital, Harris Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary goal of this project is to carry out a trial comparing pre-hospital diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke symptoms using a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) with subsequent transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) Emergency Department (ED) for further management, to standard pre-hospital triage and transport by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to a CSC ED for evaluation and treatment (Standard Management-SM).
Detailed Description
There are many ways that use of a MSU might prove valuable in stroke patients, but we will focus on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and treatment with IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset since that is the most evidence based effective emergency treatment for the most prevalent stroke diagnosis. We hypothesize that the MSU pathway will result in an overall shift towards earlier evaluation and treatment, particularly into the first hour after symptom onset, leading to substantially better outcome. We also hypothesize that as a result of improved clinical outcomes resulting from earlier treatment, the costs of a MSU program will be offset by a reduction in the costs of long term stroke care and increase in quality adjusted life years, thereby supporting more widespread use of this technology. To make MSU deployment more practical, we will confirm that a Vascular Neurologist (VN) on board the MSU can be replaced by a remote VN connected to the MSU by telemedicine (TM) thereby reducing manpower requirements and costs.
The successful completion of this project will provide data on important outcomes and costs associated with the use of MSU vs SM in the United States (U.S.) that will help determine the value of integrating MSUs into the pre-hospital environment in this country. Successfully addressing our three Specific Aims (time saved/ complications encountered, utility of TM, and cost effectiveness) will provide critical information that will be needed to determine if and how a subsequent more definitive study should be conducted. We anticipate that emanating from this exploratory study would be a larger multicenter trial carried out in both urban and rural U.S. pre-hospital environments, with treatment orchestrated via TM, and having sufficient power to determine a difference in long term outcome and costs between patients managed on the two pathways, following a study design that will be tested in this exploratory trial. The present study, therefore, is the necessary first step in a process which may dramatically modify the way that acute stroke patients are managed in the U.S.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Keywords
stroke, tpa, emergency medical service, ems, mobile, ct scan
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Alternating week assignment to groups. Entry criteria adjudicated by masked investigator. Primary outcome also by masked investigator.
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
1038 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mobile Stroke Unit Management
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Acute ischemic stroke patients treated in the Mobile Stroke Unit
Arm Title
Standard Management
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Acute ischemic stroke patients receiving standard management
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Mobile Stroke Unit Management
Intervention Description
Mobile Stroke Unit is a standard 12' Houston Fire Department ambulance equipped with point of care lab, CT scanner and staffed by a Vascular Neurologist, Registered Nurse with acute stroke and research experience, CT Technician and a Registered EMT-P. The MSU is dispatched in coordination with Houston, Bellaire and West University fire department/emergency medical services.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS) from baseline to 90 days
Description
Comparing patients found eligible for tPA (based on a blinded review of the patient's chart, regardless of whether they were treated or not) on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks. With a sample size of 693 total tPA-eligible patients (446 MSU and 247 SM patients, assuming 10% lost to follow-up), the study will have 80% power with a 0.05 Type I error rate to detect a difference between groups of 0.09 in the mean uw-mRS using a two-sample t-test.At total of 693 tPA treated patients will allow 85% power to detect a 25 min decrease in time to treatment between the two groups using a one- sided alpha level of 0.05
Time Frame
90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment
Title
Agreement between on scene Vascular Neurologist vs. Remote (Telemedicine) Vascular Neurologist
Description
The agreement between a VN remotely assessing a suspected stroke patient via TM in the MSU and in-person assessment by a VN in the MSU will be assessed by using the Kappa statistic. We anticipate that the estimated sample size of 162 is needed to allow us 90 % power to detect 90% agreement between the in-person assessment and the TM.
Time Frame
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Title
Cost Effectiveness (N.B. The BEST-MSU study including measurement of heatlhcare utilization is funded by PCORI. The cost-effectiveness measures are not covered by PCORI funding and will be reported separately)
Description
Cost Effectiveness as measured by average patient QALYs, post-stroke healthcare utilization, incremental fixed costs associated with MSU and the per-patient incremental fixed cost due the ambulance outfitting, CT, other equipment, telemedicine technology and staffing requirements.
Time Frame
up to 1 year from date of enrollment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
90 day Modified Rankin Score
Description
90 day Modified Rankin Score 0,1 vs 2-6, and ordinal shift analysis, of patients treated with tPA within 60 minutes of symptom onset according to published guidelines on either MSU or SM weeks, compared to similar patients treated 61-270 minutes after onset, adjusting for any imbalances in stroke severity (baseline NIHSS) between the groups at the time of treatment.
Time Frame
90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment
Title
90 day Modified Rankin Score
Description
90 day Modified Rankin Score 0,1 vs 2-6, and ordinal shift analysis, of all patients meeting published guidelines for treatment with tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset (whether eventually treated or not) on MSU weeks compared to patients meeting the same criteria (whether treated or not) on SM weeks, adjusting for any imbalances in stroke severity (baseline NIHSS) between the groups at the time of treatment.
Time Frame
90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment
Title
Time from symptom onset to tPA treatment
Description
The time from LSN to tPA treatment on all patients treated within 4.5 hours of LSN on MSU weeks compared to similarly eligible patients on SM weeks.
Time Frame
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Title
Time from symptom onset to Endovascular treatment
Description
The time from LSN and from ED arrival to start of endovascular procedure (intra-arterial thrombectomy-IAT) in patients who meet pre-specified criteria for IAT on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks.
Time Frame
up to 6 hours from symptom onset
Title
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality
Description
The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality in tPA treated patients on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks (Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage defined as any intracranial blood accumulation associated with a clinical deterioration of 4 points of the NIHSS for which the hemorrhage has been identified as the dominating cause of the neurologic deterioration)
Time Frame
up to hospital discharge
Title
Stroke mimics
Description
The incidence of stroke mimics and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in tPA treated patients on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks.
Time Frame
up to hospital discharge
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Last seen normal within 4hr 30 min of symptom onset
History and physical/neurological examination consistent with acute stroke
No tPA exclusions per guidelines, prior to CT scan or baseline labs
Informed consent obtained from patient (if competent) or legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
-None
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James C Grotta, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Memorial Hermann
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34496173
Citation
Grotta JC, Yamal JM, Parker SA, Rajan SS, Gonzales NR, Jones WJ, Alexandrov AW, Navi BB, Nour M, Spokoyny I, Mackey J, Persse D, Jacob AP, Wang M, Singh N, Alexandrov AV, Fink ME, Saver JL, English J, Barazangi N, Bratina PL, Gonzalez M, Schimpf BD, Ackerson K, Sherman C, Lerario M, Mir S, Im J, Willey JZ, Chiu D, Eisshofer M, Miller J, Ornelas D, Rhudy JP, Brown KM, Villareal BM, Gausche-Hill M, Bosson N, Gilbert G, Collins SQ, Silnes K, Volpi J, Misra V, McCarthy J, Flanagan T, Rao CPV, Kass JS, Griffin L, Rangel-Gutierrez N, Lechuga E, Stephenson J, Phan K, Sanders Y, Noser EA, Bowry R. Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of Mobile Stroke Units. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 9;385(11):971-981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103879. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 29;388(26):2495-2496.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33449944
Citation
Yamal JM, Parker SA, Jacob AP, Rajan SS, Bowry R, Bratina P, Wang M, Nour M, Mackey J, Collins S, Jones W, Schimpf B, Ornelas D, Spokoyny I, Im JF, Gilbert G, Eisshofer M, Grotta JC. Successful conduct of an acute stroke clinical trial during COVID. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0243603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243603. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32295510
Citation
Czap AL, Singh N, Bowry R, Jagolino-Cole A, Parker SA, Phan K, Wang M, Sheth SA, Rajan SS, Yamal JM, Grotta JC. Mobile Stroke Unit Computed Tomography Angiography Substantially Shortens Door-to-Puncture Time. Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):1613-1615. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028626. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29720439
Citation
Bowry R, Parker SA, Yamal JM, Hwang H, Appana S, Rangel-Gutierrez N, Wu TC, Rajan SS, Grotta JC. Time to Decision and Treatment With tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Using Telemedicine Versus an Onboard Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1528-1530. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020585. Epub 2018 May 2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28612680
Citation
Yamal JM, Rajan SS, Parker SA, Jacob AP, Gonzalez MO, Gonzales NR, Bowry R, Barreto AD, Wu TC, Lairson DR, Persse D, Tilley BC, Chiu D, Suarez JI, Jones WJ, Alexandrov A, Grotta JC. Benefits of stroke treatment delivered using a mobile stroke unit trial. Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):321-327. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711950. Epub 2017 Jun 14. Erratum In: Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):NP4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28082671
Citation
Wu TC, Parker SA, Jagolino A, Yamal JM, Bowry R, Thomas A, Yu A, Grotta JC. Telemedicine Can Replace the Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):493-496. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015363. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
BEnefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs