Narrow Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasia
Primary Purpose
Gastric Cancer, Gastric Metaplasia, Gastric Dysplasia
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
White light biopsy
Protocolled
Narrow Band Imaging Guided Biopsy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Gastric Cancer focused on measuring stomach neoplasms, narrow band imaging, gastroscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- presenting for upper endoscopy for gastric indications
- gastric indications include upper abdominal pain dyspepsia abnormal gastric imaging iron deficiency anemia gastric ulcer management of GI blood loss without active bleeding reflux weight loss.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who are incarcerated, younger than 18, or unable to give informed consent will be excluded.
- Patients who have evidence of active gastrointestinal bleeding will be excluded
- Patients taking anti-thrombotic agents including clopidogrel, ticlopidine, coumadin, heparin, enoxaparin, and direct II or Xa inhibitors
- Patients with INR >1.5, platelet count <75,000
Sites / Locations
- Los Angeles County HospitalRecruiting
- Department of Gastroenterology Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Gastric Symptoms
Arm Description
Patients with gastric symptoms including dyspepsia undergoing upper endoscopy will undergo white light biopsy narrow band imaging guided biopsy protocolled biopsy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Detection of Intestinal Metaplasia or Dysplasia
Confirmation of intestinal metaplasia in stomach per patient by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Regions with Intestinal Metaplasia
Number of Region with Intestinal Metaplasia detected in the stomach (total not per patient) detected by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random
Number of regions with dysplasia
Number of regions with dysplasia detected in the stomach (total not per patient) detected by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random
Biopsies driven by method
Number of biopsies driven by each method. Number driven by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random will be compared.
Helicobacter pyrlori detection
Detection ofHelicobacter pylori by method
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02197351
First Posted
July 18, 2014
Last Updated
March 2, 2023
Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
Universidade do Porto
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02197351
Brief Title
Narrow Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasia
Official Title
Prospective Controlled Trial of Narrow Band Imaging for Detection of Gastric Cancer Precursors
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
Universidade do Porto
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
It is thought that the development of cancer of the stomach follows a series of stages in which the lining becomes increasingly abnormal. Early detection of precursors of gastric cancer likely enable less invasive treatment.
The assessment of gastric mucosa using the endoscope is used to detect cancers and these precursor lesions. Narrow band imaging uses filtered light already built into modern endoscopoes to identify the early changes in the gastric lining.
The investigators' hypothesis is that narrow band imaging improves detection of precursor lesions and is a method amenable to international standardization.
The investigators will conduct a prospective trial in which standard random biopsy, white light guided biopsy, and narrow band imaging guided biopsy will be performed for each patient. The yield of the different methods for gastric cancer precursors will thus be compared.
Detailed Description
1 BACKGROUND
Precursor Lesions
Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and second leading cause of malignant death in the world. It often presents only with vague symptoms of dyspepsia and consequently is frequently diagnosed at advanced stages.
Gastric cancer develop in a series of steps beginning with H. pylori infection. 2-4 It induces an inflammatory reaction with the surrounding gut epithelium which is theorized to drive a subsequent progression in some patients to mucosal atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and finally gastric adenonocarcinoma.
Systematic biopsy protocols
In the evaluation for precancerous gastric lesions and Helicobacter pylori, experts recommend that biopsies be obtained from the antrum (3cm from pylorus), body (8cm from the pylorus), and insisura/angle. Both the greater and lesser curvature should be sampled. Additionally, recently developed staging systems including OLGIM (operative clinic on intestinal metaplasia) scores require histologic assessment (via the updated Sydney score) from two sites (antrum and corpus).
Narrow Band Imaging in endoscopy
Patients with H. pylori gastritis, gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia most commonly have no visible lesions on white-light endoscopy, although endoscopic findings may include antral nodularity, absent rugae, prominent gastric vessels white mucosal deposits. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these gross findings for underlying histological findings is poor. Therefore a number of image-enhancement techniques including chromoendoscopy using mucosal dyes or endoscopy-based virtual chromo-endoscopy (e.g., narrow band imaging) have been proposed. Narrow band imaging is the most widely investigated.
Narrow band imaging is an electronic, noninvasive technique in which the illuminating light from the endoscope is filtered to enable passage primarily of two narrow bands of light, 415nm and 540nm. These wavelengths correspond to the hemoglobin absorption wavelength in the capillaries and submucosal vessels respectively. This enhances evaluation of the mucosal surface patterns and vascular irregularities. NBI has been shown to be useful in the detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus and characterization of small colonic adenomas.
Recently, a simple NBI classification using high-definition white light endoscopy was proposed for gastric mucosal examination.18 The NBI interpretation using this classification was compared with histological examination of mucosal biopsies, with both NBI and histology determined in blinded fashion. This classification which defines the mucosal pattern of the stomach had an accuracy exceeding 80% and excellent interobserver agreement (kappa=0.75) for normal mucosa, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. However, the study was done at a referral center where 34% of patients had dysplasia and NBI was not compared with a white light assessment or standardized gastric biopsy protocol. Additionally, the results were not provided on a per patient basis, which is the most relevant endpoint in clinical practice.
2.0 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE Prompt detection of gastric cancer precursors enables early detection and less invasive treatment options such as endoscopic resection. Narrow band imaging is a completely noninvasive technique which uses filtered light to enhance assessment of mucosa. Our aim is to gauge whether biopsies targeted by narrow band imaging improves the detection of gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric dysplasia relative to standard white light techniques on a per patient basis. A secondary aim will be to assess whether the technique is amenable to standardization so that it might be used more broadly to identify patients with early gastric neoplasia. While NBI is built into the vast majority of endoscopes in use few physicians are aware of its potential use.
3.0 STUDY DESIGN
The study will be a prospective tandem endoscopy trial. All EGDs will have already been planned as part of standard clinical care.
High definition white light endoscopy will initially be performed. The specific location of all mucosal findings in the stomach such as ulceration or nodularity which require biopsy will be noted by the endoscopist and research coordinator but will not be biopsied until after NBI. This is done so that blood will not distort or bias NBI assessment. Any abnormal findings in other parts of the GI tract examined using the scope (esophagus and duodenum) will be noted and biopsied.
At the completion of the white light exam, while the scope is in the stomach, the white light endoscopist will press a button on the scope which changes the view to the narrow band imaging.
At this point the NBI endoscopist who is initially blinded to the white light findings will enter the procedure room and examine the stomach using NBI. The type and location of NBI abnormalities will be noted and biopsies obtained.
At the end of the NBI exam the NBI endoscopist will switch the scope view back to white light mode. The white light endoscopist will return to the room and biopsy any sites identified and recorded during the initial white-light endoscopy. A research coordinator present for the entire procedure will verify and record that all sites identified during the initial white light exam are biopsied.
Subsequently, random biopsies will be performed by taking 2 biopsies from the lesser curvature (body and antrum), 2 biopsies from the greater curvature (body and antrum), and one from the angle.
The biopsies obtained by white light exam, narrow band imaging exam, and random sampling will be separately coded and submitted to pathology. Histologic analysis will be performed by expert GI pathologists blinded to the acquisition approach.
Short 10 second video clips of each site targeted for biopsy by white light narrow band imaging will be recorded. They will be matched with the final biopsy results and stored WITHOUT personal health identifiers. These short videos may be used for training and shared with collaborators to assess inter-observer variability and standardize the interpretation of NBI of the stomach.
The primary outcome measure will be yield of NBI, high definition white light endoscopy, and random biopsy for the detection of atrophic gastritis, IM and dysplasia on a per patient basis. A secondary endpoint will be the number of regions found by each method to exhibit atrophic gastritis, IM, and dysplasia (per lesion (region) yield). The yields of H. Pylori by method and the total number of biopsies guided per method will be additional outcomes.
Patients will be enrolled at the Los Angeles County Hospital of the University of Southern California as well as the Gastroenterology Unit at the University of Porto in Porto Portugal. The protocol originates from and statistical analysis will be done at the University of Southern California. No personal health identifiers will be exchanged at any point between the two institutions.
Prior to the formal initiation of the study there will be a lead in period of 10-20 patients with gastric symptoms. The initial patients will be examined using the white light, NBI, and gastric biopsy protocol. After this the images will be discussed by the investigators at the two centers to make certain that NBI interpretation of gastric premalignant changes is standardized. The LAC+USC investigators will also review the Portugese video training library on gastric NBI. Any changes in performance of the lead in versus the study will be noted to address the secondary aim of developing a standardized approach to NBI which may help this technique be used widely to identify patients with early gastric neoplasia.
4 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The Fisher's exact chi squared test will be used for dichotomous outcomes such as the accurate detection of the highest level histology and number of biopsies. Adverse reactions will be reported in a descriptive manner.
Based on previous research which showed 74% correction detection of gastric cancer precursors with white light endoscopy versus 89% with NBI and given our anticipated gastric cancer prevalence of 20% we performed preliminary sample size estimates for a range of OR using G*Power (alpha=0.05, beta =0.20). We anticipate an N of 200 will be sufficient to show a significant difference between methods.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastric Cancer, Gastric Metaplasia, Gastric Dysplasia
Keywords
stomach neoplasms, narrow band imaging, gastroscopy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
220 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Gastric Symptoms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with gastric symptoms including dyspepsia undergoing upper endoscopy will undergo white light biopsy narrow band imaging guided biopsy protocolled biopsy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
White light biopsy
Intervention Description
Endoscopy with biopsies guided by high definition white light
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Protocolled
Intervention Description
Upper Endoscopy with Protocolled Biopsy (i.e. biopsy by predetermined guideline not influenced by white light or narrow band imaging findings)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Narrow Band Imaging Guided Biopsy
Intervention Description
Upper Endoscopy with biopsy guided by narrow and imaging
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Detection of Intestinal Metaplasia or Dysplasia
Description
Confirmation of intestinal metaplasia in stomach per patient by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random
Time Frame
One Year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Regions with Intestinal Metaplasia
Description
Number of Region with Intestinal Metaplasia detected in the stomach (total not per patient) detected by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of regions with dysplasia
Description
Number of regions with dysplasia detected in the stomach (total not per patient) detected by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random
Time Frame
one year
Title
Biopsies driven by method
Description
Number of biopsies driven by each method. Number driven by each method-NBI versus white light-versus random will be compared.
Time Frame
One year
Title
Helicobacter pyrlori detection
Description
Detection ofHelicobacter pylori by method
Time Frame
One year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
presenting for upper endoscopy for gastric indications
gastric indications include upper abdominal pain dyspepsia abnormal gastric imaging iron deficiency anemia gastric ulcer management of GI blood loss without active bleeding reflux weight loss.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who are incarcerated, younger than 18, or unable to give informed consent will be excluded.
Patients who have evidence of active gastrointestinal bleeding will be excluded
Patients taking anti-thrombotic agents including clopidogrel, ticlopidine, coumadin, heparin, enoxaparin, and direct II or Xa inhibitors
Patients with INR >1.5, platelet count <75,000
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
James Buxabum, MD
Phone
323 409 5371
Email
jbuxbaum@usc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Maria Trujillo
Phone
323 409 0939
Email
mit@usc.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Buxbaum, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Southern California
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Los Angeles County Hospital
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Trujillo
Phone
323-409-6939
Email
mit@usc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Buxbaum, MD
Phone
323 409 5371
Email
jbuxbaum@usc.edu
Facility Name
Department of Gastroenterology Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro, MD
Phone
+351-22-5084055
Email
mario@med.up.pt
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diogo Dias da Silva, MD
Email
diassilva.diogo@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diogo Dias da Silva, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18395075
Citation
de Vries AC, van Grieken NC, Looman CW, Casparie MK, de Vries E, Meijer GA, Kuipers EJ. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Gastroenterology. 2008 Apr;134(4):945-52. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.071. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22198778
Citation
Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC, Marcos-Pinto R, Monteiro-Soares M, O'Connor A, Pereira C, Pimentel-Nunes P, Correia R, Ensari A, Dumonceau JM, Machado JC, Macedo G, Malfertheiner P, Matysiak-Budnik T, Megraud F, Miki K, O'Morain C, Peek RM, Ponchon T, Ristimaki A, Rembacken B, Carneiro F, Kuipers EJ; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; European Helicobacter Study Group; European Society of Pathology; Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy. 2012 Jan;44(1):74-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291491. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20381801
Citation
Capelle LG, de Vries AC, Haringsma J, Ter Borg F, de Vries RA, Bruno MJ, van Dekken H, Meijer J, van Grieken NC, Kuipers EJ. The staging of gastritis with the OLGA system by using intestinal metaplasia as an accurate alternative for atrophic gastritis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.029. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23533073
Citation
den Hoed CM, Holster IL, Capelle LG, de Vries AC, den Hartog B, Ter Borg F, Biermann K, Kuipers EJ. Follow-up of premalignant lesions in patients at risk for progression to gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2013;45(4):249-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326379. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22294194
Citation
Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Soares JB, Marcos-Pinto R, Santos C, Rolanda C, Bastos RP, Areia M, Afonso L, Bergman J, Sharma P, Gotoda T, Henrique R, Moreira-Dias L. A multicenter validation of an endoscopic classification with narrow band imaging for gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions. Endoscopy. 2012 Mar;44(3):236-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291537. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24287281
Citation
Dias-Silva D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Magalhaes J, Magalhaes R, Veloso N, Ferreira C, Figueiredo P, Moutinho P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. The learning curve for narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of precancerous gastric lesions by using Web-based video. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jun;79(6):910-20; quiz 983-e1, 983.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28366441
Citation
Buxbaum JL, Hormozdi D, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Lane C, Dias-Silva D, Sahakian A, Jayaram P, Pimentel-Nunes P, Shue D, Pepper M, Cho D, Laine L. Narrow-band imaging versus white light versus mapping biopsy for gastric intestinal metaplasia: a prospective blinded trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):857-865. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1528. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Narrow Band Imaging for Gastric Neoplasia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs