search
Back to results

Non-pharmacological Interventions for Procedural Pain in Premature Neonates

Primary Purpose

Prevention of Procedural Pain, Reduction of Procedural Pain, Biochemical Effects of Oral Dextrose

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Oral glucose, facilitated tucking, NNS
Oral glucose and NNS
Facilitated tucking and NNS
Sponsored by
Loma Linda University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Prevention of Procedural Pain

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - 1 Month (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Potential subjects are premature infants between 28-36 weeks gestation, have an arterial or central catheter in place and have a clinically required heel lance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requirement for surgery
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) ≥ grade 3
  • Neonates on medications such as morphine, fentanyl, versed, muscle relaxants, phenobarbital, or dilantin
  • Renal injury (plasma creatinine > 1 mg/dl)
  • Severe cyanotic heart disease or severe respiratory distress
  • Chromosomal anomaly
  • Facial anomaly

Sites / Locations

  • Loma Linda University Children's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Oral glucose and NNS

Oral glucose and facilitated tucking and NNS

Facilitated Tucking and NNS

Arm Description

Oral glucose and NNS

Oral glucose, facilitated tucking and NNS

Facilitated tucking and NNS

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Decreased pain score using the Premature Infant Pain Profile pain scoring tool
A decrease in pain score will be quantified using the validated tool Premature Infant Pain Profile, which will be scored by a neonatologist blinded to group assignment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 7, 2014
Last Updated
March 12, 2020
Sponsor
Loma Linda University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02214589
Brief Title
Non-pharmacological Interventions for Procedural Pain in Premature Neonates
Official Title
Non-pharmacological Interventions for Procedural Pain in Premature Neonates
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Loma Linda University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A. Specific Aims Premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) require up to several hundred procedures during their hospitalization. Many of these are tissue-damaging procedures (TDPs) known to cause pain [1]. Through funding from NINR, the investigators found that TDPs not only caused pain but also increased markers of ATP degradation and oxidative stress[2[. The TDP was tape removal, a commonly performed procedure in the NICU2. Based on this finding, the investigators sought to determine if interventions that relieve pain also reduce biochemical markers of ATP degradation and oxidative stress. The investigators first examined the effect of oral sucrose, a commonly used intervention, when given before a heel lance. The investigators chose heel lance because it is the most predominant painful procedure in the NICU, as shown in 29 different clinical trials[3]. The investigators hypothesized that since oral sucrose is documented to significantly reduce pain scores, then administration of this analgesic will also decrease markers of ATP degradation and oxidative stress. However,the investigators observed the opposite effect. Although a single dose of oral sucrose reduced behavioral markers of pain, it significantly increased biochemical markers of ATP degradation (hypoxanthine, uric acid) and oxidative stress (allantoin) over time[4]. More importantly, the effect of oral sucrose on breakdown markers of ATP were enhanced and were significantly higher in neonates that were intubated or were receiving more than 30% FiO25. These findings lead to the question: If oral sucrose does not effectively reduce the biochemical effects of procedural pain, what intervention or groups of intervention will decrease both behavioral markers of procedural pain and reduce ATP utilization and oxidative stress in premature neonates? For this RO1 renewal, the investigators propose to test the individual and additive effects of two commonly used interventions for procedural pain. These interventions are (a) administration of 30% oral glucose and non-nutritive sucking (NNS) (b) facilitated tucking and NNS c) administration of 30% oral glucose, facilitated tucking and NNS. Administration of 30% oral glucose was documented to decreased procedural pain scores[6-9] without the potential adverse effects of fructose, a key ingredient of sucrose[10-11]. Facilitated tucking is the gentle positioning of preterm infants with arms and legs in a flexed, midline position close to the body, while either in a side-lying or prone position[12]. Because tachycardia often accompanies pain, a documented benefit of facilitated tucking is stabilization of heart rate and reduction of motor activity (flailing)[12-13]. Non-nutritive sucking refers to the provision of a weight-appropriate pacifier[14]. The painful procedure will be a clinically required heel lance, which refers to the puncture of a newborn's heel for blood glucose using a specially designed lancet. Our general hypothesis is that commonly used clinical interventions known to reduce procedural pain alter biochemical markers of ATP degradation, oxidative stress and cell injury. Specific Aim 1 will determine whether (a) 30% oral glucose and NNS or (b) facilitated tucking and NNS or (c) 30% oral glucose with facilitated tucking and NNS will decrease procedural pain. • Pain will be quantified using a validated pain scoring tool, the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Individual and additive effect of interventions will be determined. Specific Aim 2 will determine whether (a) 30% oral glucose and NNS or (b) facilitated tucking and NNS or (c) 30% oral glucose with facilitated tucking and NNS will decrease biochemical markers of ATP degradation, oxidative stress and oxidative cell injury. Products of ATP breakdown in plasma-hypoxanthine (Hx), xanthine (Xa), and uric acid (UA)-will be measured using high performance liquid chromatography. Oxidative stress will be quantified by measuring plasma levels of allantoin using mass spectrometry. Cell injury will be quantified by measuring plasma levels of F2 isoprostane using liquid-chromatography/mass spectrometry.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prevention of Procedural Pain, Reduction of Procedural Pain, Biochemical Effects of Oral Dextrose

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
203 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Oral glucose and NNS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral glucose and NNS
Arm Title
Oral glucose and facilitated tucking and NNS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral glucose, facilitated tucking and NNS
Arm Title
Facilitated Tucking and NNS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Facilitated tucking and NNS
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Oral glucose, facilitated tucking, NNS
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Oral glucose and NNS
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Facilitated tucking and NNS
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decreased pain score using the Premature Infant Pain Profile pain scoring tool
Description
A decrease in pain score will be quantified using the validated tool Premature Infant Pain Profile, which will be scored by a neonatologist blinded to group assignment.
Time Frame
at time of heelstick

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
1 Month
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Potential subjects are premature infants between 28-36 weeks gestation, have an arterial or central catheter in place and have a clinically required heel lance. Exclusion Criteria: Requirement for surgery Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) ≥ grade 3 Neonates on medications such as morphine, fentanyl, versed, muscle relaxants, phenobarbital, or dilantin Renal injury (plasma creatinine > 1 mg/dl) Severe cyanotic heart disease or severe respiratory distress Chromosomal anomaly Facial anomaly
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Non-pharmacological Interventions for Procedural Pain in Premature Neonates

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs