search
Back to results

HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial

Primary Purpose

Hemorrhoids, Pain, Postoperative

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hemorrhoidectomy
HAL-RAR
Sponsored by
Hospital Plató
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hemorrhoids focused on measuring HAL-RAR, Hemorrhoids, Hemorrhoid artery ligation, Anal repair, Quality of Life, Postoperative Complications

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are elegible for surgical treatment with both methods.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis.
  • Prior anorectal surgery .
  • Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics.
  • Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Plató

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Hemorrhoidectomy

HAL-RAR

Arm Description

Open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture

Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Immediate postoperative pain
All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms
Specific symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease (pain, itching , bleeding, soiling and hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction) will be evaluated. Te patient will mark in a questionaire the options "yes" or "no" for each item.

Full Information

First Posted
August 12, 2014
Last Updated
March 9, 2023
Sponsor
Hospital Plató
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02216305
Brief Title
HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial
Official Title
Prospective and Randomized Trial Comparing Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation With Recto-anal Repair (HAL-RAR) Versus Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Plató

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
HYPOTHESIS HAL- RAR causes a lower immediate postoperative pain compared with excision hemorrhoidectomy. HAL - RAR achieves similar immediate and long term results compared to the excision hemorrhoidectomy in the control of hemorrhoidal symptoms. The complication rate of HAL- RAR is low and similar to excision hemorrhoidectomy. OBJECTIVES Compare postoperative pain of both techniques. Assess the short and long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms by HAL- RAR technique, and compare the results with those of the excision hemorrhoidectomy. Evaluate and compare the rate of complications of both techniques. Assess the quality of life of patients before and after treatment.
Detailed Description
The classic surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease is the excisional hemorrhoidectomy, that consist in the surgical removal of one or more hemorrhoidal cushion, it is considered a safe, radical and definitive treatment; however, it is not exempt of complications and the postoperative pain is considerable. During the last two decades the concept of treatment has evolved to control hemorrhoidal symptoms with less invasive techniques, such as hemorrhoidal bands, arterial ligation Doppler guided hemorrhoidal and more recently, the association of anorectal repair or mucopexia for treating hemorrhoidal mucosal prolapse . MATERIAL AND METHODS The trial was subjected to evaluation and accepted by the Ethics Committee of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals (Catalonian Union of Hospitals Foundation). All patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods who agree to participate in the study, will be included in the prospective randomized trial. All patients will be required to sign the specific informed consent. Patients who are suitable for treatment with both techniques will be randomly assigned to the surgical technique. Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods. Exclusion criteria: Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis. Prior anorectal surgery . Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics. Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives. All surgeries are performed on an outpatient basis under regional anesthesia and sedation for the same team of three surgeons. Preoperative preparation consists of a cleansing enema and no prophylactic antibiotics will be administered. Both techniques will be performed in "Jack -Knife" position. The open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture. Once completed hemorrhoidectomy a perianal block is performed with bupivacaine/epinephrine. Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorroid. Other procedures will not be associated, if necessary, the patient will be excluded from the study . The patient will be discharged if adequate pain control, oral tolerance and spontaneous diuresis is achieved, and after examination by the surgeon in order to discard immediate complications. The ambulatory treatment consists of an osmotic laxative (magnesium hydroxide ), oral analgesia with paracetamol/tramadol ( 325mg/37.5mg ) every 6 hours and Dexketoprofen (25 mg) every 8 hours, metamizol (575 mg) may be associated every 8 hours if pain. In case of persistent pain, the patient will be examined in emergency room. EVALUATION OF RESULTS A power analysis was performed to assess the study sample size. Choosing a power of 0.8 and a confidence interval of 95% α-error of 0.05, we calculated that 20 patients were needed in each arm. All patients will be evaluated with a validated questionnaire of 36 questions on quality of life ( SF-36 ) and specific questions about specific symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease (pain, itching , bleeding, soiling and hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction ). The questionnaire will be answered before the intervention, after six and twelve months of follow up. All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days. The patients will be assessed on the day of discharge and at 7, 14, and 30 postoperative days. The patients will be evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 postoperative months in the outpatient clinic.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hemorrhoids, Pain, Postoperative
Keywords
HAL-RAR, Hemorrhoids, Hemorrhoid artery ligation, Anal repair, Quality of Life, Postoperative Complications

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hemorrhoidectomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture
Arm Title
HAL-RAR
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Hemorrhoidectomy
Intervention Description
Open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
HAL-RAR
Other Intervention Name(s)
Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair
Intervention Description
Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Immediate postoperative pain
Description
All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days.
Time Frame
up to first 15 postoperative days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms
Description
Specific symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease (pain, itching , bleeding, soiling and hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction) will be evaluated. Te patient will mark in a questionaire the options "yes" or "no" for each item.
Time Frame
1, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
SF-36 Quality of life score
Description
All patients will be evaluated with a validated questionnaire of 36 questions on quality of life ( SF-36 )
Time Frame
Preoperative, 6 and 12 months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods. Exclusion Criteria: Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis. Prior anorectal surgery . Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics. Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fernando Carvajal, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Plató Barcelona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Plató
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Catalunya
ZIP/Postal Code
08006
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
2295392
Citation
Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):380-6. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90828-o.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23478616
Citation
Elmer SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE. A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):484-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a8567.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs