Control of Sinus Node Tachycardia as an Additional Therapy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure (CONSTATHE)
Primary Purpose
Decompensated Heart Failure
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ivabradine
Placebo
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Decompensated Heart Failure focused on measuring ivabradine, heart rate, heart failure
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sinus node rhythm
- HR> 80 bpm
- Hospitalization for DHF
- Ejection fraction ≤ 40%
- Sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg
- Signs of hypoperfusion
- Dobutamine>15 mcg/Kg/min
- Acute myocarditis
- Primary valvular disease requiring surgery
- Stroke in the last three months
- Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy
- Sinus node disease
- Atrial fibrillation or flutter
- Second or third degree atrio-ventricular blockade
- Long QT syndrome
- Severe pulmonary disease
- Pulmonary embolism in the last three months
- Need for invasive ventilatory support
- Septicemia or septic shock
- Hepatic failure
- Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL
- Hemodialysis
- Advanced malignancy
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Immunosuppressive therapy
- Use of cytochrome P450 inhibitors
Sites / Locations
- Heart Failure Unit, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical SchoolRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
ivabradine
placebo
Arm Description
I(f) inhibitor, heart rate controller
placebo pill will be administered orally twice daily
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline heart rate
Heart rate will be assessed at morning, after 30 minutes of rest, recorded by electrocardiogram.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline blood pressure
Blood pressure will be measured at morning by electronic cuff
Change from baseline ejection fraction
Ejection fraction will be measured by echocardiography using Simpson´s rule
Change from baseline stroke volume
Stroke volume will be measured by echocardiography using Doppler velocity-time integral technique.
Change from baseline creatinine
Serum creatinine will be measured
Change from baseline brain natriuretic peptide
Serum brain natriuretic peptide will be measured
Clinical
Time of survival and free of readmission
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02236247
First Posted
September 2, 2014
Last Updated
December 30, 2016
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02236247
Brief Title
Control of Sinus Node Tachycardia as an Additional Therapy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure
Acronym
CONSTATHE
Official Title
Heart Rate Control as an Additional Therapeutic Strategy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2017 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Study aims to compare the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine with placebo as strategy of heart rate control in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF).
Detailed Description
Sympathetic hyperactivity and consequent increase in heart rate (HR) are physiological responses to low cardiac output in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF). However, elevated HR may become inappropriate in these patients, increasing myocardial oxygen demand and decreasing diastolic filling time and might lead to hemodynamic deterioration, ventricular dysfunction (tachycardiomyopathy) and clinical deterioration.
Studies show the elevated HR is a predictor of poor prognosis in DHF. Subanalyses of large clinical trials using beta blockers (BBs) demonstrate the adequate control of HR correlates with a better outcome in patients with stable chronic heart failure (HF). However, use of BBs in patients with DHF is limited due to negative inotropic and hypotensive effects of these drugs.
As alternative to BBs, ivabradine has shown to increase survival of patients with chronic stable systolic HF. Compared to BBs, ivabradine has the advantage of "pure" negative chronotropic effect, no effect on myocardial contractility or peripheral vascular resistance. Despite the inhibition of I (f) has been validated as a therapeutic option in patients with stable HF, there are no studies available on this strategy in patients with DHF.
We hypothesized that HR control by ivabradine might improve clinical, hemodynamic and neurohormonal parameters in patients with DHF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HR control with ivabradine in patients with DHF.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Decompensated Heart Failure
Keywords
ivabradine, heart rate, heart failure
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ivabradine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
I(f) inhibitor, heart rate controller
Arm Title
placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
placebo pill will be administered orally twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ivabradine
Other Intervention Name(s)
procoralan
Intervention Description
5 mg oral twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
A placebo pill (identical to ivabradine) will be administered twice daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline heart rate
Description
Heart rate will be assessed at morning, after 30 minutes of rest, recorded by electrocardiogram.
Time Frame
Baseline, day 5 after intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline blood pressure
Description
Blood pressure will be measured at morning by electronic cuff
Time Frame
Baseline, day 5 after intervention
Title
Change from baseline ejection fraction
Description
Ejection fraction will be measured by echocardiography using Simpson´s rule
Time Frame
Baseline, day 5 after intervention
Title
Change from baseline stroke volume
Description
Stroke volume will be measured by echocardiography using Doppler velocity-time integral technique.
Time Frame
Baseline, day 5 after intervention
Title
Change from baseline creatinine
Description
Serum creatinine will be measured
Time Frame
Baseline, day 5 after intervention
Title
Change from baseline brain natriuretic peptide
Description
Serum brain natriuretic peptide will be measured
Time Frame
Baseline, day 5 after intervention
Title
Clinical
Description
Time of survival and free of readmission
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Safety/Adverse Event Outcome Measure
Description
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame
Up to day 15 days after intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Sinus node rhythm
HR> 80 bpm
Hospitalization for DHF
Ejection fraction ≤ 40%
Sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg
Signs of hypoperfusion
Dobutamine>15 mcg/Kg/min
Acute myocarditis
Primary valvular disease requiring surgery
Stroke in the last three months
Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy
Sinus node disease
Atrial fibrillation or flutter
Second or third degree atrio-ventricular blockade
Long QT syndrome
Severe pulmonary disease
Pulmonary embolism in the last three months
Need for invasive ventilatory support
Septicemia or septic shock
Hepatic failure
Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL
Hemodialysis
Advanced malignancy
Pregnancy or lactation
Immunosuppressive therapy
Use of cytochrome P450 inhibitors
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marco S. Alves, MD
Phone
+55 11 981431512
Email
marco.alves@incor.usp.br
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Edimar A. Bocchi, MD-PHD
Phone
+55 11 2661-5419
Email
edimar.bocchi@incor.usp.br
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edimar A Bocchi, MD-PHD
Organizational Affiliation
Heart Failure Unit, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Heart Failure Unit, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-900
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marco S Alves, MD
Phone
+55 11 981431512
Email
marco.alves@incor.usp.br
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edimar A Bocchi, MD-PHD
Phone
+55 11 2661-5419
Email
edimar.bocchi@incor.usp.br
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marco S Alves, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27469019
Citation
Lofrano-Alves MS, Issa VS, Biselli B, Chizzola P, Ayub-Ferreira SM, Bocchi EA. Control of sinus tachycardia as an additional therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure (CONSTATHE-DHF): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Oct;35(10):1260-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 7. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Control of Sinus Node Tachycardia as an Additional Therapy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs