search
Back to results

Comparison of Treatments Following Total Knee Replacement

Primary Purpose

Degeneration; Articular Cartilage, Knee, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Knee

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Clinic-based outpatient exercise group
Community-based exercise group
Sponsored by
University of Pittsburgh
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Degeneration; Articular Cartilage, Knee focused on measuring total knee replacement, rehabilitation, exercise program, total knee arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral TKR 2 to 4 months prior
  • Older than 60 years of age
  • Experience functional limitation in daily activities (score in WOMAC-PF of at least 9 points)
  • Speak sufficient English to understand study instructions
  • Have medical clearance to participate in the study
  • Are willing to be randomized to one of the 3 treatment arms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have absolute or relative contraindications to exercise
  • Have history of uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or hypertension
  • Are unable to walk 50 meters without an assistive device
  • Have history of muscular or neurological disorder that affect lower extremity function
  • Regular participation in exercise
  • Terminal illness
  • Planning to have another joint replacement during the next 12 months
  • Plan not to be around during the next 12 months

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Clinic-based outpatient exercise group

Community-based exercise group

Wait-listed usual medical care

Arm Description

Subjects will participate in supervised sessions (clinic-based) of exercise followed by a home exercise program 2 times per week during 3 months. Each exercise session will last about 60 minutes. Treatment sessions will utilize a pragmatic approach and will include the exercises designed to increase muscular strength, low impact cardiovascular exercise, range of movement, and activity for daily living skills.

Subjects will attend to exercise classes (community-based) 2 times per week during 3 months. The exercise classes last approximately 60 minutes. The group exercise classes consists of a variety of exercises designed to increase general muscular strength, low impact aerobic exercise, range of movement, and activity for daily living.

Wait-listed usual medical care - no intervention provided by study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function (WOMAC-PF).
WOMAC-PF is a patient reported outcome with 17 items. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type Scale with descriptors from 0-4 (none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme difficulty) and summed for a maximum score of 68. Higher scores indicate worse physical function.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Composite Score of Performed-based Tests of Physical Function.
Scores on 6 performance-based tests (i.e., the 6-minute walk test, 40-meter gait speed, stair ascend/descend test, single leg stance balance test, chair stand test, and floor sitting-rising) were combined into a composite score formed with the unit-weighted Z scores of constituent tests to provide a more representative and stable measure of the subjects' underlying functional performance. The unit weights refer to averaging standardized scores (e.g., the scores for each performance-based test are converted to Z-scores before applying equal weights). Higher Z-scores represent better functional performance. The Z-scores for each participant can be interpreted as deviations from the baseline average of the whole group. We considered a change in Z-score of 0.2 as clinically important because it represents approximately 20% of a standard deviation relative to the baseline average of the whole group.

Full Information

First Posted
September 9, 2014
Last Updated
November 16, 2018
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02237911
Brief Title
Comparison of Treatments Following Total Knee Replacement
Official Title
A Comparison of Treatment Methods for Patients Following Total Knee Replacement.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 7, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 7, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Although total knee replacement (TKR) improves pain in numerous patients, it does not resolve many of the substantial functional limitations and physical inactivity that existed for a long time prior to the surgery. Exercise is an intervention that could improve these long-term limitations. To promote these improvements, exercise should be implemented at later stage post TKR when patients can tolerate doses of exercise sufficiently high to promote substantial changes. To date, we just don't have enough good research to tell us which type of exercise works best for which patients and under which circumstances at later stage post TKR. This research study will provide evidence for recommended interventions during the later stage post TKR. The specific research questions are: (1) How do group exercise in the community and individual exercise in rehabilitation clinic compare with usual medical care on physical function and activity outcomes? (2) Who are the patients most likely to respond to each exercise intervention? (3) Are the approaches safe?
Detailed Description
This is a comparative effectiveness study, designed as a 3-group single-blind randomized clinical trial. Two hundred forty older adults who underwent TKR at least 2 months prior and are otherwise eligible will be randomized into one of three treatment approaches: 1) clinic-based individual outpatient rehabilitative exercise; 2) community-based group exercise classes; or 3) usual medical care. Subjects will be treated for 3 months. Data will be collected before intervention, after intervention (3 months), and 6 months after randomization. Physical function is a primary outcome and will be assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and a battery of performance-based tests germane to patients post TKR that includes ability to walk, manage stairs, lift from the floor and the chair, and one-leg balance. We will also use an accelerometer-based monitor that provides a real-time measure of physical activity during normal daily living and is able to accurately capture most levels of activity. Linear mixed models will be fitted to compare the changes in outcome across groups. Logistic regression will identify patient characteristics that predict functional recovery in the exercise groups. Survival analysis and instrumental variable methods will be used to compare attrition, adherence and adverse events between groups.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degeneration; Articular Cartilage, Knee, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Knee
Keywords
total knee replacement, rehabilitation, exercise program, total knee arthroplasty

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Clinic-based outpatient exercise group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will participate in supervised sessions (clinic-based) of exercise followed by a home exercise program 2 times per week during 3 months. Each exercise session will last about 60 minutes. Treatment sessions will utilize a pragmatic approach and will include the exercises designed to increase muscular strength, low impact cardiovascular exercise, range of movement, and activity for daily living skills.
Arm Title
Community-based exercise group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will attend to exercise classes (community-based) 2 times per week during 3 months. The exercise classes last approximately 60 minutes. The group exercise classes consists of a variety of exercises designed to increase general muscular strength, low impact aerobic exercise, range of movement, and activity for daily living.
Arm Title
Wait-listed usual medical care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Wait-listed usual medical care - no intervention provided by study.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Clinic-based outpatient exercise group
Intervention Description
Subjects will participate in supervised sessions (clinic-based) of exercise followed by a home exercise program 2 times per week during 3 months. Each exercise session will last about 60 minutes. Treatment sessions will utilize a pragmatic approach and will include the exercises designed to increase muscular strength, low impact cardiovascular exercise, range of movement, and activity for daily living skills.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Community-based exercise group
Intervention Description
Subjects will attend to exercise classes (community-based) 2 times per week during 3 months. The exercise classes last approximately 60 minutes. The group exercise classes consists of a variety of exercises designed to increase general muscular strength, low impact aerobic exercise, range of movement, and activity for daily living.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function (WOMAC-PF).
Description
WOMAC-PF is a patient reported outcome with 17 items. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type Scale with descriptors from 0-4 (none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme difficulty) and summed for a maximum score of 68. Higher scores indicate worse physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite Score of Performed-based Tests of Physical Function.
Description
Scores on 6 performance-based tests (i.e., the 6-minute walk test, 40-meter gait speed, stair ascend/descend test, single leg stance balance test, chair stand test, and floor sitting-rising) were combined into a composite score formed with the unit-weighted Z scores of constituent tests to provide a more representative and stable measure of the subjects' underlying functional performance. The unit weights refer to averaging standardized scores (e.g., the scores for each performance-based test are converted to Z-scores before applying equal weights). Higher Z-scores represent better functional performance. The Z-scores for each participant can be interpreted as deviations from the baseline average of the whole group. We considered a change in Z-score of 0.2 as clinically important because it represents approximately 20% of a standard deviation relative to the baseline average of the whole group.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Physical Activity Energy Expenditure - Measured by Portable Activity Monitor (SenseWear).
Description
Real-time measure of daily energy expenditure physical activity assessed by portable activity monitor.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Unilateral TKR 2 to 4 months prior Older than 60 years of age Experience functional limitation in daily activities (score in WOMAC-PF of at least 9 points) Speak sufficient English to understand study instructions Have medical clearance to participate in the study Are willing to be randomized to one of the 3 treatment arms Exclusion Criteria: Have absolute or relative contraindications to exercise Have history of uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or hypertension Are unable to walk 50 meters without an assistive device Have history of muscular or neurological disorder that affect lower extremity function Regular participation in exercise Terminal illness Planning to have another joint replacement during the next 12 months Plan not to be around during the next 12 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sara R Piva, PT, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15219
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30794296
Citation
Piva SR, Schneider MJ, Moore CG, Catelani MB, Gil AB, Klatt BA, DiGioia AM, Almeida GJ, Khoja SS, Sowa G, Irrgang JJ. Effectiveness of Later-Stage Exercise Programs vs Usual Medical Care on Physical Function and Activity After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0018.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26474988
Citation
Piva SR, Moore CG, Schneider M, Gil AB, Almeida GJ, Irrgang JJ. A randomized trial to compare exercise treatment methods for patients after total knee replacement: protocol paper. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Oct 16;16:303. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0761-5.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Treatments Following Total Knee Replacement

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs