search
Back to results

Value-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Prevention of Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders

Primary Purpose

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Whiplash

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Value-based cognitive-behavioral therapy
Sponsored by
University of Southern Denmark
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Musculoskeletal Disorders focused on measuring whiplash, prevention, pain, cognitive-behavioural therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers
  • 18 and 65-years-old
  • WAD level I-II.
  • 3-months post-injury
  • Disability in at least one important life domain (≥ 5 on the pain disability index) and moderate levels of pain (average pain intensity ≥ 4 on the NRS scale).
  • Meet at least one of the psychological risk criteria:
  • Elevated levels of pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance-beliefs, symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Southern Denmark

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group A

Group B

Arm Description

Group A receives value-based cognitive behavior therapy after randomization.

Group B receives value-based cognitive behavior therapy after 3 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Disability as measured by Pain Disability Index
The PDI measures how pain interferes with daily life activities within 7 different domains. The 7 domains are rated from 0 (no disability) to 10 (worst disability). The scale shows good reliability and validity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain by NDI
Neck pain intensity and disability is measured with the Neck Disability Index (NDI; Vernon & Mior, 1991). The NDI measures within 10 domains pain and how neck pain affects the ability to handle daily life activities such as personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, pain intensity, concentration, and headache. The total score range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (total disability).
Pain by NRS
Pain is also measured on four numerical pain rating scales (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Patients mark their answers on each scale corresponding to their pain now, highest level of pain, lowest level of pain, and finally average pain over the past week (NRS: Turk & Melzack, 2001).
Fear of re-injury by TSK
Fear of re-injury due to movement is measured with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK; Kori, Miller, & Todd, 1990). TSK is a 17-item scale assessing fear of movement on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 17 to 68 with higher scores indicating higher levels of kinesiophobia. The scale is commonly used in various chronic pain samples and has good construct and predictive validity (Roelofs, Goubert, Peters, Vlayen, & Crombes, 2004). The clinical cut-off score is set to ≥ 37.
Pain-related catastrophizing by PCS
Catastrophic thinking related to pain is measured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS; Sullivan, Bishop, Pivik, 1995). The PCS-instructions ask participants to reflect on past painful experiences and to indicate the degree to which they experienced each of 13 thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain on a five-point Likert scale with (0 = not at all, 4 = all the time).
Anxiety and depression by HADS
To assess the level of anxiety and depressive symptoms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is used (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). The scale consists of 14 items, 7 relating to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 to depression (HADS-D) with responses ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (maximum impairment). A cut-off score of ≥ 8 on each subscale is used in order to include all possible cases of depression and anxiety as suggested by (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983).
PTSD-symptomatology
PTSD-symptomatology is measured with the PTSD-8 (Hansen, Andersen, Armour, Elklit, Palic, & Mackrill, 2010). The scale is a brief version of The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire part IV (HTQ-IV; Molicca, Caspi-Yavin, Bollini, & Truong, 1992) and consists of 8 items on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 4 = very often). The items relate to the three core clusters in PTSD in DSM-IV: avoidance (2 items), intrusion (4 items), and hyperarousal (2 items). The scale has proven good psychometric properties in various trauma samples including whiplash injured (Hansen et al., 2010).

Full Information

First Posted
September 19, 2014
Last Updated
November 9, 2020
Sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02251028
Brief Title
Value-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Prevention of Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders
Official Title
Value-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for the Prevention of Chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern Denmark

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a specifically tailored value-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (V-CBT) is able to prevent the development of persistent disability, pain, and psychological distress if delivered within the first three months after a whiplash injury.
Detailed Description
The primary objective of the present study is to test whether a specifically tailored value-based cognitive-behavioural therapy program (V-CBT) is able to prevent the development of persistent disability, pain, and psychological distress if delivered within the first three months after a whiplash injury. Methods. The current study is a two-armed randomized controlled study with a crossover design. Group A is scheduled for V-CBT within one week of randomization and group B with a delayed onset 3 months after randomization.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Musculoskeletal Disorders, Whiplash
Keywords
whiplash, prevention, pain, cognitive-behavioural therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
92 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group A receives value-based cognitive behavior therapy after randomization.
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group B receives value-based cognitive behavior therapy after 3 months.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Value-based cognitive-behavioral therapy
Intervention Description
The intervention is a manualized program specifically tailored for prevention of disability and psychological distress after whiplash injuries. The intervention is delivered by two trained clinical psychologists og consists of 10 weekly one-hour individual sessions.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability as measured by Pain Disability Index
Description
The PDI measures how pain interferes with daily life activities within 7 different domains. The 7 domains are rated from 0 (no disability) to 10 (worst disability). The scale shows good reliability and validity.
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain by NDI
Description
Neck pain intensity and disability is measured with the Neck Disability Index (NDI; Vernon & Mior, 1991). The NDI measures within 10 domains pain and how neck pain affects the ability to handle daily life activities such as personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, pain intensity, concentration, and headache. The total score range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (total disability).
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization
Title
Pain by NRS
Description
Pain is also measured on four numerical pain rating scales (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Patients mark their answers on each scale corresponding to their pain now, highest level of pain, lowest level of pain, and finally average pain over the past week (NRS: Turk & Melzack, 2001).
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization
Title
Fear of re-injury by TSK
Description
Fear of re-injury due to movement is measured with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK; Kori, Miller, & Todd, 1990). TSK is a 17-item scale assessing fear of movement on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 17 to 68 with higher scores indicating higher levels of kinesiophobia. The scale is commonly used in various chronic pain samples and has good construct and predictive validity (Roelofs, Goubert, Peters, Vlayen, & Crombes, 2004). The clinical cut-off score is set to ≥ 37.
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization
Title
Pain-related catastrophizing by PCS
Description
Catastrophic thinking related to pain is measured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS; Sullivan, Bishop, Pivik, 1995). The PCS-instructions ask participants to reflect on past painful experiences and to indicate the degree to which they experienced each of 13 thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain on a five-point Likert scale with (0 = not at all, 4 = all the time).
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization
Title
Anxiety and depression by HADS
Description
To assess the level of anxiety and depressive symptoms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is used (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). The scale consists of 14 items, 7 relating to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 to depression (HADS-D) with responses ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (maximum impairment). A cut-off score of ≥ 8 on each subscale is used in order to include all possible cases of depression and anxiety as suggested by (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983).
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization
Title
PTSD-symptomatology
Description
PTSD-symptomatology is measured with the PTSD-8 (Hansen, Andersen, Armour, Elklit, Palic, & Mackrill, 2010). The scale is a brief version of The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire part IV (HTQ-IV; Molicca, Caspi-Yavin, Bollini, & Truong, 1992) and consists of 8 items on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 4 = very often). The items relate to the three core clusters in PTSD in DSM-IV: avoidance (2 items), intrusion (4 items), and hyperarousal (2 items). The scale has proven good psychometric properties in various trauma samples including whiplash injured (Hansen et al., 2010).
Time Frame
Change scores at 12- and 24-weeks after randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
18 and 65-years-old WAD level I-II. 3-months post-injury Disability in at least one important life domain (≥ 5 on the pain disability index) and moderate levels of pain (average pain intensity ≥ 4 on the NRS scale). Meet at least one of the psychological risk criteria: Elevated levels of pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance-beliefs, symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tonny Elmose Andersen, MSc,Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Psychology
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ask Elklit, professor
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Psychology
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Southern Denmark
City
Odense
State/Province
Syddanmark
ZIP/Postal Code
5230
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26323830
Citation
Andersen TE, Ravn SL, Roessler KK. Value-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for the prevention of chronic whiplash associated disorders: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 1;16:232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0687-y.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Value-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Prevention of Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs