Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Angina Patients (IMWELL)
Primary Purpose
Angina
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ranolazine
Sugar pill
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Angina focused on measuring deferred percutaneous coronary intervention, fractional flow reserve
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients >= 18 years of age referred for cardiac catheterization for evaluation of cardiac symptoms ( angina, fatigue, or shortness of breath)
- At least 1 indeterminate stenosis (20-80%),
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) <=0.8 and PCI deferred
Exclusion Criteria:
- Coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) during the index procedure or anticipated within the next month
- acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock
- QTc > 500 milliseconds
- use of strong inhibitors of CTP3A (i.e. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin,nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and saquinavir)
- use of inducers of CYP3A (i.e. rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and St. John's wort)
- liver cirrhosis
- sever renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine clearance < 30mL/min/1.73 m2)
Sites / Locations
- North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Ranolazine
Sugar pill
Arm Description
Ranolazine 500 mg tablets 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
Sugar pill that looks like the drug ranolazine 500mg tablet 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 Weeks
The SAQ quantifies patients' physical limitations caused by angina, the frequency of and recent changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment, and the degree to which they perceive their disease to affect their quality of life.Each of the 5 dimensions are scored by assigning eachresponse an ordinal value, beginning with 1 for the response that implies the lowest level of functioning, and summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores then transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range1 / 3 Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)of the scale and multiplying by 100. No overall scale score is generated.
Factors and Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life).
.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Subjective Well Being
overall feeling of well being determined from rating of excellent, good, fair or poor at baseline compared to same at month 4
Ischemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization
Number of participants who reported adverse events for ischemia driven revascularization or hospitalization
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02265796
First Posted
October 10, 2014
Last Updated
August 20, 2019
Sponsor
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
Collaborators
Gilead Sciences
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02265796
Brief Title
Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Angina Patients
Acronym
IMWELL
Official Title
Improvement of Subjective Well-Being by Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
Collaborators
Gilead Sciences
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center (North Florida- South Georgia VA Medical Center) study. The study objective is to determine if ranolazine improves angina symptoms at 4 months compared with placebo among stable coronary artery disease patients who have demonstrable myocardial ischemia, but who do not undergo revascularization
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center (North Florida- South Georgia VA Medical Center) study. The study objective is to determine if ranolazine improves angina symptoms at 4 months compared with placebo among stable coronary artery disease patients who have demonstrable myocardial ischemia, but who do not undergo revascularization.
Baseline Procedure:
Assessments performed exclusively to determine eligibility for this study would be done only after obtaining informed consent. Assessments performed for clinical indications (not exclusively to determine study eligibility) may be used for baseline values even if the studies were done before informed consent was obtained. The assessment will include:
Informed Consent
Review subject eligibility criteria
FFR value calculated at the time of cardiac catheterization
Review previous and concomitant medications
Frequency of symptoms and quality of life prior to study according to Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Screening Visit:
The assessments to determine eligibility are:
Review of eligibility criteria
Review of cardiac catheterization and FFR
Review of medications taken in the past 30 days Subjects that meet eligibility criteria will be randomized to receive either the active drug, Ranolazine or a matching placebo (non-active drug). Staff and subjects will not know if the subject will be receiving the active drug or the placebo.
Drug schedule will be as follows:
1st dose of one tablet (500mg) will begin the evening of Day 1
On Days 2-7, one tablet (500mg) two times a day (12-hours apart).
On Day 8, increase dose of study drug to two tablets (1000mg) twice a day; once in the morning and once in the evening, 12 hours apart. This dose will continue for the duration of the study. The study drug can be taken with or without food.
Telephone Follow-up:
One week phone calls will be made to determine well being, adverse events, answer questions and remind subjects to increase the study medication dose.
Month 4 Follow-up:
Frequency of symptoms and quality of life according to Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Assessment of well-being
Any hospitalizations or the need for revascularization
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Angina
Keywords
deferred percutaneous coronary intervention, fractional flow reserve
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Ranolazine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ranolazine 500 mg tablets
500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then,
500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
Arm Title
Sugar pill
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Sugar pill that looks like the drug ranolazine 500mg tablet
500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then,
500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranolazine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ranexa
Intervention Description
Ranolazine 500mg tablet
500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then,
500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sugar pill
Other Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then,
500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 Weeks
Description
The SAQ quantifies patients' physical limitations caused by angina, the frequency of and recent changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment, and the degree to which they perceive their disease to affect their quality of life.Each of the 5 dimensions are scored by assigning eachresponse an ordinal value, beginning with 1 for the response that implies the lowest level of functioning, and summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores then transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range1 / 3 Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)of the scale and multiplying by 100. No overall scale score is generated.
Factors and Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life).
.
Time Frame
Change in baseline to 16 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjective Well Being
Description
overall feeling of well being determined from rating of excellent, good, fair or poor at baseline compared to same at month 4
Time Frame
Compare from baseline to month 4
Title
Ischemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization
Description
Number of participants who reported adverse events for ischemia driven revascularization or hospitalization
Time Frame
4 month
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patients >= 18 years of age referred for cardiac catheterization for evaluation of cardiac symptoms ( angina, fatigue, or shortness of breath)
At least 1 indeterminate stenosis (20-80%),
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) <=0.8 and PCI deferred
Exclusion Criteria:
Coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) during the index procedure or anticipated within the next month
acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock
QTc > 500 milliseconds
use of strong inhibitors of CTP3A (i.e. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin,nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and saquinavir)
use of inducers of CYP3A (i.e. rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and St. John's wort)
liver cirrhosis
sever renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine clearance < 30mL/min/1.73 m2)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anthony A Bavry, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
NorthFlorida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL 32608
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28044265
Citation
Bavry AA, Park KE, Choi CY, Mahmoud AN, Wen X, Elgendy IY. Improvement of Subjective Well-Being by Ranolazine in Patients with Chronic Angina and Known Myocardial Ischemia (IMWELL Study). Cardiol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):81-88. doi: 10.1007/s40119-016-0081-3. Epub 2017 Jan 2. Erratum In: Cardiol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):89.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Angina Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs