The Safety and Tolerability of an Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Program With Cognitive Training Post-stroke
Primary Purpose
Cerebral Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CARET
CTI
Sham CARET
Sham CTI
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Cerebral Stroke focused on measuring Stroke, Exercise Training, Cognitive Training, Quality of Life
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of <4 at screening
- Recently discharged from the hospital or rehabilitation program
- Male or female ≥18 years of age
- Less than ideal physical activity ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment (less than ideal physical (as defined by the American Heart Association)
- Able to walk ≥10 meters with or without assistance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to follow instructions for exercise and cognitive interventions
- Any uncontrolled medical condition expected to limit life expectancy or interfere with participation in the trial (i.e. unstable cancer, severe depression or anxiety by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria)
- Abnormal stress test, as determined by the treating physician (unless cardiology clearance provided)
- Active substance abuse or alcohol dependence
- Less than 6th grade reading level
- Uncorrected vision or hearing deficits that would preclude administration of the cognitive measures
- Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Jackson Memorial Hospital
- University of Miami Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
CARET + CTI
Sham CARET + Sham CTI
Arm Description
Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training (CARET) plus Cognitive Training Intervention (CTI)
Control group Sham Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training (CARET) plus Sham Cognitive Training Intervention (CTI)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of participants with treatment emergent serious adverse events
To assess the number of participants with serious adverse events related to the interventions, comparing active groups versus the sham group.
Adherence to a 12-week combined exercise and cognitive training protocol versus a sham group
To assess participant adherence in the intervention group versus the sham group, comparing time on study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Cognitive Performance on cognitive neuropsychological battery done at pre, post and 6 month follow-up visits
Global cognitive performance will be compared for the intervention groups versus the sham group, using a cognitive assessment battery.
Change in Health Related Quality of Life - Depression
As measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Minimum score 0, maximum score 60, and a score of 16 or higher indicates clinical depression.
Change in Health Related Quality of Life - Daily Activities
As measured by Stroke impact scale scores measuring health related quality of life. Minimum score 16, maximum score 80. Higher scores indicate higher level of functionality in participants, while lower scores indicate a lower level of functionality.
Change in blood plasma concentration of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels will be compared between the exercise group and the sham group at baseline and 12 weeks.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02272426
First Posted
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 18, 2020
Sponsor
University of Miami
Collaborators
American Heart Association, Bugher Foundation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02272426
Brief Title
The Safety and Tolerability of an Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Program With Cognitive Training Post-stroke
Official Title
The Safety and Tolerability of an Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Program With Cognitive Training Post-stroke
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 20, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Miami
Collaborators
American Heart Association, Bugher Foundation
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
It is estimated that 2 out of 3 patients with a stroke have some problems with their memory, difficulties performing certain tasks, making decisions and learning new things. In addition, many stroke patients do not get regular exercise and are often sedentary. Both physical and cognitive exercise have the potential to improve quality of life, cognition, and overall health, but the safety and tolerability of such interventions is not clear in stroke patients. The investigators will examine these outcomes by allocating stroke survivor participants to one of two groups: a combined exercise and cognitive training program and a sham control group.
Detailed Description
Stroke is well recognized as the leading cause of disability in the United States. Cognitive deficits after stroke are common, even in those without dementia prior to the event, and stroke patients with worse cognition on hospital admission have worse outcomes. Cognitive deficits contribute to stroke-related disability and mortality. Evidence suggests an interaction between cognitive deficits and physical limitations, and cognitive rehabilitation may improve functional outcomes post stroke. Recent data also suggest that both cognitive training and exercise interventions improve cognition in stroke patients, but few randomized trials of these interventions, alone or in combination, have been conducted.
We will study the effects of a Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training (CARET) program and CTI interventions on the primary outcome of safety, feasibility, and adherence among ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke survivors with mild to moderate disability. We hypothesize that these interventions are safe and tolerable, and that they will lead to improvements in our secondary outcomes of cognitive performance and quality of life. We will also explore the role of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in cognitive changes related to the physical exercise intervention.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Stroke
Keywords
Stroke, Exercise Training, Cognitive Training, Quality of Life
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
132 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
CARET + CTI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training (CARET) plus Cognitive Training Intervention (CTI)
Arm Title
Sham CARET + Sham CTI
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Control group Sham Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training (CARET) plus Sham Cognitive Training Intervention (CTI)
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
CARET
Intervention Description
Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
CTI
Intervention Description
Cognitive Training Intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sham CARET
Intervention Description
Sham Combined Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sham CTI
Intervention Description
Sham Cognitive Training Intervention
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with treatment emergent serious adverse events
Description
To assess the number of participants with serious adverse events related to the interventions, comparing active groups versus the sham group.
Time Frame
At 12 weeks visit (post-intervention)
Title
Adherence to a 12-week combined exercise and cognitive training protocol versus a sham group
Description
To assess participant adherence in the intervention group versus the sham group, comparing time on study.
Time Frame
At 12 weeks visit (post-intervention)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Cognitive Performance on cognitive neuropsychological battery done at pre, post and 6 month follow-up visits
Description
Global cognitive performance will be compared for the intervention groups versus the sham group, using a cognitive assessment battery.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months follow up
Title
Change in Health Related Quality of Life - Depression
Description
As measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Minimum score 0, maximum score 60, and a score of 16 or higher indicates clinical depression.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months follow up measure.
Title
Change in Health Related Quality of Life - Daily Activities
Description
As measured by Stroke impact scale scores measuring health related quality of life. Minimum score 16, maximum score 80. Higher scores indicate higher level of functionality in participants, while lower scores indicate a lower level of functionality.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months follow up
Title
Change in blood plasma concentration of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor
Description
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels will be compared between the exercise group and the sham group at baseline and 12 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 month follow up
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of <4 at screening
Recently discharged from the hospital or rehabilitation program
Male or female ≥18 years of age
Less than ideal physical activity ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment (less than ideal physical (as defined by the American Heart Association)
Able to walk ≥10 meters with or without assistance
Exclusion Criteria:
Unable to follow instructions for exercise and cognitive interventions
Any uncontrolled medical condition expected to limit life expectancy or interfere with participation in the trial (i.e. unstable cancer, severe depression or anxiety by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria)
Abnormal stress test, as determined by the treating physician (unless cardiology clearance provided)
Active substance abuse or alcohol dependence
Less than 6th grade reading level
Uncorrected vision or hearing deficits that would preclude administration of the cognitive measures
Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sebastian Koch, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Miami
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jackson Memorial Hospital
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami Hospital
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32394777
Citation
Koch S, Tiozzo E, Simonetto M, Loewenstein D, Wright CB, Dong C, Bustillo A, Perez-Pinzon M, Dave KR, Gutierrez CM, Lewis JE, Flothmann M, Mendoza-Puccini MC, Junco B, Rodriguez Z, Gomes-Osman J, Rundek T, Sacco RL. Randomized Trial of Combined Aerobic, Resistance, and Cognitive Training to Improve Recovery From Stroke: Feasibility and Safety. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e015377. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015377. Epub 2020 May 12.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
The Safety and Tolerability of an Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Program With Cognitive Training Post-stroke
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs