search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to DMARDs

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peficitinib
Placebo
Etanercept
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis, ASP015K

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has RA diagnosed according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria
  • Subject who did not receive the following drugs, or received the drugs with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to the baseline (start of treatment) for RA treatment:

    • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; excluding topical formulations), oral morphine or equivalent opioid analgesics (≤ 30 mg/day), acetaminophen, or oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day in prednisolone equivalent)
  • At screening subject has active RA as evidenced by both of the following:

    • ≥ 6 tender/painful joints (using 68-joint assessment)
    • ≥ 6 swollen joints (using 66-joint assessment)
  • CRP > 0.50 mg/dL at screening
  • Subject meets the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria for the Classification of Global Functional Status in RA Class I, II or, III at screening.
  • Inadequate responder to (including subjects who were intolerant of) at least one DMARD administered for at least 90 days prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has received a biologic DMARD within the specified period
  • Subject has received etanercept
  • Inadequate responder to at least 3 biologic DMARDs as determined by investigator/sub-investigator
  • Subject has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular or endorectal (excluding suppositories for anal diseases) corticosteroid within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has participated in any study of ASP015K and has received ASP015K or placebo
  • Subject has received other investigational drugs within 90 days or within 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to baseline
  • Subject has received plasma exchange therapy within 60 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has undergone joint drainage, has received local anesthesia and nerve block, or has received articular cartilage protectant at the assessed joint within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has undergone surgery and has residual effects in the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator, or is scheduled to undergo surgery that may affect the study evaluation of the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator
  • A diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, SLE, sarcoidosis, etc.) other than RA
  • Any of the following laboratory values at screening:

    • Hemoglobin < 9.0 g/dL
    • Absolute neutrophil count < 1000/μL
    • Absolute lymphocyte count < 800/μL
    • Platelet count < 75000/μL
    • ALT ≥ 2 ×ULN
    • AST ≥ 2 × ULN
    • Total bilirubin (TBL) ≥ 1.5 × ULN
    • Estimated GFR ≤ 40 mL/min as measured by the MDRD method
    • β-D-glucan > ULN [in case of Japan: ≥ 11 pg/mL]
    • Positive HBs antigen, HBc antibody, HBs antibody or HBV-DNA quantitation (However, subject with negative HBs antigen and HBV-DNA quantitation, and positive HBc antibody and/or HBs antibody is eligible if HBV-DNA is monitored by HBV-DNA quantitation at every scheduled visit after initiation of study drug or reference drug administration.)
    • Positive HCV antibody
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent active tuberculosis (TB)
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent interstitial pneumonia and investigator/sub-investigator judges that it is inappropriate for the subject to participate in this study
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent malignant tumor (except for successfully treated basal cell carcinoma)
  • Subject has received live or live attenuated virus vaccination within 56 days prior to baseline. (Inactivated vaccines including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are allowed.)
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent demyelinating disorders
  • Subject has any ongoing severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, infectious, or autoimmune disease except for RA (excluding Sjogren's syndrome and chronic thyroiditis), or any ongoing illness which would make the subject unsuitable for the study as determined by the investigator/sub-investigator
  • Subject has a history of clinically significant allergy. (Clinically significant allergy includes allergies such as systemic urticaria induced by specific antigens and drugs, anaphylaxis, and allergy associated with shock necessitating hospitalized treatment.)
  • Subject has concurrent cardiac failure, defined as NYHA classification Class III or higher, or a history of it
  • Subject has concurrent prolonged QT syndrome or a history of it. Subject has prolonged QT interval (defined as QTc ≥ 500 msec. Subject has QTc ≥ 500 msec at retest will be excluded) at screening
  • Subject has a history of positive HIV infection
  • Subject has congenital short QT syndrome or a history of it. Subject has shortened QT interval (defined as QTc < 330 msec. Subject has QTc < 330 msec at retest will be excluded) at screening.

Sites / Locations

  • JP00037
  • JP00109
  • JP00130
  • JP00066
  • JP00140
  • JP00108
  • JP00156
  • JP00068
  • JP00102
  • JP00127
  • JP00115
  • JP00138
  • JP00120
  • JP00040
  • JP00119
  • JP00071
  • JP00097
  • JP00106
  • JP00033
  • JP00026
  • JP00090
  • JP00125
  • JP00001
  • JP00002
  • JP00003
  • JP00031
  • JP00038
  • JP00114
  • JP00158
  • JP00056
  • JP00069
  • JP00113
  • JP00041
  • JP00042
  • JP00092
  • JP00154
  • JP00117
  • JP00107
  • JP00073
  • JP00054
  • JP00049
  • JP00084
  • JP00048
  • JP00058
  • JP00141
  • JP00096
  • JP00128
  • JP00057
  • JP00004
  • JP00027
  • JP00036
  • JP00105
  • JP00151
  • JP00050
  • JP00162
  • JP00101
  • JP00103
  • JP00153
  • JP00094
  • JP00025
  • JP00144
  • JP00064
  • JP00051
  • JP00011
  • JP00134
  • JP00078
  • JP00137
  • JP00070
  • JP00086
  • JP00061
  • JP00075
  • JP00126
  • JP00007
  • JP00082
  • JP00060
  • JP00161
  • JP00062
  • JP00052
  • JP00008
  • JP00133
  • JP00077
  • JP00024
  • JP00043
  • JP00149
  • JP00152
  • JP00095
  • JP00099
  • JP00142
  • JP00063
  • JP00053
  • JP00072
  • JP00083
  • JP00148
  • JP00100
  • JP00032
  • JP00010
  • JP00155
  • JP00104
  • JP00047
  • JP00018
  • JP00020
  • JP00035
  • JP00059
  • JP00067
  • JP00076
  • JP00131
  • JP00164
  • JP00013
  • JP00014
  • JP00015
  • JP00016
  • JP00055
  • JP00065
  • JP00074
  • JP00093
  • JP00022
  • JP00046
  • JP00123
  • JP00159
  • JP00023
  • JP00122
  • JP00080
  • JP00098
  • JP00112
  • JP00147
  • JP00017
  • JP00118
  • JP00150
  • JP00157
  • JP00089
  • JP00135
  • JP00139
  • KR00504
  • KR00510
  • KR00505
  • KR00506
  • KR00508
  • KR00501
  • KR00502
  • KR00503
  • KR00509
  • KR00511
  • KR00507
  • TW00708
  • TW00709
  • TW00704
  • TW00705
  • TW00710
  • TW00712
  • TW00701
  • TW00702
  • TW00711
  • TW00703

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo

Peficitinib 100 mg

Peficitinib 150 mg

Etanercept

Arm Description

Participants were assigned to receive placebo to peficitinib once a day until week 12.

Participants were assigned to receive peficitinib 100 mg/day for 52 weeks.

Participants were assigned to receive peficitinib 150 mg/day for 52 weeks.

Participants were administered 50 mg of subcutaneous etanercept once weekly for 52 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12
The ACR20 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. Tender joint count (TJC) : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. Swollen joint count (SJC) : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 20% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline (3) ≥ 20% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, Subject's Global Assessment of Arthritis (SGA), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With an ACR20-CRP Response Through Week 52
The ACR20 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 20% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50)-CRP Response at Week 12
The ACR50 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 50% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response Through Week 52
The ACR50 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 50% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70)-CRP Response at Week 12
The ACR70 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 70% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response Through Week 52
The ACR70 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 70% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP at Week 12
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 12
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) at Week 12
The following 68 joints subjects to assessment were examined for tender joints and the location was confirmed. Higher TJC68 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), hip joints (2), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) Through Week 52
The following 68 joints subjects to assessment were examined for tender joints and the location was confirmed. Higher TJC68 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), hip joints (2), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) (66 Joints) at Week 12
The following 66 joints subjects to assessment were examined for swollen joints and the location was confirmed. Higher SJC66 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Change From Baseline in SJC (66 Joints) Through Week 52
The following 66 joints subjects to assessment were examined for swollen joints and the location was confirmed. Higher SJC66 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP < 2.6 at Week 12
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP < 2.6 Through Week 52
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR < 2.6 at Week 12
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR < 2.6 Through Week 52
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <= 3.2 at Week 12
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <= 3.2 Through Week 52
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 at Week 12
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 Through Week 52
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 12
Higher CRP indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CRP Through Week 52
Higher CRP indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 12
Higher ESR indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in ESR Through Week 52
Higher ESR indicates greater disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a Good EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a Good EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission at Week 12
ACR/EULAR Remission was defined as TJC (68 joints) ≤ 1, SJC (66 joints) ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, and subject's global assessment of arthritis ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 - 100 mm). Statistical analysis of treatment difference vs placebo was not estimable for either peficitinib 100 mg or peficitinib 150 mg reporting groups.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission Through Week 52
ACR/EULAR Remission was defined as TJC (68 joints) ≤ 1, SJC (66 joints) ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, and subject's global assessment of arthritis ≤ 1 cm (on a VAS of 0 - 100 mm).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission at Week 12
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. SDAI Remission was defined as SDAI score ≤ 3.3. Statistical analysis of treatment difference vs placebo was not estimable for either peficitinib 100 mg or peficitinib 150 mg reporting groups.
Percentage of Participants Achieving SDAI Remission Through Week 52
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. SDAI Remission was defined as SDAI score ≤ 3.3.
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at Week 12
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 86. Higher SDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Through Week 52
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 86. Higher SDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score <= 2.8 at Week 12
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. CDAI. Remission was defined as CDAI score ≤ 2.8. Statistical analysis of treatment difference vs placebo was not estimable for either peficitinib 100 mg or peficitinib 150 mg reporting groups.
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Score <= 2.8 Through Week 52
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. CDAI. Remission was defined as CDAI score ≤ 2.8.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 76. Higher CDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Through Week 52
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 76. Higher CDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA) at Week 12
The investigator assessed the participants' disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the physician assessment table. Higher PGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Change From Baseline in PGA Through Week 52
The investigator assessed the participants' disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the physician assessment table. Higher PGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Change From Baseline in Subject's SGA at Week 12
The participant assessed his/her own disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Change From Baseline in SGA Through Week 52
The participant assessed his/her own disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Change From Baseline in Subject's Assessment of Pain at Week 12
The participant assessed his/her own pain severity on a VAS from 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA of pain (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity pain.
Change From Baseline in Subject's Assessment of Pain Through Week 52
The participant assessed his/her own pain severity on a VAS from 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA of pain (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity pain.
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy
The number of participants who withdrew due to lack of efficacy up to week 12 was calculated.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
The HAQ-DI (range 0 - 3) was composed of 20 items in 8 categories (Dressing and Grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities). Each category has at least two questions. Within each category, participants reported the amount of difficulty they have in performing the specific question items. Higher HAQ-DI score indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Through Week 52
The HAQ-DI (range 0 - 3) was composed of 20 items in 8 categories (Dressing and Grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities). Each category has at least two questions. Within each category, participants reported the amount of difficulty they have in performing the specific question items. Higher HAQ-DI score indicates greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey - 36 Questions, Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score at Week 12
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary Score Through Week 52
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score at Week 12
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score Through Week 52
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score at Week 12
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score Through Week 52
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) Percent Work Time Missed at Week 12
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4).
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Work Time Missed Through Week 52
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4).
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working at Week 12
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent impairment while working due to problem: Q5/10.
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working Through Week 52
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent impairment while working due to problem: Q5/10.
Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment at Week 12
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent overall work impairment due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)].
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Overall Work Impairment Through Week 52
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent overall work impairment due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)].
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment at Week 12
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent activity impairment due to problem: Q6/10.
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment Through Week 52
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent activity impairment due to problem: Q6/10.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the First 12 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity after initial dose of study drug or reference drug through week 52 or withdrawal. TEAEs were summarized using MedDRA (Version 11.1) by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT). Participants reporting more than 1 AE for a given MedDRA PT were counted only once for that term. Participants reporting more than 1 AE within a SOC were counted only once for the SOC total. Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade: grade 3 = severe or medically significant, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events From Week 12
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity after initial dose of study drug or reference drug through week 52 or withdrawal. TEAEs were summarized using MedDRA (Version 11.1) by SOC and PT. Participants reporting more than 1 AE for a given MedDRA PT were counted only once for that term. Participants reporting more than 1 AE within a SOC were counted only once for the SOC total. Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade: grade 3 = severe or medically significant, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death related to AE.

Full Information

First Posted
December 2, 2014
Last Updated
March 1, 2020
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02308163
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to DMARDs
Official Title
Phase 3 Study of ASP015K - A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Confirmatory Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Had an Inadequate Response to DMARDs
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 8, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 23, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 22, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to verify the superiority of ASP015K alone or in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) over placebo in terms of efficacy in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to DMARDs
Detailed Description
This was a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, confirmatory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP015K alone or in combination with DMARDs in participants with RA who had an inadequate response to DMARDs. Etanercept was also administered as the reference drug in an open-label manner. The study drug was orally administered once daily (QD) after breakfast for 52 weeks. Etanercept was administered subcutaneously QD for 52 weeks. At Week 12, participants in the placebo group were switched to ASP015K. The dose of ASP015K to be started at Week 12 for the placebo group was determined randomly at baseline in advance and switched in a blinded manner. Participants in ASP015K group or placebo groups who had completed the study were eligible for participation in an open-label extension study (015K-CL-RAJ2).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, ASP015K

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
509 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants were assigned to receive placebo to peficitinib once a day until week 12.
Arm Title
Peficitinib 100 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants were assigned to receive peficitinib 100 mg/day for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Peficitinib 150 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants were assigned to receive peficitinib 150 mg/day for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Etanercept
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants were administered 50 mg of subcutaneous etanercept once weekly for 52 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Peficitinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
ASP015K
Intervention Description
oral
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
oral
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Etanercept
Intervention Description
subcutaneous injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12
Description
The ACR20 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. Tender joint count (TJC) : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. Swollen joint count (SJC) : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 20% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline (3) ≥ 20% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, Subject's Global Assessment of Arthritis (SGA), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/early termination (ET)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20-CRP Response Through Week 52
Description
The ACR20 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 20% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 20% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50)-CRP Response at Week 12
Description
The ACR50 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 50% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response Through Week 52
Description
The ACR50 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 50% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70)-CRP Response at Week 12
Description
The ACR70 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 70% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response Through Week 52
Description
The ACR70 response required that all criteria from (1) to (3) below be met. TJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. SJC : ≥ 70% reduction compared with baseline. ≥ 70% improvement in 3 or more of the following 5 parameters compared with baseline: Subject's assessment of pain, SGA, PGA, HAQ-DI, CRP.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
Description
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 12
Description
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
Description
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Higher DAS28 score indicated greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) at Week 12
Description
The following 68 joints subjects to assessment were examined for tender joints and the location was confirmed. Higher TJC68 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), hip joints (2), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) Through Week 52
Description
The following 68 joints subjects to assessment were examined for tender joints and the location was confirmed. Higher TJC68 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), hip joints (2), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) (66 Joints) at Week 12
Description
The following 66 joints subjects to assessment were examined for swollen joints and the location was confirmed. Higher SJC66 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in SJC (66 Joints) Through Week 52
Description
The following 66 joints subjects to assessment were examined for swollen joints and the location was confirmed. Higher SJC66 indicated greater disease activity. Temporomandibular joints (2), sternoclavicular joints (2), acromioclavicular joints (2), shoulder joints (2), elbow joints (2), wrist joints (2), distal interphalangeal joints (8), proximal interphalangeal joints of both hands (10), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), knee joints (2), ankle joints (2), tarsal bones (2), metatarsophalangeal joints (10), interphalangeal joint joints of toes (2), proximal interphalangeal joints of both feet (8).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP < 2.6 at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP < 2.6 Through Week 52
Description
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR < 2.6 at Week 12
Description
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR < 2.6 Through Week 52
Description
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. If the DAS28 score was less than 2.6, the participant was considered to be in DAS28 remission.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <= 3.2 at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <= 3.2 Through Week 52
Description
DAS28-CRP response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), CRP, SGA, and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.36 ln (CRP + 1) + 0.014 × SGA + 0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0.96 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 at Week 12
Description
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 Through Week 52
Description
DAS28-ESR response consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), ESR, SGA , and calculated according to below description. DAS28 = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 × SGA. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2 was considered to be low disease activity.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 12
Description
Higher CRP indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in CRP Through Week 52
Description
Higher CRP indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 12
Description
Higher ESR indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in ESR Through Week 52
Description
Higher ESR indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12
Description
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
Description
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12
Description
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
Description
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Good EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12
Description
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Good EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
Description
Good response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12
Description
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
Description
Good and moderate response was defined as DAS28 after treatment ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6, or DAS28 after treatment > 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 1.2.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission at Week 12
Description
ACR/EULAR Remission was defined as TJC (68 joints) ≤ 1, SJC (66 joints) ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, and subject's global assessment of arthritis ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 - 100 mm). Statistical analysis of treatment difference vs placebo was not estimable for either peficitinib 100 mg or peficitinib 150 mg reporting groups.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission Through Week 52
Description
ACR/EULAR Remission was defined as TJC (68 joints) ≤ 1, SJC (66 joints) ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, and subject's global assessment of arthritis ≤ 1 cm (on a VAS of 0 - 100 mm).
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission at Week 12
Description
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. SDAI Remission was defined as SDAI score ≤ 3.3. Statistical analysis of treatment difference vs placebo was not estimable for either peficitinib 100 mg or peficitinib 150 mg reporting groups.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving SDAI Remission Through Week 52
Description
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. SDAI Remission was defined as SDAI score ≤ 3.3.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at Week 12
Description
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 86. Higher SDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Through Week 52
Description
SDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, CRP (mg/dL), and calculated according to below description. SDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA + CRP. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 86. Higher SDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score <= 2.8 at Week 12
Description
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. CDAI. Remission was defined as CDAI score ≤ 2.8. Statistical analysis of treatment difference vs placebo was not estimable for either peficitinib 100 mg or peficitinib 150 mg reporting groups.
Time Frame
Week 12/ET
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Score <= 2.8 Through Week 52
Description
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. CDAI. Remission was defined as CDAI score ≤ 2.8.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12
Description
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 76. Higher CDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Through Week 52
Description
CDAI score consisted of following parameters: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), SGA, PGA, and calculated according to below description. CDAI = TJC + SJC + SGA + PGA. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 76. Higher CDAI indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA) at Week 12
Description
The investigator assessed the participants' disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the physician assessment table. Higher PGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in PGA Through Week 52
Description
The investigator assessed the participants' disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the physician assessment table. Higher PGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject's SGA at Week 12
Description
The participant assessed his/her own disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in SGA Through Week 52
Description
The participant assessed his/her own disease activity on a VAS of 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject's Assessment of Pain at Week 12
Description
The participant assessed his/her own pain severity on a VAS from 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA of pain (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject's Assessment of Pain Through Week 52
Description
The participant assessed his/her own pain severity on a VAS from 0-100 mm on the questionnaire form. Higher SGA of pain (100 mm VAS) scores indicate greater activity pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy
Description
The number of participants who withdrew due to lack of efficacy up to week 12 was calculated.
Time Frame
Up to week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Description
The HAQ-DI (range 0 - 3) was composed of 20 items in 8 categories (Dressing and Grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities). Each category has at least two questions. Within each category, participants reported the amount of difficulty they have in performing the specific question items. Higher HAQ-DI score indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Through Week 52
Description
The HAQ-DI (range 0 - 3) was composed of 20 items in 8 categories (Dressing and Grooming, Arising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities). Each category has at least two questions. Within each category, participants reported the amount of difficulty they have in performing the specific question items. Higher HAQ-DI score indicates greater disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey - 36 Questions, Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score at Week 12
Description
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary Score Through Week 52
Description
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score at Week 12
Description
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score Through Week 52
Description
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score at Week 12
Description
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score Through Week 52
Description
The SF-36v2 was scored for the 8 subscales (each range: 0-100 scale): 1. physical functioning, 2. role physical, 3. bodily pain, 4. general health, 5. vitality, 6. social functioning, 7. role-emotional, and 8. mental health. Physical Component Summary Score, Mental Component Summary Score and Roll/Social Component Summary Score were calculated based on the 2007 General Japanese Population Means and Standard Deviations and coefficient. Component summary measures had means of 50 in 2007 General Japanese Population and deviation was expressed by the scale of 10. Higher score indicated better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) Percent Work Time Missed at Week 12
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Work Time Missed Through Week 52
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working at Week 12
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent impairment while working due to problem: Q5/10.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working Through Week 52
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent impairment while working due to problem: Q5/10.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment at Week 12
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent overall work impairment due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)].
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Overall Work Impairment Through Week 52
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent overall work impairment due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)].
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment at Week 12
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent activity impairment due to problem: Q6/10.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12/ET
Title
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment Through Week 52
Description
WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the rheumatoid arthritis; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. Higher WPAI scores indicate greater activity impairment. Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent activity impairment due to problem: Q6/10.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 28, and 52
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the First 12 Weeks
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity after initial dose of study drug or reference drug through week 52 or withdrawal. TEAEs were summarized using MedDRA (Version 11.1) by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT). Participants reporting more than 1 AE for a given MedDRA PT were counted only once for that term. Participants reporting more than 1 AE within a SOC were counted only once for the SOC total. Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade: grade 3 = severe or medically significant, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death related to AE.
Time Frame
Week 0 to Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events From Week 12
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AE that started or worsened in severity after initial dose of study drug or reference drug through week 52 or withdrawal. TEAEs were summarized using MedDRA (Version 11.1) by SOC and PT. Participants reporting more than 1 AE for a given MedDRA PT were counted only once for that term. Participants reporting more than 1 AE within a SOC were counted only once for the SOC total. Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade: grade 3 = severe or medically significant, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death related to AE.
Time Frame
Week 12 to week 52, plus 28 days after the week 52 visit for participants who did not enroll in the extension study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject has RA diagnosed according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria Subject who did not receive the following drugs, or received the drugs with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to the baseline (start of treatment) for RA treatment: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; excluding topical formulations), oral morphine or equivalent opioid analgesics (≤ 30 mg/day), acetaminophen, or oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day in prednisolone equivalent) At screening subject has active RA as evidenced by both of the following: ≥ 6 tender/painful joints (using 68-joint assessment) ≥ 6 swollen joints (using 66-joint assessment) CRP > 0.50 mg/dL at screening Subject meets the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria for the Classification of Global Functional Status in RA Class I, II or, III at screening. Inadequate responder to (including subjects who were intolerant of) at least one DMARD administered for at least 90 days prior to screening Exclusion Criteria: Subject has received a biologic DMARD within the specified period Subject has received etanercept Inadequate responder to at least 3 biologic DMARDs as determined by investigator/sub-investigator Subject has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular or endorectal (excluding suppositories for anal diseases) corticosteroid within 28 days prior to baseline Subject has participated in any study of ASP015K and has received ASP015K or placebo Subject has received other investigational drugs within 90 days or within 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to baseline Subject has received plasma exchange therapy within 60 days prior to baseline Subject has undergone joint drainage, has received local anesthesia and nerve block, or has received articular cartilage protectant at the assessed joint within 28 days prior to baseline Subject has undergone surgery and has residual effects in the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator, or is scheduled to undergo surgery that may affect the study evaluation of the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator A diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, SLE, sarcoidosis, etc.) other than RA Any of the following laboratory values at screening: Hemoglobin < 9.0 g/dL Absolute neutrophil count < 1000/μL Absolute lymphocyte count < 800/μL Platelet count < 75000/μL ALT ≥ 2 ×ULN AST ≥ 2 × ULN Total bilirubin (TBL) ≥ 1.5 × ULN Estimated GFR ≤ 40 mL/min as measured by the MDRD method β-D-glucan > ULN [in case of Japan: ≥ 11 pg/mL] Positive HBs antigen, HBc antibody, HBs antibody or HBV-DNA quantitation (However, subject with negative HBs antigen and HBV-DNA quantitation, and positive HBc antibody and/or HBs antibody is eligible if HBV-DNA is monitored by HBV-DNA quantitation at every scheduled visit after initiation of study drug or reference drug administration.) Positive HCV antibody Subject has a history of or concurrent active tuberculosis (TB) Subject has a history of or concurrent interstitial pneumonia and investigator/sub-investigator judges that it is inappropriate for the subject to participate in this study Subject has a history of or concurrent malignant tumor (except for successfully treated basal cell carcinoma) Subject has received live or live attenuated virus vaccination within 56 days prior to baseline. (Inactivated vaccines including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are allowed.) Subject has a history of or concurrent demyelinating disorders Subject has any ongoing severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, infectious, or autoimmune disease except for RA (excluding Sjogren's syndrome and chronic thyroiditis), or any ongoing illness which would make the subject unsuitable for the study as determined by the investigator/sub-investigator Subject has a history of clinically significant allergy. (Clinically significant allergy includes allergies such as systemic urticaria induced by specific antigens and drugs, anaphylaxis, and allergy associated with shock necessitating hospitalized treatment.) Subject has concurrent cardiac failure, defined as NYHA classification Class III or higher, or a history of it Subject has concurrent prolonged QT syndrome or a history of it. Subject has prolonged QT interval (defined as QTc ≥ 500 msec. Subject has QTc ≥ 500 msec at retest will be excluded) at screening Subject has a history of positive HIV infection Subject has congenital short QT syndrome or a history of it. Subject has shortened QT interval (defined as QTc < 330 msec. Subject has QTc < 330 msec at retest will be excluded) at screening.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Inc
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
JP00037
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00109
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00130
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00066
City
Okazaki
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00140
City
Toyoake
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00108
City
Toyohashi
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00156
City
Toyota
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00068
City
Yatomi
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00102
City
Kamagaya
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00127
City
Matsudo
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00115
City
Narashino
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00138
City
Yotsukaido
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00120
City
Iizuka
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00040
City
Kitakyushu
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00119
City
Kitakyushu
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00071
City
Kurume
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00097
City
Kurume
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00106
City
Kurume
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00033
City
Takasaki
State/Province
Gunma
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00026
City
Asahikawa
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00090
City
Hakodate
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00125
City
Kushiro
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00001
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00002
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00003
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00031
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00038
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00114
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00158
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00056
City
Akashi
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00069
City
Himeji
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00113
City
Kakogawa
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00041
City
Kato
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00042
City
Kobe
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00092
City
Kobe
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00154
City
Kobe
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00117
City
Nishinomiya
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00107
City
Hitachi
State/Province
Ibaraki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00073
City
Koga
State/Province
Ibaraki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00054
City
Mito
State/Province
Ibaraki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00049
City
Morioka
State/Province
Iwate
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00084
City
Isehara
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00048
City
Kawasaki
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00058
City
Kawasaki
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00141
City
Sagamihara
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00096
City
Yokohama
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00128
City
Yokosuka
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00057
City
Tamana
State/Province
Kumamoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00004
City
Sendai
State/Province
Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00027
City
Sendai
State/Province
Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00036
City
Sendai
State/Province
Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00105
City
Sendai
State/Province
Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00151
City
Sendai
State/Province
Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00050
City
Hyuga
State/Province
Miyazaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00162
City
Isehaya
State/Province
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00101
City
Omura
State/Province
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00103
City
Omura
State/Province
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00153
City
Sasebo
State/Province
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00094
City
Kashihara
State/Province
Nara
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00025
City
Nagaoka
State/Province
Niigata
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00144
City
Shibata
State/Province
Niigata
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00064
City
Beppu
State/Province
Oita
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00051
City
Setouchi
State/Province
Okayama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00011
City
Hannan
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00134
City
Higashiosaka
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00078
City
Kawachinagano
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00137
City
Sakai
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00070
City
Suita
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00086
City
Suita
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00061
City
Toyonaka
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00075
City
Ureshino
State/Province
Saga
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00126
City
Gyoda
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00007
City
Hiki
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00082
City
Iruma
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00060
City
Kawagoe
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00161
City
Kawagoe
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00062
City
Kawaguchi
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00052
City
Sayama
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00008
City
Tokorozawa
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00133
City
Kakegawa
State/Province
Shizuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00077
City
Kanuma
State/Province
Tochigi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00024
City
Bunkyo
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00043
City
Bunkyo
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00149
City
Bunkyo
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00152
City
Bunkyo
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00095
City
Chiyoda
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00099
City
Chiyoda
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00142
City
Chuo
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00063
City
Hachioji
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00053
City
Kiyose
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00072
City
Meguro
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00083
City
Meguro
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00148
City
Ota
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00100
City
Setagaya
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00032
City
Shinjuku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00010
City
Takaoka
State/Province
Toyama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00155
City
Nishimuro
State/Province
Wakayama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00104
City
Shimonoseki
State/Province
Yamaguchi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00047
City
Shunan
State/Province
Yamaguchi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00018
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00020
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00035
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00059
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00067
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00076
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00131
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00164
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00013
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00014
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00015
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00016
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00055
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00065
City
Kagoshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00074
City
Kagoshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00093
City
Kochi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00022
City
Kumamoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00046
City
Kumamoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00123
City
Kyoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00159
City
Kyoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00023
City
Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00122
City
Miyazaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00080
City
Nagano
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00098
City
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00112
City
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00147
City
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00017
City
Oita
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00118
City
Okayama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00150
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00157
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00089
City
Shizuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00135
City
Shizuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
JP00139
City
Toyama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
KR00504
City
Daegu
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00510
City
Daegu
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00505
City
Gwangju
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00506
City
Incheon
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00508
City
Jeonju
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00501
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00502
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00503
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00509
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00511
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KR00507
City
Suwon
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
TW00708
City
Kaohsiung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00709
City
Kaohsiung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00704
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00705
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00710
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00712
City
Tainan
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00701
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00702
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00711
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
TW00703
City
Taoyuan
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34429152
Citation
Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Izutsu H, Kaneko Y, Kato D, Fukuda M, Rokuda M, Schultz NM. Patient- and physician-reported outcomes from two phase 3 randomized studies (RAJ3 and RAJ4) of peficitinib (ASP015K) in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Aug 24;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02590-z.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33929089
Citation
Toyoshima J, Kaibara A, Shibata M, Kaneko Y, Izutsu H, Nishimura T. Exposure-response modeling of peficitinib efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 May;9(3):e00744. doi: 10.1002/prp2.744.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33068028
Citation
Toyoshima J, Shibata M, Kaibara A, Kaneko Y, Izutsu H, Nishimura T. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;87(4):2014-2022. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14605. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31350270
Citation
Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Tanaka S, Kawakami A, Iwasaki M, Song YW, Chen YH, Wei JC, Lee SH, Rokuda M, Izutsu H, Ushijima S, Kaneko Y, Akazawa R, Shiomi T, Yamada E. Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3). Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Oct;78(10):1320-1332. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215163. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=335
Description
Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to DMARDs

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs