search
Back to results

A Trial of the Implementation of iFOBT in General Practice

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intervention
Sponsored by
University of Aarhus
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring iFOBT, FIT, general practice, early diagnosis

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • GPs in the Central Denmark Region
  • Patients >30 years eligible for iFOBT according to guideline

Exclusion Criteria:

Sites / Locations

  • Research Unit for General Practice

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Before intervention

After intervention

Arm Description

GPs in this group have not yet received intervention.

GPs in this group have received the intervention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The rate of positive iFOBTs
The number of CRCs diagnosed after a positive iFOBT
The stage distribution of CRCs for patients with a positive iFOBT
UICC stages I-IV
The positive predictive value for detecting colorectal cancer
The risk of having CRC when the iFOBT is positive
The positive predictive value for detecting colorectal cancer in relation to cut-off value of iFOBT
The risk of having CRC at different iFOBT values.
The positive predictive value for detecting colorectal cancer in relation to indications of using iFOBT
The risk of having CRC when iFOBT is positive and specific symptoms. When requesting FIT, the GP register the patients' symptoms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The rate of general practices starting to use the iFOBT, stratified for participation in the CME.
The relation between number of general practices started using iFOBT and time.
The monthly rate of requested iFOBTs, stratified for participation in the CME.
The relation between number of requested iFOBTs and time.
The monthly rate of positive iFOBTs, stratified for participation in the CME.
The relation between number of positive iFOBTs and time.
Indications used for requesting iFOBT, stratified for participation in the CME.
The rate of referrals in the cancer patient pathway for colorectal cancer
The rate of performed colonoscopies

Full Information

First Posted
November 26, 2014
Last Updated
April 25, 2017
Sponsor
University of Aarhus
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02308384
Brief Title
A Trial of the Implementation of iFOBT in General Practice
Official Title
The Use of Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Test (iFOBT) in General Practice. A Randomised Trial of the Implementation of iFOBT.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Aarhus

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common, and a leading cause of cancer death. The evaluation of patients suspected to have CRC is difficult due to poorly predictive alarm symptoms and many patients present with uncharacteristic or vague symptoms. The faecal marker of human globin, iFOBT, could play an important role in aiding the general practitioner in detecting CRC. Hypothesis It will be possible to implement iFOBT in general practice as a test performed on patients who do not fulfill the criteria for fast-track referral for colorectal cancer, but whose symptoms could indicate an undiagnosed colorectal cancer. Aim To implement iFOBT in general practice and evaluate the uptake and clinical use of the test. Furthermore, we want to investigate the performance of iFOBT when used on patients presenting with uncharacteristic symptoms of CRC, and the clinical implications. Materials and methods The study uses a cluster randomised stepped wedge design. Clusters are constituted by the 18 municipalities in the central Denmark Region, and these are randomised when to receive a continuous medical education (CME). The date of inclusion is defined as the first working day in the month the CME is planned to be conducted. The CME is part of an intervention aimed to facilitate the implementation of iFOBT in general practice. Besides a CME, the intervention consist of a start package (iFOBT kits, a guideline and online educational material) that is sent to GPs when they are included in the study, and a status mail that GPs receive approx. one month after inclusion. The inclusion period is during the first 7 month of the study period, the study lasts for one year. Perspectives This study will provide important knowledge on how to improve CRC diagnostics in general practice.
Detailed Description
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common type of cancer in Denmark and is a leading cause of cancer death. Since 2000, the incidence has been increasing by 1-1.5% each year. The estimated 5-year survival rate is currently 80% for stage I cancer, 50% for stages II and III, and <5 % for stage IV cancer. These figures emphasize the importance of detecting the disease in early stages and underline the current challenge of diagnosing CRC in general practice. In 2008, a national fast-track system for cancer patients was established to ensure fast diagnosis and initiation of treatment. The fast-track system implies that patients presenting 'alarm' symptoms of e.g. CRC will be referred immediately for diagnostic workup; no more than 14 days must pass from referral to initiation of treatment. Several studies have shown that the positive predictive values (PPV) of the symptoms regarding CRC are fairly low (4-8%). In addition, approximately 50% of new CRC incidents will present with other vague and uncharacteristic symptoms than alarm symptoms. In addition, a screening programme for CRC has been implemented. It is suggested that this will increase survival rate of CRC, however, it is estimated that approximately 75% of yearly CRC still have to be diagnosed through general practice. A huge load is, consequently, still placed on general practice in the quest for earlier diagnosis of CRC, and better methods to aid the general practitioner in the diagnostic process are needed. One tool could be the use of iFOBT in general practice for patients who present with symptoms that could origin from an underlying CRC, but without being alarm symptoms. Aim To implement iFOBT in general practice and evaluate the uptake and clinical use of the test. Furthermore, we want to investigate the performance of iFOBT when used on patients presenting with uncharacteristic symptoms of CRC, and the clinical implications. Materials and methods We will develop a guideline for the use of iFOBT in general practice. The guideline is aimed at men and women aged 30 years and above who present symptoms that could origin from a CRC, but are not classified as alarm symptoms. The guideline will contain a list of symptoms for which it is recommended to perform iFOBT and suggested actions for positive and negative test result. A value of <49µg/L will be considered 'negative' and >50µg/L as 'positive'. The study uses a cluster randomised stepped wedge design, and is executed in the Central Denmark Region. Municipalities of the region are randomised when to receive a CME, and are included sequentially in the study during the first seven month of the study period. The CME are arranged on scheduled GP-meetings in each municipality and will consist of a 45 minutes lecture on CRC diagnosis and use of iFOBT. Besides a CME, the intervention consist of a start package (10 iFOBT kits, a guideline and online educational material) that is sent to GPs when they are included in the study, and a status mail that GPs receive approx. one month after inclusion. The study period is one year. Data analysis will focus on the uptake and clinical use of iFOBT in general practice, the performance of iFOBT when used on patients presenting with uncharacteristic symptoms of CRC and the clinical implications. Perspectives This study will investigate iFOBT and explore its role in general practice. To our knowledge, this study will be one of the first and most thorough investigations of this test in a primary care setting. The results will bring important knowledge of how to improve the diagnostics of colorectal cancer in the future and hopefully reduce time to diagnosis. Especially for patients who do not meet the traditional Danish criteria for fast-track referral, this study will be a corner stone in the identification of more efficient ways to locate patients at risk of developing CRC. At both national and international level, this project will contribute with important knowledge that may provide better planning of CRC diagnostics in the future.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
iFOBT, FIT, general practice, early diagnosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
825 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Before intervention
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
GPs in this group have not yet received intervention.
Arm Title
After intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
GPs in this group have received the intervention.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Intervention
Intervention Description
CME, Start-package and status mail
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The rate of positive iFOBTs
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The number of CRCs diagnosed after a positive iFOBT
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The stage distribution of CRCs for patients with a positive iFOBT
Description
UICC stages I-IV
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The positive predictive value for detecting colorectal cancer
Description
The risk of having CRC when the iFOBT is positive
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The positive predictive value for detecting colorectal cancer in relation to cut-off value of iFOBT
Description
The risk of having CRC at different iFOBT values.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The positive predictive value for detecting colorectal cancer in relation to indications of using iFOBT
Description
The risk of having CRC when iFOBT is positive and specific symptoms. When requesting FIT, the GP register the patients' symptoms.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The rate of general practices starting to use the iFOBT, stratified for participation in the CME.
Description
The relation between number of general practices started using iFOBT and time.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The monthly rate of requested iFOBTs, stratified for participation in the CME.
Description
The relation between number of requested iFOBTs and time.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The monthly rate of positive iFOBTs, stratified for participation in the CME.
Description
The relation between number of positive iFOBTs and time.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Indications used for requesting iFOBT, stratified for participation in the CME.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The rate of referrals in the cancer patient pathway for colorectal cancer
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The rate of performed colonoscopies
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: GPs in the Central Denmark Region Patients >30 years eligible for iFOBT according to guideline Exclusion Criteria:
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Vedsted, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Research Unit of General Practice, Odense
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Unit for General Practice
City
Aarhus C
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27400657
Citation
Juul JS, Bro F, Hornung N, Andersen BS, Laurberg S, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Implementation of immunochemical faecal occult blood test in general practice: a study protocol using a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge design. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 11;16:445. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2477-9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Trial of the Implementation of iFOBT in General Practice

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs