search
Back to results

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PF-06252616 in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Primary Purpose

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PF-06252616
Placebo
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy focused on measuring Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, myostatin

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 15 Years (Child)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ambulatory boys age 6 to <16 years old (at the time of randomization), diagnosed with DMD. Diagnosis must be confirmed in subject's medical history and by genetic testing obtained during routine clinical care for diagnostic purposes as reported from an appropriate regulated laboratory using a clinically validated genetic test (genetic testing is not provided by the sponsor).
  2. Subjects who are able to perform the 4 stair climb in > or = 0.33 but < or =1.6 stairs/second.
  3. Subjects must be receiving glucocorticosteroids for a minimum of 6 months prior to signing informed consent. There should be no significant change (>0.2 mg/kg) in dosage or dose regimen (not related to body weight change) for at least 3 months immediately prior to signing the informed consent and a reasonable expectation that dosage and dosing regimen will not change significantly for the duration of the study.
  4. Adequate hepatic and renal function on screening laboratory assessments.
  5. No underlying disposition for iron accumulation on screening laboratory assessments.
  6. Iron content estimate on the screening liver MRI is within the normal range.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with known cognitive impairment or behavioral issues that would impede the ability to follow instructions.
  2. History of major surgical procedure within 6 weeks of signing the informed consent or planned surgery during the study.
  3. Any injury which may impact functional testing. Previous injuries must be fully healed prior to consenting. Prior lower limb fractures must be fully healed and at least 3 months from injury date.
  4. Presence or history of other musculoskeletal or neurologic disease or somatic disorder not related to DMD including pulmonary and cardiac disease.
  5. Compromised cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction <55% as determined on a screening cardiac MRI or echocardiogram). Subjects may be receiving ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitors or beta blockers, ARB (angiotensin II receptor antagonist) or aldosterone blocker/thiazide diuretic; however they must have initiated treatment more than 3 months prior to screening to ensure stable therapy.
  6. Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular (including uncontrolled hypertension), hepatic, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at time of dosing).
  7. Documented history of iron overload including hemochromatosis, beta thalassemia major, beta thalassemia intermedia or hemolytic anemia.
  8. Unwilling or unable (eg, metal implants, requires sedation) to undergo examination with closed MRI without sedation.
  9. Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s) for a minimum of 30 days or within 5 half lives (whichever is longer) prior to signing the informed consent and/or during study participation.
  10. Current or prior treatment with anti-myostatin, exon skipping, nonsense mutation targeted therapies ever or more than 30 days of treatment with utrophin modifiers and treatment with utrophin modifiers within 30 days prior ot signing the informed consent and/or during study participation.
  11. Current or prior treatment within the past 3 months with androgens or human growth hormone.
  12. Current treatment with immunosuppressant therapies (other than glucocorticoid steroids), aminoglycosides (eg, gentamicin), multi vitamins with iron and iron supplements and other investigational therapies (including idebenone).

Sites / Locations

  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Pharmacy
  • UCLA (David Geffen School of Medicine)
  • University of California, Davis Medical Center
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children - Tampa
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
  • University of Iowa ICTS
  • KU Clinical Research Center, Clinical and Translational Science Unit(CTSU)
  • University of Kansas-Clinical Research Center, Investigational Pharmacy
  • University of Kansas Medical Center, Landon Center on Aging
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute Out-patient center
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins Investigational Drug Service
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital
  • St Louis Children's Hospital
  • Duke University Medical Center,Lenox Baker Children's Hospital
  • Duke University, Investigational Drug Pharmacy
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences
  • Utah Center for Advanced Imaging and Research (UCAIR)
  • Investigational Drug Services
  • University of Utah, Department of Neurology
  • University of Utah Medical Center
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
  • Lady Cilento Children's Hospital
  • Clinical Densitometry and Bone Metabolic Disease Department, General and Clinical Pathology Clinic
  • Hospital Pharmacy, UMHAT Alexandrovska
  • Imaging Diagnostic Clinic,UMHAT Alexandrovska
  • Neurology Disease Clinic,UMHAT Alexandrovska
  • UMHAT Alexandrovska Cardiology Department,Internal Diseases Propaedeutic Clinic
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
  • UBC Children's and Women's Health Center of British Columbia
  • Children's Hospital- London Health Sciences Centre
  • CHU Sainte-Justine
  • UOC Farmacia-Istituto Gianna Gaslini, Istituto Pediatrico di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
  • UOC Medicina Fisica Riabilitativa
  • UOC Neurologia Pediatrica e Malattie Muscolari
  • UOC Radiologia-Istituto Gianna. Gaslini, Istituto Pediatrico di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere
  • UOS Dipartimentale Endocrinologia Clinica Sperimentale
  • Dipartimento Pediatrico Universitario-Ospedaliero Endocrinologia
  • Farmacia Ospedaliera, IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Padiglione Sant'Onofrio
  • Malattie Neuromuscolari e Neurodegenerative, IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
  • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Centro Trial, DPUO - Padiglione Salviati
  • U.O.C Farmacia
  • U.O.C. Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Fondazione Policlinico
  • Hyogo college of medicine hospital
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie Apteka Szpitalna Blok F
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, I Katedra i Klinika Kardiologii
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, II Zaklad Radiologii Klinicznej
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, Klinika Neurologii
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, Laboratorium Centralne
  • MTZ Clinical Research Sp.z o.o.
  • Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
  • Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
  • Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre Institute of Child Health
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital
  • Institute of Genetic Medicine, Muscle Team
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary Research Pharmacy
  • Clinical Research Facility

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

PF-06252616

Placebo

Arm Description

3 dose levels (5mg/kg, 20mg/kg and 40 mg/kg) of IV infused PF-06252616 will be investigated within each subject

Matching Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Week 49
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and AEs. TEAEs were AEs occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Severe TEAEs were TEAEs that interfered significantly with participants' usual function. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs by Week 49
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Dose Reduced or Temporary Discontinuation Due to TEAEs by Week 49
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Hematology
Hematology evaluation included: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell (RBC) count, platelets, RBC morphology, white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute lymphocytes, absolute atypical lymphocytes, absolute total neutrophils, absolute total neutrophils count, absolute band cells, absolute basophils, absolute eosinophils, absolute monocytes and absolute myelocytes.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Coagulation
Coagulation evaluation included activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Liver Function
Liver function evaluation included: total/direct/indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin and glutamate dehydrogenase.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Renal Function
Renal function evaluation included: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and uric acid.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Electrolytes
Electrolytes evaluation included: sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate, ferritin, transferrin saturation, iron, iron binding capacity and unsaturated iron binding capacity. Number of participants with iron abnormalities was reported in different age groups.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Hormones
Hormone evaluations included free thyroxine (T4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), lutenizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and androstenedione. Numbers of participants with abnormalities of LH, FSH and androstenedione were reported in different age groups.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Clinical Chemistry
Clinical chemistry evaluation included glucose, creatine kinase (CK), troponin I, and amylase.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Urinalysis
Urinalysis included: urine pH, qualitative urine glucose, qualitative urine ketones, qualitative urine protein, qualitative blood/hemoglobin, urine nitrite, urine leukocytes, urine RBC, urine WBC, urine granular casts, urine hyaline casts, urine urate (uric acid) acidic crystal, urine calcium oxalate crystals, urine amorphous crystals, urine bacteria, urine microscopic exam.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Fecal
Number of participants with blood detected in fecal samples is presented.
Categorical Summary of Liver Iron Accumulation by Week 49
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of Liver was obtained to quantify liver iron accumulation for safety monitoring. MRIs were sent to an independent central radiology imaging facility for calculation of the average transverse relaxation rate (R2*) value which was used to monitor for iron accumulation in the liver. Number of participants meeting the following criteria is presented as follows: 1) normal: R2*<=75Hz at 1.5T or <=139 Hz at 3.0T; 2) above normal: R2*>75Hz and <=190Hz at 1.5T or R2* >139Hz and <=369Hz at 3.0T; 3) mild overload: R2*>190Hz at 1.5T or R2*>360Hz at 3.0T.
Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings Reported as SAEs by Week 49
Physical examination included head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. A targeted nose and throat mucosal exam were also performed to monitor for any signs of mucosal telangiectasias. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Investigators determined which physical examination findings were reported as SAEs.
Summary of Tanner Stage Rating by Week 49
Tanner staging was performed before the first dose of each dose escalation to monitor for signs of accelerated sexual development. The physical changes in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed using the system described by Marshall and Tanner. Stage 1 is preadolescent, Stages 2, 3, and 4 are initiation of puberty and Stage 5 is mature adult. Details about the system can be referred to Tanner JM. Growth at Adolescence. Blackwell Scientific Publications 1962; 2nd edition.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Findings Reported as SAEs by Week 49
Vital signs evaluation included supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Investigators determined which vital signs findings were reported as SAEs.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria by Week 49
Number of participants with ECG data meeting the following criteria are presented: 1) corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval) <450msec; 2) QTcF interval >=450 and <480msec; 3) QTcF interval >=480 and <500msec; 4) QTcF interval>=500msec; 5) QTcF interval increase from baseline<30msec; 6) QTcF interval increase from baseline >=30 and <60msec; 7) QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60msec.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Compared to Placebo by Week 49
The LVEF was the ratio of blood ejected during systole to blood in the ventricle at the end of diastole. LVEF was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance image (MRI) or echocardiogram. The same method of cardiac imaging was used consistently within a single participant. Cardiac MRIs were read by a central imaging vendor and echocardiograms were read locally at each site. The LVEF values measured by cardiac MRI and echocardiogram are combined in the following presentation. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo on LVEF. The baseline result, age, use of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/beta blocker/angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and treatment were included as fixed effects in the model.
Height-adjusted Z-score of Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Over Time by Week 49
Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The height adjusted Z-score presented below is the number of standard deviations which compares the BMD of the participant to the average BMD matched for their age, sex and ethnicity. If the Z-score was -2 standard deviations or lower, the result was "below the expected range for age". If the Z-score was above -2 standard deviations, the result was "within the expected range for age".
Bone Age to Chronological Age Ratio by Week 49
Bone age assessment was evaluated by the ratio of the bone age to the chronological age using the X rays of the hand and wrist. Ratio of bone age to chronological age was calculated by bone age/chronological age at scan date. Chronological age at scan date was calculated by (scan date-date of birth+1)/365.25.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior Reported as AEs by Week 49
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was performed to identify the risk of suicide ideation or behavior. AEs of suicide ideation or behavior were determined by the investigator.
Change From Baseline on the 4 Stair Climb (4SC) as Compared to Placebo at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. Mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the change from baseline on 4SC for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Northstar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
ROM was evaluated by using goniometry to evaluate the loss of motion in the ankles. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on ROM for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) Overall Score at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items). Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Score at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Elbow Extension at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Elbow Flexion at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Hip Abduction at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Knee Extension at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Shoulder Abduction at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on 4SC for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 4SC for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on using the natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG (Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group) natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 4SC data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on 4SC for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 4SC for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 4SC data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2) treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4 participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on FVC for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on using the natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable FVC data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on FVC for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable FVC data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2) treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4 participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on NSAA for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. A total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on NSAA for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on the using natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable NSAA data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on NSAA for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on NSAA for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable NSAA data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2) treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4 participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on 6MWD for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on using the natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 6MWD data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on 6MWD for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 6MWD data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 4SC at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 4SC at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds.MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 4SC at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on FVC at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on FVC at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on FVC at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on NSAA at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on NSAA at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on NSAA at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on PUL Overall Scores at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items). Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline .The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on PUL Overall Score at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items).Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline.The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on PUL Overall Score at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items).Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline.The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 6MWD at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 6MWD at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 6MWD at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline on Muscle Strength at Weeks 17, 33 and 49 in Pre-specified Subset (Baseline 4SC <3.5 Seconds)
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. Change from baseline on muscle strength in all participants with baseline 4SC <3.5 seconds are presented below.
Change From Baseline on Muscle Strength at Weeks 17, 33 and 49 in Pre-specified Subset (Baseline 4SC >=3.5 Seconds and <=8 Seconds)
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. Change from baseline on muscle strength in all participants with baseline 4SC >=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds are presented below.
Change From Baseline on Muscle Strength at Weeks 17, 33 and 49 in Pre-specified Subset (Baseline 4SC >8 Seconds)
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. Change from baseline on muscle strength in all participants with baseline 4SC >8 seconds are presented below.
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume as Compared to Placebo by Weeks 17, 33 and 49
The whole thigh muscle volume was measured by the proton density weighted sequence with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which was used to segment the entire thigh region into 3 primary regions for volumetric measure including 1) muscle; 2) inter/intra-muscular fat, 3) subcutaneous fat. MMRM was used to analyze the percent change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Percent Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume Index by Weeks 17, 33 and 49
The thigh muscle volume index was derived from the thigh muscle volume measurements as the fraction of total thigh tissue that was the lean muscle. MMRM was used to analyze the percent change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Change From Baseline in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume Through Week 97
The whole thigh muscle volume was measured by the proton density weighted sequence with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which was used to segment the entire thigh region into 3 primary regions for volumetric measure including 1) muscle; 2) inter/intra-muscular fat, 3) subcutaneous fat.
Change From Baseline in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume Index Through Week 97
The thigh muscle volume index was derived from the thigh muscle volume measurements as the fraction of total thigh tissue that was the lean muscle.
Concentration of Growth Differentiation Factor 8 (GDF-8) at Time 0 (Pre-dose),(C0(GDF-8) )
GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the target of domagrozumab. C0(GDF-8) was observed directly from data.
Trough Serum Concentration of GDF-8 (Ctrough,(GDF-8)) for Participants Receiving Domagrozumab in Period 1
GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the target of domagrozumab. Ctrough,(GDF-8) was observed directly from data.
Ctrough,(GDF-8) for Participants of Sequence 3 in Period 2
GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the target of domagrozumab. Ctrough,(GDF-8) was observed directly from data.
Trough (Pre-dose) Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Domagrozumab
Ctrough was observed directly from data.
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Domagrozumab
Cmax was observed directly from data.
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Domagrozumab
Tmax was observed directly from the data.
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Domagrozumab for Participants in Sequence 2 After the Last Dose of Domagrozumab
t1/2 was calculated by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Participants in Sequence 2 received the last dose of domagrozumab at Week 45.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval Tau (AUCtau) of Domagrozumab
The dosing interval tau was 672 hours (4 weeks). AUCtau was obtained by linear/log trapezoidal method. The AUCtau was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Average Serum Concentration Over the Dosing Interval (Cav) of Domagrozumab
Cav was calculated by AUCtau/tau. The Cav was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Clearance (CL) of Domagrozumab
CL was calculated by Dose/AUCtau. The CL was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Domagrozumab for Participants in Sequence 2 Required for Additional PK Assessment
Vss was calculated by CL*MRT, where MRT was the mean residence time. Vss was assessed to fully characterize PK data.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Development by Week 97
The criterion for positive result of ADA samples was ADA titer >=1.88.

Full Information

First Posted
November 4, 2014
Last Updated
November 11, 2020
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02310763
Brief Title
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PF-06252616 in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Official Title
A PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTIPLE ASCENDING DOSE STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, EFFICACY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF PF-06252616 IN AMBULATORY BOYS WITH DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Termination Date 30AUG2018: Reason for termination: Lack of Efficacy
Study Start Date
November 24, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 30, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 23, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase 2 randomized, 2-period, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, PK and PD of PF-06252616 administered to ambulatory boys diagnosed with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Three intravenous (IV) dose levels will be investigated in a within subject dose escalating fashion. Subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 sequence groups for approximately 96 weeks (2 periods of 48 weeks each). In period 1, two of the sequence groups will receive PF-06252616 and one sequence group will receive placebo. In period 2, the placebo group will switch to PF-06252616 and the two remaining sequence groups will either receive placebo or PF-06252616. Efficacy will be based on an observed mean change from baseline on function (4 stair climb) of PF-06252616 as compared to the placebo at the end of period 1. Period 2 provides an opportunity to evaluate PK. Subjects will receive monthly IV infused doses of either PF-06252616 or placebo and will undergo safety evaluations (Laboratory, cardiac monitoring, physical exams, x-ray, MRI), functional evaluations (pulmonary function testing, 4 stair climb, range of motion, strength testing, Northstar Ambulatory Assessment, upper limb functional testing and the six minute walk test), pharmacokinetic testing and pharmacodynamic testing to evaluate changes in muscle volume (MRI).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Keywords
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, myostatin

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
121 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PF-06252616
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
3 dose levels (5mg/kg, 20mg/kg and 40 mg/kg) of IV infused PF-06252616 will be investigated within each subject
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Matching Placebo
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06252616
Intervention Description
PF-06252616 IV Infusion, 3 dose levels (5mg/kg, 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg) will be investigated within each subject
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Week 49
Description
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and AEs. TEAEs were AEs occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Severe TEAEs were TEAEs that interfered significantly with participants' usual function. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Time Frame
Study Day 1 to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs by Week 49
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Time Frame
Study Day 1 to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Dose Reduced or Temporary Discontinuation Due to TEAEs by Week 49
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator.
Time Frame
Study Day 1 to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Hematology
Description
Hematology evaluation included: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell (RBC) count, platelets, RBC morphology, white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute lymphocytes, absolute atypical lymphocytes, absolute total neutrophils, absolute total neutrophils count, absolute band cells, absolute basophils, absolute eosinophils, absolute monocytes and absolute myelocytes.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Coagulation
Description
Coagulation evaluation included activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT).
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Liver Function
Description
Liver function evaluation included: total/direct/indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin and glutamate dehydrogenase.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Renal Function
Description
Renal function evaluation included: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and uric acid.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Electrolytes
Description
Electrolytes evaluation included: sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate, ferritin, transferrin saturation, iron, iron binding capacity and unsaturated iron binding capacity. Number of participants with iron abnormalities was reported in different age groups.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Hormones
Description
Hormone evaluations included free thyroxine (T4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), lutenizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and androstenedione. Numbers of participants with abnormalities of LH, FSH and androstenedione were reported in different age groups.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Clinical Chemistry
Description
Clinical chemistry evaluation included glucose, creatine kinase (CK), troponin I, and amylase.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Urinalysis
Description
Urinalysis included: urine pH, qualitative urine glucose, qualitative urine ketones, qualitative urine protein, qualitative blood/hemoglobin, urine nitrite, urine leukocytes, urine RBC, urine WBC, urine granular casts, urine hyaline casts, urine urate (uric acid) acidic crystal, urine calcium oxalate crystals, urine amorphous crystals, urine bacteria, urine microscopic exam.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) by Week 49 - Fecal
Description
Number of participants with blood detected in fecal samples is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Categorical Summary of Liver Iron Accumulation by Week 49
Description
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of Liver was obtained to quantify liver iron accumulation for safety monitoring. MRIs were sent to an independent central radiology imaging facility for calculation of the average transverse relaxation rate (R2*) value which was used to monitor for iron accumulation in the liver. Number of participants meeting the following criteria is presented as follows: 1) normal: R2*<=75Hz at 1.5T or <=139 Hz at 3.0T; 2) above normal: R2*>75Hz and <=190Hz at 1.5T or R2* >139Hz and <=369Hz at 3.0T; 3) mild overload: R2*>190Hz at 1.5T or R2*>360Hz at 3.0T.
Time Frame
Screening, Weeks 13, 29 and 45
Title
Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings Reported as SAEs by Week 49
Description
Physical examination included head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. A targeted nose and throat mucosal exam were also performed to monitor for any signs of mucosal telangiectasias. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Investigators determined which physical examination findings were reported as SAEs.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Summary of Tanner Stage Rating by Week 49
Description
Tanner staging was performed before the first dose of each dose escalation to monitor for signs of accelerated sexual development. The physical changes in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed using the system described by Marshall and Tanner. Stage 1 is preadolescent, Stages 2, 3, and 4 are initiation of puberty and Stage 5 is mature adult. Details about the system can be referred to Tanner JM. Growth at Adolescence. Blackwell Scientific Publications 1962; 2nd edition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Findings Reported as SAEs by Week 49
Description
Vital signs evaluation included supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Investigators determined which vital signs findings were reported as SAEs.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria by Week 49
Description
Number of participants with ECG data meeting the following criteria are presented: 1) corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval) <450msec; 2) QTcF interval >=450 and <480msec; 3) QTcF interval >=480 and <500msec; 4) QTcF interval>=500msec; 5) QTcF interval increase from baseline<30msec; 6) QTcF interval increase from baseline >=30 and <60msec; 7) QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60msec.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Compared to Placebo by Week 49
Description
The LVEF was the ratio of blood ejected during systole to blood in the ventricle at the end of diastole. LVEF was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance image (MRI) or echocardiogram. The same method of cardiac imaging was used consistently within a single participant. Cardiac MRIs were read by a central imaging vendor and echocardiograms were read locally at each site. The LVEF values measured by cardiac MRI and echocardiogram are combined in the following presentation. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo on LVEF. The baseline result, age, use of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/beta blocker/angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and treatment were included as fixed effects in the model.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Height-adjusted Z-score of Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Over Time by Week 49
Description
Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The height adjusted Z-score presented below is the number of standard deviations which compares the BMD of the participant to the average BMD matched for their age, sex and ethnicity. If the Z-score was -2 standard deviations or lower, the result was "below the expected range for age". If the Z-score was above -2 standard deviations, the result was "within the expected range for age".
Time Frame
Screening and Week 49
Title
Bone Age to Chronological Age Ratio by Week 49
Description
Bone age assessment was evaluated by the ratio of the bone age to the chronological age using the X rays of the hand and wrist. Ratio of bone age to chronological age was calculated by bone age/chronological age at scan date. Chronological age at scan date was calculated by (scan date-date of birth+1)/365.25.
Time Frame
Screening, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior Reported as AEs by Week 49
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was performed to identify the risk of suicide ideation or behavior. AEs of suicide ideation or behavior were determined by the investigator.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 49 visit
Title
Change From Baseline on the 4 Stair Climb (4SC) as Compared to Placebo at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. Mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the change from baseline on 4SC for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Northstar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
ROM was evaluated by using goniometry to evaluate the loss of motion in the ankles. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on ROM for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) Overall Score at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items). Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on the Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Score at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Elbow Extension at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Elbow Flexion at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Hip Abduction at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Knee Extension at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on Muscle Strength of Shoulder Abduction at Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on muscle strength for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on 4SC for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 4SC for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on using the natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG (Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group) natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 4SC data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on 4SC for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 4SC for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 4SC data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2) treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4 participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 97
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on FVC for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on using the natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable FVC data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on FVC for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable FVC data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2) treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4 participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 97
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on NSAA for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. A total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on NSAA for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on the using natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable NSAA data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on NSAA for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on NSAA for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable NSAA data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2) treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4 participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 97
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 49 on 6MWD for Participants in Sequence 3 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for the natural history control group compared to placebo group (Sequence 3). This MMRM was established to assess the appropriateness on using the natural history control group as a comparator. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 6MWD data on Week 49 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 97 on 6MWD for Participants in Sequence 1 Compared to the Natural History Control Group
Description
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to the natural history control group. The natural history control group was established by filtering the CINRG natural history database. Participants who met the following requirements at baseline and had evaluable 6MWD data on Week 97 were included in this group: 1) age: 6 to <16 years; 2)treatment of glucocorticoid steroids >=6 months prior to baseline and continuous use until the latest visit week; 3) 4SC: 2-15.9 seconds; 4) participants who were ambulatory at baseline; 5) LVEF: >=55% or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 97
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 4SC at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 17
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 4SC at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds.MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 33
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 4SC at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The 4SC quantified the time required for a participant to ascend 4 standard steps. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on FVC at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 17
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on FVC at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 33
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on FVC at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
FVC was measured by spirometry to evaluate respiratory muscle function. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on FVC for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on NSAA at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 17
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on NSAA at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 33
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on NSAA at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The NSAA is a 17-item test that measured gross motor function. Each individual item received a score of 0-unable to perform independently, 1-able to perform with assistance, or 2-able to perform without assistance. A total score was achieved by summing all the individual items. The total score could range from 0 to 34 (fully-independent function). A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on PUL Overall Scores at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items). Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline .The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 17
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on PUL Overall Score at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items).Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline.The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 33
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on PUL Overall Score at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
The PUL was used to assess motor performance of the upper limb. The PUL scale includes 22 items; an entry item defining the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into three levels: shoulder (4 items), middle (9 items) and distal (8 items).Scoring options per item may not be uniform and may vary from 0-1 and 0-6, according to the performance, with higher values corresponding to better performance. A total maximum score of 74 is achieved by adding the individual level scores. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline.The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 6MWD at Week 17 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 17
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 6MWD at Week 33 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 33
Title
Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo on 6MWD at Week 49 in Pre-specified Subsets
Description
6MWD evaluated ambulation ability by measuring the distance walked in 6 minutes. A subset analysis was performed by categorizing participants into 3 subsets according to the baseline 4SC time: 1) <3.5 seconds, 2)>=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds, 3) >8 seconds. MMRM was used to analyze the change from baseline on 6MWD for domagrozumab compared to placebo in subsets. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 49
Title
Change From Baseline on Muscle Strength at Weeks 17, 33 and 49 in Pre-specified Subset (Baseline 4SC <3.5 Seconds)
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. Change from baseline on muscle strength in all participants with baseline 4SC <3.5 seconds are presented below.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline on Muscle Strength at Weeks 17, 33 and 49 in Pre-specified Subset (Baseline 4SC >=3.5 Seconds and <=8 Seconds)
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. Change from baseline on muscle strength in all participants with baseline 4SC >=3.5 seconds and <=8 seconds are presented below.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline on Muscle Strength at Weeks 17, 33 and 49 in Pre-specified Subset (Baseline 4SC >8 Seconds)
Description
Muscle strength was quantified by means of a handheld dynamometer. The following muscle groups were evaluated: knee extension, elbow flexion, hip abduction, elbow extension and shoulder abduction. Change from baseline on muscle strength in all participants with baseline 4SC >8 seconds are presented below.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume as Compared to Placebo by Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
The whole thigh muscle volume was measured by the proton density weighted sequence with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which was used to segment the entire thigh region into 3 primary regions for volumetric measure including 1) muscle; 2) inter/intra-muscular fat, 3) subcutaneous fat. MMRM was used to analyze the percent change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Percent Change From Baseline as Compared to Placebo in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume Index by Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Description
The thigh muscle volume index was derived from the thigh muscle volume measurements as the fraction of total thigh tissue that was the lean muscle. MMRM was used to analyze the percent change from baseline for domagrozumab compared to placebo. The stratification factor, baseline result, treatment, time and treatment by time interaction were included as fixed effects in the model. Participants were included as a random effect and the model was fit with an unstructured covariance for the repeated measures.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33 and 49
Title
Change From Baseline in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume Through Week 97
Description
The whole thigh muscle volume was measured by the proton density weighted sequence with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which was used to segment the entire thigh region into 3 primary regions for volumetric measure including 1) muscle; 2) inter/intra-muscular fat, 3) subcutaneous fat.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49 and 97
Title
Change From Baseline in Whole Thigh Muscle Volume Index Through Week 97
Description
The thigh muscle volume index was derived from the thigh muscle volume measurements as the fraction of total thigh tissue that was the lean muscle.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49 and 97
Title
Concentration of Growth Differentiation Factor 8 (GDF-8) at Time 0 (Pre-dose),(C0(GDF-8) )
Description
GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the target of domagrozumab. C0(GDF-8) was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Predose on Day 1 of Week 1
Title
Trough Serum Concentration of GDF-8 (Ctrough,(GDF-8)) for Participants Receiving Domagrozumab in Period 1
Description
GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the target of domagrozumab. Ctrough,(GDF-8) was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Every 4 weeks on dosing day (at predose, end of 2-hour infusion and 6 hours since start of infusion) from Week 1 to Week 48
Title
Ctrough,(GDF-8) for Participants of Sequence 3 in Period 2
Description
GDF-8, also called myostatin, is the target of domagrozumab. Ctrough,(GDF-8) was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Every 4 weeks on dosing day (predose, end of 2-hour infusion and 6 hours since start of infusion) from Week 49 to Week 96
Title
Trough (Pre-dose) Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Domagrozumab
Description
Ctrough was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Every 4 weeks on dosing day (predose, end of 2-hour infusion and 6 hours since start of infusion) from Week 1 to Week 96 for Sequence 1; from Week 1 to Week 48 for Sequence 2; from Week 49 to Week 96 for Sequence 3
Title
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Domagrozumab
Description
Cmax was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Every 4 weeks on dosing day (predose, end of 2-hour infusion and 6 hours since start of infusion) from Week 1 to Week 96 for Sequence 1; from Week 1 to Week 48 for Sequence 2; from Week 49 to Week 96 for Sequence 3
Title
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Domagrozumab
Description
Tmax was observed directly from the data.
Time Frame
Every 4 weeks on dosing day (predose, end of 2-hour infusion and 6 hours since start of infusion) from Week 1 to Week 96 for Sequence 1; from Week 1 to Week 48 for Sequence 2; from Week 49 to Week 96 for Sequence 3
Title
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Domagrozumab for Participants in Sequence 2 After the Last Dose of Domagrozumab
Description
t1/2 was calculated by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Participants in Sequence 2 received the last dose of domagrozumab at Week 45.
Time Frame
At predose, end of 2-hour infusion and 6 hours since start of infusion at Week 45
Title
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval Tau (AUCtau) of Domagrozumab
Description
The dosing interval tau was 672 hours (4 weeks). AUCtau was obtained by linear/log trapezoidal method. The AUCtau was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Time Frame
At predose, end of 2-hour infusion,6 hours and 168 hours since start of infusion on Weeks 1, 13, 17, 29, 33 and 45
Title
Average Serum Concentration Over the Dosing Interval (Cav) of Domagrozumab
Description
Cav was calculated by AUCtau/tau. The Cav was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Time Frame
At predose, end of 2-hour infusion, 6 hours and 168 hours since start of infusion on Weeks 1, 13, 17, 29, 33 and 45
Title
Clearance (CL) of Domagrozumab
Description
CL was calculated by Dose/AUCtau. The CL was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Time Frame
At predose, end of 2-hour infusion, 6 hours and 168 hours since start of infusion on Weeks 13, 29 and 45
Title
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Domagrozumab for Participants in Sequence 2 Required for Additional PK Assessment
Description
Vss was calculated by CL*MRT, where MRT was the mean residence time. Vss was assessed to fully characterize PK data.
Time Frame
At predose, end of 2-hour infusion, 6 hours and 168 hours since start of infusion on Week 45
Title
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Development by Week 97
Description
The criterion for positive result of ADA samples was ADA titer >=1.88.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 4 weeks from Week 5 to Week 97 visit or early termination
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Serum Concentration (AUClast) of Domagrozumab
Description
AUClast was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. AUCtau was obtained by linear/log trapezoidal method. AUClast was assessed to fully characterize PK data and it was only assessed on the first 12 participants enrolled in the study who were required to complete additional PK visits.
Time Frame
At predose, end of 2-hour infusion, 6 hours and 168 hours since start of infusion on Weeks 1, 13, 17, 29, 33 and 45

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ambulatory boys age 6 to <16 years old (at the time of randomization), diagnosed with DMD. Diagnosis must be confirmed in subject's medical history and by genetic testing obtained during routine clinical care for diagnostic purposes as reported from an appropriate regulated laboratory using a clinically validated genetic test (genetic testing is not provided by the sponsor). Subjects who are able to perform the 4 stair climb in > or = 0.33 but < or =1.6 stairs/second. Subjects must be receiving glucocorticosteroids for a minimum of 6 months prior to signing informed consent. There should be no significant change (>0.2 mg/kg) in dosage or dose regimen (not related to body weight change) for at least 3 months immediately prior to signing the informed consent and a reasonable expectation that dosage and dosing regimen will not change significantly for the duration of the study. Adequate hepatic and renal function on screening laboratory assessments. No underlying disposition for iron accumulation on screening laboratory assessments. Iron content estimate on the screening liver MRI is within the normal range. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects with known cognitive impairment or behavioral issues that would impede the ability to follow instructions. History of major surgical procedure within 6 weeks of signing the informed consent or planned surgery during the study. Any injury which may impact functional testing. Previous injuries must be fully healed prior to consenting. Prior lower limb fractures must be fully healed and at least 3 months from injury date. Presence or history of other musculoskeletal or neurologic disease or somatic disorder not related to DMD including pulmonary and cardiac disease. Compromised cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction <55% as determined on a screening cardiac MRI or echocardiogram). Subjects may be receiving ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitors or beta blockers, ARB (angiotensin II receptor antagonist) or aldosterone blocker/thiazide diuretic; however they must have initiated treatment more than 3 months prior to screening to ensure stable therapy. Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular (including uncontrolled hypertension), hepatic, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at time of dosing). Documented history of iron overload including hemochromatosis, beta thalassemia major, beta thalassemia intermedia or hemolytic anemia. Unwilling or unable (eg, metal implants, requires sedation) to undergo examination with closed MRI without sedation. Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s) for a minimum of 30 days or within 5 half lives (whichever is longer) prior to signing the informed consent and/or during study participation. Current or prior treatment with anti-myostatin, exon skipping, nonsense mutation targeted therapies ever or more than 30 days of treatment with utrophin modifiers and treatment with utrophin modifiers within 30 days prior ot signing the informed consent and/or during study participation. Current or prior treatment within the past 3 months with androgens or human growth hormone. Current treatment with immunosuppressant therapies (other than glucocorticoid steroids), aminoglycosides (eg, gentamicin), multi vitamins with iron and iron supplements and other investigational therapies (including idebenone).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ronald Reagan UCLA Pharmacy
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA (David Geffen School of Medicine)
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, Davis Medical Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Tampa
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa ICTS
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
KU Clinical Research Center, Clinical and Translational Science Unit(CTSU)
City
Fairway
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66205
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas-Clinical Research Center, Investigational Pharmacy
City
Fairway
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66205
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center, Landon Center on Aging
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kennedy Krieger Institute Out-patient center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kennedy Krieger Institute
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Investigational Drug Service
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
St Louis Children's Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center,Lenox Baker Children's Hospital
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University, Investigational Drug Pharmacy
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Utah Center for Advanced Imaging and Research (UCAIR)
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigational Drug Services
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah, Department of Neurology
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Medical Center
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah School of Medicine
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lady Cilento Children's Hospital
City
South Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4101
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Clinical Densitometry and Bone Metabolic Disease Department, General and Clinical Pathology Clinic
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Hospital Pharmacy, UMHAT Alexandrovska
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Imaging Diagnostic Clinic,UMHAT Alexandrovska
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Neurology Disease Clinic,UMHAT Alexandrovska
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
UMHAT Alexandrovska Cardiology Department,Internal Diseases Propaedeutic Clinic
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Alberta Children's Hospital
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T3B 6A8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
UBC Children's and Women's Health Center of British Columbia
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6H3V4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Children's Hospital- London Health Sciences Centre
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5W9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHU Sainte-Justine
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1C5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
UOC Farmacia-Istituto Gianna Gaslini, Istituto Pediatrico di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16147
Country
Italy
Facility Name
UOC Medicina Fisica Riabilitativa
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16147
Country
Italy
Facility Name
UOC Neurologia Pediatrica e Malattie Muscolari
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16147
Country
Italy
Facility Name
UOC Radiologia-Istituto Gianna. Gaslini, Istituto Pediatrico di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16147
Country
Italy
Facility Name
UOS Dipartimentale Endocrinologia Clinica Sperimentale
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16147
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Dipartimento Pediatrico Universitario-Ospedaliero Endocrinologia
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00150
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Farmacia Ospedaliera, IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Padiglione Sant'Onofrio
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00165
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Malattie Neuromuscolari e Neurodegenerative, IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00165
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Centro Trial, DPUO - Padiglione Salviati
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00165
Country
Italy
Facility Name
U.O.C Farmacia
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
Facility Name
U.O.C. Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Fondazione Policlinico
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Hyogo college of medicine hospital
City
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
663-8501
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
187-8551
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie Apteka Szpitalna Blok F
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, I Katedra i Klinika Kardiologii
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, II Zaklad Radiologii Klinicznej
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, Klinika Neurologii
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie, Laboratorium Centralne
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
MTZ Clinical Research Sp.z o.o.
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-106
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
City
Liverpool
ZIP/Postal Code
L12 2AP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
City
Liverpool
ZIP/Postal Code
L14 5AB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre Institute of Child Health
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
WC1N 3JH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Great Ormond Street Hospital
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
WC1N 3JH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Institute of Genetic Medicine, Muscle Team
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 3BZ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Victoria Infirmary Research Pharmacy
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Clinical Research Facility
City
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36335191
Citation
Sherlock SP, Palmer J, Wagner KR, Abdel-Hamid HZ, Tian C, Mah JK, Muntoni F, Guglieri M, Butterfield RJ, Charnas L, Marraffino S. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of lean body mass as a biomarker for progression in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 5;12(1):18762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23072-5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
36104012
Citation
Wojciechowski J, Purohit VS, Harnisch LO, Dua P, Tan B, Nicholas T. Population PK and PD Analysis of Domagrozumab in Pediatric Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Dec;112(6):1291-1302. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2747. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35998119
Citation
Muntoni F, Guglieri M, Mah JK, Wagner KR, Brandsema JF, Butterfield RJ, McDonald CM, Mayhew AG, Palmer JP, Marraffino S, Charnas L, Mercuri E. Novel approaches to analysis of the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD): Observations from a phase 2 trial. PLoS One. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0272858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272858. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35396602
Citation
Sherlock SP, Palmer J, Wagner KR, Abdel-Hamid HZ, Bertini E, Tian C, Mah JK, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Muntoni F, Guglieri M, Brandsema JF, Mercuri E, Butterfield RJ, McDonald CM, Charnas L, Marraffino S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging measures as biomarkers of disease progression in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a phase 2 trial of domagrozumab. J Neurol. 2022 Aug;269(8):4421-4435. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11084-0. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34533053
Citation
Wagner KR, Guglieri M, Ramaiah SK, Charnas L, Marraffino S, Binks M, Vaidya VS, Palmer J, Goldstein R, Muntoni F. Safety and disease monitoring biomarkers in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: results from a Phase II trial. Biomark Med. 2021 Oct;15(15):1389-1396. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2021-0222. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34155911
Citation
Sherlock SP, Zhang Y, Binks M, Marraffino S. Quantitative muscle MRI biomarkers in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: cross-sectional correlations with age and functional tests. Biomark Med. 2021 Jun;15(10):761-773. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2020-0801. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32522498
Citation
Wagner KR, Abdel-Hamid HZ, Mah JK, Campbell C, Guglieri M, Muntoni F, Takeshima Y, McDonald CM, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Karachunski P, Butterfield RJ, Mercuri E, Fiorillo C, Bertini ES, Tian C, Statland J, Sadosky AB, Purohit VS, Sherlock SP, Palmer JP, Binks M, Charnas L, Marraffino S, Wong BL. Randomized phase 2 trial and open-label extension of domagrozumab in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2020 Jun;30(6):492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 19. Erratum In: Neuromuscul Disord. 2021 Feb;31(2):167-168.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=B5161002&StudyName=A%20Phase%202%20Randomized%2C%20Double-blind%2C%20Placebo-controlled%2C%20Multiple%20Ascending%20Dose%20Study%20To%20Evaluate%20The%20Safety%2C%20Efficacy%2C%20Pharmacokinetics%20And%20Pharmacodynamics%20Of%20Pf-06252616%20In%20Ambulatory%20Boys%20With%20Duchenne%20Muscular%20Dystrophy
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PF-06252616 in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs