search
Back to results

Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Performance Feedback
Sponsored by
Cereneo AG
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Stroke

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First time Inpatient at the Cereneo rehabilitation clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rey-Figur Kopie <= 25 AND Rechnerisches Denken WIE <=5
  • Becks Depression Inventar (BDI) > 17
  • Major aphasia preventing understanding of study materials (according to the treating physician).

Sites / Locations

  • Cereneo, Center For Rehabilitation and Neurology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

No intervention group

Intervention group

Arm Description

Patients in stroke rehabilitation receiving standard therapy

Patients in stroke rehabilitation receiving standard therapy plus performance feedback

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Motivation
Weekly: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory Questionnaire
Motivation
Motivation rating of patients regarding the foregoing therapy session by therapists
Motivation
Time patient spends on self administered training
Motivation
Amount of activities (walking, stair climbing) during free time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical scores (e.g. Fugl-Meyer Score)
Standard quality assessments of the study site (rehabilitation clinic)

Full Information

First Posted
December 8, 2014
Last Updated
January 27, 2021
Sponsor
Cereneo AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02315963
Brief Title
Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
Official Title
Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cereneo AG

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
High motivation is a predictor for good therapy results in physical therapy [Grahn 2000]. The investigator want to show that it is possible to increase patients motivation for stroke rehabilitation by providing them objective performance feedback about the patients therapy progress.
Detailed Description
High motivation is a predictor for good therapy results in physical therapy [Grahn 2000]. Additional focus on motivation and rewards has fallen on the topic of stroke rehabilitation since it was shown in an animal model that the brain centers involved with motivation and rewards are crucial to motor learning [Hosp 2011]. The investigators goal is to target the overall motivation for therapy. During the guided therapy sessions the therapists will be the main motivators and the investigators do not want to interfere with that. But the amount of guided therapy sessions is often limited due to economical reason rather than therapeutic ones. Therefore patients are encouraged to do training on their own if possible and to be active during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic. The investigators target the patients motivation to train by themselves and be active but also the patients attitude towards the guided therapies. It is known that performance feedback can improve motivation [Harackiewicz 1979]. Therefore the investigators want to use the data about therapy progress to produce feedback for patients visualizing the patients progress and efforts during the patients stay in the clinic. The investigators will compare patients who receive normal therapy to patients who receive normal therapy plus performance feedback regarding a variety of motivation measures.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
No intervention group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients in stroke rehabilitation receiving standard therapy
Arm Title
Intervention group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients in stroke rehabilitation receiving standard therapy plus performance feedback
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Performance Feedback
Intervention Description
Performance Feedback regarding the patients efforts and accomplishments during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic, an expected average of 6 weeks. The data available about the patients progress will be analysed and processed to create a visual illustration shown to the patient on a daily bases.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motivation
Description
Weekly: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory Questionnaire
Time Frame
Weekly for the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeks
Title
Motivation
Description
Motivation rating of patients regarding the foregoing therapy session by therapists
Time Frame
After each therapy session for the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeks
Title
Motivation
Description
Time patient spends on self administered training
Time Frame
Continuous for the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeks
Title
Motivation
Description
Amount of activities (walking, stair climbing) during free time
Time Frame
Continuousfor the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical scores (e.g. Fugl-Meyer Score)
Description
Standard quality assessments of the study site (rehabilitation clinic)
Time Frame
When decided by therapists for the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: First time Inpatient at the Cereneo rehabilitation clinic Exclusion Criteria: Rey-Figur Kopie <= 25 AND Rechnerisches Denken WIE <=5 Becks Depression Inventar (BDI) > 17 Major aphasia preventing understanding of study materials (according to the treating physician).
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cereneo, Center For Rehabilitation and Neurology
City
Vitznau
State/Province
Lucerne
ZIP/Postal Code
6354
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11087060
Citation
Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. A two-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Oct 15;22(15):639-54. doi: 10.1080/096382800445443.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21325515
Citation
Hosp JA, Pekanovic A, Rioult-Pedotti MS, Luft AR. Dopaminergic projections from midbrain to primary motor cortex mediate motor skill learning. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2481-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5411-10.2011.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Harackiewicz, Judith M. The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 37(8), Aug 1979, 1352-1363.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs