Low-dose Capecitabine Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer (LcACEC)
Primary Purpose
Colorectal Neoplasms
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Capecitabine
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Neoplasms focused on measuring colorectal cancer, stage II/III, elderly, adjuvant chemotherapy, capecitabine, non-inferiority
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- With informed consents
- Histologically identified carcinoma of colon and rectum
- pT3-4NanyM0 or pTanyN+M0(stage II/III)
- age between 70 to 90
- undergone R0 resection
- ECOG ≤2
- Stage II patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) or microsatellite low (MSL)
Exclusion Criteria:
- With other types of malignances simultaneously
- Creatinine clearance ≤ 70 ml/min
- Undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- In anticoagulant therapy
- Pregnant or lactating women
- History of antineoplastic drugs
- With other contraindications for chemotherapy
Sites / Locations
- West China HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
standard-dose
reduced-dose
Arm Description
capecitabine, oral administration, 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, and repeated on day 22; 8 circles in total.
capecitabine, oral administration, 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, and repeated on day 22; 8 circles in total.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
disease free survival
Secondary Outcome Measures
overall survival
toxic and adverse effects
completion rate
quality of life
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02316535
First Posted
December 9, 2014
Last Updated
September 10, 2016
Sponsor
West China Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02316535
Brief Title
Low-dose Capecitabine Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer
Acronym
LcACEC
Official Title
Low-dose Versus Standard-dose Capecitabine Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Chinese Elderly Patients With Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 3 Non-inferiority Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2018 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
West China Hospital
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Approximately half of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were first diagnosed after 70 years old. However, compared with younger patients, elderly patients were often undertreated in chemotherapy due to their impaired tolerance. Recently, there have been great controversy on adjuvant chemotherapy strategy for stage II/III CRC patients. As an oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine has been demonstrated to be equivalent to i.v. 5-Fu/leucovorin regimen in stage III CRC patients. In light of fewer adverse effects and better flexibility, capecitabine was regarded as an ideal alternative for elderly CRC patients, but the optimal dosage for stage II/III elderly CRC patients still remains inconclusive. Our trial expected to prospectively randomized 710 postoperative stage II/III elderly CRC patients (between 70 and 90 years of age) to adjuvant mono-chemotherapy with a standard dose of capecitabine (2500 mg/m2/day) or a reduced dose (2000 mg/m2/day). This is a non-inferiority phase 3 trial with a primary endpoint of 3-year disease free survival (DFS), and other outcomes include 3-year overall survival(OS), completion rate, toxic and adverse effects and quality of life(Qol). By this trial, we aimed to achieve more precise evidence on the individualized adjuvant chemotherapy strategy for stage II/III elderly CRC patients.
Detailed Description
An estimated 1,200,000 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer(CRC) cases arose worldwide every year, and CRC has become the third most common malignances in China. Especially in urban areas of China, rapid growth of CRC patients has considerably increased the burden of disease. It is well believed that multi-discipline treatment(MDT) including surgery, chemoradiotherapy and target therapy based on individualized characteristics will benefit CRC patients significantly.
Generally, stage II (T3-4N0M0) and stage III (TanyN1-2M0) colorectal carcinoma can be resected by surgery. In 1990s, National Institutes of Health (NIH) suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy should be applied to stage II/III CRC patients to improve their outcomes. As for stage II CRC, results from the QUASA study indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy could improve 5-year overall survival by 3% to 4% for stage II CRC patients. Currently, most of the global guidelines such as National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines still recommended adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III CRC patients.
In western countries, approximately 50% of the CRC patients were firstly diagnosed after 70 years old. It was reported that in 1980s, the median age of CRC diagnosis in China was 50. However, in 2005 it had reached 58 years old and has kept increasing in recent years. Limited by age-related organ function decline and comorbid conditions, elderly people shows impaired physical and mental tolerance for chemotherapy. Generally for stage II/III CRC patients, both elderly and younger patients shares common principles of chemotherapy, while a large-scale retrospective analysis based on the ACCENT database showed that among all the CRC cases included, patients with the age ≥ 70 only accounted for 17.1%, much lower than normal. Similarly, Shrag and colleagues reported in their investigation that the proportion of patients ≥75 years old undergoing chemotherapy was substantially lower than patients ≤ 75 years old. These evidence implied that elderly CRC patients held much lower acceptance and completion rate of chemotherapy. With respect to outcomes, a pooled analysis including 3351 CRC cases with adjuvant chemotherapy reported no significant difference on both efficacy and adverse effects among groups of various age, indicating elderly patients could achieve the same benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, it is essential to improve the acceptance and completion rate by modifying chemotherapy regimen for elderly CRC patients to achieve better prognosis. There was no random controlled trial focusing on the adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III elderly CRC patients.
Results of MOSAIC trial showed that adding oxaliplatin to 5-Fu/ leucovorin could significantly improve 5-year survival of stage II/III colon cancer patients, which made the oxaliplatin-based combine chemotherapy (Folfox, Xelox) be recommended by the latest guidelines. In the subgroup analysis of that trial, however, there was no significant improvement detected in stage II patients. Recent analysis from ACCENT database in 2013 indicated that elderly stage II/III CRC patients (≥ 70 yr) acquired no significant benefits from adding oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, which suggested monochemotherapy might be a better option for elderly CRC patients.
Capecitabine ( Xeloda®) is the unique oral prodrug of 5-Fu recommended by global guidelines and especially International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), and it has been verified by clinical trials that in view of efficacy and safety, capecitabine monochemotherapy was equivalent to i.v. 5-Fu/ leucovorin adjuvant chemotherapy. With efficacy retained, a large group of patients prefer capecitabine due to oral administration which can remarkably enhance flexibility and compliance. These advantages make capecitabine a potential ideal choice for elderly patients. According to the NCCN guideline, the standard dosage of capecitabine was 1250mg/m2 .bid. It was well-established that different characteristics such as ethnicity, age and sex could alter the metabolism and change individual tolerance for drugs; hence, there are still controversies on the optimal dose of capecitabine in different populations. The X-Act trial provided a result that among elderly patients (≥ 70 yr) undergoing standard-dose capecitabine adjuvant chemotherapy(1250mg/m2 .bid), 51% of the patients required dose reduction to complete the whole treatment cycle, implying that the recommended 1250mg/m2 .bid. might be an overdose for elderly patients given the fact that only elderly patients with relatively better health (≤ 75 yr, ECOG≤1) were eventually included in X-ACT trial. Chang and colleagues have verified feasibility of a tailored-dose strategy with a starting dose at 1000 mg/m2 .bid in a single-arm study. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has also recommended an option of 80% standard dosage (i.e. 1000 mg/m2 .bid) for elderly II/III CRC patients. However, no prospective trial has been conducted yet to confirm this reduced-dose strategy.
Based on current evidence and controversy above, we designed this non-inferiority, phase 3 clinical trial to explore the optimal dosage of capecitabine monochemotherapy for stage II/III elderly CRC patients. Following the results of sample size estimation, 710 postoperative (pT3-4NanyM0 or pTanyN+M0) elderly patients between 70 to 90 years of age were anticipated to be included and randomly divided into two groups (A and B). Patients in group A would receive the standard dose regimen (1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, and repeated on day 22); accordingly the patients in group B would receive the reduced dose regimen (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, and repeated on day 22). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease free survival (DFS), other outcomes included 3-year overall survival (OS), completion rate, toxic and adverse effects and quality of life (Qol).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Neoplasms
Keywords
colorectal cancer, stage II/III, elderly, adjuvant chemotherapy, capecitabine, non-inferiority
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
710 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
standard-dose
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
capecitabine, oral administration, 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, and repeated on day 22; 8 circles in total.
Arm Title
reduced-dose
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
capecitabine, oral administration, 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, and repeated on day 22; 8 circles in total.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Capecitabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Xeloda
Intervention Description
adjuvant chemotherapy;
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
disease free survival
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
overall survival
Time Frame
3 years
Title
toxic and adverse effects
Time Frame
30 weeks
Title
completion rate
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
quality of life
Time Frame
3 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
With informed consents
Histologically identified carcinoma of colon and rectum
pT3-4NanyM0 or pTanyN+M0(stage II/III)
age between 70 to 90
undergone R0 resection
ECOG ≤2
Stage II patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) or microsatellite low (MSL)
Exclusion Criteria:
With other types of malignances simultaneously
Creatinine clearance ≤ 70 ml/min
Undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy
In anticoagulant therapy
Pregnant or lactating women
History of antineoplastic drugs
With other contraindications for chemotherapy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yazhou He, MD
Phone
+8615196636081
Email
yazhou_he@foxmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Xiangbing Deng, MD
Phone
+8613730677124
Email
xiangbingdeng@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ziqiang Wang, MD/PhD
Organizational Affiliation
West China Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
West China Hospital
City
Chengdu
State/Province
Sichuan
ZIP/Postal Code
610000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ziqiang Wang, MD/PhD
Phone
+86-18980602028
Email
wzqtrial@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yazhou He, MD
Phone
+86-15196636081
Email
yazhou_he@foxmail.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21296855
Citation
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Erratum In: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):134.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15199089
Citation
Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR, Cohen AM, Figueredo AT, Flynn PJ, Krzyzanowska MK, Maroun J, McAllister P, Van Cutsem E, Brouwers M, Charette M, Haller DG. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 15;22(16):3408-19. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.063. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18083404
Citation
Quasar Collaborative Group; Gray R, Barnwell J, McConkey C, Hills RK, Williams NS, Kerr DJ. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet. 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61866-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15319237
Citation
Folprecht G, Cunningham D, Ross P, Glimelius B, Di Costanzo F, Wils J, Scheithauer W, Rougier P, Aranda E, Hecker H, Kohne CH. Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2004 Sep;15(9):1330-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh344.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23733765
Citation
McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Green E, Yothers G, de Gramont A, Van Cutsem E, O'Connell M, Twelves CJ, Saltz LB, Haller DG, Sargent DJ. Impact of age on the efficacy of newer adjuvant therapies in patients with stage II/III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT database. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2600-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6638. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11390534
Citation
Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Begg CB. Age and adjuvant chemotherapy use after surgery for stage III colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jun 6;93(11):850-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.11.850.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11596588
Citation
Sargent DJ, Goldberg RM, Jacobson SD, Macdonald JS, Labianca R, Haller DG, Shepherd LE, Seitz JF, Francini G. A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 11;345(15):1091-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010957.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19451431
Citation
Andre T, Boni C, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T, Topham C, Bonetti A, Clingan P, Bridgewater J, Rivera F, de Gramont A. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3109-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6771. Epub 2009 May 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18922882
Citation
Papamichael D, Audisio R, Horiot JC, Glimelius B, Sastre J, Mitry E, Van Cutsem E, Gosney M, Kohne CH, Aapro M; SIOG. Treatment of the elderly colorectal cancer patient: SIOG expert recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2009 Jan;20(1):5-16. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn532. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15026800
Citation
Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P, Bukowski RM, Cunningham D, Dufour P, Graeven U, Lokich J, Madajewicz S, Maroun JA, Marshall JL, Mitchell EP, Perez-Manga G, Rougier P, Schmiegel W, Schoelmerich J, Sobrero A, Schilsky RL. Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22;90(6):1190-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22503032
Citation
Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Muller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15987918
Citation
Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP, Abt M, Burris H 3rd, Carrato A, Cassidy J, Cervantes A, Fagerberg J, Georgoulias V, Husseini F, Jodrell D, Koralewski P, Kroning H, Maroun J, Marschner N, McKendrick J, Pawlicki M, Rosso R, Schuller J, Seitz JF, Stabuc B, Tujakowski J, Van Hazel G, Zaluski J, Scheithauer W. Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 30;352(26):2696-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043116.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21821549
Citation
Chang HJ, Lee KW, Kim JH, Bang SM, Kim YJ, Kim DW, Kang SB, Lee JS. Adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy using a tailored-dose strategy in elderly patients with colon cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):911-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr329. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26021722
Citation
He Y, Liu P, Zhang Y, Deng X, Meng W, Wei M, Yang T, Wang Z, Qiu M. Low-dose capecitabine adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly stage II/III colorectal cancer patients (LC-ACEC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 May 29;16:238. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0753-7.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.esmo.org/Guidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers
Description
ESMO guidelines for gastrointestinal cancers
Learn more about this trial
Low-dose Capecitabine Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs