search
Back to results

Combined Pressure and Flow Measurements to Guide Treatment of Coronary Stenoses (DEFINE-FLOW)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Sponsored by
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Coronary Flow Reserve

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Eligible for PCI based on local practice standards during the current procedure (PCI cannot be staged).
  • At least one epicardial stenosis of ≥50% diameter (by visual or quantitative assessment) and meeting the following criteria as determined by the operator based on either a prior or the current diagnostic angiogram:

    • <100% diameter (not a chronic, total occlusion);
    • in a native coronary artery (including side branches but excludes bypass grafts);
    • of ≥2.5mm reference diameter (near the level of the stenosis);
    • and supplies sufficiently viable myocardium (exclude regions of known, prior, transmural myocardial infarction).
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anatomic exclusions:

    • Prior CABG.
    • Preferred treatment strategy for revascularization would be CABG based on local practice standards.
    • Left main coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
    • Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding intracoronary physiologic measurements. Operators may also exclude subtotal or similar high-grade lesions, which in their judgment may be threatened by ComboWire placement.
    • Known severe LV hypertrophy (septal wall thickness at echocardiography of >13 mm).
  • Clinical exclusions:

    • Inability to receive intravenous adenosine (for example, severe reactive airway disease, marked hypotension, or high-grade AV block without pacemaker).
    • Recent (within 3 weeks prior to cardiac catheterization) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in any arterial distribution (not specifically target lesion).
    • Culprit lesions (based on clinical judgment of the operator) for either STEMI or non-STEMI cannot be included.
    • Severe cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction <30%).
    • Planned need for cardiac surgery (for example, valve surgery, treatment of aortic aneurysm, or septal myomectomy).
  • General exclusions:

    • A life expectancy of less than 2 years.
    • Inability to sign an informed consent, due to any mental condition that renders the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the trial or due to mental retardation or language barrier.
    • Potential for non-compliance towards the requirements for follow-up visits.
    • Participation or planned participation in another cardiovascular clinical trial before completing the 24 month follow-up.

Sites / Locations

  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
  • Gifu Heart Center
  • Toda Central General Hospital
  • Tokyo Medical University
  • Tsuchiura Kyodo
  • Amsterdam UMC - location AMC
  • Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc
  • Tergooi Hospital
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
  • Royal Free Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

All patients

Arm Description

All lesions undergo simultaneous assessment with a combined pressure and flow sensor

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Major adverse cardiac events
All-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, urgent and elective revascularization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) anginal class (or freedom from angina)
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) anginal class (or freedom from angina)

Full Information

First Posted
December 18, 2014
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Volcano Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02328820
Brief Title
Combined Pressure and Flow Measurements to Guide Treatment of Coronary Stenoses
Acronym
DEFINE-FLOW
Official Title
DEFINE-FLOW (Distal Evaluation of Functional Performance With Intravascular Sensors to Assess the Narrowing Effect - Combined Pressure and Doppler FLOW Velocity Measurements)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Volcano Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study evaluates the prognostic value and therapeutic potential of combined pressure and flow measurements when evaluating a coronary artery stenosis. Lesions with intact coronary flow reserve (CFR) despite a reduced fractional flow reserve (FFR) will receive optimal medical therapy. Only lesions with a simultaneous reduction in both CFR and FFR will be treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Detailed Description
Pressure and flow represent the two physiologic variables that can be measured directly inside a coronary artery. Already pressure measurements have proven their clinical value in the form of fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, myocardial function can remain intact with sufficient flow, even at a low perfusion pressure. Therefore, combined pressure and flow measurements provide a more complete description of physiologic stenosis severity as a guide to medical treatment versus revascularization. Based on existing work relating the most common flow measurement, coronary flow reserve (CFR), to FFR and linking both variables with subsequent prognosis, we hypothesize that lesions with an intact CFR>=2.0 can be reasonably treated with medical therapy despite a reduced FFR<=0.8.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Coronary Flow Reserve

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
455 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
All patients
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All lesions undergo simultaneous assessment with a combined pressure and flow sensor
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Intervention Description
For lesions with both FFR<=0.8 and CFR<2.0
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Intervention Description
For lesions with FFR>0.8 or CFR>=2.0 or both
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Major adverse cardiac events
Description
All-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, urgent and elective revascularization
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) anginal class (or freedom from angina)
Description
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) anginal class (or freedom from angina)
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years. Eligible for PCI based on local practice standards during the current procedure (PCI cannot be staged). At least one epicardial stenosis of ≥50% diameter (by visual or quantitative assessment) and meeting the following criteria as determined by the operator based on either a prior or the current diagnostic angiogram: <100% diameter (not a chronic, total occlusion); in a native coronary artery (including side branches but excludes bypass grafts); of ≥2.5mm reference diameter (near the level of the stenosis); and supplies sufficiently viable myocardium (exclude regions of known, prior, transmural myocardial infarction). Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Anatomic exclusions: Prior CABG. Preferred treatment strategy for revascularization would be CABG based on local practice standards. Left main coronary artery disease requiring revascularization. Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding intracoronary physiologic measurements. Operators may also exclude subtotal or similar high-grade lesions, which in their judgment may be threatened by ComboWire placement. Known severe LV hypertrophy (septal wall thickness at echocardiography of >13 mm). Clinical exclusions: Inability to receive intravenous adenosine (for example, severe reactive airway disease, marked hypotension, or high-grade AV block without pacemaker). Recent (within 3 weeks prior to cardiac catheterization) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in any arterial distribution (not specifically target lesion). Culprit lesions (based on clinical judgment of the operator) for either STEMI or non-STEMI cannot be included. Severe cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction <30%). Planned need for cardiac surgery (for example, valve surgery, treatment of aortic aneurysm, or septal myomectomy). General exclusions: A life expectancy of less than 2 years. Inability to sign an informed consent, due to any mental condition that renders the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the trial or due to mental retardation or language barrier. Potential for non-compliance towards the requirements for follow-up visits. Participation or planned participation in another cardiovascular clinical trial before completing the 24 month follow-up.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nils Johnson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan J Piek, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Aarhus University Hospital
City
Aarhus
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
City
Rome
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Gifu Heart Center
City
Gifu
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Toda Central General Hospital
City
Toda
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tokyo Medical University
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tsuchiura Kyodo
City
Tsuchiura
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Amsterdam UMC - location AMC
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Tergooi Hospital
City
Blaricum
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Amphia Hospital
City
Breda
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Royal Free Hospital
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22340827
Citation
Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary pathophysiology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Feb;5(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24782198
Citation
van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Delewi R, Piek MA, Chamuleau SA, Voskuil M, Henriques JP, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Siebes M, Tijssen JG, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(3):301-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001049. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35410913
Citation
Eftekhari A, Westra J, Stegehuis V, Holm NR, van de Hoef TP, Kirkeeide RL, Piek JJ, Lance Gould K, Johnson NP, Christiansen EH. Prognostic value of microvascular resistance and its association to fractional flow reserve: a DEFINE-FLOW substudy. Open Heart. 2022 Apr;9(1):e001981. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001981.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34503740
Citation
Johnson NP, Collet C. Can FFR After Stenting Help Reduce Target Vessel Failure? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1901-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.001. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32660310
Citation
Murai T, Stegehuis VE, van de Hoef TP, Wijntjens GWM, Hoshino M, Kanaji Y, Sugiyama T, Hamaya R, Nijjer SS, de Waard GA, Echavarria-Pinto M, Knaapen P, Meuwissen M, Davies JE, van Royen N, Escaned J, Siebes M, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL, Johnson NP, Piek JJ, Kakuta T. Coronary Flow Capacity to Identify Stenosis Associated With Coronary Flow Improvement After Revascularization: A Combined Analysis From DEFINE FLOW and IDEAL. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 21;9(14):e016130. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016130. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32062172
Citation
Stegehuis VE, Wijntjens GWM, van de Hoef TP, Casadonte L, Kirkeeide RL, Siebes M, Spaan JAE, Gould KL, Johnson NP, Piek JJ. Distal Evaluation of Functional performance with Intravascular sensors to assess the Narrowing Effect-combined pressure and Doppler FLOW velocity measurements (DEFINE-FLOW) trial: Rationale and trial design. Am Heart J. 2020 Apr;222:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30115688
Citation
Gould KL, Johnson NP, Roby AE, Nguyen T, Kirkeeide R, Haynie M, Lai D, Zhu H, Patel MB, Smalling R, Arain S, Balan P, Nguyen T, Estrera A, Sdringola S, Madjid M, Nascimbene A, Loyalka P, Kar B, Gregoric I, Safi H, McPherson D. Regional, Artery-Specific Thresholds of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion by PET Associated with Reduced Myocardial Infarction and Death After Revascularization in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;60(3):410-417. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.211953. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28728652
Citation
Matsumura M, Johnson NP, Fearon WF, Mintz GS, Stone GW, Oldroyd KG, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Maehara A, Jeremias A. Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: Observations From a Core Laboratory Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 24;10(14):1392-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.031.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27282899
Citation
Johnson NP, Gould KL, Di Carli MF, Taqueti VR. Invasive FFR and Noninvasive CFR in the Evaluation of Ischemia: What Is the Future? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 14;67(23):2772-2788. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.584.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27013162
Citation
Gould KL, Johnson NP. Coronary Blood Flow After Acute MI: Alternative Truths. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 28;9(6):614-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.009. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26979084
Citation
Gould KL. Intense Exercise and Native Collateral Function in Stable Moderate Coronary Artery Disease: Incidental, Causal, or Clinically Important? Circulation. 2016 Apr 12;133(15):1431-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022037. Epub 2016 Mar 15. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26068287
Citation
Gould KL, Johnson NP. Myocardial Bridges: Lessons in Clinical Coronary Pathophysiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;8(6):705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.013. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25977304
Citation
Gould KL, Johnson NP, Kaul S, Kirkeeide RL, Mintz GS, Rentrop KP, Sdringola S, Virmani R, Narula J. Patient selection for elective revascularization to reduce myocardial infarction and mortality: new lessons from randomized trials, coronary physiology, and statistics. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):e003099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.003099. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Combined Pressure and Flow Measurements to Guide Treatment of Coronary Stenoses

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs