search
Back to results

REPRISE Next Generation Delivery System (NGDS)

Primary Purpose

Aortic Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lotus Valve and LOTUS Edge Valve System
Sponsored by
Boston Scientific Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Stenosis

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥70 years of age
  2. Subject has documented calcific native aortic valve stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2) and either a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg or a jet velocity ≥4 m/s, as measured by echocardiography.
  3. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size between ≥20 and ≤27.5 mm based on pre-procedure diagnostic imaging
  4. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II.
  5. Subject is considered high risk for surgical valve replacement based on at least one of the following:

    • Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥8%, and/or
    • Agreement by the heart team (which must include an in-person evaluation by an experienced cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high operative risk of serious morbidity or mortality with surgical valve replacement.
  6. Heart team (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement
  7. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
  8. Subject, family member and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  2. Subject with an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of creatine kinase-myoglobin band (CK-MB) elevation and/or troponin level elevation).
  3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect prior to study enrollment.
  4. Subject is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level >3.0 mg/dL or 265 µml/L.
  5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic heart valve (aortic or mitral) or a prosthetic ring in any position.
  6. Subject has ≥3+ mitral regurgitation, ≥3+ aortic regurgitation or ≥3+ tricuspid regurgitation (i.e., subject cannot have more than moderate mitral, aortic or tricuspid regurgitation).
  7. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  8. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 12 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  9. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  10. Subject has Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
  11. Subject is receiving chronic (≥72 hours) anticoagulation therapy (warfarin), and cannot tolerate concomitant therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel (subjects who require chronic anticoagulation must additionally be able to be treated with either aspirin or clopidogrel).*
  12. Subject has active peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleed within the past 3 months, other bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse transfusions.
  13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all thienopyridines, heparin, nickel, titanium, or polyurethanes.
  14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, co-morbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
  15. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty and pacemaker implantation which are allowed).
  17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician, is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
  18. Subject has documented left ventricular ejection fraction <30%.
  19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
  20. Subject has severe peripheral vascular disease (including aneurysm defined as maximal luminal diameter >5 cm or with documented presence of thrombus, marked tortuosity, narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta or thick [>5 mm] protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch) or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease.
  21. Femoral artery lumen of <6.0 mm for subjects requiring 23 mm valve size or <6.5 mm for subjects requiring 27 mm valve size, or severe iliofemoral tortuosity or calcification that would prevent safe placement of the introducer sheath.
  22. Current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.).
  23. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
  24. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation.

Sites / Locations

  • Prince Charles Hospital
  • Monash Heart

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Lotus Valve and LOTUS Edge Valve System

Arm Description

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System with the Next Generation Delivery System and LOTUS Edge Valve System

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Technical Success
Defined as successful vascular access, delivery, and deployment of the Lotus Valve; successful retrieval with the Lotus Next Generation delivery system; and correct positioning of a single Lotus Valve in the proper anatomical location (reported as percent of subjects implanted with a Lotus Valve). Reported as percent of subjects.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Successful repositioning of the study valve if repositioning is attempted
Reported as percent of subjects
Successful retrieval of the study valve if retrieval is attempted
Reported as percent of subjects
Severe or moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Reported as percent of subjects
Mild, trace/trivial, or no paravalvular aortic regurgitation as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Reported as percent of subjects
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; mmHg
Effective orifice area as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; cm2
Peak aortic valve pressure gradient as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; mmHg
Peak aortic velocity as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; m/sec
Mortality: all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular
Reported as percent of subjects
Stroke: disabling and non-disabling
Reported as percent of subjects
Myocardial infarction (MI): periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure)
Reported as percent of subjects
Bleeding: life-threatening (or disabling) and major
Reported as percent of subjects
Acute kidney injury based on the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2
Reported as percent of subjects
Major vascular complications major
Reported as percent of subjects
Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy)
Reported as percent of subjects
Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)
Reported as percent of subjects
New permanent pacemaker implantation resulting from new or worsened conduction disturbances
Reported as percent of subjects
New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Reported as percent of subjects
Coronary obstruction
Reported as percent of subjects
Ventricular septal perforation
Reported as percent of subjects
Mitral apparatus damage
Reported as percent of subjects
Cardiac tamponade
Reported as percent of subjects
Prosthetic aortic valve malpositioning, including valve migration, valve embolization, or ectopic valve deployment
Reported as percent of subjects
Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-TAV deployment
Reported as percent of subjects
Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis
Reported as percent of subjects
Prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis
Reported as percent of subjects
Neurological status per modified Rankin Scale score
Reported as percent of subjects
Neurological status per National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Reported as percent of subjects
Functional Improvement from baseline per NYHA functional classification
Reported as percent of subjects

Full Information

First Posted
November 19, 2014
Last Updated
May 23, 2018
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02329496
Brief Title
REPRISE Next Generation Delivery System
Acronym
NGDS
Official Title
REPRISE NGDS: REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LotuS™ ValvE With the Next Generation Delivery System
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 3, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 6, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 19, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To confirm the acute performance and safety of the Lotus™ Valve with the Next Generation Delivery System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis who are considered high risk for surgical valve replacement.
Detailed Description
This clinical study is a prospective single-arm study designed to demonstrate that the acute performance and safety of the LOTUS Edge Valve System when used with the iSleeve Introducer Set or current Lotus Introducer Set are consistent with the results of the Lotus Valve System used in the REPRISE II study, when delivered and deployed in symptomatic subjects who have severe calcific aortic valve stenosis and who are at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Stenosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
38 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lotus Valve and LOTUS Edge Valve System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System with the Next Generation Delivery System and LOTUS Edge Valve System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Lotus Valve and LOTUS Edge Valve System
Intervention Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Lotus Valve System with the Next Generation Delivery System and LOTUS Edge Valve System, with either the Lotus Introducer or iSleeve Introducer Sets
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical Success
Description
Defined as successful vascular access, delivery, and deployment of the Lotus Valve; successful retrieval with the Lotus Next Generation delivery system; and correct positioning of a single Lotus Valve in the proper anatomical location (reported as percent of subjects implanted with a Lotus Valve). Reported as percent of subjects.
Time Frame
Immediately post-procedure (patient discharged from operative room)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Successful repositioning of the study valve if repositioning is attempted
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
Immediately post-procedure (patient discharged from operative room)
Title
Successful retrieval of the study valve if retrieval is attempted
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
Immediately post-procedure (patient discharged from operative room)
Title
Severe or moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Mild, trace/trivial, or no paravalvular aortic regurgitation as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Description
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; mmHg
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Effective orifice area as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Description
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; cm2
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Peak aortic valve pressure gradient as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Description
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; mmHg
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Peak aortic velocity as measured by echocardiography and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Description
Reported as mean ± standard deviation; m/sec
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or at 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Mortality: all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Stroke: disabling and non-disabling
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Myocardial infarction (MI): periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure)
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Bleeding: life-threatening (or disabling) and major
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Acute kidney injury based on the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
≤7 days post index procedure
Title
Major vascular complications major
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy)
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
New permanent pacemaker implantation resulting from new or worsened conduction disturbances
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Coronary obstruction
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Ventricular septal perforation
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Mitral apparatus damage
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Cardiac tamponade
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve malpositioning, including valve migration, valve embolization, or ectopic valve deployment
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-TAV deployment
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Neurological status per modified Rankin Scale score
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Neurological status per National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure
Title
Functional Improvement from baseline per NYHA functional classification
Description
Reported as percent of subjects
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is ≥70 years of age Subject has documented calcific native aortic valve stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2) and either a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg or a jet velocity ≥4 m/s, as measured by echocardiography. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size between ≥20 and ≤27.5 mm based on pre-procedure diagnostic imaging Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II. Subject is considered high risk for surgical valve replacement based on at least one of the following: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥8%, and/or Agreement by the heart team (which must include an in-person evaluation by an experienced cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high operative risk of serious morbidity or mortality with surgical valve replacement. Heart team (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent. Subject, family member and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve. Subject with an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of creatine kinase-myoglobin band (CK-MB) elevation and/or troponin level elevation). Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect prior to study enrollment. Subject is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level >3.0 mg/dL or 265 µml/L. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic heart valve (aortic or mitral) or a prosthetic ring in any position. Subject has ≥3+ mitral regurgitation, ≥3+ aortic regurgitation or ≥3+ tricuspid regurgitation (i.e., subject cannot have more than moderate mitral, aortic or tricuspid regurgitation). Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 12 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. Subject has Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3. Subject is receiving chronic (≥72 hours) anticoagulation therapy (warfarin), and cannot tolerate concomitant therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel (subjects who require chronic anticoagulation must additionally be able to be treated with either aspirin or clopidogrel).* Subject has active peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleed within the past 3 months, other bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse transfusions. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all thienopyridines, heparin, nickel, titanium, or polyurethanes. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, co-morbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty and pacemaker implantation which are allowed). Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician, is clinically significant and requires revascularization. Subject has documented left ventricular ejection fraction <30%. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices. Subject has severe peripheral vascular disease (including aneurysm defined as maximal luminal diameter >5 cm or with documented presence of thrombus, marked tortuosity, narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta or thick [>5 mm] protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch) or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease. Femoral artery lumen of <6.0 mm for subjects requiring 23 mm valve size or <6.5 mm for subjects requiring 27 mm valve size, or severe iliofemoral tortuosity or calcification that would prevent safe placement of the introducer sheath. Current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.). Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Gooley, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Monash
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Prince Charles Hospital
City
Chermside
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Monash Heart
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

REPRISE Next Generation Delivery System

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs