search
Back to results

Randomised Control Study to Asses the Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in the Management of Wound in Surgical Patient

Primary Purpose

Wound Infection, Wound Complication

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Ireland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PICO + Acticoat group
Sponsored by
St James Connolly Memorial Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Wound Infection focused on measuring Prevention of wound infection and wound complication

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. One from below:

    • High BMI
    • Malignancy
    • Malnutrition
    • T2 DM
    • Emergency surgery
    • Post radio chemotherapy
    • On steroids
    • Open colorectal resection
  2. At least two from below:

    • Smoking
    • Age>75
    • Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
  • Age < 18

Sites / Locations

  • Connolly HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PICO + Acticoat group

Standard Wound management

Arm Description

Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith & Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination.

If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Reduction in wound infection by 50%

Secondary Outcome Measures

Reduction of the length of hospital stay
Decrease antibiotics use in a wound infection management
To decrease the cost of patient treatment

Full Information

First Posted
August 4, 2014
Last Updated
January 3, 2015
Sponsor
St James Connolly Memorial Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02331485
Brief Title
Randomised Control Study to Asses the Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in the Management of Wound in Surgical Patient
Official Title
RANDOMISED CONTROL STUDY TO ASSES THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WOUND IN SURGICAL PATIENT
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
St James Connolly Memorial Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aim of the study is to assess the role of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of the complication of the laparotomy wound in the high risk patients group. Primary outcome: Reduction in wound infection rate by 50% Secondary outcome: Reduction of the length of hospital stay Decrease of using abx. for wound management Decrease cost of patient treatment
Detailed Description
Wound complications are common in general surgical patients after laparotomy. The rate of Surgical Site Infections after elective surgery ranges between 3-30%, depending of the study. There are subgroups of patients with co-morbid conditions that put them at high risk of wound complications. These co-morbid conditions include increase BMI, known malignancy, diabetes mellitus, emergency surgery, malnutrition, smoking and diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries. Management of these complicated wounds are a significant source of psychological trauma to patients and significantly increases hospital stay and cost. Since its introduction, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been used mainly to deal with chronic wounds. Mechanism of action of NPWT includes protection of wound bed, splinting of soft tissues, reduction of oedema, increasing blood perfusion of wound and enhancing granulation tissue. Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to prevent wound complications is a new concept, which has been successfully applied in acute wounds in orthopaedics, gynecological and cardiothoracic surgery patients. There is limited data about the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in high risk general surgical patients with acute wounds, but available studies suggest significant reduction in wound complication rate and hospital costs. There is a need for a randomised controlled study to assess the reduction of wound complication ratio. Patient will be randomized to two groups: Group 1. Standard wound treatment, Group 2. Treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis. Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith & Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination. Participants will be recruited from patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in Connolly Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, St Vincent University Hospital and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital based on inclusion or exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria: One from below: High BMI Malignancy Malnutrition T2 DM Emergency surgery Post radio chemotherapy On steroids Open colorectal resection At least two from below: Smoking Age>75 Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries Exclusion criteria: Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria) Age < 18 Patient who fulfills inclusion criteria will be contacted prior to surgery by a research team member. Details of the study and risks and benefits will be explained to the patient. After obtaining consent the patient will be randomized to one of two groups - standard wound treatment or negative pressure treatment - by senior research team member. depending on the randomisation patient will recived appropriate dressing. Surgical wound will be asses on day 2 to 4, on day 7 and on day 30. Prior to first dressing application, after 2-4 days and on day 30 a wound swap will be obtain for C&S. Any wound complication will be recorded in research evaluation form.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Wound Infection, Wound Complication
Keywords
Prevention of wound infection and wound complication

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PICO + Acticoat group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith & Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination.
Arm Title
Standard Wound management
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PICO + Acticoat group
Other Intervention Name(s)
PICO, Acticoat Flexi 7 dressing
Intervention Description
Comparison between Pico and Acticoat dressing change after 3 and 7 days with standard Mepor dressing change on daily basis.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reduction in wound infection by 50%
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reduction of the length of hospital stay
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Decrease antibiotics use in a wound infection management
Time Frame
1 year
Title
To decrease the cost of patient treatment
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: One from below: High BMI Malignancy Malnutrition T2 DM Emergency surgery Post radio chemotherapy On steroids Open colorectal resection At least two from below: Smoking Age>75 Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries Exclusion Criteria: Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria) Age < 18
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sebastian Krzysztof Smolarek, M.D
Phone
00353857401990
Email
sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Michal Kazanowski, M.D
Phone
0035385241368
Email
mikazanowski@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D
Organizational Affiliation
Connolly Hospital/Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas N Walsh, Professor, M.D, FRCSI
Organizational Affiliation
Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Connolly Hospital
City
Dublin
ZIP/Postal Code
16
Country
Ireland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D
Phone
0857401990
Email
sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michal Kazanowski, M.D
Email
mikazanowski@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas N Walsh, Prof, M.D, FRCSI
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michal Kazanowski, M.D
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mayilone Arumugasamy, M.D, FRCSI

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24440649
Citation
Lewis LS, Convery PA, Bolac CS, Valea FA, Lowery WJ, Havrilesky LJ. Cost of care using prophylactic negative pressure wound vacuum on closed laparotomy incisions. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23981819
Citation
Ousey KJ, Atkinson RA, Williamson JB, Lui S. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for spinal wounds: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23539123
Citation
Hansen E, Durinka JB, Costanzo JA, Austin MS, Deirmengian GK. Negative pressure wound therapy is associated with resolution of incisional drainage in most wounds after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3230-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2937-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23111014
Citation
Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22901916
Citation
Stoffan AP, Ricca R, Lien C, Quigley S, Linden BC. Use of negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal wounds in neonates and infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug;47(8):1555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.014.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Randomised Control Study to Asses the Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in the Management of Wound in Surgical Patient

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs