search
Back to results

Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (HOVER) (HOVER)

Primary Purpose

Tricuspid Regurgitation

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava
Sponsored by
Henry Ford Health System
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tricuspid Regurgitation

Eligibility Criteria

22 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must be at least 21 years old.
  2. The patient must have severe, symptomatic (ACC/AHA Stage D symptoms) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as assessed by 2D echocardiogram with evidence of peripheral and central venous congestion (specifically lower extremity edema and abdominal ascites requiring diuretics.)
  3. The patient must be evaluated by a "heart team" of physicians including an interventional cardiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, heart failure specialist, and imaging specialist, and presented for review at a local multi-disciplinary conference. By consensus, the heart team must agree (and verify in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
  4. The heart team must agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Also, other factors which may increase the patients perceived surgical risk for inclusion in the trial will be clearly delineated if they are present. These include, but are not limited to the following as defined by VARC 2: Frailty, Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, IMA or other critical conduit crossing the midline or adherent to the posterior table of sternum, severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The surgeons' consultation notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion. At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have interviewed and examined the patient.
  5. The study patient provides informed consent and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits, including annual visits up to 5 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient to be a good surgical candidate).
  2. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
  3. Untreated, severe, left sided valvular heart disease including mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and aortic regurgitation or stenosis.
  4. Mean pulmonary artery pressures ≥40mmHG and PVR >4 woods units as assessed by right heart catheterization.
  5. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure. Examples of permanent implant would include any new heart valve. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is excluded.
  6. Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
  7. Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt < 50,000 cell/mL).
  8. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
  9. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  10. Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%.
  11. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  12. Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure.
  13. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
  14. Recent CVA clinically confirmed (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure.
  15. Estimated life expectancy < 1 year from conditions other than TR.
  16. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of tricuspid regurgitation
  17. Currently participating in another investigational cardiac device study or any other clinical trial, including drugs or biologics. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
  18. Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure.
  19. Patients with signs or symptoms of SVC syndrome, or hepatic cirrhosis not felt due to passive congestion from TR.

20: Subject unable to personally provide informed consent 21. FEV1<30% of predicted 22. Model for End State Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥21 (calculated per reference study.

Sites / Locations

  • Henry Ford Hosptial

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

Arm Description

This is a non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Procedural success
Procedural success will include both device success and no device/procedure related SAE's including: all death, all stroke, MI, new AKI grade 3, life threatening bleeding, major vascular complications (arterial or venous-requiring unplanned intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, SVC syndrome
Individual patient success
Individual patient success is defined by device success and the following: no re-hospitalizations for right sided heart failure or right sided heart failure equivalents including drainage of ascites or pleural effusions, new listing for heart transplant, VAD, or other mechanical support; improvement in one of three variables: KCCQ improvement>15 vs. baseline; 6MWT improvement> 70 meters vs. baseline; or VO2 peak improvement > 6% vs baseline..

Secondary Outcome Measures

LE edema
Improvement in LE edema measured by the Villalta Scale
Stroke and TIA
Occurrence of stroke or TIA by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria
Mortality
Death
Myocardial Infarction
Occurrence of MI by VARC-2
Acute kidney injury
Occurrence of acute kidney injury by VARC-2
Major vascular complications
Occurrence of major vascular complications by VARC-2
EORTC QLQ-C30
Improvement in Quality of Life questionnaire
ESAS-AM
Improvement in Quality of Life questionnaire

Full Information

First Posted
January 13, 2015
Last Updated
September 20, 2023
Sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02339974
Brief Title
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (HOVER)
Acronym
HOVER
Official Title
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation HOVER Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Henry Ford Health System

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine the short term safety (<30 days) and efficacy (6 months) of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective multi-center, non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT or S3 valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tricuspid Regurgitation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
6 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This is a non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedural success
Description
Procedural success will include both device success and no device/procedure related SAE's including: all death, all stroke, MI, new AKI grade 3, life threatening bleeding, major vascular complications (arterial or venous-requiring unplanned intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, SVC syndrome
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Individual patient success
Description
Individual patient success is defined by device success and the following: no re-hospitalizations for right sided heart failure or right sided heart failure equivalents including drainage of ascites or pleural effusions, new listing for heart transplant, VAD, or other mechanical support; improvement in one of three variables: KCCQ improvement>15 vs. baseline; 6MWT improvement> 70 meters vs. baseline; or VO2 peak improvement > 6% vs baseline..
Time Frame
30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
LE edema
Description
Improvement in LE edema measured by the Villalta Scale
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
Stroke and TIA
Description
Occurrence of stroke or TIA by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
Mortality
Description
Death
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
Myocardial Infarction
Description
Occurrence of MI by VARC-2
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
Acute kidney injury
Description
Occurrence of acute kidney injury by VARC-2
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
Major vascular complications
Description
Occurrence of major vascular complications by VARC-2
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
EORTC QLQ-C30
Description
Improvement in Quality of Life questionnaire
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years
Title
ESAS-AM
Description
Improvement in Quality of Life questionnaire
Time Frame
30 days, 6 months, annually to 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients must be at least 21 years old. The patient must have severe, symptomatic (ACC/AHA Stage D symptoms) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as assessed by 2D echocardiogram with evidence of peripheral and central venous congestion (specifically lower extremity edema and abdominal ascites requiring diuretics.) The patient must be evaluated by a "heart team" of physicians including an interventional cardiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, heart failure specialist, and imaging specialist, and presented for review at a local multi-disciplinary conference. By consensus, the heart team must agree (and verify in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient. The heart team must agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Also, other factors which may increase the patients perceived surgical risk for inclusion in the trial will be clearly delineated if they are present. These include, but are not limited to the following as defined by VARC 2: Frailty, Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, IMA or other critical conduit crossing the midline or adherent to the posterior table of sternum, severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The surgeons' consultation notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion. At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have interviewed and examined the patient. The study patient provides informed consent and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits, including annual visits up to 5 years. Exclusion Criteria: Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient to be a good surgical candidate). Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)]. Untreated, severe, left sided valvular heart disease including mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and aortic regurgitation or stenosis. Mean pulmonary artery pressures ≥40mmHG and PVR >4 woods units as assessed by right heart catheterization. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure. Examples of permanent implant would include any new heart valve. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is excluded. Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt < 50,000 cell/mL). Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation. Need for emergency surgery for any reason. Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure. Recent CVA clinically confirmed (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure. Estimated life expectancy < 1 year from conditions other than TR. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of tricuspid regurgitation Currently participating in another investigational cardiac device study or any other clinical trial, including drugs or biologics. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure. Patients with signs or symptoms of SVC syndrome, or hepatic cirrhosis not felt due to passive congestion from TR. 20: Subject unable to personally provide informed consent 21. FEV1<30% of predicted 22. Model for End State Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥21 (calculated per reference study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian P O'Neill, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Henry Ford Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Henry Ford Hosptial
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (HOVER)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs