search
Back to results

Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cooled Radiofrequency
Corticosteroid injection
Sponsored by
Halyard Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis of the Knee focused on measuring cooled radiofrequency ablation, knee pain, osteoarthritis, pain management

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Age ≥ 21 years
  2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures
  3. History of chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months unresponsive to conservative treatments (PT, oral analgesics, intra-articular injections with steroids and/or viscosupplementation)
  4. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a geniculate nerve block of the index knee
  5. Pain on NRS ≥ 6 on a 10 point scale for the index knee
  6. Radiologic confirmation of osteoarthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 12 months for the index knee
  7. Oxford Knee Score group at Baseline of ≤ 35 indicating moderate to severe OA in the index knee
  8. If the patient is taking an opioid or other morphine equivalent medication, the dose must be considered clinically stable (defined as <10% change in dosage for ≥ 2 months prior to the screening visit).
  9. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin and antidepressants for pain such as Cymbalta must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of investigator. Agree to see one pain doctor (study investigator) for knee pain during the study period
  10. Index knee pathology that is consistent with generally accepted indications for total knee arthroplasty.
  11. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for 12 months.
  12. Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Pseudo arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory arthritis condition that could cause knee pain.
  2. Previous or pending lower limb amputation.
  3. Intra-articular steroid, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or hyaluronic acid injections in the index knee within 90 days from the screening visit.
  4. An intra-articular corticosteroid injection is not indicated as an appropriate treatment option.
  5. Prior radiofrequency of the genicular nerves of the index knee.
  6. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty in index knee.
  7. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee.
  8. Evidence of structural abnormality other than osteoarthritis of knee, hip or back that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain.
  9. BMI > 40.
  10. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns.
  11. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability remuneration (secondary gain) related to knee.
  12. Pregnant or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period.
  13. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction.
  14. Beck's Depression Index score of > 22 (indicates clinically depressed state).
  15. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedure.
  16. Systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved).
  17. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable.
  18. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol.
  19. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance or alcohol abuse.
  20. Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to greater than 60 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose.
  21. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.)
  22. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker or defibrillator.
  23. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
  24. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements.

Sites / Locations

  • Valley Anesthesiology Consultants - Estrella
  • Valley Anesthesiology Consultants/Valley Pain Consultants
  • Orthopedic Pain Specialists
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • MAPS Applied Research Center, Inc.
  • Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
  • Center for Clinical Research
  • Drexel University
  • Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management
  • Virginia iSpine Physicians
  • Advanced Pain Management

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cooled radiofrequency

Corticosteroid injection

Arm Description

Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to study subjects' knees to ablate culprit sensory nerves and reduce knee pain

Corticosteroid injections will be administered to study subjects' knees to reduce knee pain

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain".
Safety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.
Safety Endpoint: Number of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Numeric Rating Scale
The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain".
Oxford Knee Score
Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. The Oxford Knee Score is determined by a 12-question survey that measures knee function, and is scored on a scale that ranges from 0 - 48 points, with scores of 0 - 19 = "severe arthritis", 20 - 29 = "moderate to severe arthritis", 30 - 39 = "mild to moderate arthritis", and 40 - 48 = "satisfactory joint function".

Full Information

First Posted
January 15, 2015
Last Updated
May 9, 2019
Sponsor
Halyard Health
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02343003
Brief Title
Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain
Official Title
A Prospective, Multi-Center, RCT Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Coolief™ Cooled Radiofrequency Probe to Create Lesions of the Genicular Nerves and Comparing Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 16, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Halyard Health

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed to: Determine the effectiveness (primarily measured by pain relief) of Coolief when used to create radiofrequency lesions of the genicular nerves compared to pain relief following corticosteroid injection; and Confirm the safety of Coolief when used to perform radiofrequency lesions of the genicular nerves in subjects to manage knee pain compared to safety of corticosteroid injection
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects having knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with the Coolief system compared to subjects receiving corticosteroid injection. A total of approximately 144 subjects will be enrolled into this study with subjects undergoing either radiofrequency neurotomy or corticosteroid injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow up will be conducted for a total of 12 months post Coolief procedure with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Subjects randomized to the comparison (corticosteroid) group will have the option to cross over to the neurotomy group after completing the 6 month endpoint assessment. They would then be followed for an additional 6 months. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups in order to determine success. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS scale at 6 Months. Primary Safety Endpoint: The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoints: The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. Tertiary Effectiveness Endpoint: Subject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months. Quaternary Effectiveness Endpoint: Reduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage. In addition, exploratory analyses of health economic indicators may be performed. Subjects will participate in the study for up to 13 months (2 week roll-in period + treatment visit + 12 month follow up), except for subjects who participate in the optional crossover group. These crossover subjects will be on study for up to 15 months (2 week roll-in + treatment + 6 month follow-up and crossover + 6 month follow up). Enrollment is anticipated to take approximately 6-8 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Keywords
cooled radiofrequency ablation, knee pain, osteoarthritis, pain management

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
151 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cooled radiofrequency
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to study subjects' knees to ablate culprit sensory nerves and reduce knee pain
Arm Title
Corticosteroid injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Corticosteroid injections will be administered to study subjects' knees to reduce knee pain
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cooled Radiofrequency
Other Intervention Name(s)
Coolief
Intervention Description
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Corticosteroid injection
Intervention Description
Delivery of corticosteroid into knee by injection with needle to reduce knee pain
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain".
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Safety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.
Description
Safety Endpoint: Number of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric Rating Scale
Description
The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain".
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. The Oxford Knee Score is determined by a 12-question survey that measures knee function, and is scored on a scale that ranges from 0 - 48 points, with scores of 0 - 19 = "severe arthritis", 20 - 29 = "moderate to severe arthritis", 30 - 39 = "mild to moderate arthritis", and 40 - 48 = "satisfactory joint function".
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Subject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater
Description
Subject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months. The study subjects' perception of treatment effect was reflected by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE). The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever".
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Medication Usage
Description
Reduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA Age ≥ 21 years Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures History of chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months unresponsive to conservative treatments (PT, oral analgesics, intra-articular injections with steroids and/or viscosupplementation) Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a geniculate nerve block of the index knee Pain on NRS ≥ 6 on a 10 point scale for the index knee Radiologic confirmation of osteoarthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 12 months for the index knee Oxford Knee Score group at Baseline of ≤ 35 indicating moderate to severe OA in the index knee If the patient is taking an opioid or other morphine equivalent medication, the dose must be considered clinically stable (defined as <10% change in dosage for ≥ 2 months prior to the screening visit). Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin and antidepressants for pain such as Cymbalta must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of investigator. Agree to see one pain doctor (study investigator) for knee pain during the study period Index knee pathology that is consistent with generally accepted indications for total knee arthroplasty. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for 12 months. Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Pseudo arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory arthritis condition that could cause knee pain. Previous or pending lower limb amputation. Intra-articular steroid, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or hyaluronic acid injections in the index knee within 90 days from the screening visit. An intra-articular corticosteroid injection is not indicated as an appropriate treatment option. Prior radiofrequency of the genicular nerves of the index knee. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty in index knee. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee. Evidence of structural abnormality other than osteoarthritis of knee, hip or back that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain. BMI > 40. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability remuneration (secondary gain) related to knee. Pregnant or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction. Beck's Depression Index score of > 22 (indicates clinically depressed state). Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedure. Systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved). History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance or alcohol abuse. Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to greater than 60 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.) Subject currently implanted with pacemaker or defibrillator. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David T Curd, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Halyard Health, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Valley Anesthesiology Consultants - Estrella
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Valley Anesthesiology Consultants/Valley Pain Consultants
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85254
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Pain Specialists
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
MAPS Applied Research Center, Inc.
City
Maple Grove
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55369
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Clinical Research
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drexel University
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29622
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia iSpine Physicians
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Pain Management
City
Greenfield
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53221
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30772821
Citation
Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, Hunter C, Lindley DA, Patel N, Choi D, Soloman M, Gupta A, Desai M, Cook E, Kapural L. Twelve-month analgesia and rescue, by cooled radiofrequency ablation treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain: results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, cross-over trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 16:rapm-2018-100051. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100051. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29095245
Citation
Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, Hunter C, Lindley D, Patel N, Choi D, Soloman M, Gupta A, Desai M, Buvanendran A, Kapural L. Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation With Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain From Osteoarthritis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jan;43(1):84-91. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000690.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs