search
Back to results

A Trial of Sertraline vs. CBT for End-stage Renal Disease Patients With Depression {ASCEND} (ASCEND)

Primary Purpose

Depression, End Stage Renal Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Engagement Interview
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Antidepressant Drug Therapy
Sponsored by
University of Washington
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression focused on measuring Comorbid Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymia, Cognitive Behavioral therapy (CBT), Sertraline, Engagement Interview, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Hemodialysis

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 21 years;
  2. Undergoing thrice-weekly maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months;
  3. Able to speak either English or Spanish;
  4. BDI-II score ≥ 15; and
  5. Meets diagnostic criteria for either current major depressive episode or dysthymia on the MINI.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active suicidal intent;
  2. Ongoing psychotherapy or current treatment with certain anti-depressant drugs;
  3. Evidence of cognitive impairment on Mini-Cog;
  4. Present or past psychosis or bipolar disorder I or II on the MINI;
  5. Alcohol or substance abuse diagnosed on the MINI or history of such abuse in the past three months;
  6. Life expectancy < 3 months, in the judgment of the site principal investigator;
  7. Anticipated to receive living related donor kidney transplantation within 3 months;
  8. Pregnancy, or lactation, or women of childbearing age not willing to use adequate birth control;
  9. Clinical and/or laboratory evidence of chronic liver disease;
  10. History of significant active bleeding in the past three months, such as hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding;
  11. Current use of class I anti-arrhythmic medications (e.g., propafenone, flecainide), pimozide, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, reserpine, guanethidine, cimetidine, tri-cyclic anti-depressants, triptans, tramadol, linezolid, tryptophan, and St. John's wort; and
  12. Known hypersensitivity to sertraline.

Sites / Locations

  • University of New Mexico
  • University of Texas Southwestern
  • University of Washington

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Engagement Interview

Control Visit

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Antidepressant Drug Therapy

Observational Cohort

Arm Description

Subjects will be randomly assigned to engagement interview or a control visit.Trained CBT therapists at each of the three sites will conduct the engagement interview. The session will be aimed at improving the acceptance of the diagnosis of depression by patients and treatment for the same.

Subjects will be randomly assigned to engagement interview or a control visit. Individuals assigned to control visit will be scheduled for a follow-up discussion with a member of the research team. During this session, they will be informed of the diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia, the options for treatment available through the clinical trial, and alternatives should they decline participation in the clinical trial.

The subjects will be randomly assigned to individual CBT or sertraline drug therapy using block randomization. Individuals will undergo 10 CBT sessions of 60 minutes each, by a trained therapist in the dialysis facility (8 weekly sessions; then every other week x 2). The CBT will be administered while the patient is undergoing HD; however, alternative arrangements will be made upon individual patient's preferences.

The subjects will be randomly assigned to individual CBT or sertraline drug therapy using block randomization. Anti-Depressant Drug Therapy will be delivered with sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and the dose will be titrated using the Measurement Based Care Protocol.

Subjects who (1) are not willing to participate in the clinical trial and (2) do not find any treatment acceptable outside the clinical trial will be invited to participate in the prospective observational cohort for serial assessment of depressive symptoms.These subjects will only undergo assessment of severity of depressive symptoms at weeks 0, 6, and 12 using QIDS-C.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Initiated Depression Treatment
The primary measure of efficacy of the Engagement Interview will be the number of patients undergoing hemodialysis with co-morbid depression who initiate treatment for the condition. This will be defined as one of the following: Completing at least one psychotherapy session either as a part of the clinical trial or in the community within four weeks of establishing a diagnosis of major depression and/or dysthymia. Receiving a supply of anti-depressant drug either as a part of the clinical trial or the treating physician within four weeks of establishing a diagnosis of major depression and/or dysthymia.
QIDS-C Score
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician-rated (QIDS-C) scale ranges from 0-27, higher scores indicate worse depression. The primary measure of efficacy of Intervention will be the mean difference in QIDS-C score at Week 12 between treatment groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Accepted Depression Treatment
The secondary measure of efficacy of the Engagement Interview will be the % of patients undergoing hemodialysis with co-morbid depression who are willing to accept treatment. This will be measured by the patient's intent and will be defined as one of the following: Signing the informed consent to be randomly assigned to individual CBT or drug therapy Receiving a referral by the research team and/or primary care physician and/or treating nephrologist to a therapist for psychotherapy in the community. Receiving a prescription for anti-depressant drug therapy from primary care physician and/or treating nephrologist within two weeks of establishing a diagnosis of major depression/dysthymia.
BDI-II
Beck Depression Inventory-II, range 0-63, higher scores indicate worse depression
GAD-7
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, range 0-21, higher scores indicate worse anxiety
Sheehan Disability Scale
range 0-30, higher scores indicate worse disability
SF-36 Energy/Vitality
Energy/vitality subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, range 0-100, higher scores indicate better energy/vitality
Global Quality of Life Scale
range 0-10, higher scores indicate better quality of life
Satisfaction With Life Scale
range 1-35, higher scores indicate better satisfaction
Perceived Social Support
Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, range 1-7, higher scores indicate better social support
PSQI
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, range 0-21, higher scores indicate worse sleep quality
Exercise
Single item activity measure, range 1-6, higher indicates less activity
Percentage of Dialysis Treatment Sessions Skipped and/or Shortened
Treatment Adherence with Dialysis as defined by the percentage of all dialysis sessions skipped and/or requested by the patient to be shortened by ≥ 10 minutes over the 12-week intervention period. Dialysis sessions missed due to hospitalization will not be included as a skipped treatment.
Percent Inter-dialytic Weight Gain
Treatment Adherence with Fluid Intake as defined by inter-dialytic weight gain (as % of post-dialysis weight) during Week 12 of the study
Serum Phosphorus Level
Treatment Adherence with Diet and/or Medications as defined by Serum phosphorus level measured as a part of routine clinical care during the third month of participation in the study.

Full Information

First Posted
January 13, 2015
Last Updated
July 3, 2019
Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
University of Texas, University of New Mexico, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02358343
Brief Title
A Trial of Sertraline vs. CBT for End-stage Renal Disease Patients With Depression {ASCEND}
Acronym
ASCEND
Official Title
ASCEND: A Trial of Sertraline vs. CBT for End-stage Renal Disease Patients With Depression
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 23, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 15, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 15, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
University of Texas, University of New Mexico, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients whose kidneys fail generally require dialysis treatments to sustain life. The ability of patients to make major adjustments in their lives for dialysis is hampered by depression that affects almost one-quarter of such individuals. There are no studies that have adequately tested whether treatment of depression is effective in dialysis patients and if there is any difference between the response to the two most commonly available forms of treatment, psychotherapy and anti-depressant drug therapy. To fill this important gap in the investigators knowledge, the investigators propose to undertake (1) a randomized controlled clinical trial of 200 patients to test whether an engagement interview will result in a higher proportion of dialysis patients accepting treatment for depression; and (2) a randomized controlled clinical trial of 120 patients to determine whether there is any difference in the likelihood of improvement of depressive symptoms with psychotherapy or drug therapy among dialysis patients with depression. Patients in these studies will be enrolled from among individuals receiving care in 50 dialysis facilities in three metropolitan areas - Seattle, Dallas, and Albuquerque. The research proposal has been developed with the support of patients, caregivers, and stakeholders to ensure that the findings from the study are relevant to them and can be readily implemented in day-to-day clinical practice. Hence, the engagement interview and psychotherapy will be delivered in a dialysis facility to ease the burden on patients, and the dose of the study drug will be changed in partnership with the study participants. In addition to depressive symptoms, the effect of treatment on other meaningful outcomes such as fatigue and sleep will be determined. The two forms of treatment for depression being tested in this clinical trial are very different from each other and patients differ with regards to the treatment option preferable and/or available to them. Successful completion of the clinical trial will provide patients, caregivers, and other stakeholders with the information that they would need when faced with a diagnosis of depression in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This will allow patients to select evidence-based treatments to improve outcomes that are relevant to them.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND Patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) have to adjust to complex treatment regimens, and experience frequent care transitions. This is compounded by a four-fold higher prevalence of comorbid depression than in the general population, which is strongly associated with poor patient-centered outcomes. Yet, depression is often not diagnosed when present, not treated when identified, and many HD patients are reluctant to accept treatment. This is likely a result of lack of high-quality evidence for the efficacy of different treatment options for comorbid depression in HD patients. OBJECTIVES Conduct an open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial among HD patients with comorbid depression to (1) compare the efficacy of an engagement interview with usual care in increasing acceptability of treatment (n=200); and (2) compare the efficacy of 12 weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or anti-depressant drug therapy (sertraline) for reducing the severity of depressive symptoms, and other meaningful outcomes (n=120). METHODS HD patients in up to 50 dialysis facilities in three different regions (Albuquerque, NM; Dallas, TX; Seattle, WA) will be pre-screened for the presence of clinically significant depressive symptoms. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia will be randomly assigned to an engagement interview or usual care to determine efficacy in increasing acceptability of treatment (n=200). Individuals who agree to treatment will be randomly assigned to individual CBT or drug therapy. CBT will be administered in a dialysis facility by a trained therapist. Sertraline will be titrated to the maximum tolerated dose using Measurement Based Care, a model of shared-decision-making. Patient-reported outcomes will be measured by a single assessor for all three sites, blinded to the treatment assignment. The primary efficacy measure will be a change in severity of depressive symptoms; secondary outcome measures will assess other important patient-reported outcomes such as somatic symptom burden, functioning, and adherence with dialysis treatment, diet, and medications. The longitudinal evolution of symptoms in patients who refuse to accept any treatment either within or outside the clinical trial will also be studied (n=40). PATIENT OUTCOMES (PROJECTED) This study will provide answers to three questions faced by HD patients with clinically significant depressive symptoms: (1) "Given my preferences, what should I expect will happen to me?"; (2) "What are my options, and what are the potential benefits and harms of these options?"; and (3) "What can I do to improve the outcomes that are most important to me?" Oversight of study will be provided by separate Patient Council and Stakeholder Council to align with PCORI's mission of generating high-integrity, evidence-based information from research guided by patients, caregivers, and broader health care community.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression, End Stage Renal Disease
Keywords
Comorbid Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymia, Cognitive Behavioral therapy (CBT), Sertraline, Engagement Interview, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Hemodialysis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
184 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Engagement Interview
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomly assigned to engagement interview or a control visit.Trained CBT therapists at each of the three sites will conduct the engagement interview. The session will be aimed at improving the acceptance of the diagnosis of depression by patients and treatment for the same.
Arm Title
Control Visit
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomly assigned to engagement interview or a control visit. Individuals assigned to control visit will be scheduled for a follow-up discussion with a member of the research team. During this session, they will be informed of the diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia, the options for treatment available through the clinical trial, and alternatives should they decline participation in the clinical trial.
Arm Title
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The subjects will be randomly assigned to individual CBT or sertraline drug therapy using block randomization. Individuals will undergo 10 CBT sessions of 60 minutes each, by a trained therapist in the dialysis facility (8 weekly sessions; then every other week x 2). The CBT will be administered while the patient is undergoing HD; however, alternative arrangements will be made upon individual patient's preferences.
Arm Title
Antidepressant Drug Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The subjects will be randomly assigned to individual CBT or sertraline drug therapy using block randomization. Anti-Depressant Drug Therapy will be delivered with sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and the dose will be titrated using the Measurement Based Care Protocol.
Arm Title
Observational Cohort
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Subjects who (1) are not willing to participate in the clinical trial and (2) do not find any treatment acceptable outside the clinical trial will be invited to participate in the prospective observational cohort for serial assessment of depressive symptoms.These subjects will only undergo assessment of severity of depressive symptoms at weeks 0, 6, and 12 using QIDS-C.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Engagement Interview
Intervention Description
An Engagement Interview will comprise a one-on-one session with the patient, during which the health-care provider will use reflective statements and non-judgmental listening techniques, will explore barriers to treatment, and will help patient articulate ambivalence about engaging in treatment. This session will be enhanced with a 40-minute DVD that the subject will watch with the therapist in the dialysis facility. The subject will be encouraged to take the DVD home with them and watch it with their family members as well.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
CBT
Intervention Description
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a short-term psychotherapy that will focus on how the individual is thinking, behaving, and communicating today rather than on their childhood experience. The therapist will assist the patient in identifying specific distortions (cognitive assessment) and biases in thinking and will provide guidance on how to change this thinking. During the course of intervention, study subjects will undergo assessment of severity of depressive symptoms using Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) every two weeks for the first six weeks (weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6) and every three weeks for the next six weeks (weeks 9 and 12).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Antidepressant Drug Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sertraline, "Zoloft"
Intervention Description
The site investigators will prescribe sertraline drug at a starting dose of 25 mg oral tablets. Dose titration will be implemented using standardized assessments of depressive symptoms and drug side effects; and the research team and the patient make joint decisions to maintain, increase, or decrease the dose. This will help establish the highest effective but tolerable dose tailored for each patient. The QIDS-SR scale will be used to assess the clinical response for dose titration. The FIBSER scale will be used to assess side effects and the degree to which they interfere with day-to-day functions. The participant-specific dose at week 6, up to a maximum of 200 mg/d, will be continued for the remaining 6 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Initiated Depression Treatment
Description
The primary measure of efficacy of the Engagement Interview will be the number of patients undergoing hemodialysis with co-morbid depression who initiate treatment for the condition. This will be defined as one of the following: Completing at least one psychotherapy session either as a part of the clinical trial or in the community within four weeks of establishing a diagnosis of major depression and/or dysthymia. Receiving a supply of anti-depressant drug either as a part of the clinical trial or the treating physician within four weeks of establishing a diagnosis of major depression and/or dysthymia.
Time Frame
within four weeks of engagement interview or control visit
Title
QIDS-C Score
Description
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician-rated (QIDS-C) scale ranges from 0-27, higher scores indicate worse depression. The primary measure of efficacy of Intervention will be the mean difference in QIDS-C score at Week 12 between treatment groups.
Time Frame
Week 12 of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Accepted Depression Treatment
Description
The secondary measure of efficacy of the Engagement Interview will be the % of patients undergoing hemodialysis with co-morbid depression who are willing to accept treatment. This will be measured by the patient's intent and will be defined as one of the following: Signing the informed consent to be randomly assigned to individual CBT or drug therapy Receiving a referral by the research team and/or primary care physician and/or treating nephrologist to a therapist for psychotherapy in the community. Receiving a prescription for anti-depressant drug therapy from primary care physician and/or treating nephrologist within two weeks of establishing a diagnosis of major depression/dysthymia.
Time Frame
within two weeks of engagement interview or control visit
Title
BDI-II
Description
Beck Depression Inventory-II, range 0-63, higher scores indicate worse depression
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
GAD-7
Description
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, range 0-21, higher scores indicate worse anxiety
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Sheehan Disability Scale
Description
range 0-30, higher scores indicate worse disability
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
SF-36 Energy/Vitality
Description
Energy/vitality subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, range 0-100, higher scores indicate better energy/vitality
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Global Quality of Life Scale
Description
range 0-10, higher scores indicate better quality of life
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Satisfaction With Life Scale
Description
range 1-35, higher scores indicate better satisfaction
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Perceived Social Support
Description
Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, range 1-7, higher scores indicate better social support
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
PSQI
Description
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, range 0-21, higher scores indicate worse sleep quality
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Exercise
Description
Single item activity measure, range 1-6, higher indicates less activity
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Dialysis Treatment Sessions Skipped and/or Shortened
Description
Treatment Adherence with Dialysis as defined by the percentage of all dialysis sessions skipped and/or requested by the patient to be shortened by ≥ 10 minutes over the 12-week intervention period. Dialysis sessions missed due to hospitalization will not be included as a skipped treatment.
Time Frame
Over 12 Weeks
Title
Percent Inter-dialytic Weight Gain
Description
Treatment Adherence with Fluid Intake as defined by inter-dialytic weight gain (as % of post-dialysis weight) during Week 12 of the study
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Serum Phosphorus Level
Description
Treatment Adherence with Diet and/or Medications as defined by Serum phosphorus level measured as a part of routine clinical care during the third month of participation in the study.
Time Frame
Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 21 years; Undergoing thrice-weekly maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months; Able to speak either English or Spanish; BDI-II score ≥ 15; and Meets diagnostic criteria for either current major depressive episode or dysthymia on the MINI. Exclusion Criteria: Active suicidal intent; Ongoing psychotherapy or current treatment with certain anti-depressant drugs; Evidence of cognitive impairment on Mini-Cog; Present or past psychosis or bipolar disorder I or II on the MINI; Alcohol or substance abuse diagnosed on the MINI or history of such abuse in the past three months; Life expectancy < 3 months, in the judgment of the site principal investigator; Anticipated to receive living related donor kidney transplantation within 3 months; Pregnancy, or lactation, or women of childbearing age not willing to use adequate birth control; Clinical and/or laboratory evidence of chronic liver disease; History of significant active bleeding in the past three months, such as hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding; Current use of class I anti-arrhythmic medications (e.g., propafenone, flecainide), pimozide, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, reserpine, guanethidine, cimetidine, tri-cyclic anti-depressants, triptans, tramadol, linezolid, tryptophan, and St. John's wort; and Known hypersensitivity to sertraline.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rajnish Mehrotra, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Washington
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of New Mexico
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87131
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Southwestern
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16310620
Citation
Davison SN, Jhangri GS. The impact of chronic pain on depression, sleep, and the desire to withdraw from dialysis in hemodialysis patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Nov;30(5):465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.05.013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15975996
Citation
Weisbord SD, Fried LF, Arnold RM, Fine MJ, Levenson DJ, Peterson RA, Switzer GE. Prevalence, severity, and importance of physical and emotional symptoms in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Aug;16(8):2487-94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005020157. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16598203
Citation
Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Kuchibhatla M, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA. The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006 May;69(9):1662-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000308.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10792629
Citation
Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Alleyne S, Cruz I, Veis JH. Multiple measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int. 2000 May;57(5):2093-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00059.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18580856
Citation
Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Briley LP, Sloane RJ, Pieper CF, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA. Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney Int. 2008 Oct;74(7):930-6. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.311. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
Results Reference
background
Citation
System, U.S.R.D., US Department of Public Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 2012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12169073
Citation
Glassman AH, O'Connor CM, Califf RM, Swedberg K, Schwartz P, Bigger JT Jr, Krishnan KR, van Zyl LT, Swenson JR, Finkel MS, Landau C, Shapiro PA, Pepine CJ, Mardekian J, Harrison WM, Barton D, Mclvor M; Sertraline Antidepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHEART) Group. Sertraline treatment of major depression in patients with acute MI or unstable angina. JAMA. 2002 Aug 14;288(6):701-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.6.701. Erratum In: JAMA 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1720.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19242502
Citation
Cukor D, Rosenthal DS, Jindal RM, Brown CD, Kimmel PL. Depression is an important contributor to low medication adherence in hemodialyzed patients and transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2009 Jun;75(11):1223-1229. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.51. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11773470
Citation
Kutner NG, Zhang R, McClellan WM, Cole SA. Psychosocial predictors of non-compliance in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Jan;17(1):93-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.93.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17702730
Citation
Weisbord SD, Fried LF, Mor MK, Resnick AL, Unruh ML, Palevsky PM, Levenson DJ, Cooksey SH, Fine MJ, Kimmel PL, Arnold RM. Renal provider recognition of symptoms in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;2(5):960-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00990207. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24115478
Citation
Cukor D, Ver Halen N, Asher DR, Coplan JD, Weedon J, Wyka KE, Saggi SJ, Kimmel PL. Psychosocial intervention improves depression, quality of life, and fluid adherence in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jan;25(1):196-206. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012111134. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19455196
Citation
Duarte PS, Miyazaki MC, Blay SL, Sesso R. Cognitive-behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment for major depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2009 Aug;76(4):414-21. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.156. Epub 2009 May 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19953347
Citation
Atalay H, Solak Y, Biyik M, Biyik Z, Yeksan M, Uguz F, Guney I, Tonbul HZ, Turk S. Sertraline treatment is associated with an improvement in depression and health-related quality of life in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Jun;42(2):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s11255-009-9686-y. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18684897
Citation
Cukor D, Coplan J, Brown C, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL. Course of depression and anxiety diagnosis in patients treated with hemodialysis: a 16-month follow-up. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1752-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01120308. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19493600
Citation
Hedayati SS, Minhajuddin AT, Toto RD, Morris DW, Rush AJ. Validation of depression screening scales in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Sep;54(3):433-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16728903
Citation
Wisniewski SR, Rush AJ, Balasubramani GK, Trivedi MH, Nierenberg AA; STARD Investigators. Self-rated global measure of the frequency, intensity, and burden of side effects. J Psychiatr Pract. 2006 Mar;12(2):71-9. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200603000-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12946886
Citation
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, Markowitz JC, Ninan PT, Kornstein S, Manber R, Thase ME, Kocsis JH, Keller MB. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep 1;54(5):573-83. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8. Erratum In: Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep 1;54(5):585.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30802897
Citation
Mehrotra R, Cukor D, Unruh M, Rue T, Heagerty P, Cohen SD, Dember LM, Diaz-Linhart Y, Dubovsky A, Greene T, Grote N, Kutner N, Trivedi MH, Quinn DK, Ver Halen N, Weisbord SD, Young BA, Kimmel PL, Hedayati SS. Comparative Efficacy of Therapies for Treatment of Depression for Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 19;170(6):369-379. doi: 10.7326/M18-2229. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26621218
Citation
Hedayati SS, Daniel DM, Cohen S, Comstock B, Cukor D, Diaz-Linhart Y, Dember LM, Dubovsky A, Greene T, Grote N, Heagerty P, Katon W, Kimmel PL, Kutner N, Linke L, Quinn D, Rue T, Trivedi MH, Unruh M, Weisbord S, Young BA, Mehrotra R. Rationale and design of A Trial of Sertraline vs. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for End-stage Renal Disease Patients with Depression (ASCEND). Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://kri.washington.edu
Description
Kidney Research Institute

Learn more about this trial

A Trial of Sertraline vs. CBT for End-stage Renal Disease Patients With Depression {ASCEND}

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs