The Outcomes of Seamless ADL Training Between Occupational Therapist and Nurse in Stroke Patients
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Thailand
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Seamless ADL training
Conventional ADL training
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- First attack of stroke
- Good sitting balance
- TMSE 24 or more
- Need help in dresssing and bathing
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral hemiparesis
- Dependent ADL before stroke attack
- Dementia
- Depression
Sites / Locations
- Poungkaew Thitisakulchai
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
conventional ADL training
seamless ADL training
Arm Description
The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training programme which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Ability of Dressing and Bathing
Normalized gain
The raw score from the self-care checklist for dressing and washing oneself was used to calculate the normalized gain. Because stroke patients had varying scores for their initial dressing and washing oneself abilities, their possible window of improvement could be limited by the "floor to ceiling" effect. Therefore, it was considered that their improvements should be assessed by the normalized gain, which was introduced by Hake as a rough measure of the effectiveness of a training course and has since become the standard method for reporting scores. Hake defined normalized gain (g) as the ratio of the actual gain to the maximum possible gain as given in the equation:
Normalized gain (g) = (post-training) - (pre-training) / (maximum score) - (pre-training) With a possible value between 0.0-1.0, the normalized gain can be divided into 3 levels: ''high-g'' for g ≥ 0.7, ''medium-g'' for 0.3 ≤ g ˂0.7, and ''low-g'' for g ˂ 0.3 The higher score means a better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02361307
Brief Title
The Outcomes of Seamless ADL Training Between Occupational Therapist and Nurse in Stroke Patients
Official Title
The Outcomes of Seamless ADL Training Between Occupational Therapist and Nurse in Stroke Patients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mahidol University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aimed to develop and implement an interdisciplinary team model with integration of all the relevant expertise and to establish powerful collaboration and communication among the team. To this extent, we designed a new approach toward self-care training called the "seamless self-care training" technique, which involves enhanced coordination and communication between OTs and nurses in the rehabilitation ward to promote interdisciplinary cooperation in self-care training.
Detailed Description
Rehabilitation is mandatory to promote functional recovery and minimize the distress of stroke survivors as much as possible. Even though rehabilitation outcomes are expected in all aspects, in one study the highest improvements were observed for bowel and bladder functions, transfer, and mobility, while the lowest improvements were seen in bathing (washing oneself), grooming (caring of body parts), dressing, and stair climbing.
Occupational therapists (OTs) are responsible for assessing and teaching skills to facilitate patients' activities and participation, including maximizing their performance of ADLs, and provide training programs and techniques that are tailor-made for each individual's impairment using targeted task-specific training, which has been acknowledged as the most effective method for enhancing functional outcomes. Nevertheless, the most important key factor for successful training outcomes is the collaboration of multiple healthcare professionals. All team members, especially nurses who spend lots of time with patients, should focus on encouraging and facilitating patients in transferring the newly relearned skills from professionals into their lives. Unfortunately, each expert usually approaches the patients from their own aspects, causing a lack of team perspective that could potentially preclude the patients from achieving their rehabilitation goals.
In current inpatient rehabilitation practice, there is still a gap in carrying out self-care training. Self-care training is usually carried out by OTs at the occupational therapy unit, whereas nursing staff assists washing and dressing the patients during admission at the rehabilitation ward. Due to time constraints, nurses usually concentrate on preparing the patients to be ready on time for other specific training. This hinders them from allowing patients the time and opportunity to practice by themselves, resulting in patients' having low confidence and a perception of low self-efficacy. Consequently, some patients may not develop sufficient skills to perform self-care independently after discharge. This situation was reported by Pryor and Long that an integrative function of nurses and other professionals was sub-optimal.
Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to develop and implement an interdisciplinary team model with integration of all the relevant expertise and to establish powerful collaboration and communication among the team. To this extent, we designed a new approach toward self-care training called the "seamless self-care training" technique, which involves enhanced coordination and communication between OTs and nurses in the rehabilitation ward to promote interdisciplinary cooperation in self-care training. We hope that this technique could make therapeutic intervention more successful and fill the gap in treatment processes, as well as to increase the self-efficacies of stroke survivors. The objective of this study was to explore the outcomes of providing this seamless self-care training to stroke patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
conventional ADL training
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
Arm Title
seamless ADL training
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training programme which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Seamless ADL training
Intervention Description
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional ADL training
Intervention Description
The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ability of Dressing and Bathing
Description
Normalized gain
The raw score from the self-care checklist for dressing and washing oneself was used to calculate the normalized gain. Because stroke patients had varying scores for their initial dressing and washing oneself abilities, their possible window of improvement could be limited by the "floor to ceiling" effect. Therefore, it was considered that their improvements should be assessed by the normalized gain, which was introduced by Hake as a rough measure of the effectiveness of a training course and has since become the standard method for reporting scores. Hake defined normalized gain (g) as the ratio of the actual gain to the maximum possible gain as given in the equation:
Normalized gain (g) = (post-training) - (pre-training) / (maximum score) - (pre-training) With a possible value between 0.0-1.0, the normalized gain can be divided into 3 levels: ''high-g'' for g ≥ 0.7, ''medium-g'' for 0.3 ≤ g ˂0.7, and ''low-g'' for g ˂ 0.3 The higher score means a better outcome.
Time Frame
2 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
First attack of stroke
Good sitting balance
TMSE 24 or more
Need help in dresssing and bathing
Exclusion Criteria:
Bilateral hemiparesis
Dependent ADL before stroke attack
Dementia
Depression
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Poungkaew Thitisakulchai, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Poungkaew Thitisakulchai
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10700
Country
Thailand
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
The Outcomes of Seamless ADL Training Between Occupational Therapist and Nurse in Stroke Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs