search
Back to results

the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia

Primary Purpose

Parastomal Hernia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Application of IPOM mesh
Sponsored by
Oulu University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Parastomal Hernia focused on measuring prevention

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarsinoma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who can not give their consent to participate in the study
  • Patients in poor general conditions (American Society of Anaesthesiologists classes 4-5)
  • Patients with incurable cancer or another rectal malignancy than adenocarcinoma
  • Patients with any abdominal infection

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Intervention group

    Control group

    Arm Description

    Patients with IPOM Dynamesh mesh around the straight permanent colostomy.

    Patients with the straight permanent colostomy without a mesh.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of parastomal hernia

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Number of colostomy-related complications

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 19, 2014
    Last Updated
    February 20, 2015
    Sponsor
    Oulu University Hospital
    Collaborators
    Helsinki University Central Hospital, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland, Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital, Central Finland Hospital District
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02368873
    Brief Title
    the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
    Official Title
    Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of a Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia of Permanent Colostomy
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2015
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 2010 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    April 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Oulu University Hospital
    Collaborators
    Helsinki University Central Hospital, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland, Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital, Central Finland Hospital District

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating whether prophylactic laparoscopic placement of a dual-component IPOM mesh around a colostomy may prevent parastomal hernia compared with conventional colostomy after abdominoperineal resection. Eligible subjects will be recruited prospectively from five Finnish Hospitals (Oulu University Hospital,Vaasa Central Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Lahti Central Hospital, Jyväskylä Central Hospital). Patients were considered eligible for this study if undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients are randomized to prophylactic preperitoneal placement of a dual-component mesh (Dynamesh IPOM) around permanent colostomy or to conventional permanent colostomy. Estimating a parastomal hernia rate of 50%, a sample size of 26 patients per each study group is projected to provide 90% power (1-beta) with a alpha 0.05 (2-beta) to detect a 40% reduction in risk for parastomal hernia at 1-year. Since we expect a dropout rate of 20%, 37 patients per study group will be included in this study. All abdominoperineal resections are performed using laparosopic technique. At the and of the abdominal laparoscopic phase the straight permanent end colostomy is performed. In the intervention group the 10 x 10 cm Dynamesh IPOM mesh is cut in the middle according to volume of the bowel. Stapled bowel end is then pulled through the crosswise opened mesh, which is pushed to the abdomen and fixed to the peritoneum. Follow-up visits are scheduled at 1-, 3- and 12-month after surgery. Patients are evaluated for their clinical status and C-reactive protein, leukocytes and hemoglobin are assessed at each control visit. Computed tomography (CT) scan with and without Valsalva maneuver is performed 12 months after surgery for radiological evaluation of possible parastomal hernia. The primary end-point of this study is the incidence of clinically and radiologically detected parastomal hernias, and their extent 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcome end-points were colostomy-related morbidity such as stomal stenosis, necrosis and/or wound infection.The extent of parastomal hernia was graded at CT according to the Hernia Society criteria. Statistical analysis is performed using a SPSS statistical software. Continuous variables are reported as the mean and standard deviation, whereas nominal variables are reported as counts and proportions. Univariate analysis is performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. P-values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Parastomal Hernia
    Keywords
    prevention

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    74 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Intervention group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients with IPOM Dynamesh mesh around the straight permanent colostomy.
    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Patients with the straight permanent colostomy without a mesh.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Application of IPOM mesh
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Dual-component mesh (Dynamesh IPOM, FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Aachen, Germany)
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of parastomal hernia
    Time Frame
    One year
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of colostomy-related complications
    Time Frame
    One year

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarsinoma Exclusion Criteria: Patients who can not give their consent to participate in the study Patients in poor general conditions (American Society of Anaesthesiologists classes 4-5) Patients with incurable cancer or another rectal malignancy than adenocarcinoma Patients with any abdominal infection

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    32032196
    Citation
    Makarainen-Uhlback EJ, Klintrup KHB, Vierimaa MT, Carpelan-Holmstrom MA, Kossi JAO, Kairaluoma MV, Ohtonen PP, Tahvonen PR, Rautio TT. Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of Prosthetic Mesh to Prevent a Parastomal Hernia in a Permanent Colostomy: Results of a Long-term Follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):678-684. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001599.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs