search
Back to results

ESWT vs Cryo-US Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: One Year Follow up Study

Primary Purpose

Tendinopathy

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MODULITH® SLK, STORZ MEDICAL AG, Switzerland
Cryoultrasound™, Medisport S.r.l., Italy
Sponsored by
University of Roma La Sapienza
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tendinopathy focused on measuring Elbow pain, lateral epicondylitis, conservative treatment, shock wave treatment, therapeutic ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • an age range from 18 to 75 years
  • clinical or instrumental diagnosis of chronic lateral epicondylitis, present for at least three months
  • intensity of pain of more than 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) performing a maximum voluntary resisted isometric wrist extension with the elbow in extension (Cozen test)
  • the failure of conservative treatments previously made
  • a wash-out period of at least 12 weeks since the last conservative therapy carried out before inclusion in the study
  • capability of filling in the questionnaires and signing the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with Cryo-US, ultrasound therapy, ESWT
  • The conjoint presence of bilateral or lateral and medial epicondylitis
  • Acute infection of the soft tissues or the bones adjacent to the area of treatment
  • Local bleedings or skin lesions, pathologies of the blood coagulation, or use of anticoagulant drugs
  • Pacemaker, pregnancy
  • Neoplastic disease
  • Raynaud's disease, altered thermal and pain sensitivity, or cold intolerance
  • Evidence of elbow bursitis, or articular or synovial pathologies; signs of elbow laxity or instability
  • Cervicobrachialgia; syndrome of ulnar, radial, or posterior interosseous nerve entrapment

Sites / Locations

  • Sant'Andrea Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

ESWT Group

Cryo-US Group

Arm Description

Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: 3 sessions were carried out, with the time interval between sessions spanning between 48 and 72 hours. In each session, 2400 pulses were administered with energy flux density (EDF) ranging from 0.14 and 0.20 mJ/mm2

Therapeutic cryoultrasound: 12 sessions was performed in a continuous emission modality, using an ultrasound emission power rating of 1,8 Watt/cm2, and a temperature of -2˚C, for a total of 12 sessions lasting 20 minutes each.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference of two points in pain recorded on the VAS
a difference of two points in pain recorded on the VAS during a maximum voluntary resisted isometric wrist extension with the elbow in extension (Cozen test), between the ESWT Group and the Cryo-US Group, in at least one of the periods taken into account.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patients satisfaction based on the Roles and Maudsley score
the number of patients who achieved at least 50% satisfactory results at 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment. Satisfactory results were described as the sum of the excellent and good scores based on the Roles and Maudsley score.

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2015
Last Updated
February 19, 2015
Sponsor
University of Roma La Sapienza
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02371902
Brief Title
ESWT vs Cryo-US Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: One Year Follow up Study
Official Title
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy vs Cryoultrasound Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: One Year Follow up Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Roma La Sapienza

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Chronic lateral epicondylitis is usually managed conservatively. The purpose of this single-blinded, randomized, controlled study is to compare the clinical therapeutic effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in comparison with cryoultrasound (Cryo-US) therapy in chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE) during a period of 12 months.
Detailed Description
Eighty participants with chronic LE were randomly assigned to receive 3 ESWT sessions at 48/72-hours intervals -2400 impulses at energy flux density 0.14-0.20 mJ/mm2 at each session- (ESWT Group, n=40) or 12 Cryo-US therapy sessions (4 daily sessions per week) in a continuous modality at 1.8 Watt/cm2 and -2˚C at each session- (Cryo-US Group, n=40). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and satisfactory results, considered as the sum of the excellent and good scores in the Roles and Maudsley score, were used as outcome measures at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tendinopathy
Keywords
Elbow pain, lateral epicondylitis, conservative treatment, shock wave treatment, therapeutic ultrasound

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ESWT Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: 3 sessions were carried out, with the time interval between sessions spanning between 48 and 72 hours. In each session, 2400 pulses were administered with energy flux density (EDF) ranging from 0.14 and 0.20 mJ/mm2
Arm Title
Cryo-US Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Therapeutic cryoultrasound: 12 sessions was performed in a continuous emission modality, using an ultrasound emission power rating of 1,8 Watt/cm2, and a temperature of -2˚C, for a total of 12 sessions lasting 20 minutes each.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MODULITH® SLK, STORZ MEDICAL AG, Switzerland
Other Intervention Name(s)
Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, ESWT
Intervention Description
Three sessions were carried out, with the time interval between sessions spanning between 48 and 72 hours. In each session, 2400 pulses were administered with energy flux density (EDF) ranging from 0.14 and 0.20 mJ/mm2, depending on the maximum tolerated pain of each patient. Analgesics or local anaesthetics were not administered before, during or after treatment.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cryoultrasound™, Medisport S.r.l., Italy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Therapeutic Ultrasound, Cryo-US therapy
Intervention Description
Cryo-US therapy was performed in a continuous emission modality, using an ultrasound emission power rating of 1,8 Watt/cm2, and a temperature of -2˚C, for a total of 12 sessions lasting 20 minutes each. The treatment was performed in 3 weeks (4 daily sessions per week).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference of two points in pain recorded on the VAS
Description
a difference of two points in pain recorded on the VAS during a maximum voluntary resisted isometric wrist extension with the elbow in extension (Cozen test), between the ESWT Group and the Cryo-US Group, in at least one of the periods taken into account.
Time Frame
3, 6, or 12 months after the end of treatments
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patients satisfaction based on the Roles and Maudsley score
Description
the number of patients who achieved at least 50% satisfactory results at 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment. Satisfactory results were described as the sum of the excellent and good scores based on the Roles and Maudsley score.
Time Frame
3, 6, or 12 months after the end of treatments

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: an age range from 18 to 75 years clinical or instrumental diagnosis of chronic lateral epicondylitis, present for at least three months intensity of pain of more than 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) performing a maximum voluntary resisted isometric wrist extension with the elbow in extension (Cozen test) the failure of conservative treatments previously made a wash-out period of at least 12 weeks since the last conservative therapy carried out before inclusion in the study capability of filling in the questionnaires and signing the consent form Exclusion Criteria: Previous treatment with Cryo-US, ultrasound therapy, ESWT The conjoint presence of bilateral or lateral and medial epicondylitis Acute infection of the soft tissues or the bones adjacent to the area of treatment Local bleedings or skin lesions, pathologies of the blood coagulation, or use of anticoagulant drugs Pacemaker, pregnancy Neoplastic disease Raynaud's disease, altered thermal and pain sensitivity, or cold intolerance Evidence of elbow bursitis, or articular or synovial pathologies; signs of elbow laxity or instability Cervicobrachialgia; syndrome of ulnar, radial, or posterior interosseous nerve entrapment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria C Vulpiani, MD
Organizational Affiliation
La Sapienza University of Rome
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sant'Andrea Hospital
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00144
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16968862
Citation
Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, Heliovaara M. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec 1;164(11):1065-74. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj325. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10073590
Citation
Kraushaar BS, Nirschl RP. Tendinosis of the elbow (tennis elbow). Clinical features and findings of histological, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopy studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Feb;81(2):259-78. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24005204
Citation
Galloway MT, Lalley AL, Shearn JT. The role of mechanical loading in tendon development, maintenance, injury, and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1620-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01004.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12810936
Citation
Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Prognostic factors in lateral epicondylitis: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up in 266 new cases treated with minimal occupational intervention or the usual approach in general practice. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Oct;42(10):1216-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg360. Epub 2003 Jun 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23335238
Citation
Dingemanse R, Randsdorp M, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Evidence for the effectiveness of electrophysical modalities for treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(12):957-65. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091513. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21617986
Citation
Vetrano M, d'Alessandro F, Torrisi MR, Ferretti A, Vulpiani MC, Visco V. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of primary cultured human tenocytes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Dec;19(12):2159-68. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1534-9. Epub 2011 May 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23189160
Citation
Leone L, Vetrano M, Ranieri D, Raffa S, Vulpiani MC, Ferretti A, Torrisi MR, Visco V. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment (ESWT) improves in vitro functional activities of ruptured human tendon-derived tenocytes. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049759. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11752501
Citation
Speed CA. Therapeutic ultrasound in soft tissue lesions. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Dec;40(12):1331-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.12.1331.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16705693
Citation
Tsai WC, Pang JH, Hsu CC, Chu NK, Lin MS, Hu CF. Ultrasound stimulation of types I and III collagen expression of tendon cell and upregulation of transforming growth factor beta. J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1310-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.20130.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16116824
Citation
Costantino C, Pogliacomi F, Vaienti E. Cryoultrasound therapy and tendonitis in athletes: a comparative evaluation versus laser CO2 and t.e.ca.r. therapy. Acta Biomed. 2005 Apr;76(1):37-41.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24172641
Citation
Costantino C, Vulpiani MC, Romiti D, Vetrano M, Saraceni VM. Cryoultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with heel spurs. A randomized controlled clinical study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Feb;50(1):39-47. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16162988
Citation
Chung B, Wiley JP, Rose MS. Long-term effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of previously untreated lateral epicondylitis. Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Sep;15(5):305-12. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000179137.69598.7e.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17551726
Citation
Radwan YA, ElSobhi G, Badawy WS, Reda A, Khalid S. Resistant tennis elbow: shock-wave therapy versus percutaneous tenotomy. Int Orthop. 2008 Oct;32(5):671-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0379-9. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15090392
Citation
Rompe JD, Decking J, Schoellner C, Theis C. Repetitive low-energy shock wave treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis in tennis players. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):734-43. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261697.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12919888
Citation
Day B. 'Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis--a double blind randomised controlled trial', by Speed CA, Nichols D, Richards C, Humphreys H, Wies JT, Burnet S, Hazleman BL [Journal of Orthopaedic Research 29 (2002) 895-898]. J Orthop Res. 2003 Sep;21(5):960; author reply 961. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00045-7. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17254903
Citation
Rompe JD, Overend TJ, MacDermid JC. Validation of the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire. J Hand Ther. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1):3-10; quiz 11. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

ESWT vs Cryo-US Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: One Year Follow up Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs