search
Back to results

Ultrasound vs Palpation for Infant Lumbar Puncture

Primary Purpose

Spinal; Puncture, Complications

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ultrasound
Sponsored by
Columbia University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Spinal; Puncture, Complications focused on measuring infant, lumbar puncture, patient safety, ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - 90 Days (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is less than 90 days old.
  • Patient is receiving a lumbar puncture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is clinically unstable
  • Patient had a previous lumbar puncture in the past 24 hours
  • An outside consultant (not working in ED) is performing the LP
  • Patient has developmental delay or neurological impairment
  • There is no legal guardian present
  • The legal guardians speak neither English nor Spanish
  • There is no ultrasound personnel available to enroll

Sites / Locations

  • Columbia University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard Anatomic Palpation Technique

Pre-Procedural Ultrasound

Arm Description

Participants randomized to this group will receive standard of care treatment with providers using the palpation technique to select an interspace to perform lumbar puncture.

Participants randomized to this group will receive an ultrasound of the interspace selected via the palpation method prior to performance of the lumbar puncture to determine measurements of appropriate angle and depth and evaluation of any overlying vasculature.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Lumbar Puncture Success - Composite Score Including Lab Results and Reported Attempts
Our primary outcome of the clinical trial is binary, success or failure of lumbar puncture. Success is defined as obtaining a sample of cerebrospinal fluid on the first attempt that has a red blood cell count of <1000 red blood cells per high-powered field.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Attempts- Per Direct Observation
Defined as the number of times a lumbar puncture needle is removed from skin and reinserted or a new needle is inserted.

Full Information

First Posted
February 7, 2015
Last Updated
October 22, 2023
Sponsor
Columbia University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02373774
Brief Title
Ultrasound vs Palpation for Infant Lumbar Puncture
Official Title
Sonographic Visualization vs Palpation Technique for Infant Lumbar Puncture
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Columbia University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if performing an ultrasound to identify the space to insert the needle before performing a lumbar puncture will improve success of the procedure and patient safety.
Detailed Description
The investigators are conducting a single-center, prospective two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial in an urban pediatric emergency department to determine if performing an ultrasound prior to lumbar puncture procedure improves success of the procedure. Patients will be block-randomized into two groups to receive procedural interspace selection via 1) standard anatomic palpation technique or 2) visualization with pre-procedural ultrasound (experimental group). Standard Anatomic Palpation Technique: Participants randomized to this group will receive standard of care treatment with providers using the palpation technique to select an interspace. As variations on the palpation technique exist, the investigators will provide a standardized educational cognitive aid that clinicians can use for this approach. Pre-Procedural Ultrasound: Clinicians will first use the standard palpation technique to select an interspace for ultrasound evaluation. A select group of pediatric emergency medicine attendings and fellows who have already trained to a mastery standard with the ultrasound protocol will then conduct the pre-procedural ultrasound. The clinicians performing the lumbar puncture will be provided the following information to conduct the lumbar puncture: i. Assessment for fluid at the level selected (and the number of interspaces above that have fluid without conus present) ii. Measurements of appropriate angle and depth iii. Evaluation of any overlying vasculature Post-Lumbar Puncture: After the lumbar puncture, infants randomized to both groups will receive a post-procedural ultrasound scan performed by one of the mastery trained ultrasound physicians.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal; Puncture, Complications
Keywords
infant, lumbar puncture, patient safety, ultrasound

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
81 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard Anatomic Palpation Technique
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants randomized to this group will receive standard of care treatment with providers using the palpation technique to select an interspace to perform lumbar puncture.
Arm Title
Pre-Procedural Ultrasound
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants randomized to this group will receive an ultrasound of the interspace selected via the palpation method prior to performance of the lumbar puncture to determine measurements of appropriate angle and depth and evaluation of any overlying vasculature.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Ultrasound
Other Intervention Name(s)
(Zonare Z1.pro and/or Sonosite Mturbo)
Intervention Description
Patients will receive an ultrasound prior to lumbar puncture procedure to help visualize and select spinal interspace.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lumbar Puncture Success - Composite Score Including Lab Results and Reported Attempts
Description
Our primary outcome of the clinical trial is binary, success or failure of lumbar puncture. Success is defined as obtaining a sample of cerebrospinal fluid on the first attempt that has a red blood cell count of <1000 red blood cells per high-powered field.
Time Frame
Outcome measured on the same day of the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Attempts- Per Direct Observation
Description
Defined as the number of times a lumbar puncture needle is removed from skin and reinserted or a new needle is inserted.
Time Frame
Outcome measured at the time of the procedure (same day)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Days
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient is less than 90 days old. Patient is receiving a lumbar puncture Exclusion Criteria: Patient is clinically unstable Patient had a previous lumbar puncture in the past 24 hours An outside consultant (not working in ED) is performing the LP Patient has developmental delay or neurological impairment There is no legal guardian present The legal guardians speak neither English nor Spanish There is no ultrasound personnel available to enroll
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David O Kessler, MD, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerald Behr, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter S Dayan, MD, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Columbia University
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17047467
Citation
Alpern ER, Stanley RM, Gorelick MH, Donaldson A, Knight S, Teach SJ, Singh T, Mahajan P, Goepp JG, Kuppermann N, Dean JM, Chamberlain JM; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Epidemiology of a pediatric emergency medicine research network: the PECARN Core Data Project. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Oct;22(10):689-99. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000236830.39194.c0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24470644
Citation
Jain S, Cheng J, Alpern ER, Thurm C, Schroeder L, Black K, Ellison AM, Stone K, Alessandrini EA. Management of febrile neonates in US pediatric emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):187-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1820. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23439901
Citation
Kessler DO, Arteaga G, Ching K, Haubner L, Kamdar G, Krantz A, Lindower J, Miller M, Petrescu M, Pusic MV, Rocker J, Shah N, Strother C, Tilt L, Weinberg ER, Chang TP, Fein DM, Auerbach M. Interns' success with clinical procedures in infants after simulation training. Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):e811-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0607. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17321005
Citation
Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21622691
Citation
Glatstein MM, Zucker-Toledano M, Arik A, Scolnik D, Oren A, Reif S. Incidence of traumatic lumbar puncture: experience of a large, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Nov;50(11):1005-9. doi: 10.1177/0009922811410309. Epub 2011 May 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24188604
Citation
Bonadio W. Pediatric lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.056. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23572300
Citation
Duniec L, Nowakowski P, Kosson D, Lazowski T. Anatomical landmarks based assessment of intravertebral space level for lumbar puncture is misleading in more than 30%. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;45(1):1-6. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11892638
Citation
Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002 Mar;57(3):277-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.2403_4.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24423049
Citation
Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013 Mar;(211):1-945.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11436885
Citation
Coley BD, Shiels WE 2nd, Hogan MJ. Diagnostic and interventional ultrasonography in neonatal and infant lumbar puncture. Pediatr Radiol. 2001 Jun;31(6):399-402. doi: 10.1007/s002470100453.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20403933
Citation
Abo A, Chen L, Johnston P, Santucci K. Positioning for lumbar puncture in children evaluated by bedside ultrasound. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1149-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0646. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23603648
Citation
Lo MD, Parisi MT, Brown JC, Klein EJ. Sitting or tilt position for infant lumbar puncture does not increase ultrasound measurements of lumbar subarachnoid space width. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):588-91. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e630d.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22684159
Citation
Oncel S, Gunlemez A, Anik Y, Alvur M. Positioning of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit for lumbar puncture as determined by bedside ultrasonography. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Mar;98(2):F133-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301475. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23532866
Citation
Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Beyene J, Sung L. Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013 Mar 26;346:f1720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1720.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21444601
Citation
Bruccoleri RE, Chen L. Needle-entry angle for lumbar puncture in children as determined by using ultrasonography. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):e921-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2511. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23966025
Citation
Bailie HC, Arthurs OJ, Murray MJ, Kelsall AW. Weight-based determination of spinal canal depth for paediatric lumbar punctures. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Nov;98(11):877-80. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303793. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2650477
Citation
Wilson DA, Prince JR. John Caffey award. MR imaging determination of the location of the normal conus medullaris throughout childhood. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 May;152(5):1029-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.5.1029.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7793365
Citation
Hill CA, Gibson PJ. Ultrasound determination of the normal location of the conus medullaris in neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Mar;16(3):469-72.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1491937
Citation
Wolf S, Schneble F, Troger J. The conus medullaris: time of ascendence to normal level. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22(8):590-2. doi: 10.1007/BF02015359.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9279188
Citation
Sahin F, Selcuki M, Ecin N, Zenciroglu A, Unlu A, Yilmaz F, Mavis N, Saribas S. Level of conus medullaris in term and preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Jul;77(1):F67-9. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.1.f67.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24178234
Citation
Rozzelle CJ, Reed GT, Kirkman JL, Shannon CN, Chern JJ, Wellons JC 3rd, Tubbs RS. Sonographic determination of normal Conus Medullaris level and ascent in early infancy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014 Apr;30(4):655-8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2310-6. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14535904
Citation
Tame SJ, Burstal R. Investigation of the radiological relationship between iliac crests, conus medullaris and vertebral level in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Oct;13(8):676-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01120.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17961006
Citation
Kesler H, Dias MS, Kalapos P. Termination of the normal conus medullaris in children: a whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/FOC-07/08/E7.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Ultrasound vs Palpation for Infant Lumbar Puncture

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs