search
Back to results

Clinical Validity and Utility of Genomic-targeted Chemoprevention of PCa: Aim 4a

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Familial, Hereditary Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Genetic Risk Score: Number Format
Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph
Family History: Number Format
Family History: Number + Pictograph
Sponsored by
NorthShore University HealthSystem
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Genetic testing, Genomic testing, Chemoprevention, Prostate Specific Antigen, Prostate Cancer, Predictive Genetic Testing, Genetic Counseling, Prostate-Specific Antigen

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 49 Years (Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 40 to 49 years, self-defined Caucasian background, and no prior prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening nor prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • outside of age range, or not self defined Caucasian background, or a prior history of PSA screening or PCa diagnosis

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm 4

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Genetic Risk Score: Number Format

    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph

    Family History: Number Format

    Family History: Number + Pictograph

    Arm Description

    Genetic Risk Score: Number Format Subjects receive genetic risk scores in a number format.

    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph Subjects receive genetic risk scores in a number and pictograph format.

    Family History: Number Format Subjects receive family history risk in a number format.

    Family History: Number + Pictograph Subjects receive family history risk in a number and pictograph format.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of Participants Who Had Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Discussion With Physician at 3 Months, Measured by Survey
    Discussion with Physician regarding PSA screening, measured by survey 3 months after provision of risk information
    Number of Participants Who Had PSA Testing at 3 Months, Measured by Survey
    PSA screening, measured by survey 3 months after provision of risk information.
    Number of Participants Who Had PSA Testing at 3 Years, Measured by Medical Records
    PSA screening, measured by medical records 3 years after provision of risk information.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Anxiety, Measured by State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
    Immediate reaction to risk information. Measured by state anxiety scale that assess current feelings "at this moment": 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. A shortened version of questions 1,3,5,9,11,12,13,15,17, and 19 from STAI form XI were used. Each item, within then STAI is scored on a scale of 1-4 and with 10 items, the possible range of total scores was 10 (lowest anxiety) to 40 (highest anxiety). Lowest scores represent better outcomes.
    Accuracy of Immediate Recall of Risk Information Measured by Survey
    Mean between Immediate recall of risk information and told risk information. Immediate recall is measured by survey question: "Based on the information given to you, what were you told is your chance of developing prostate cancer in your lifetime from 0% to 100% ______ %"
    Accuracy of Recall of Risk Information at 3 Months Measured by Survey
    Mean between recall of risk information at 3 months measured by survey, and told risk information. Recall at 3 months is measured by survey question: "Based on the information given to you, what were you told is your chance of developing prostate cancer in your lifetime from 0% to 100% ______ %"

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 28, 2015
    Last Updated
    November 4, 2019
    Sponsor
    NorthShore University HealthSystem
    Collaborators
    Van Andel Research Institute, Spectrum Health Medical Group, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02381015
    Brief Title
    Clinical Validity and Utility of Genomic-targeted Chemoprevention of PCa: Aim 4a
    Official Title
    Clinical Validity and Utility of Genomic-targeted Chemoprevention of PCa: Aim 4a
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    June 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 2012 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 2012 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    NorthShore University HealthSystem
    Collaborators
    Van Andel Research Institute, Spectrum Health Medical Group, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study was designed to compare the efficacy, perception, decision making, and cost-effectiveness of genomic and non-genomic approaches for risk assessment of prostate cancer and for chemoprevention of prostate cancer.
    Detailed Description
    ABSTRACT: This clinical trial registration is focused on Aim 4 within the overall project described in the following. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer among men in the U.S. One important strategy to address this public health concern is to prevent the disease. Two large randomized clinical trials, The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) and The Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE), have demonstrated a 23-25% reduction in PCa risk with the use of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs: finasteride and dutasteride). However, 5ARIs have not been widely adopted due, in part, to poor cost-effectiveness. We hypothesize that targeted chemoprevention, based on 1) overall genetic risk [family history (FH) and PCa risk-associated genetic variants], and 2) polymorphisms that interact with 5ARIs, may be more efficacious and cost-effective, and thus more likely to be employed by physicians and their patients. The effectiveness of this genomic-targeted approach needs to be systematically evaluated and compared to non-genomic approaches using evidence-based methods such as those recommended by the EGAPP (Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention) working group. We have assembled a multidisciplinary research team to address an overarching question of whether a genomic-targeted approach improves outcomes related to chemoprevention of PCa using 5ARIs compared to a non-targeted approach. We will evaluate and compare the efficacy, perception, decision making, and cost-effectiveness of genomic and non-genomic approaches in two existing large randomized clinical trials (Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT)), two new study populations of men at risk for PCa, and in a survey of physicians. The unique study design of REDUCE and PCPT, with end-of-study prostate biopsies, allows us to address two critical questions in this study: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) detection-bias of PCa risk-associated Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and efficacy of genomic-targeted chemoprevention of PCa using 5ARIs. We have the following specific aims: 1) assess the clinical validity of PCa risk prediction models using a panel of non PSA detection biased PCa risk-associated SNPs. 2) identify and assess the clinical validity of novel polymorphisms that interact with 5ARIs in reducing PCa diagnosis using both genome-wide and candidate gene approaches, 3) assess the clinical utility of a genomic-targeted approach by comparing its reduction in rates of PCa with non-targeted chemoprevention, 4) compare perception and decision making of physicians and patients for genomic and non-genomic-targeted chemoprevention of PCa, and 5) Compare the cost-effectiveness of genomic and non-genomic-targeted chemoprevention of PCa. Results from this study will provide comprehensive data for evidence-based evaluation by the Center for Disease Control's Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) working group, provide a proof of principle study of Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER), and will help build a road map for future Genomic and Personalized Medicine (GPM) in the 21st century.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Familial, Hereditary Prostate Cancer
    Keywords
    Genetic testing, Genomic testing, Chemoprevention, Prostate Specific Antigen, Prostate Cancer, Predictive Genetic Testing, Genetic Counseling, Prostate-Specific Antigen

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Basic Science
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    700 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Genetic Risk Score: Number Format
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Genetic Risk Score: Number Format Subjects receive genetic risk scores in a number format.
    Arm Title
    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph Subjects receive genetic risk scores in a number and pictograph format.
    Arm Title
    Family History: Number Format
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Family History: Number Format Subjects receive family history risk in a number format.
    Arm Title
    Family History: Number + Pictograph
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Family History: Number + Pictograph Subjects receive family history risk in a number and pictograph format.
    Intervention Type
    Genetic
    Intervention Name(s)
    Genetic Risk Score: Number Format
    Intervention Description
    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph Genetic risk score based on validated panel of 46 single nucleotide polymorphisms previously identified to be associated with Prostate Cancer risk by Genome Wide Association Studies, presented to subjects as a number.
    Intervention Type
    Genetic
    Intervention Name(s)
    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph
    Intervention Description
    Genetic Risk Score: Number + Pictograph Risk information conveyed as either a number or a number + pictograph, depending on randomization group.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Family History: Number Format
    Intervention Description
    Family History: Number Format Risk information conveyed as either a number or a number + pictograph, depending on randomization group.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Family History: Number + Pictograph
    Intervention Description
    Family History: Number + Pictograph Risk information conveyed as either a number or a number + pictograph, depending on randomization group.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Participants Who Had Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Discussion With Physician at 3 Months, Measured by Survey
    Description
    Discussion with Physician regarding PSA screening, measured by survey 3 months after provision of risk information
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Title
    Number of Participants Who Had PSA Testing at 3 Months, Measured by Survey
    Description
    PSA screening, measured by survey 3 months after provision of risk information.
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Title
    Number of Participants Who Had PSA Testing at 3 Years, Measured by Medical Records
    Description
    PSA screening, measured by medical records 3 years after provision of risk information.
    Time Frame
    3 years
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Anxiety, Measured by State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
    Description
    Immediate reaction to risk information. Measured by state anxiety scale that assess current feelings "at this moment": 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. A shortened version of questions 1,3,5,9,11,12,13,15,17, and 19 from STAI form XI were used. Each item, within then STAI is scored on a scale of 1-4 and with 10 items, the possible range of total scores was 10 (lowest anxiety) to 40 (highest anxiety). Lowest scores represent better outcomes.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Accuracy of Immediate Recall of Risk Information Measured by Survey
    Description
    Mean between Immediate recall of risk information and told risk information. Immediate recall is measured by survey question: "Based on the information given to you, what were you told is your chance of developing prostate cancer in your lifetime from 0% to 100% ______ %"
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Accuracy of Recall of Risk Information at 3 Months Measured by Survey
    Description
    Mean between recall of risk information at 3 months measured by survey, and told risk information. Recall at 3 months is measured by survey question: "Based on the information given to you, what were you told is your chance of developing prostate cancer in your lifetime from 0% to 100% ______ %"
    Time Frame
    3 month

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Male
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    40 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    49 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: age 40 to 49 years, self-defined Caucasian background, and no prior prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening nor prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. Exclusion Criteria: outside of age range, or not self defined Caucasian background, or a prior history of PSA screening or PCa diagnosis
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jianfeng Xu, Dr.P.H.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    There is no intent to share individual participant data (IPD). The terms included in the study consent form do not allow sharing of IPD.

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical Validity and Utility of Genomic-targeted Chemoprevention of PCa: Aim 4a

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs