search
Back to results

Pneumatic Reversible Portal Vein Diameter Modulation After Major Hepatectomy (MODHEP1)

Primary Purpose

Liver Failure, Major Hepatectomy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MID-AVR
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Liver Failure focused on measuring hepatectomy, post-operative liver failure, portal vein, portal flow, portal pressure, modulation, surgical device

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • French resident affiliated to Social Insurance
  • Major hepatectomy (Phase A)
  • Major hepatectomy that preserved only one hepatic vein (Phase B)
  • Remnant liver volume > 0.5% of the body weight

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 80 (Phase A) and Age > 70 (Phase B)
  • Cirrhotic patient (F4)
  • Repeat hepatectomy
  • Patient who required a portal vein resection
  • History of deep venous thrombosis
  • History of portal thrombosis

Sites / Locations

  • AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hepato-BiliaireRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

MID-AVR

Arm Description

Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR during surgery (Phase A) and after surgery (Phase B)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Success of MID-AVR positioning
Phase A: Feasibility of MID-AVR positioning around the portal vein by hepato-biliary surgeon and visual evaluation of potential spatial conflict with hepatic artery and choledochal. Each procedure will be filmed.
Persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow at bi-daily ultrasonography
Phase B: Persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow without portal vein thrombosis upstream MID-AVR

Secondary Outcome Measures

Portal pressure measured upstream and downstream the MID-AVR
Phase A
Portal flow measured downstream the MID-AVR
Phase A
Liver perfusion assessed by intraoperative contrast enhanced ultrasonography
Phase A
Reliability of MID-AVR opening by balloon inflation and removal from the portal vein by smooth traction on the tube that is connected to MID-AVR.
Phase A Each procedure will be filmed.
Occurrence of POLF (Bilirubin > 50 µmol/L and PT < 50% )
Phase B
Occurrence of post-operative hemorrhage (decrease in haemoglobin that required red pack cell transfusion)
Phase B
Occurrence of Post-operative biliary fistulae (Bilirubin concentration in fluid drainage greater than 3 fold the plasmatic bilirubin rate)
Phase B
Reliability of MID-AVR opening by balloon inflation and percutaneously removal from the portal vein by smooth traction on the tube that is connected to MID-AVR.
Phase B Removal will be done at the operating room under neurolept analgesia and local anesthesia under radiological control. Each procedure will be filmed.

Full Information

First Posted
March 11, 2015
Last Updated
April 15, 2019
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
Medical Innovation Developpement (MID)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02390713
Brief Title
Pneumatic Reversible Portal Vein Diameter Modulation After Major Hepatectomy
Acronym
MODHEP1
Official Title
Pneumatic Reversible Portal Vein Diameter Modulation After Major Hepatectomy in Non Cirrhotic Patient
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 18, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
Medical Innovation Developpement (MID)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This ring aimed to preserve an intra-hepatic porto-caval gradient inferior to 5 mm Hg during and after major hepatectomy (48h) to protect the liver during the initial phases of liver regeneration. Morphological features of MID-AVRTM allow its intra corporeal opening and percutaneously removal after an balloon inflation with 5 ml of physiological serum. MID-AVRTM had been developed in pig where it had proved its efficiency to improve liver function after 75% hepatectomy and its capacity to be removed percutaneously. Aim of this feasibility study (Phase I/II) is to prove in series of 3 evaluable patients (Phase A) then 6 evaluable patients (Phase B) that MID-AVRTM could be used in human without deleterious consequence. In phase A, MID-AVRTM is dispose around the portal vein before and during a major hepatectomy performed on healthy liver and removed before abdominal closure. If phase A results confirmed that MID-AVRTM well modulates portal pressure and is easily opened and removed by acute inflation, the phase B will be started. In phase B, MID-AVRTM will be dispose around the portal vein before major hepatectomy on healthy liver and conserved 48 hours before to be removed percutaneously at the operating room.
Detailed Description
Preserving liver function is vital, especially after hepatectomy, the main curative treatment of liver tumor. An hepatectomy that preserved a remnant liver volume < 0.5% of the body weight is associated with a very high risk of post-operative liver failure. In such situation, liver volume is not sufficient to support local hemodynamic consequences of the hepatectomy that is responsible of intrahepatic endothelial cell injury that impaired liver function and regeneration. To date, preoperative vein embolization (PVE) associated or not to liver transection (ALPSS procedure) that increased future remnant liver from 20% to 90% is the only method to prevent this complication. Even this preparation is necessary for the moment, PVE increased cancer cell proliferation and is associated with lower recurrence free survival than without PVE. Despite a potential PVE, POLF occurred in 5% to 7% after major hepatectomy and stayed the first cause of death after hepatectomy. It has been demonstrated that portal pressure superior to 20 mm Hg and/or porto-caval gradient superior to 12 mm Hg at the end of hepatectomy was associated to the occurrence of POLF. Aim to avoid this acute intra hepatic portal hypertension associated to major hepatectomy that is associated with an early liver endothelial cell injury, we had developed an silicon ring to dispose around the portal vein that contained an circular inflatable balloon to narrow precisely the portal vein lumen (MID-AVRTM). Phase A: Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR during surgery Each procedure will be filmed. Phase B: Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR after surgery Each procedure will be filmed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Failure, Major Hepatectomy
Keywords
hepatectomy, post-operative liver failure, portal vein, portal flow, portal pressure, modulation, surgical device

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
12 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MID-AVR
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR during surgery (Phase A) and after surgery (Phase B)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MID-AVR
Intervention Description
Phase A (4 patients): After laparotomy and dissection of hepatic pedicle, feasibility of MID-AVR positioning around the portal vein by hepato-biliary surgeon and visual evaluation of potential spatial conflict with hepatic artery and choledochal. Mid-AVR is removed at the end of surgery. Each procedure will be filmed. Phase B (12 patients): Mid-AVR is maintained at the end of surgery, and during 48 hours to evaluate the persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow without portal vein thrombosis upstream MID-AVR during the 48 hours after the liver surgery at bi-daily ultrasonography.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Success of MID-AVR positioning
Description
Phase A: Feasibility of MID-AVR positioning around the portal vein by hepato-biliary surgeon and visual evaluation of potential spatial conflict with hepatic artery and choledochal. Each procedure will be filmed.
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow at bi-daily ultrasonography
Description
Phase B: Persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow without portal vein thrombosis upstream MID-AVR
Time Frame
during the 48 hours after the liver surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Portal pressure measured upstream and downstream the MID-AVR
Description
Phase A
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Portal flow measured downstream the MID-AVR
Description
Phase A
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Liver perfusion assessed by intraoperative contrast enhanced ultrasonography
Description
Phase A
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Reliability of MID-AVR opening by balloon inflation and removal from the portal vein by smooth traction on the tube that is connected to MID-AVR.
Description
Phase A Each procedure will be filmed.
Time Frame
intraoperative
Title
Occurrence of POLF (Bilirubin > 50 µmol/L and PT < 50% )
Description
Phase B
Time Frame
at postoperative day 3
Title
Occurrence of post-operative hemorrhage (decrease in haemoglobin that required red pack cell transfusion)
Description
Phase B
Time Frame
at postoperative day 3
Title
Occurrence of Post-operative biliary fistulae (Bilirubin concentration in fluid drainage greater than 3 fold the plasmatic bilirubin rate)
Description
Phase B
Time Frame
at postoperative day 3
Title
Reliability of MID-AVR opening by balloon inflation and percutaneously removal from the portal vein by smooth traction on the tube that is connected to MID-AVR.
Description
Phase B Removal will be done at the operating room under neurolept analgesia and local anesthesia under radiological control. Each procedure will be filmed.
Time Frame
at postoperative day 3

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: French resident affiliated to Social Insurance Major hepatectomy (Phase A) Major hepatectomy that preserved only one hepatic vein (Phase B) Remnant liver volume > 0.5% of the body weight Exclusion Criteria: Age > 80 (Phase A) and Age > 70 (Phase B) Cirrhotic patient (F4) Repeat hepatectomy Patient who required a portal vein resection History of deep venous thrombosis History of portal thrombosis
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Eric VIBERT, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0)6 60 64 96 97
Email
eric.vibert@pbr.aphp.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric VIBERT, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hepato-Biliaire
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laina N'DIAYE
Phone
+33 (0)1 45 21 31 72
Email
laina.ndiaye@bct.aphp.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric VIBERT, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Pneumatic Reversible Portal Vein Diameter Modulation After Major Hepatectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs