Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of IV PCA in Patients Undergoing RALP
Primary Purpose
Prostate Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
fentanyl
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient who is scheduled to get a robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
- Patient who agree to get a patient controlled analgesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status over III
- History of alcohol or drug addiction
- History of acute or chronic pain or pain treatment
- Allergic to opioid analgesics
- BMI over 30 kg/m2
- History of sleep apnea or respiratory complications
Sites / Locations
- Asan Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Conventional analgesic group
Model based analgesic group
Arm Description
fentanyl
fentanyl
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Amount and number of postoperative analgesic requirements
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of participants with complications
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02402621
Brief Title
Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of IV PCA in Patients Undergoing RALP
Official Title
Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Asan Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Comparing postoperative analgesics requirements and complications between conventional and model-based infusion strategy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients who undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Group A: conventional intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, Group B: model-based infusion strategy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
Detailed Description
The investigators compared postoperative analgesics requirements and complications between conventional and model-based infusion strategy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) in patients who undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP)
Group A: conventional IV PCA, Group B: model based IV PCA
Primary endpoint: comparison of postoperative analgesic requirements in patient undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) between conventional patient controlled analgesia (PCA) (Group A) and effective-compartment based dosing strategy of PCA (Group B)
Secondary endpoint: 1) VAS analysis between two groups, 2) postoperative nausea and vomiting analysis between two groups, 3) complication evaluation between two groups
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
111 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Conventional analgesic group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
fentanyl
Arm Title
Model based analgesic group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
fentanyl
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
fentanyl
Intervention Description
fentanyl with antiemetic drug
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Amount and number of postoperative analgesic requirements
Time Frame
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with complications
Time Frame
Up to 48 hours
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame
Up to 48 hours
Title
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame
Up to 48 hours
Title
Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation
Time Frame
Up to 48 hours
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
69 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient who is scheduled to get a robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Patient who agree to get a patient controlled analgesia
Exclusion Criteria:
American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status over III
History of alcohol or drug addiction
History of acute or chronic pain or pain treatment
Allergic to opioid analgesics
BMI over 30 kg/m2
History of sleep apnea or respiratory complications
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Young-Kug Kim
Organizational Affiliation
Asan Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Asan Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of IV PCA in Patients Undergoing RALP
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs