search
Back to results

Study of Narrow Band Imaging in the Characterization of Serrated Lesions (CROMOSER)

Primary Purpose

Serrated Polyps, Sessile Serrated Adenoma, Colorectal Neoplasms

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NBI
WLE
Sponsored by
Parc de Salut Mar
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Serrated Polyps focused on measuring Serrated lesion, sessile serrated adenoma, Narrow Band Imaging, Colonoscopy, colorectal neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 50 years old who accept CRC screening colonoscopy
  • Patients with a basal colonoscopy findings: ≥1 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon, which are greater than ≥10mm in diameter; or ≥3 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of a CRC in the basal colonoscopy
  • Subjects with other types of histology polyps
  • Subjects who neglect to follow-up
  • Subjects who do not accept informed consent
  • Subjects with high risk of perforation or complications due to sedation, including patients with comorbidities (ASA IV-V)
  • Inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy (defined by Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS): ≤ 5 total points; or 0-1 points in any of the 3 segments of the colon)

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital del Mar

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

WLE-NBI

NBI-WLE

Arm Description

Participants will be evaluated by same endoscopist, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. It consists of two withdrawal from the cecum to sigmoid colon using firstly High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE) and secondly Narrow Band Imaging (NBI). All detected polyps will be classified macroscopically and resected in each withdrawal.

Participants will be evaluated by same endoscopist, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. It consists of two withdrawal from the cecum to sigmoid colon using firstly Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and secondly High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE). All detected polyps will be classified macroscopically and resected in each withdrawal.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of polyps detected with both techniques (NBI versus WLE)
Efficacy of NBI in detecting serrated polyps compared with WLE

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of new patients who accomplish the SPS criteria
Number of missed lesions on basal colonoscopy
Compare the number of missed lesions on the index examination based on the colonoscopy findings (NBI and WLE)
Number of accurate detection of adenomas with morphologic features with both groups (NBI and WLE) compared to histopathology
Accuracy in detecting adenomas endoscopically compared with histopathology (gold standard)

Full Information

First Posted
March 30, 2015
Last Updated
May 3, 2016
Sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02406547
Brief Title
Study of Narrow Band Imaging in the Characterization of Serrated Lesions
Acronym
CROMOSER
Official Title
Randomised Tandem Colonoscopy of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and White Light Endoscopy in Patients With Serrated Lesions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the utility of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) compared with High Definition White Light colonoscopy (WLE) in subjects with serrated lesions who do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria of Serrated Polyposis Syndrome (SPS).
Detailed Description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in western countries. Conventional polyps were considered the precursor lesions of all cases of sporadic colon cancer. Recently, serrated lesions and especially the Sessile Serrated Adenoma (SSA), are responsible of interval CRC between 20% to 35% of all CRC cases. These polyps are difficult to identify at endoscopy because they are located in the right colon, they are sessile or flat morphology and are pale color with mucus capping. According to the WHO, SPS is defined with one of the following criteria: (1) at least 5 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon, 2 of which are greater than 10 mm in diameter; (2) any number of serrated polyps occurring proximal to the sigmoid colon in an individual who has a first-degree relative with serrated polyposis; or (3) more than 20 serrated polyps of any size distributed throughout the colon. Therefore, patients with SPS are considered to be at increased risk of CRC. Considering the substantial risk of polyp recurrence, it is mandatory to follow up an annual surveillance. Narrow-Band Imaging (NBI, Olympus) selectively uses certain wavelengths of the visible light leading to a shift in the excitation spectrum towards blue light. Blood vessels will appear dark, allowing an improved visibility and identification of the surface and vascular structures. In contrast to conventional chromoendoscopy, it is easily activated by pressing a button on the endoscope. A pilot study in patients with SPS showed significantly lower polyp miss rate with NBI compared with WLE. Furthermore, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recently published the first Guideline of Advanced Endoscopic Imaging for the detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia and recommends conventional chromoendoscopy or NBI in patients with SPS (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). The hypothesis is that NBI could improve the detection rate of serrated polyps compared with WLE in patients who do not accomplish the SPS criteria. The investigators will perform a randomised, cross-over trial of tandem colonoscopy using NBI and WLE. The main goal is to compare the rate of detected polyps between both techniques and, if it is necessary, reassessing the diagnosis for an appropriate surveillance interval.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Serrated Polyps, Sessile Serrated Adenoma, Colorectal Neoplasms
Keywords
Serrated lesion, sessile serrated adenoma, Narrow Band Imaging, Colonoscopy, colorectal neoplasms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
41 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
WLE-NBI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be evaluated by same endoscopist, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. It consists of two withdrawal from the cecum to sigmoid colon using firstly High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE) and secondly Narrow Band Imaging (NBI). All detected polyps will be classified macroscopically and resected in each withdrawal.
Arm Title
NBI-WLE
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be evaluated by same endoscopist, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. It consists of two withdrawal from the cecum to sigmoid colon using firstly Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and secondly High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE). All detected polyps will be classified macroscopically and resected in each withdrawal.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
NBI
Other Intervention Name(s)
Narrow Band Imaging
Intervention Description
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Evis Exera III, Olympus)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
WLE
Other Intervention Name(s)
High Definition White Light Endoscopy
Intervention Description
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of polyps detected with both techniques (NBI versus WLE)
Description
Efficacy of NBI in detecting serrated polyps compared with WLE
Time Frame
Less than 1 year after the basal colonoscopy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of new patients who accomplish the SPS criteria
Time Frame
Less than 1 year after the basal colonoscopy
Title
Number of missed lesions on basal colonoscopy
Description
Compare the number of missed lesions on the index examination based on the colonoscopy findings (NBI and WLE)
Time Frame
Less than 1 year after the basal colonoscopy
Title
Number of accurate detection of adenomas with morphologic features with both groups (NBI and WLE) compared to histopathology
Description
Accuracy in detecting adenomas endoscopically compared with histopathology (gold standard)
Time Frame
Less than 1 year after the basal colonoscopy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients over 50 years old who accept CRC screening colonoscopy Patients with a basal colonoscopy findings: ≥1 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon, which are greater than ≥10mm in diameter; or ≥3 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of a CRC in the basal colonoscopy Subjects with other types of histology polyps Subjects who neglect to follow-up Subjects who do not accept informed consent Subjects with high risk of perforation or complications due to sedation, including patients with comorbidities (ASA IV-V) Inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy (defined by Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS): ≤ 5 total points; or 0-1 points in any of the 3 segments of the colon)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fausto Riu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Parc de Salut Mar
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital del Mar
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23485231
Citation
Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24639052
Citation
Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):104-17. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8247072
Citation
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16454841
Citation
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20927746
Citation
Brown SR, Baraza W. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;(10):CD006439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006439.pub3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24639382
Citation
Kaminski MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Pohl J, Pellise M, Dekker E, Ignjatovic-Wilson A, Hoffman A, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Heresbach D, Dumonceau JM, East JE. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):435-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365348. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21811939
Citation
Boparai KS, van den Broek FJ, van Eeden S, Fockens P, Dekker E. Increased polyp detection using narrow band imaging compared with high resolution endoscopy in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):676-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256447. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20420948
Citation
Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2088-100. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.066.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32299380
Citation
Riu Pons F, Andreu M, Naranjo D, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Seoane A, Dedeu JM, Barranco L, Bessa X. Narrow-band imaging and high-definition white-light endoscopy in patients with serrated lesions not fulfilling criteria for serrated polyposis syndrome: a randomized controlled trial with tandem colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01257-4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study of Narrow Band Imaging in the Characterization of Serrated Lesions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs