Pragmatic Study Comparing the Clinical Evlauation Methods ( C) and / or Ultrasound Method ( B or D) in Rheumatoid Arthritis to Adapt Treatment (BCD)

Pragmatic Study Comparing the Clinical Evlauation Methods ( C) and / or Ultrasound Method ( B or D) in Rheumatoid Arthritis to Adapt Treatment

Pragmatic Study Comparing the Clinical Evlauation Methods ( C) and / or Ultrasound Method ( B or D) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) to Adapt Treatment

This study compares different methods of clinical evaluation (C) and/or ultrasound (B or D) concerning the rheumatoid arthritis in order to monitore the treatment. This study will provide the exact number of patients in remission according the 3 methods. It could allow to assess the concordance between the 3 evaluated methods. This study will permit to define the best method which limit the evolution of structural damages ( principal criteria).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the Xrays evolution at 1 year ( at least one new erosion versus no erosion with the Sharp modified by van der Heijde) of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (ACR/EULAR 2010). The first approach is the assessment of remission defined by modified SDAI in order to evaluate in all cases the same number of joints [Simplified Disease Activity Index algebric sum of 5 parametres : number of painful joints (28 joints) , number of synovitis (38 joints), global evaluation of patient and and practitioner with VAS, and PCR ≤ 3.3mg/l] (mode C). The second one is a combined approach: clinical-ultrasound (same criteria but with MTPs and shoulders in B mode so a 26 joints evaluation with clinical examination and 12 joints evaluation in B mode) (mode B). The last one is an ultrasound approach (remission defined as the absence of power Doppler on 38 joints (28 of SDAI plus 10 MTPs joints) (mode D) in a pragmatical context (study assessed by private rheumatologists and hospital rheumatologists). This trial is a National randomized multicentre trial that compares three modes of follow to adjust the therapeutic adaptation in Rheumatoid Artritis.

No drug and no placebo were used in this arm. Patients were followed by Clinical evaluation in combination with ultrasound (in B mode).

No drug and no placebo were used in this arm. Patients were followed by Ultrasound approach in D mode.

Assessement of the Xrays evolution at 1 year through adaptated treatment according to clinical or ultrasound remission criteria.

The primary outcome is to evaluate the Xrays evolution at 1 year ( at least one new erosion versus no erosion with the Sharp modified by van der Heijde) of rheumatoid arthritis patients (ACR/EULAR 2010) according to remission defined by modified SDAI in order to evaluate in all cases the same number of joints [Simplified Disease Activity Index algebric sum of 5 parametres : number of painful joints (28 joints) , number of synovitis (38 joints), global evaluation of patient and practitioner with VAS, and PCR ≤ 3.3mg/l] (mode C), with a combined approach clinical-ultrasound (same criteria but with MTPs and shoulders in B mode so a 26 joints evaluation with clinical examination and 12 joints evaluation in B mode) (mode B) or an ultrasound approach (remission défined as the absence of power Doppler on 38 joints (28 of SDAI plus 10 MTPs joints) (mode D) in a pragmatical context (study assessed by private rheumatologists and hospital rheumatologists).

Inclusion Criteria: Both gender patients aged 18 -to 80 years old Patients will be eligible if they fulfill ACR/EULAR 2010 rheumatoid arthritis All the treatment recommended for rheumatoïd arthritis (anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, hydroxychloroquine, salazopyrine, methotrexate, ARAVA or biologics treatment: Enbrel, humira, remicade, cimzia, tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept, simponi) would be in stable posology since at least 12 weeks before inclusion Patients would be able to understand and be agree with the protocole Patients would be able to consent Exclusion Criteria: Patient unable to cooperate patient and who refuse to sign consent form Patient unable to understand the study,under administrative supervision or legal guardianship Signs and symptoms of uncontroled or severe progressive pathology at the level of renal, hepatic, hematological, endocrine, lung, cardiac, neurological or cerebral Scheduled surgery procedure during the study on the estimated joint. Patient non-affiliated to social security Pregnant and nursing mothers