search
Back to results

e-PAT Neuromod Evaluation of Personalized rTMS for Resistant Depression

Primary Purpose

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Functional magnetic resonance imaging used to individualize rTMS protocol using robotic coil positioning
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depressive Disorder focused on measuring Individualized Medicine, Functional Neuroimaging, Robotic Proceedure, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Repetitive, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Monocentric, Compariative Cross-Over 3 Arms Study Randomized, Single-Blind Method

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Aged from 18 to 65 Y
  • Affiliated to the health insurance
  • Having signed an informed consent
  • Suffering from major depression according to the DSM5
  • Unresponsive or incomplete remission after at least one trial of antidepressant (> 6 weeks at efficient dose or side effects)
  • Treatment stable for > 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria:

  • Contraindication for MRI, rTMS or tDCS: non-removable ferromagnetic body, prosthesis, pacemaker, medication delivered by an implanted pump clip or vascular stent, heart valve or ventricular shunt, seizure disorders, skin pathology in the region of tDCS electrode placement.
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe and non-stabilized somatic pathology
  • Patients deprived of liberty or hospitalized without their consent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Individualized rTMS protocol

    High frequency rTMS as usual

    Trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Arm Description

    The target region will be defined by comparing the rCBF scan of the patient to a control population (n = 80). rCBF will be measured using the QUIPS2 arterial spin labeling sequence on a Siemens 3T Verio. The therapeutic protocol will be design to correct the rCBF anomaly first by defining each point where to deliver the stimulation than the stimulation protocol for each point (180% of active motor threshold, 4-second 10 Hz train duration, with 26-second intertrain interval for a total of 3000 pulses). The whole target will be homogeneously stimulated. The active motor threshold will be assessed. The programmed protocol will be delivered while a figure of eight coil will be positioned by a robotic device (Axilum Robotics). The procedure will be repeated twice a day for 10 days over 2 weeks.

    rTMS will be performed as usual using a figure-eight coil: Defining the active motor threshold. For each session positioning the coil 5 cm ahead of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle, stimulating at 180% of active motor threshold (10 Hz, 4-second train duration, and 26-second intertrain interval) for 37.5 minutes (3000 pulses per session), twice a day for 10 days over 2 weeks. Coil and stimulator will remain the same between individualized and "as usual" proceedures.

    tDCS will be performed as usual: After controlling for skin healthiness, the anode and the cathode will be respectively placed over F3 and F4. A commercial devices (MagStim), will deliver a constant current of 2 mA through 25 cm2 saline-soaked rubber sponges for 20 min per session. The procedure will be repeated twice a day for 10 days over 2 weeks.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Reduction of the target regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) anomaly
    The target region will be defined by comparing the rCBF scan of the patient to a control population (n = 80). rCBF will be measured using the QUIPS2 arterial spin labeling sequence on a Siemens 3T Verio. We will compare the average rCBF of the target region before and after the therapeutic protocol between the different procedures (ANOVA).
    Reduction of the functional connectivity anomalies
    Functional connectivity map of the target region will be performed by extracting its average temporal course and looking at the region(s) which activity is correlated (smoothed by a 8 mm Gaussian kernel). The contrast map of each patient will be compared to the one of a control population submitted to the same analysis. We will compare the number of above threshold voxels (F-test, p < 0.05 uncorrected, extension > 1 cm3) before and after the therapeutic procedure (ANOVA). We will compare the average rCBF of the target region before and after the therapeutic protocol between the different procedures (ANOVA).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Symptoms evaluated by the clinician (QIDS16-C)
    See http://www.ids-qids.org/ for documentation relative to these scales. Computation will be performed in terms of : Percentage of symptom reduction Number responders (reduction of more than 50% of symptoms) Numbers of remitters (QIDS16-C ≤ 6).
    Symptoms evaluated by the patient (QIDS30-SR)
    See http://www.ids-qids.org/ for documentation relative to these scales. Computation will be performed in terms of : Percentage of symptom reduction Number responders (reduction of more than 50% of symptoms) Numbers of remitters (QIDS16-C ≤ 6).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 1, 2015
    Last Updated
    January 4, 2016
    Sponsor
    University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02410421
    Brief Title
    e-PAT Neuromod Evaluation of Personalized rTMS for Resistant Depression
    Official Title
    Validation of Individualized rTMS Protocol Using Non Invasive Functional Brain Imaging and Robotic Coil Placement in Resistant Depression: Comparison With Classical rTMS and tDCS
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Study Start Date
    undefined (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 2020 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    May 2020 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Although repetitive trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective therapy for resistant depression, it still fail to remit up to 70% of these patients. We hypothesize that personalizing the procedure using functional MRI to better select dysfunctional regions and robotic coil placement to stimulate these regions homogeneously, will increase its efficacy. Individualized rTMS will be compared to traditional rTMS procedure and to trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In this small proof of principle study our primary outcome measure will be the correction of the MRI anomalies. Symptoms reduction and the proportion of remitters will be secondary outcome measurements.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
    Keywords
    Individualized Medicine, Functional Neuroimaging, Robotic Proceedure, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Repetitive, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Monocentric, Compariative Cross-Over 3 Arms Study Randomized, Single-Blind Method

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    Care Provider
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Individualized rTMS protocol
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    The target region will be defined by comparing the rCBF scan of the patient to a control population (n = 80). rCBF will be measured using the QUIPS2 arterial spin labeling sequence on a Siemens 3T Verio. The therapeutic protocol will be design to correct the rCBF anomaly first by defining each point where to deliver the stimulation than the stimulation protocol for each point (180% of active motor threshold, 4-second 10 Hz train duration, with 26-second intertrain interval for a total of 3000 pulses). The whole target will be homogeneously stimulated. The active motor threshold will be assessed. The programmed protocol will be delivered while a figure of eight coil will be positioned by a robotic device (Axilum Robotics). The procedure will be repeated twice a day for 10 days over 2 weeks.
    Arm Title
    High frequency rTMS as usual
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    rTMS will be performed as usual using a figure-eight coil: Defining the active motor threshold. For each session positioning the coil 5 cm ahead of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle, stimulating at 180% of active motor threshold (10 Hz, 4-second train duration, and 26-second intertrain interval) for 37.5 minutes (3000 pulses per session), twice a day for 10 days over 2 weeks. Coil and stimulator will remain the same between individualized and "as usual" proceedures.
    Arm Title
    Trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    tDCS will be performed as usual: After controlling for skin healthiness, the anode and the cathode will be respectively placed over F3 and F4. A commercial devices (MagStim), will deliver a constant current of 2 mA through 25 cm2 saline-soaked rubber sponges for 20 min per session. The procedure will be repeated twice a day for 10 days over 2 weeks.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Functional magnetic resonance imaging used to individualize rTMS protocol using robotic coil positioning
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Reduction of the target regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) anomaly
    Description
    The target region will be defined by comparing the rCBF scan of the patient to a control population (n = 80). rCBF will be measured using the QUIPS2 arterial spin labeling sequence on a Siemens 3T Verio. We will compare the average rCBF of the target region before and after the therapeutic protocol between the different procedures (ANOVA).
    Time Frame
    difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Title
    Reduction of the functional connectivity anomalies
    Description
    Functional connectivity map of the target region will be performed by extracting its average temporal course and looking at the region(s) which activity is correlated (smoothed by a 8 mm Gaussian kernel). The contrast map of each patient will be compared to the one of a control population submitted to the same analysis. We will compare the number of above threshold voxels (F-test, p < 0.05 uncorrected, extension > 1 cm3) before and after the therapeutic procedure (ANOVA). We will compare the average rCBF of the target region before and after the therapeutic protocol between the different procedures (ANOVA).
    Time Frame
    difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Symptoms evaluated by the clinician (QIDS16-C)
    Description
    See http://www.ids-qids.org/ for documentation relative to these scales. Computation will be performed in terms of : Percentage of symptom reduction Number responders (reduction of more than 50% of symptoms) Numbers of remitters (QIDS16-C ≤ 6).
    Time Frame
    difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Title
    Symptoms evaluated by the patient (QIDS30-SR)
    Description
    See http://www.ids-qids.org/ for documentation relative to these scales. Computation will be performed in terms of : Percentage of symptom reduction Number responders (reduction of more than 50% of symptoms) Numbers of remitters (QIDS16-C ≤ 6).
    Time Frame
    difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Response time and accuracy at the attentional network test
    Description
    Switch or mixed states (MAThyS) NAA/Choline and Lactate of the target (NMR spectroscopy)
    Time Frame
    Difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Title
    Quality of life ("Echelle synoptique des 3 temps")
    Description
    Switch or mixed states (MAThyS) NAA/Choline and Lactate of the target (NMR spectroscopy)
    Time Frame
    difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Title
    Global Assessment of Functioning
    Description
    Switch or mixed states (MAThyS) NAA/Choline and Lactate of the target (NMR spectroscopy)
    Time Frame
    Difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Title
    Activity measured by an actimeter
    Description
    Switch or mixed states (MAThyS) NAA/Choline and Lactate of the target (NMR spectroscopy)
    Time Frame
    Difference between before (D-7 to -1) and after (D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)
    Title
    Acceptance of each therapeutic procedure
    Description
    Feeling comfortable with the environment (visual analog scale), this will be evaluated at each stimulation
    Time Frame
    We will directly compare each therapeutic protocol by averaging this value from D1 to D12.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion criteria: Aged from 18 to 65 Y Affiliated to the health insurance Having signed an informed consent Suffering from major depression according to the DSM5 Unresponsive or incomplete remission after at least one trial of antidepressant (> 6 weeks at efficient dose or side effects) Treatment stable for > 6 weeks Exclusion criteria: Contraindication for MRI, rTMS or tDCS: non-removable ferromagnetic body, prosthesis, pacemaker, medication delivered by an implanted pump clip or vascular stent, heart valve or ventricular shunt, seizure disorders, skin pathology in the region of tDCS electrode placement. Pregnancy Severe and non-stabilized somatic pathology Patients deprived of liberty or hospitalized without their consent
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jack FOUCHER, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Service de Psychiatrie 1, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    e-PAT Neuromod Evaluation of Personalized rTMS for Resistant Depression

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs