search
Back to results

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation (i-gel_br)

Primary Purpose

Heart Arrest

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Conventional endotracheal tube
Reinforced endotracheal tube
Sponsored by
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Heart Arrest focused on measuring intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, manikins

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • emergency physician
  • work at emergency department more than 1 year.
  • 50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having backache or wrist pain

Sites / Locations

  • Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Intubation using laryngoscope

i-gel blind intubation

i-gel bronchoscopic intubation

Arm Description

Intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately. Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used Conventional endotracheal tube Reinforced endotracheal tube

i-gel blind intubation means that blind endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion. i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately. Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used Conventional endotracheal tube Reinforced endotracheal tube

i-gel bronchoscopic intubation means that bronchoscopic endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion. i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately. Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used Conventional endotracheal tube Reinforced endotracheal tube

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

intubation time
1st intubation attempt, an expected average time is 1 min.

Secondary Outcome Measures

success rate for intubation
the rate for successful 1st intubation

Full Information

First Posted
March 18, 2015
Last Updated
April 13, 2015
Sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02411422
Brief Title
Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation
Acronym
i-gel_br
Official Title
Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel-Assisted Blind Intubation and I-gel-assisted Bronchoscopic Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Simulation Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption. Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Arrest
Keywords
intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, manikins

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
23 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intubation using laryngoscope
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately. Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used Conventional endotracheal tube Reinforced endotracheal tube
Arm Title
i-gel blind intubation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
i-gel blind intubation means that blind endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion. i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately. Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used Conventional endotracheal tube Reinforced endotracheal tube
Arm Title
i-gel bronchoscopic intubation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
i-gel bronchoscopic intubation means that bronchoscopic endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion. i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately. Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used Conventional endotracheal tube Reinforced endotracheal tube
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional endotracheal tube
Intervention Description
Conventional endotracheal tube
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Reinforced endotracheal tube
Intervention Description
Reinforced endotracheal tube
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
intubation time
Description
1st intubation attempt, an expected average time is 1 min.
Time Frame
1 Day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
success rate for intubation
Description
the rate for successful 1st intubation
Time Frame
1 Day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: emergency physician work at emergency department more than 1 year. 50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation Exclusion Criteria: having backache or wrist pain
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
City
Seoul
State/Province
Yeongdeungpo-gu
ZIP/Postal Code
150-037
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs