search
Back to results

Comparing Two Palliative Schemes of Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer (COOPERATION)

Primary Purpose

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
6 x 6 Gy
16 x 3.125 Gy
Sponsored by
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Head and Neck Neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

• Newly diagnosed patients with primary non-metastatic carcinoma located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except T1 glottic), hypopharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses and salivary gland and carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck region who are not suitable for radical treatment with surgery or (chemo) and, therefore, planned for treatment with radiotherapy in palliative setting.

OR

  • Newly diagnosed patients with primary head and neck carcinoma with limited metastatic disease in a good general condition and few comorbidities (ACE-25 <3) with life expectancy of at least 6 months are also eligible.
  • No chemotherapy or surgery is allowed before inclusion.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previously radiation treatment in the head and neck region, for any reason.

    * Chemotherapy or surgery for head and neck tumor before inclusion and no other concomitant anti-cancer therapy is allowed during study treatment.

  • Patients with head and neck malignancies arising from skin, nose, thyroid gland or esophagus.
  • Patients with advanced stage sarcoma or lymphoma of the head and neck region.
  • Expected life expectancy of less than 3 months

Sites / Locations

  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
  • Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
  • Radiotherapiegroep, lokatie Arnhem
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • Maastro Clinic
  • Radboud umc
  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum
  • Instituut Verbeeten

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

arm 1: 6 fractions of radiation

arm 2: 16 fractrions of radiation

Arm Description

radiation in a 6 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 6 Gy

radiation in a 16 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 3.125 Gy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

time to loco-regional progression
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
impact of both radiation schemes on QoL
this will be measured by the EORTC questionnaires C30 and HN35; analysis will be performed by a random effects regression model

Secondary Outcome Measures

overall survival rates
RECIST
loco-regional control rates
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; according to RECIST
overall response rates
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
compliance to the study treatments as assessed by completed treatment and follow-up visits
number of treatment fractions and follow-up visits
the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute and late toxicity
scoring of AE according tot CTC 4.0

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2015
Last Updated
June 26, 2019
Sponsor
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02421458
Brief Title
Comparing Two Palliative Schemes of Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
Acronym
COOPERATION
Official Title
Dutch Randomized Multicenter Trial COmparing twO PalliativE RAdiaTION Schemes for Incurable Head and Neck Cancer (COOPERATION)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
recruiting rate was to low
Study Start Date
November 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The Netherlands Cancer Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RCT to compare two radiation schemes for palliative HeadNeck cancer
Detailed Description
A substantial proportion of patients with head and neck (HNC) are not suitable for curative treatment with surgery and/or (chemo)radiotherapy (CRT) because of very advanced stage, significant comorbidities, bad general condition, distant metastasis, or a combination of these factors. Although radiotherapy (RT) is a commonly used option to achieve durable disease control and to alleviate troublesome symptoms, the data about the optimal radiation scheme and the impact of these schedules on quality of life (QoL) of these vulnerable patients is extremely scarce. Although different radiation schemes are used worldwide (in the Netherlands, at least 15 different radiation schedules are used), it is currently not possible to identify the best RT scheme, based only on retrospective studies because of the major differences between these studies with regard to patient's demographics, radiation schedules given, the radiation technique used etc. Furthermore, no any information is available on the impact of these schemes on treatment-related toxicity and QoL. This illustrates the urgent need for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify the most optimal schemes of RT for this group of patients. Therefore, the investigators intend to initiate a prospective RCT comparing the survival, loco-regional control, toxicity, and QoL of two commonly used schemes. This study will be the first of his kind for palliative patients with HNC and will compare a short-course (6 fractions) with a long-course of radiotherapy (16 fractions). Because most of patients with incurable HNC have a poor performance status and major comorbidity and prefer limited number of visits to the hospital, it is quite reasonable to investigate whether a short scheme of radiotherapy with limited number of visits to the clinic as good as a relatively long-course of radiotherapy in terms of outcome, toxicity and QoL. This delicate balance between outcomes, possible toxicity and patient's comfort would justify the initiation of such randomized trial. The results of this study will in the nearby future enable us to indicate the radiation scheme best suits which patient category

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Head and Neck Neoplasms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
arm 1: 6 fractions of radiation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
radiation in a 6 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 6 Gy
Arm Title
arm 2: 16 fractrions of radiation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
radiation in a 16 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 3.125 Gy
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
6 x 6 Gy
Intervention Description
radiation in 6 fraction of 6 Gy, twice a week during 3 weeks
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
16 x 3.125 Gy
Intervention Description
radiation in 16 fraction of 3.125 Gy, 4 times a week during 4 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
time to loco-regional progression
Description
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
Time Frame
4 months
Title
impact of both radiation schemes on QoL
Description
this will be measured by the EORTC questionnaires C30 and HN35; analysis will be performed by a random effects regression model
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
overall survival rates
Description
RECIST
Time Frame
4 months
Title
loco-regional control rates
Description
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; according to RECIST
Time Frame
3 months
Title
overall response rates
Description
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
Time Frame
2 year
Title
compliance to the study treatments as assessed by completed treatment and follow-up visits
Description
number of treatment fractions and follow-up visits
Time Frame
4 months
Title
the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute and late toxicity
Description
scoring of AE according tot CTC 4.0
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: • Newly diagnosed patients with primary non-metastatic carcinoma located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except T1 glottic), hypopharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses and salivary gland and carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck region who are not suitable for radical treatment with surgery or (chemo) and, therefore, planned for treatment with radiotherapy in palliative setting. OR Newly diagnosed patients with primary head and neck carcinoma with limited metastatic disease in a good general condition and few comorbidities (ACE-25 <3) with life expectancy of at least 6 months are also eligible. No chemotherapy or surgery is allowed before inclusion. Age ≥ 18 years WHO performance status 0-2 Signed written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients with previously radiation treatment in the head and neck region, for any reason. * Chemotherapy or surgery for head and neck tumor before inclusion and no other concomitant anti-cancer therapy is allowed during study treatment. Patients with head and neck malignancies arising from skin, nose, thyroid gland or esophagus. Patients with advanced stage sarcoma or lymphoma of the head and neck region. Expected life expectancy of less than 3 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Abrahim Al-Mamgani, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medisch Spectrum Twente
City
Enschede
State/Province
Overijssel
ZIP/Postal Code
7513 ER
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
City
Leiden
State/Province
Zuid Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
2333 ZA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
19066CX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Radiotherapiegroep, lokatie Arnhem
City
Arnhem
ZIP/Postal Code
6815AD
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2260 AK
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9700 RB
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maastro Clinic
City
Maastricht
ZIP/Postal Code
NL-6229 ET
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Radboud umc
City
NIjmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6225GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3008EA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Instituut Verbeeten
City
Tilburg
ZIP/Postal Code
5042 SB
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32417345
Citation
Al-Mamgani A, Kessels R, Verhoef CG, Navran A, Hamming-Vrieze O, Kaanders JHAM, Steenbakkers RJHM, Tans L, Hoebers F, Ong F, van Werkhoven E, Langendijk JA. Randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal radiotherapy scheme for palliative treatment of incurable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Aug;149:181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 14.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparing Two Palliative Schemes of Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs