search
Back to results

Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cycling
Balance
Standard physical therapy
Sponsored by
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring post-acute stroke, functional electrical stimulation, biofeedback, balance, cycling, rehabilitation, gait

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke (both ischemic or hemorrhagic) less than 6 months before recruitment
  • low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale <2)
  • no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints
  • able to sit up to 30 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological impairment (Mini mental scale <24)
  • presence of other neurological diseases
  • spatial hemineglect
  • cardiac pacemakers
  • allergy to electrodes
  • an inability to tolerate electrical stimulation.

Sites / Locations

  • Istituti Clinici e Scientifici MaugeriRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Biofeedback training

Usual Care

Arm Description

It consists of 15 daily sessions of voluntary cycling training augmented by functional electrical stimulation (FES) followed by 15 daily sessions of balance training (multimodal biofeedback training). Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback and last about 20 minutes. In addition to cycling or balance training, subjects perform standard physical therapy in order to reach 90 minutes of training per day.

It consists of 30 daily sessions of standard physical therapy. Each session last about 90 minutes.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Gait Speed
Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Gait speed
Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.
Aerobic capacity/endurance during gait assessed by 6-minute walking test
Subjects are asked to walk along a rectilinear corridor for 6 minutes. The distance covered is measured.
Motor power of the paretic lower extremity assessed by Motricity Index
Italian version; Only leg-subscale of the paretic side
Trunk Control assessed by Trunk Control Test
Italian version
Abilities during activities of daily life assessed by Functional Independence Measure
Italian version
Risk of fall assessed by Fall Efficacy Scale
Italian version
Balance control assessed by Berg Balance Scale
Italian version
Patient's perception of the effect of the intervention assessed by Global Perceived Effect
Italian version
Pedaling performance assessed by Pedaling test
A pedaling test is performed on the motorized cycle-ergometer to measure the force produced by the two sides during voluntary cycling as well as electromyography activations of the main lower limb muscles. Subjects are asked to pedal at four difference target pace (20 RPM, 30 RPM, 40 RPM, and 50 RPM), while the ergometer motor maintains a constant cadence of 10 RPM less than the target. A visual numerical cadence indicator and a metronome help the subjects to keep the constant cadence.
Balance performance assessed by Balance test
Postural stability is evaluated using the commercial balance board exploited in the experimental intervention program (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Pre-defined assessments are used to evaluate the postural sways during upright stance both with eyes open and closed; the limits of stability in all directions (forward, backward, right, and left); and the capability to shift the weight both left/right and forward/backward.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2015
Last Updated
March 6, 2017
Sponsor
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
Collaborators
Politecnico di Milano
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02439515
Brief Title
Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training
Official Title
Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
Collaborators
Politecnico di Milano

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study proposes a novel rehabilitative program for the recovery of locomotor abilities in post-acute stroke patients. The hypothesis is that a rehabilitative program which involves a biofeedback cycling training combining voluntary effort and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the leg muscles, and a biofeedback balance training is superior to usual care in improving walking abilities, disability, motor performance, and independence of post-acute stroke patients. The innovative approach is to investigate whether interventions which do not directly involve locomotor functions but movements similar in terms of kinematic patterns and neural commands (e.g. pedaling), or aimed at recovering an essential prerequisite for walking, such as postural control during upright stance, may improve and/or accelerate the recovery of walking abilities. A single-blind randomized controlled study is carried out. Participants are post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke less than 6 months before recruitment, with an adult age, a low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale <2), no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints, and able to sit up to 30 minutes. Subjects are randomized to one of two groups, one performing the novel rehabilitative program in addition to usual care (experimental group), and one performing usual care alone (control group). The experimental program consists of 15 sessions of FES-supported voluntary cycling training followed by 15 sessions of balance training. Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback in order to maximize patients' involvement in the exercise and are performed in addition to usual care. The control group is involved in standard physical therapy which includes stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation. Both training programs last 6 weeks and patients are trained daily for about 90 minutes. Cycling and balance training last about 20 minutes; thus, patients in the experimental group perform only about 70 minutes of usual care. Participants are evaluated at baseline (T1), after the end of the cycling training or after 3 weeks of usual care (post-treatment, T2), after the end of the whole intervention (post-treatment, T3), and about 6 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up, T4).
Detailed Description
More details on the experimental training program are here provided. The cycling training is performed on a motorized cycle-ergometer (MOTOmed, Reck GmbH) equipped with force sensors mounted at the base of the cranks (PowerForce system, Radlabor GmbH). The acquired force signals are displayed to the subjects who are asked to achieve a symmetrical involvement of the two legs. To deliver FES, a current-controlled 8-channel stimulator (RehaStim; Hasomed GmbH) is used and surface electrodes are applied in a bipolar configuration on the quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius lateralis, and tibialis anterior of both legs. Rectangular biphasic pulses with a pulse width of 400 μs and a stimulation frequency of 20 Hz are adopted. The stimulus intensity is set on each muscle the first day of training: for the paretic muscles values well tolerated by the subject and able to produce visibly good muscle contractions are identified, whereas for the healthy side lower values just above the sensory threshold are used. The stimulation timing is synchronized to the cycling movement according to physiological stereotyped activation patterns. The balance training is performed during upright stance using a balance board (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Subjects are asked to keep still or move their center of pressure following a target displayed on a screen in front of them.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
post-acute stroke, functional electrical stimulation, biofeedback, balance, cycling, rehabilitation, gait

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Biofeedback training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
It consists of 15 daily sessions of voluntary cycling training augmented by functional electrical stimulation (FES) followed by 15 daily sessions of balance training (multimodal biofeedback training). Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback and last about 20 minutes. In addition to cycling or balance training, subjects perform standard physical therapy in order to reach 90 minutes of training per day.
Arm Title
Usual Care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
It consists of 30 daily sessions of standard physical therapy. Each session last about 90 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cycling
Other Intervention Name(s)
MOTOmed, Reck GmbH, PowerForce system, Radlabor GmbH, RehaStim; Hasomed GmbH
Intervention Description
Voluntary cycling augmented by electrical stimulation and biofeedback
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Balance
Other Intervention Name(s)
Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.
Intervention Description
Balance control exercises with visual biofeedback
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard physical therapy
Intervention Description
It consists of stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gait Speed
Description
Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.
Time Frame
"6 weeks"
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gait speed
Description
Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Aerobic capacity/endurance during gait assessed by 6-minute walking test
Description
Subjects are asked to walk along a rectilinear corridor for 6 minutes. The distance covered is measured.
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Motor power of the paretic lower extremity assessed by Motricity Index
Description
Italian version; Only leg-subscale of the paretic side
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Trunk Control assessed by Trunk Control Test
Description
Italian version
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Abilities during activities of daily life assessed by Functional Independence Measure
Description
Italian version
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Risk of fall assessed by Fall Efficacy Scale
Description
Italian version
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Balance control assessed by Berg Balance Scale
Description
Italian version
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Patient's perception of the effect of the intervention assessed by Global Perceived Effect
Description
Italian version
Time Frame
"6 weeks"
Title
Pedaling performance assessed by Pedaling test
Description
A pedaling test is performed on the motorized cycle-ergometer to measure the force produced by the two sides during voluntary cycling as well as electromyography activations of the main lower limb muscles. Subjects are asked to pedal at four difference target pace (20 RPM, 30 RPM, 40 RPM, and 50 RPM), while the ergometer motor maintains a constant cadence of 10 RPM less than the target. A visual numerical cadence indicator and a metronome help the subjects to keep the constant cadence.
Time Frame
"Day 0", "3 weeks","6 months+6 weeks"
Title
Balance performance assessed by Balance test
Description
Postural stability is evaluated using the commercial balance board exploited in the experimental intervention program (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Pre-defined assessments are used to evaluate the postural sways during upright stance both with eyes open and closed; the limits of stability in all directions (forward, backward, right, and left); and the capability to shift the weight both left/right and forward/backward.
Time Frame
"3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke (both ischemic or hemorrhagic) less than 6 months before recruitment low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale <2) no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints able to sit up to 30 minutes Exclusion Criteria: neurological impairment (Mini mental scale <24) presence of other neurological diseases spatial hemineglect cardiac pacemakers allergy to electrodes an inability to tolerate electrical stimulation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Simona Ferrante, PhD
Phone
+390223999004
Email
simona.ferrante@polimi.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Emilia Ambrosini, PhD
Phone
+390223999509
Email
emilia.ambrosini@polimi.it
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simona Ferrante, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Politecnico di Milano
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Istituti Clinici e Scientifici Maugeri
City
Lissone
State/Province
Monza Brianza
ZIP/Postal Code
20851
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giorgio Ferriero, PhD
Phone
+390394657259
Email
giorgio.ferriero@icsmaugeri.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emilia Ambrosini, PhD
Phone
+390223999509
Email
emilia.ambrosini@polimi.it

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22514205
Citation
Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, Ferrigno G, Molteni F, Pedrocchi A. Cycling induced by electrical stimulation improves muscle activation and symmetry during pedaling in hemiparetic patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 May;20(3):320-30. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2191574. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21861930
Citation
Ferrante S, Ambrosini E, Ravelli P, Guanziroli E, Molteni F, Ferrigno G, Pedrocchi A. A biofeedback cycling training to improve locomotion: a case series study based on gait pattern classification of 153 chronic stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Aug 24;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-47.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21372309
Citation
Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, Pedrocchi A, Ferrigno G, Molteni F. Cycling induced by electrical stimulation improves motor recovery in postacute hemiparetic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):1068-73. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599068. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32106874
Citation
Ambrosini E, Parati M, Peri E, De Marchis C, Nava C, Pedrocchi A, Ferriero G, Ferrante S. Changes in leg cycling muscle synergies after training augmented by functional electrical stimulation in subacute stroke survivors: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Feb 27;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00662-w.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31556542
Citation
Ambrosini E, Peri E, Nava C, Longoni L, Monticone M, Pedrocchi A, Ferriero G, Ferrante S. A multimodal training with visual biofeedback in subacute stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Feb;56(1):24-33. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05847-7. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs