Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter: A Pilot Study
Primary Purpose
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Surefire® Infusion System
Standard End-hole catheter
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Lobar-only treatments
- Patients with biopsy or radiographically proven hepatocellular carcinoma who are not candidates for transplant, surgical resection or ablative therapy
- Patients 18 years of age and older
- Patients who are able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C disease,
- Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 3,
- Patients who are unable to tolerate Y-90,
- Patients with arterial anatomy unsuitable to place Surefire catheter,
- Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy,
- Patients with platelets less than 50 (uncorrectable),
- Bilirubin >3 mg/dl,
- AST or ALT>5x upper limit of normal,
- Patients who are unable to tolerate angiography,
- Patients with < 3 months to live,
- Patients who meet the standard Y-90 exclusion criteria according to package insert
- Female patients who are pregnant
- Patients under the age of 18
- Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Surefire® Infusion System
Standard End-hole catheter
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Surefire® Infusion System treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a Surefire catheter.
Patients randomized to the standard end-hole catheter treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a standard end-hole catheter.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Y-90 distribution and concentration as determined by post embolization PET-CT
Y-90 distribution and concentration within targeted hepatocellular carcinoma as determined by post embolization PET-CT.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary outcome (length of duration for arteriogram)
length of duration for arteriogram
Secondary outcome (fluoro time duration)
fluoro time duration
Secondary outcome (number of vessels requiring coiling)
number of vessels requiring coiling
Secondary outcome (tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST criteria)
Secondary outcome- toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
Secondary outcome (time to progression of tumor)
time to progression of tumor
Secondary outcome (vessel injury)
vessel injury
Secondary outcome (MELD)
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
Secondary outcome (CPS)
Childs-Pugh Score (CPS)
Secondary outcome (non-target embolization)
non-target embolization
Secondary outcome (time to death from first treatment)
time to death from first treatment
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02446925
First Posted
May 7, 2015
Last Updated
July 25, 2022
Sponsor
Wright State University
Collaborators
Surefire Medical, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02446925
Brief Title
Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter: A Pilot Study
Official Title
Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter in Yttrium-90 Distribution and Tissue Penetration: A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Insufficient number of subjects meeting inclusion criteria
Study Start Date
May 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 19, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 19, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wright State University
Collaborators
Surefire Medical, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The Surefire Infusion System is a novel catheter initially developed to prevent reflux of embolic material into non-target vascular territories. Further research has demonstrated improved penetration and distribution of embolic material into treated arterial territories. The purpose of this study is to compare Y-90 glass microsphere distribution and penetration into cancerous tissue within the liver between a standard endhole catheter and the Surefire Infusion System.
Detailed Description
Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization is a minimally invasive trans-arterial treatment for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies that relies on tumor hypervascularity for concentration of radioactive microspheres. The Surefire® Infusion System (SIS) (Westminster, CO) was developed to reduce non-target embolization which can result in morbid complications, especially those involving radioembolic or drug eluting microspheres. Prior to its introduction, radioembolization and other trans-arterial therapies have been performed with standard end-hole catheters. In addition to providing protection against non-target embolization, studies have demonstrated improved penetration of embolic material (tantalum microspheres and Tc-99M labeled MAA) with the use of the SIS when compared to conventional end-hole catheters. To date, no study has demonstrated improved distribution and penetration of yttrium-90 glass microspheres with the use of the Surefire catheter versus a standard end-hole catheter. Y-90 distribution can be evaluated with the use of immediate post-delivery PET/CT imaging as it creates its own pair production and can be imaged in the immediate post delivery period. PET/CT will demonstrate distribution and the dose to tumors can be calculated. The investigators propose a pilot study comparing yttrium-90 tumor distribution and concentration in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the use of the SIS versus a standard end-hole catheter.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
8 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Surefire® Infusion System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Surefire® Infusion System treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a Surefire catheter.
Arm Title
Standard End-hole catheter
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the standard end-hole catheter treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a standard end-hole catheter.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Surefire® Infusion System
Intervention Description
Utilization of Surefire® Infusion System for Y-90 glass microsphere embolization
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Standard End-hole catheter
Intervention Description
Utilization of Standard End-hole catheter for Y-90 glass microsphere embolization
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Y-90 distribution and concentration as determined by post embolization PET-CT
Description
Y-90 distribution and concentration within targeted hepatocellular carcinoma as determined by post embolization PET-CT.
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary outcome (length of duration for arteriogram)
Description
length of duration for arteriogram
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (fluoro time duration)
Description
fluoro time duration
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (number of vessels requiring coiling)
Description
number of vessels requiring coiling
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
Description
tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST criteria)
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome- toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
Description
toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (time to progression of tumor)
Description
time to progression of tumor
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (vessel injury)
Description
vessel injury
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (MELD)
Description
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (CPS)
Description
Childs-Pugh Score (CPS)
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (non-target embolization)
Description
non-target embolization
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Secondary outcome (time to death from first treatment)
Description
time to death from first treatment
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Lobar-only treatments
Patients with biopsy or radiographically proven hepatocellular carcinoma who are not candidates for transplant, surgical resection or ablative therapy
Patients 18 years of age and older
Patients who are able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C disease,
Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 3,
Patients who are unable to tolerate Y-90,
Patients with arterial anatomy unsuitable to place Surefire catheter,
Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy,
Patients with platelets less than 50 (uncorrectable),
Bilirubin >3 mg/dl,
AST or ALT>5x upper limit of normal,
Patients who are unable to tolerate angiography,
Patients with < 3 months to live,
Patients who meet the standard Y-90 exclusion criteria according to package insert
Female patients who are pregnant
Patients under the age of 18
Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shannon Kauffman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23462064
Citation
Arepally A, Chomas J, Kraitchman D, Hong K. Quantification and reduction of reflux during embolotherapy using an antireflux catheter and tantalum microspheres: ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter: A Pilot Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs