search
Back to results

Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter: A Pilot Study

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Surefire® Infusion System
Standard End-hole catheter
Sponsored by
Wright State University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lobar-only treatments
  • Patients with biopsy or radiographically proven hepatocellular carcinoma who are not candidates for transplant, surgical resection or ablative therapy
  • Patients 18 years of age and older
  • Patients who are able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C disease,
  • Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 3,
  • Patients who are unable to tolerate Y-90,
  • Patients with arterial anatomy unsuitable to place Surefire catheter,
  • Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy,
  • Patients with platelets less than 50 (uncorrectable),
  • Bilirubin >3 mg/dl,
  • AST or ALT>5x upper limit of normal,
  • Patients who are unable to tolerate angiography,
  • Patients with < 3 months to live,
  • Patients who meet the standard Y-90 exclusion criteria according to package insert
  • Female patients who are pregnant
  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Surefire® Infusion System

    Standard End-hole catheter

    Arm Description

    Patients randomized to the Surefire® Infusion System treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a Surefire catheter.

    Patients randomized to the standard end-hole catheter treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a standard end-hole catheter.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Y-90 distribution and concentration as determined by post embolization PET-CT
    Y-90 distribution and concentration within targeted hepatocellular carcinoma as determined by post embolization PET-CT.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Secondary outcome (length of duration for arteriogram)
    length of duration for arteriogram
    Secondary outcome (fluoro time duration)
    fluoro time duration
    Secondary outcome (number of vessels requiring coiling)
    number of vessels requiring coiling
    Secondary outcome (tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
    tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST criteria)
    Secondary outcome- toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
    toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
    Secondary outcome (time to progression of tumor)
    time to progression of tumor
    Secondary outcome (vessel injury)
    vessel injury
    Secondary outcome (MELD)
    Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
    Secondary outcome (CPS)
    Childs-Pugh Score (CPS)
    Secondary outcome (non-target embolization)
    non-target embolization
    Secondary outcome (time to death from first treatment)
    time to death from first treatment

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 7, 2015
    Last Updated
    July 25, 2022
    Sponsor
    Wright State University
    Collaborators
    Surefire Medical, Inc.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02446925
    Brief Title
    Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter: A Pilot Study
    Official Title
    Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter in Yttrium-90 Distribution and Tissue Penetration: A Pilot Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Terminated
    Why Stopped
    Insufficient number of subjects meeting inclusion criteria
    Study Start Date
    May 1, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 19, 2018 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 19, 2018 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Wright State University
    Collaborators
    Surefire Medical, Inc.

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The Surefire Infusion System is a novel catheter initially developed to prevent reflux of embolic material into non-target vascular territories. Further research has demonstrated improved penetration and distribution of embolic material into treated arterial territories. The purpose of this study is to compare Y-90 glass microsphere distribution and penetration into cancerous tissue within the liver between a standard endhole catheter and the Surefire Infusion System.
    Detailed Description
    Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization is a minimally invasive trans-arterial treatment for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies that relies on tumor hypervascularity for concentration of radioactive microspheres. The Surefire® Infusion System (SIS) (Westminster, CO) was developed to reduce non-target embolization which can result in morbid complications, especially those involving radioembolic or drug eluting microspheres. Prior to its introduction, radioembolization and other trans-arterial therapies have been performed with standard end-hole catheters. In addition to providing protection against non-target embolization, studies have demonstrated improved penetration of embolic material (tantalum microspheres and Tc-99M labeled MAA) with the use of the SIS when compared to conventional end-hole catheters. To date, no study has demonstrated improved distribution and penetration of yttrium-90 glass microspheres with the use of the Surefire catheter versus a standard end-hole catheter. Y-90 distribution can be evaluated with the use of immediate post-delivery PET/CT imaging as it creates its own pair production and can be imaged in the immediate post delivery period. PET/CT will demonstrate distribution and the dose to tumors can be calculated. The investigators propose a pilot study comparing yttrium-90 tumor distribution and concentration in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the use of the SIS versus a standard end-hole catheter.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Device Feasibility
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    8 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Surefire® Infusion System
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients randomized to the Surefire® Infusion System treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a Surefire catheter.
    Arm Title
    Standard End-hole catheter
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients randomized to the standard end-hole catheter treatment arm will undergo Y-90 glass microsphere embolization with a standard end-hole catheter.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Surefire® Infusion System
    Intervention Description
    Utilization of Surefire® Infusion System for Y-90 glass microsphere embolization
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Standard End-hole catheter
    Intervention Description
    Utilization of Standard End-hole catheter for Y-90 glass microsphere embolization
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Y-90 distribution and concentration as determined by post embolization PET-CT
    Description
    Y-90 distribution and concentration within targeted hepatocellular carcinoma as determined by post embolization PET-CT.
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Secondary outcome (length of duration for arteriogram)
    Description
    length of duration for arteriogram
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (fluoro time duration)
    Description
    fluoro time duration
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (number of vessels requiring coiling)
    Description
    number of vessels requiring coiling
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
    Description
    tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST criteria)
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome- toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
    Description
    toxicities (per standard labs: Total bilirubin; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Albumin; International Normalized Ratio (INR); Creatinine; Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP))
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (time to progression of tumor)
    Description
    time to progression of tumor
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (vessel injury)
    Description
    vessel injury
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (MELD)
    Description
    Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (CPS)
    Description
    Childs-Pugh Score (CPS)
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (non-target embolization)
    Description
    non-target embolization
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months
    Title
    Secondary outcome (time to death from first treatment)
    Description
    time to death from first treatment
    Time Frame
    Up to 12 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Lobar-only treatments Patients with biopsy or radiographically proven hepatocellular carcinoma who are not candidates for transplant, surgical resection or ablative therapy Patients 18 years of age and older Patients who are able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C disease, Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 3, Patients who are unable to tolerate Y-90, Patients with arterial anatomy unsuitable to place Surefire catheter, Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy, Patients with platelets less than 50 (uncorrectable), Bilirubin >3 mg/dl, AST or ALT>5x upper limit of normal, Patients who are unable to tolerate angiography, Patients with < 3 months to live, Patients who meet the standard Y-90 exclusion criteria according to package insert Female patients who are pregnant Patients under the age of 18 Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Shannon Kauffman, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    23462064
    Citation
    Arepally A, Chomas J, Kraitchman D, Hong K. Quantification and reduction of reflux during embolotherapy using an antireflux catheter and tantalum microspheres: ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Surefire Catheter Versus Standard End-hole Microcatheter: A Pilot Study

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs