search
Back to results

Interest of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Non Invasive Ventilation During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants (TRAMONTANE)

Primary Purpose

Bronchiolitis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HFNC
nCPAP
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Montpellier
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bronchiolitis

Eligibility Criteria

1 Day - 6 Months (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age<6months
  • bronchiolitis
  • mWCAS > or=3
  • hospitalisation in pediatric intensive care unit
  • signed consent form (2 parents)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intubated patient
  • Neurological or cardiac disease

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital of MontpellierRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

HFNC treatment

nCPAP treatment

Arm Description

HFNC : High flow nasal canula 24hours Patients will be treated by a High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) for the initial management of their bronchiolitis (24 hours)

nCPAP : nasal NCPAP Patients will be treated by a nasal CPAP (n-CPAP: 7 cmH2O) for the initial management of their bronchiolitis (24 hours)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of failure
Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

Secondary Outcome Measures

number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
comparison of the clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) in both arms
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
comparison of the clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) in both arms
number of participants with an increase of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms and classification of the lesions with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms and classification of the lesions with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms and classification of the lesions with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
number of participants with Discomfort in both arms
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN
number of participants with Discomfort in both arms
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN
number of participants with Discomfort in both arms
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN

Full Information

First Posted
January 27, 2015
Last Updated
May 26, 2015
Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02457013
Brief Title
Interest of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Non Invasive Ventilation During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants
Acronym
TRAMONTANE
Official Title
Interest of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Non Invasive Ventilation During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2016 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus nasal CPAP( continuous positive airway pressure) (n-CPAP: 7 cmH2O) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants. Design: non-inferiority study, prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center. Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS >3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups: "n-CPAP"(nasal continuous positive airway pressure) or "HFNC" during 24 hours. Conditions of measurements: Primary endpoint: Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea. Secondary outcomes: Assessment at H1, H12, H24 of mWCAS, respiratory and heart rate, EDIN score, skin lesions, FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen ) required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%, transcutaneous PCO2 (carbon dioxide partial pressure) (correlated to an initial gas analysis), Report SpO2 / FiO2 Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis. Expected number of patients: 71 per arm: 142 children. Study Schedule: October 2014-April 2016

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bronchiolitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
142 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HFNC treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
HFNC : High flow nasal canula 24hours Patients will be treated by a High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) for the initial management of their bronchiolitis (24 hours)
Arm Title
nCPAP treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
nCPAP : nasal NCPAP Patients will be treated by a nasal CPAP (n-CPAP: 7 cmH2O) for the initial management of their bronchiolitis (24 hours)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HFNC
Intervention Description
Hygh flow nasal canula HFNC
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
nCPAP
Intervention Description
nasal nCPAP
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of failure
Description
Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.
Time Frame
24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
Description
comparison of the clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) in both arms
Time Frame
1hour
Title
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
Description
comparison of the clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) in both arms
Time Frame
12hours
Title
number of participants with an increase of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
Description
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
Description
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
Description
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Time Frame
12 hours
Title
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
Description
Assessment of Report Sp02/Fi02in both arms
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms
Description
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms and classification of the lesions with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms
Description
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms and classification of the lesions with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
Time Frame
12 hours
Title
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms
Description
number of participants with skin lesions in both arms and classification of the lesions with the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
number of participants with Discomfort in both arms
Description
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
number of participants with Discomfort in both arms
Description
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN
Time Frame
12 hours
Title
number of participants with Discomfort in both arms
Description
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN
Time Frame
24 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Day
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age<6months bronchiolitis mWCAS > or=3 hospitalisation in pediatric intensive care unit signed consent form (2 parents) Exclusion Criteria: Intubated patient Neurological or cardiac disease
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Christophe MILESI, Doctor
Phone
0033467336609
Email
c-milesi@chu-montpellier.fr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital of Montpellier
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34395
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Interest of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Non Invasive Ventilation During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs