search
Back to results

Evaluation of Liver Grafts With FibroScan® Before Organ Retrieval in Patients With Brain Death (FIBROSCAME)

Primary Purpose

Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Liver Transplantation, Brain Death

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fibroscan
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Limoges
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Tissue and Organ Harvesting focused on measuring Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Liver graft, Brain Death, FibroScan®

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years with recognized clinical brain death confirmed by clinical examination, who are considered for organ retrieval and clinically stable to achieve the retrieval procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Personal objection to organ retrieval and clinical research expressed during lifetime and registered in the Registre National des Refus (French registration of all refusals to organ donation)
  • Family objection to liver retrieval after donor's death
  • Ongoing pregnancy when brain death is declared
  • For FT and ST measurements included in the panel FibroMaxTM, 4 exclusion criteria are defined specifically (Acute hepatitis or cytolysis with ALT higher than 622 IU/L, acute or chronic hemolysis, extrahepatic cholestasis, sepsis)

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • Estaing University Hospital
  • AP-HP Henri MONDOR
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • Croix Rousse Hospital
  • Nice University Hospital
  • AP-HP Kremlin Bicêtre
  • University Hospital
  • Univesity Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital
  • University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Fibroscan

Arm Description

All included patients will undergo a Fibroscan (either Fibroscan Touch model or 402 model which enable CAPTM data extraction) once all eligibility criteria have been checked. Liver recipients will be followed up during one year. Biological and medical data used by all transplant sites for the follow-up of transplant patient will be collected

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the CAP™ measured with Fibroscan® to objectively reflect the degree of liver steatosis, a parameter which can be used as an aid in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in donors with brain death (DBD).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of LS measured with Fibroscan® to objectively reflect the degree of fibrosis and steatosis, a parameter which can be used as an aid in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in DBD
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Determination of the prognostic value of CAP™ in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week after transplantation
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Determination of the prognostic value of LS in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week after transplantation
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Determination of the prognostic value of LS in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Determination of the prognostic value of CAP™ in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Determination of the prognostic value of LS in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week, one month and one year after transplantation
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Determination of the prognostic value of CAP™ in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week, one month and one year after transplantation
Fibrosis measurement
evaluate the diagnostic a accuracy of FibroTest in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in DBD by comparing with 1) histological data obtained with liver biopsy (degree of steatosis, degree of fibrosis) and with 2) CAPTM/LS
Steatosis measurement
evaluate the diagnostic a accuracy of SteatoTest in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in DBD by comparing with 1) histological data obtained with liver biopsy (degree of steatosis, degree of fibrosis) and with 2) CAPTM/LS
Fibrosis measurement
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of FibroTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Steatosis measurement
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of SteatoTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Fibrosis measurement
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of FibroTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one year after transplantation
Steatosis measurement
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of SteatoTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one year after transplantation

Full Information

First Posted
May 13, 2015
Last Updated
October 23, 2019
Sponsor
University Hospital, Limoges
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02460250
Brief Title
Evaluation of Liver Grafts With FibroScan® Before Organ Retrieval in Patients With Brain Death
Acronym
FIBROSCAME
Official Title
Evaluation of Liver Grafts With FibroScan® Before Organ Retrieval in Patients With Brain Death
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 9, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 9, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Limoges

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
According to the French Biomedicine Agency annual report on retrieval activities and transplants, 1,164 liver transplants were performed in 2011 and 1,161 in 2012. If the amount of brain death donors and retrieved liver grafts appears relatively stable, it remains clearly insufficient compared to the increasing number of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (2,462 in 2011). The median time on the waiting list before liver transplantation which was established from the cohort of patients registered between 2007 and 2011 (excluding patients registered for emergency transplantation and for living related-donor transplantation) increased significantly from 4.4 months between 2007 and 2009 to 6.6 months between 2010 and 2011. In order to compensate for the lack of liver grafts, donors acceptance criteria were broadened. For example, alternative transplantation lists were created with liver grafts coming from so-called "marginal" donors. However, despite these efforts, livers were retrieved on only two out of three brain death donors, i.e. in 1,572 and 1,589 organ donors in 2011 and 2012, respectively. This is unfortunately not enough to meet the increasing needs in liver grafts and a growing number of patients wait each year for transplant. Strategic lines of improvement were defined in order to meet the "2012-2016 transplant perspective" which targets 5,700 transplants carried out in 2015 (+5% every year, all transplants included, with 5,023 transplants in 2012). According to the last consensus conference on liver transplantation of the HAS (French High Authority of Health) the assessment of the degree of macrovacuolar and microvacuolar steatosis determines the possibility to retrieve the graft or not. Liver steatosis consists in an accumulation of fatty droplets in hepatocytes. Its prevalence is high, ranging from 16% to 31% in the general population, and increases up to 46% in heavy drinkers and to 50-80% in the obese population. Steatosis results mostly from alcohol consumption and from metabolic syndrome (obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia) called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and is more rarely secondary to viral hepatitis or exposure to certain medications. NAFLD involves up to 30% of the population in Western countries and its prevalence is increasing. NAFLD may lead to asymptomatic steatosis, but also to steatohepatitis or advanced fibrosis including cirrhosis and its complications Accordingly, the improvement of liver grafts selection based on objective quantitative criteria which takes into account the degree of liver steatosis appears crucial to increase the number of hepatic transplants.
Detailed Description
Medical procedure: Fibroscan® based on vibration control transient elastography (VCTETM) with evaluation of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP™) by ultrasounds (Echosens, Paris, France).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Liver Transplantation, Brain Death
Keywords
Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Liver graft, Brain Death, FibroScan®

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
740 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Fibroscan
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All included patients will undergo a Fibroscan (either Fibroscan Touch model or 402 model which enable CAPTM data extraction) once all eligibility criteria have been checked. Liver recipients will be followed up during one year. Biological and medical data used by all transplant sites for the follow-up of transplant patient will be collected
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Fibroscan
Intervention Description
All included patients will undergo a Fibroscan (either Fibroscan Touch model or 402 model which enable CAPTM data extraction) once all eligibility criteria have been checked.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Description
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the CAP™ measured with Fibroscan® to objectively reflect the degree of liver steatosis, a parameter which can be used as an aid in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in donors with brain death (DBD).
Time Frame
1 Day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Description
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of LS measured with Fibroscan® to objectively reflect the degree of fibrosis and steatosis, a parameter which can be used as an aid in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in DBD
Time Frame
1 Day
Title
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Description
Determination of the prognostic value of CAP™ in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week after transplantation
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Description
Determination of the prognostic value of LS in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week after transplantation
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Description
Determination of the prognostic value of LS in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Description
Determination of the prognostic value of CAP™ in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Liver Stiffness (LS) measurement
Description
Determination of the prognostic value of LS in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week, one month and one year after transplantation
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Controlled Attenuation Parameter™ (CAP™) measurement
Description
Determination of the prognostic value of CAP™ in terms of survival of liver grafts at one week, one month and one year after transplantation
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Fibrosis measurement
Description
evaluate the diagnostic a accuracy of FibroTest in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in DBD by comparing with 1) histological data obtained with liver biopsy (degree of steatosis, degree of fibrosis) and with 2) CAPTM/LS
Time Frame
1 Day
Title
Steatosis measurement
Description
evaluate the diagnostic a accuracy of SteatoTest in selecting liver grafts before retrieval in DBD by comparing with 1) histological data obtained with liver biopsy (degree of steatosis, degree of fibrosis) and with 2) CAPTM/LS
Time Frame
1 Day
Title
Fibrosis measurement
Description
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of FibroTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Steatosis measurement
Description
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of SteatoTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one month after transplantation
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Fibrosis measurement
Description
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of FibroTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one year after transplantation
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Steatosis measurement
Description
Determination of the short-term prognostic values of SteatoTest in terms of survival of liver grafts at one year after transplantation
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients older than 18 years with recognized clinical brain death confirmed by clinical examination, who are considered for organ retrieval and clinically stable to achieve the retrieval procedure Exclusion Criteria: Personal objection to organ retrieval and clinical research expressed during lifetime and registered in the Registre National des Refus (French registration of all refusals to organ donation) Family objection to liver retrieval after donor's death Ongoing pregnancy when brain death is declared For FT and ST measurements included in the panel FibroMaxTM, 4 exclusion criteria are defined specifically (Acute hepatitis or cytolysis with ALT higher than 622 IU/L, acute or chronic hemolysis, extrahepatic cholestasis, sepsis)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas PICHON, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Limoges
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80054
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49100
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Besançon
ZIP/Postal Code
25030
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33000
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29200
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Caen
ZIP/Postal Code
14033
Country
France
Facility Name
Estaing University Hospital
City
Clermont Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63100
Country
France
Facility Name
AP-HP Henri MONDOR
City
Creteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87042
Country
France
Facility Name
Croix Rousse Hospital
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69004
Country
France
Facility Name
Nice University Hospital
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06000
Country
France
Facility Name
AP-HP Kremlin Bicêtre
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
84270
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France
Facility Name
Univesity Hospital
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51100
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54500
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Liver Grafts With FibroScan® Before Organ Retrieval in Patients With Brain Death

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs