Porous and Non-porous Bone Grafts in Intra-bony Periodontal Defects
Primary Purpose
Periodontal Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Porous variant of Bioactive Glass.
Non porous variant of Bioactive Glass.
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Periodontal Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Age: 18-55 years.
- Probing Depth >5mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- History of periodontal treatment last six months.
- Bleeding disorders.
- Gross oral pathology.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
porous bone graft group
Non-porous bone gaft group
Arm Description
Intervention: Flap surgery procedure with porous bone grafting (Periooglass)
Intervention: Flap surgery procedure with non-porous bone grafting (Novabone morsels)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in relative attachment loss
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in probing depth
Change in plaque index
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02463006
First Posted
May 29, 2015
Last Updated
June 2, 2015
Sponsor
Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02463006
Brief Title
Porous and Non-porous Bone Grafts in Intra-bony Periodontal Defects
Official Title
Comparative Evaluation of Porous and Non Porous Variants of Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Till date, no study has been reported in the literature where porous bioactive glass was used for the management of periodontal osseous defects. In this context, the present study is designed to assess the efficacy of the porous variant of bioactive glass and compare with that of nonporous variant using cone beam computed tomography.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate clinically the periodontal healing with Porous variant of Bioactive Glass placed in the intra bony defects at an interval of 6 months.
To evaluate clinically the periodontal healing with Non Porous variant of Bioactive Glass placed in the intra bony defects at an interval of 6 months.
To evaluate the radiographic changes in the intra bony defect grafted with Porous variant of Bioactive Glass at baseline and an interval of 6 months.
To evaluate the radiographic changes in the intra bony defect grafted with Non Porous variant of Bioactive Glass at baseline and an interval of 6 months.
To compare clinically soft tissue healing for sites grafted with Porous variant of Bioactive Glass and sites grafted with Non Porous variant of Bioactive Glass in the treatment of periodontal intra bony defects at an interval of 6 months.
To compare the radiographic changes for sites grafted with Porous variant and sites grafted with Non Porous of Bioactive Glass in the treatment of periodontal intra bony defects at an interval of 6 months.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Periodontal Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
porous bone graft group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention: Flap surgery procedure with porous bone grafting (Periooglass)
Arm Title
Non-porous bone gaft group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: Flap surgery procedure with non-porous bone grafting (Novabone morsels)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Porous variant of Bioactive Glass.
Intervention Description
Flap surgery with Porous variant of Bioactive Glass.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Non porous variant of Bioactive Glass.
Intervention Description
Flap surgery with non-Porous variant of Bioactive Glass.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in relative attachment loss
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in probing depth
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in plaque index
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Age: 18-55 years.
Probing Depth >5mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
History of periodontal treatment last six months.
Bleeding disorders.
Gross oral pathology.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23055593
Citation
Gokhale ST, Dwarakanath CD. The use of a natural osteoconductive porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) in infrabony periodontal defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Apr;16(2):247-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99270.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21692628
Citation
Wohlfahrt JC, Aass AM, Ronold HJ, Heijl L, Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP. Microcomputed tomographic and histologic analysis of animal experimental degree II furcation defects treated with porous titanium granules or deproteinized bovine bone. J Periodontol. 2012 Feb;83(2):211-21. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110128. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Porous and Non-porous Bone Grafts in Intra-bony Periodontal Defects
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs