A Study Of PF-06410293 (Adalimumab-Pfizer) And Adalimumab (Humira®) In Combination With Methotrexate In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (REFLECTIONS B538-02).
Primary Purpose
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PF-06410293
Adalimumab
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring Phase 3, adalimumab, rheumatoid arthritis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis based on 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for at least 4 months.
- At least 6 tender (of 68 assessed) and 6 swollen (of 66 assessed) joints at screening and baseline.
- Hs-CRP equal or greater than 8 mg/L.
- Must have received methotrexate for at least 12 weeks and been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first study dose.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of untreated or inadequately treated latent or active TB.
- Evidence of uncontrolled, clinically significant diseases, including moderate or severe heart failure (NYHA Class III/IV) or malignancy in the previous 5 years.
- History of infection requiring hospitalization or parenteral antimicrobial therapy within 6 months prior to first dose of study drug.
- May have received no more than 2 doses of one biologic therapy (other than adalimumab or lymphocyte depleting therapy).
- Any second DMARD must be washed out prior to the first study dose.
Sites / Locations
- ArthroCare, Arthritis Care & Research P.C.
- Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, PC
- Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, PC
- St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
- East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
- Westlake Medical Research
- Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
- Desert Valley Medical Group
- Javed Rheumatology Associates, Inc
- Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Specialties
- Robert W. Levin, MD, PA
- International Medical Research
- SIMED Arthritis Center
- Southeastern Integrated Medical, PL, d/b/a Florida Medical Research
- Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, P.A.
- Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
- Alastair C. Kennedy, MD
- Indian River Primary Care
- St Luke's Intermountain Research Center
- St Luke' s Clinic
- Physician's Clinic of Iowa, P.C.
- Graves-Gilbert Clinic Bowling Green
- The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research
- Bronson Internal Medicine and Rheumatology
- North Mississippi Medical Clinics, Inc. - Clinical Research
- Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
- Westroads Clinical Research, Inc.
- Arthritis, Rheumatic & Back Disease Associates, P.A.
- Manhattan Medical Research
- Buffalo Rheumatology and Medicine PLLC
- Physicians East PA
- Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research
- Clinical Research of Reading, LLC
- Low Country Rheumatology, PA
- Regional Health Clinical Research
- Regional Medical Clinic - Rheumatology
- West Tennessee Research Institute
- Ramesh C Gupta, M.D.
- Amarillo Center for Clinical Research, Ltd.
- Austin Regional Clinic
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center
- The Clinical Research Institute of Houston, LLC
- Accurate Clinical Research
- Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC
- Northwest Diagnostic Clinic, PA
- Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, P.C.
- Wenatchee Valley Hospitals & Clinics
- Rheumatology and Pulmonary Clinic
- Paradise Arthritis & Rheumatology Pty Ltd
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
- RK Will Pty Ltd
- EDUMED Educação em Saúde S/S Ltda
- MHAT Plovdiv AD
- University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment (UMHAT) Kaspela EOOD
- UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD
- University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD
- Fundacion Instituto de Reumatologia Fernando Chalem
- Lekarna Na vrsku
- Revmatologie Bruntal, s.r.o.
- L.K.N. Arthrocentrum, s.r.o.
- Lekarna Vesalion
- Benu Lekarna
- CCBR-SYNARC, a.s.
- Revmatologicky ustav
- Lekarna Hradebni s.r.o.
- MEDICAL PLUS, s.r.o.
- Innomedica OÜ
- East Tallinn Central Hospital
- LTD "Unimed Adjara"
- Unimedi Kakheti Ltd, Telavi Referral Hospital
- V.Tsitlanadze Scientifically-Practical Rheumatology Center LTD
- V.Tsitlanadze Scientifically-Practical Rheumatology Center
- LTD Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic Helsicore"
- LTD Cardio-Reanimation Center
- Tbilisi Heart and Vascular Clinic LTD
- LTD Altravita
- LTD.MediClubGeorgia
- JSC Medical Corporation Evex
- Schlosspark-Klinik
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. von Hinüber/Dr. Demary
- Klinikum der Universität München
- Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius
- Rheumapraxis Dr. Martin Welcker und Kollegen
- Knappschaftsklinikum Saar GmbH
- Rheumazentrum Ratingen
- Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ
- Qualiclinic Kft.
- Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogorvosi Kozpont
- Anjo Kosei Hospital
- Inoue Hospital
- National Hospital Organization Asahikawa Medical Center
- Katayama Orthopaedic Rheumatology Clinic
- Sapporo City General Hospital
- Hokkaido University Hospital
- Matsubara Mayflower Hospital
- National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center
- Saitama Medical Center
- Hirose Clinic
- Kondo clinic for rheumatism and orthopaedics
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center
- Chonnam National University Hospital
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
- Konkuk University Medical Center
- Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
- LSMUL Kauno klinikos
- Klaipedos universitetine ligonine
- Vilniaus universiteto ligonines Santariskiu klinikos
- Consultorio Medico Privado de Reumatologia
- Consultorio de Reumatologia
- MedLab
- Timaru Hospital
- Timaru Rheumatology Studies
- Waikato Hospital
- Wellington Hospital, Capital Coast District Health Board
- Oficina administrativa
- Unidad de Investigacion en Medicina Interna y Enfermedades Criticas
- Oficina Administrativa
- ABK REUMA SRL-Medicentro Biociencias Peru SRL
- Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia
- Centro de Investigación para el Estudio de Enfermedades Reumáticas
- Instituto de Ginecología y Reproducción & Cirugía Mínimamente Invasiva
- Gabinet Internistyczno-Reumatologiczny Piotr Adrian Klimiuk
- NZOZ Zdrowie Osteo-Medic s.c.
- Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze J.Brzezicki, B. Gornikiewicz-Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
- NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Lek. med. Barbara Bazela
- Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Gdyni
- Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Katowicach
- Centrum Medyczne Pratia Katowice
- Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych "REUMED" Filia nr 2
- NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED. S.C.
- Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM Dr Hab. Med. Pawel Hrycaj
- Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej ''Nasz Lekarz''
- Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Warszawie
- Centrum Medyczne AMED
- MTZ Clinical Research Sp. z o.o.
- ''Rheuma Medicus'' Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej
- Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddział we Wroclawiu
- GBUZ Republican hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov
- LLC Alliance Biomedical Ural group
- GAUZ of Kemerovo Region "Regional clinical hospital for war veterans"
- GMU Kursk Regional Clinical Hospital of the Healthcare Committee of the Kursk Region
- Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1 Named after N.I. Pirogov
- GBUZ of city of Moscow City clinical hospital n.a. A.K.Eramishantsev of Ministry of Healthcare of
- Orenburg State Medical Academy
- Regional Clinical Hospital
- GBOU VPO Ryazan State Medical University Named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
- GBU of Ryazan region Regional clinical cardiology dispanser
- Spb GBUZ "Clinical rheumatology hospital # 25" City CDC prevention of osteoporosis
- GUZ " Regional clinical hospital"
- GBUZ VO Regional clinical hospital
- GBKUZ of Yaroslavl region "City hospital n. a. N.A. Semashko"
- Institute of Rheumatology
- Military Medical Academy,
- Institute for Treatment and Rehabilitation Niska Banja
- Special Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Novi Sad
- Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital
- Clinresco Centres (Pty) Ltd
- St. Augustine's Hospital
- Arthritis Clinical Research Trials, Dr. C.E Spargo and Dr. R.B Bhorat Practice
- Panorama Medical Centre
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
- Hospital Universitario Cruces
- Hospital Universitario A Coruña
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
- Hospital Infanta Luisa
- Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
- China Medical University Hospital
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
- Kyivska miska klinichna likarnia #6
- Lvivskyi oblasnyi klinichnyi diahnostychnyi tsentr,
- Komunalna 4-a miska klinichna likarnia m. Lvova,
- Komunalnyi zaklad okhorony zdorovia "Kharkivska miska klinichna likarnia #8"
- Komunalnyi zaklad Kyivskoi oblasnoi rady "Kyivska oblasna klinichna likarnia",
- Bahatoprofilnyi medychnyi tsentr (Universytetska klinika #1)
- Komunalnyi zaklad Sumskoi oblasnoi rady "Sumska oblasna klinichna
- Vinnytska oblasna klinichna likarnia im. M.I.Pyrohova revmatolohichne viddilennia
- Komunalna ustanova "Zaporizka oblasna klinichna likarnia" Zaporizkoi oblasnoi rady
- Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Foundation Trust ,Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
- The Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
PF-06410293
Adalimumab
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12: Period 1
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Other Time Points Other Than Week 12: Period 1
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response: Period 2
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response: Period 3
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response: Period 1
ACR50 is a categorical variable indicating a 50% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response: Period 2
ACR50 is a categorical variable indicating a 50% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response: Period 3
ACR50 is a categorical variable indicating a 50% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response: Period 1
ACR70 is a categorical variable indicating a 70% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response: Period 2
ACR70 is a categorical variable indicating a 70% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response: Period 3
ACR70 is a categorical variable indicating a 70% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count: Period 1
Sixty-eight (68) joints were assessed by an independent blinded joint assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. The 68 joints assessed were: upper body including temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular; upper extremity including shoulder, elbow, wrist (radiocarpal, carpal and carpometacarpal considered as 1 unit), metacarpophalangeals (MCP I, II, III, IV, V), thumb interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeals (PIP II, III, IV, V), and distal interphalangeals (DIP II, III, IV, V); lower extremity including hip, knee, ankle, tarsus (subtalar, transverse tarsal and tarsometatarsal considered as 1 unit), metatarsophalangeals (MTP I, II, III, IV, V), great toe interphalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeals combined (PIP and DIP II, III, IV, V).
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count: Period 2
Sixty-eight (68) joints were assessed by an independent blinded joint assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. The 68 joints assessed were: upper body including temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular; upper extremity including shoulder, elbow, wrist (radiocarpal, carpal and carpometacarpal considered as 1 unit), metacarpophalangeals (MCP I, II, III, IV, V), thumb interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeals (PIP II, III, IV, V), and distal interphalangeals (DIP II, III, IV, V); lower extremity including hip, knee, ankle, tarsus (subtalar, transverse tarsal and tarsometatarsal considered as 1 unit), metatarsophalangeals (MTP I, II, III, IV, V), great toe interphalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeals combined (PIP and DIP II, III, IV, V).
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count: Period 3
Sixty-eight (68) joints were assessed by an independent blinded joint assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. The 68 joints assessed were: upper body including temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular; upper extremity including shoulder, elbow, wrist (radiocarpal, carpal and carpometacarpal considered as 1 unit), metacarpophalangeals (MCP I, II, III, IV, V), thumb interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeals (PIP II, III, IV, V), and distal interphalangeals (DIP II, III, IV, V); lower extremity including hip, knee, ankle, tarsus (subtalar, transverse tarsal and tarsometatarsal considered as 1 unit), metatarsophalangeals (MTP I, II, III, IV, V), great toe interphalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeals combined (PIP and DIP II, III, IV, V).
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count: Period 1
Sixty-six (66) joints were assessed for swelling, the same as those listed for tender joint count, excluding the right and left hip joints.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count: Period 2
Sixty-six (66) joints were assessed for swelling, the same as those listed for tender joint count, excluding the right and left hip joints.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count: Period 3
Sixty-six (66) joints were assessed for swelling, the same as those listed for tender joint count, excluding the right and left hip joints.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGAA): Period 1
The investigator assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease symptoms, functional capacity and physical examination, and independent of the participant's reported assessments of PGA (patient's global assessment of arthritis) and PAAP (patient's assessment of arthritis pain). The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "None" and the 100 mm end labeled "Extreme".
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGAA): Period 2
The investigator assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease symptoms, functional capacity and physical examination, and independent of the participant's reported assessments of PGA (patient's global assessment of arthritis) and PAAP (patient's assessment of arthritis pain). The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "None" and the 100 mm end labeled "Extreme".
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGAA): Period 3
The investigator assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease symptoms, functional capacity and physical examination, and independent of the participant's reported assessments of PGA (patient's global assessment of arthritis) and PAAP (patient's assessment of arthritis pain). The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "None" and the 100 mm end labeled "Extreme".
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP): Period 1
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP): Period 2
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP): Period 3
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA): Period 1
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "Very Well" and the 100 mm end labeled "Very Poorly".
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA): Period 2
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "Very Well" and the 100 mm end labeled "Very Poorly".
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA): Period 3
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "Very Well" and the 100 mm end labeled "Very Poorly".
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Period 1
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device would adjust to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Period 2
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device would adjust to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Period 3
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device would adjust to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Period 1
Serum samples were analyzed to determine the level of hs-CRP, which was an acute-phase reactant.
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Period 2
Serum samples were analyzed to determine the level of hs-CRP, which was an acute-phase reactant.
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Period 3
Serum samples were analyzed to determine the level of hs-CRP, which was an acute-phase reactant.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (4 Components Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28-4 [CRP]): Period 1
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. Higher score indicate more disease activity. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L).
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (4 Components Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28-4 [CRP]): Period 2
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. Higher score indicate more disease activity. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L).
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (4 Components Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28-4 [CRP]): Period 3
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. Higher score indicate more disease activity. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L).
Number of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 1
EULAR response was based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria. Good response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 =<3.2. Moderate response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 =<5.1; or DAS improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 >3.2. No response was achieved if DAS improvement from baseline =<0.6 (no matter present DAS28 score); or DAS improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 >5.1.
Number of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 2
EULAR response was based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria. Good response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 =<3.2. Moderate response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 =<5.1; or DAS improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 >3.2. No response was achieved if DAS improvement from baseline =<0.6 (no matter present DAS28 score); or DAS improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 >5.1.
Number of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 3
EULAR response was based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria. Good response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 =<3.2. Moderate response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 =<5.1; or DAS improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 >3.2. No response was achieved if DAS improvement from baseline =<0.6 (no matter present DAS28 score); or DAS improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 >5.1.
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Remission (DAS <2.6): Period 1
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L). Higher score indicate more disease activity; DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 indicates remission.
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Remission (DAS <2.6): Period 2
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L). Higher score indicate more disease activity; DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 indicates remission.
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Remission (DAS <2.6): Period 3
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L). Higher score indicate more disease activity; DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 indicates remission.
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response:Period 1
Participants were considered to be in ACR/EULAR remission when either of the following criteria was met: scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, hs-CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0-10 cm scale) were all =<1; or the score on the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) was =<3.3. SDAI score was the sum of tender joint count (28), swollen joint count (28), PGA (0-10 cm scale), physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA, 0-10 cm scale) and hs-CRP (mg/dL).
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 2
Participants were considered to be in ACR/EULAR remission when either of the following criteria was met: scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, hs-CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0-10 cm scale) were all =<1; or the score on the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) was =<3.3. SDAI score was the sum of tender joint count (28), swollen joint count (28), PGA (0-10 cm scale), physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA, 0-10 cm scale) and hs-CRP (mg/dL).
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 3
Participants were considered to be in ACR/EULAR remission when either of the following criteria was met: scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, hs-CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0-10 cm scale) were all =<1; or the score on the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) was =<3.3. SDAI score was the sum of tender joint count (28), swollen joint count (28), PGA (0-10 cm scale), physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA, 0-10 cm scale) and hs-CRP (mg/dL).
Serum Concentration Versus Time Summary: Period 1
Serum Concentration Versus Time Summary: Period 2
Serum Concentration Versus Time Summary: Period 3
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb): Period 1
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of ADA using a semi-quantitative electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, and ADA positive was defined as ADA titer >=1.88. Serum samples tested positive for ADA were further analyzed for the presence or absence of NAb using a semi-quantitative cell-based assay, and NAb positive was defined as NAb titer >=0.70.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb): Period 2
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of ADA using a semi-quantitative electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, and ADA positive was defined as ADA titer >=1.88. Serum samples tested positive for ADA were further analyzed for the presence or absence of NAb using a semi-quantitative cell-based assay, and NAb positive was defined as NAb titer >=0.70.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb): Period 3
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of ADA using a semi-quantitative electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, and ADA positive was defined as ADA titer >=1.88. Serum samples tested positive for ADA were further analyzed for the presence or absence of NAb using a semi-quantitative cell-based assay, and NAb positive was defined as NAb titer >=0.70.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment Related TEAEs: Period 1
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs for Period 1 were events between first dose of study drug in Period 1 and up to Week 26 pre-dose assessments that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Treatment-related TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment Related TEAEs: Period 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs for Period 2 were events between first dose of study drug in Period 2 and up to Week 52 pre-dose assessments that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to prior state. Treatment-related TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment Related TEAEs: Period 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs for Period 3 were events between first dose of study drug in Period 3 and up to Week 92 visit that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to prior state. Treatment-related TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Period 1
Laboratory evaluation included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Each parameter was evaluated against commonly used and widely accepted criteria. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality during Period 1 (without regard to baseline abnormality) is presented.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Period 2
Laboratory evaluation included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Each parameter was evaluated against commonly used and widely accepted criteria. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality during Period 2 (without regard to baseline abnormality) is presented.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Period 3
Laboratory evaluation included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Each parameter was evaluated against commonly used and widely accepted criteria. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality during Period 3 (without regard to baseline abnormality) is presented.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02480153
Brief Title
A Study Of PF-06410293 (Adalimumab-Pfizer) And Adalimumab (Humira®) In Combination With Methotrexate In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (REFLECTIONS B538-02).
Official Title
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY ASSESSING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-06410293 AND ADALIMUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH METHOTREXATE IN SUBJECTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS WHO HAVE HAD AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO METHOTREXATE
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 25, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 6, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study will assess the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PF-06410293 and adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in subjects with moderately to severly active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate.
In an additional optional portion of the study, during open label Treatment Period 3 (TP3), a subset of subjects used a Prefilled Pen (PFP) to administer up to 3 injections of their study treatment (PF-06410293) at home.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
Phase 3, adalimumab, rheumatoid arthritis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
597 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PF-06410293
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Adalimumab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06410293
Other Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab-Pfizer
Intervention Description
PF-06410293 will be administered with a uniform dose regimen, which is SC injection at a dose of 40 mg every other week, throughout the study treatment.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab-European Union, Humira®
Intervention Description
Adalimumab will be administered with a uniform dose regimen, which is SC injection at a dose of 40 mg every other week, throughout the study treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12: Period 1
Description
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Other Time Points Other Than Week 12: Period 1
Description
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response: Period 2
Description
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response: Period 3
Description
ACR20 is a categorical variable indicating a 20% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response: Period 1
Description
ACR50 is a categorical variable indicating a 50% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response: Period 2
Description
ACR50 is a categorical variable indicating a 50% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response: Period 3
Description
ACR50 is a categorical variable indicating a 50% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response: Period 1
Description
ACR70 is a categorical variable indicating a 70% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response: Period 2
Description
ACR70 is a categorical variable indicating a 70% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response: Period 3
Description
ACR70 is a categorical variable indicating a 70% or greater improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 other ACR-core set measures: patient's assessment of arthritis pain (PAAP); patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA); physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count: Period 1
Description
Sixty-eight (68) joints were assessed by an independent blinded joint assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. The 68 joints assessed were: upper body including temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular; upper extremity including shoulder, elbow, wrist (radiocarpal, carpal and carpometacarpal considered as 1 unit), metacarpophalangeals (MCP I, II, III, IV, V), thumb interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeals (PIP II, III, IV, V), and distal interphalangeals (DIP II, III, IV, V); lower extremity including hip, knee, ankle, tarsus (subtalar, transverse tarsal and tarsometatarsal considered as 1 unit), metatarsophalangeals (MTP I, II, III, IV, V), great toe interphalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeals combined (PIP and DIP II, III, IV, V).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count: Period 2
Description
Sixty-eight (68) joints were assessed by an independent blinded joint assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. The 68 joints assessed were: upper body including temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular; upper extremity including shoulder, elbow, wrist (radiocarpal, carpal and carpometacarpal considered as 1 unit), metacarpophalangeals (MCP I, II, III, IV, V), thumb interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeals (PIP II, III, IV, V), and distal interphalangeals (DIP II, III, IV, V); lower extremity including hip, knee, ankle, tarsus (subtalar, transverse tarsal and tarsometatarsal considered as 1 unit), metatarsophalangeals (MTP I, II, III, IV, V), great toe interphalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeals combined (PIP and DIP II, III, IV, V).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count: Period 3
Description
Sixty-eight (68) joints were assessed by an independent blinded joint assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender. The 68 joints assessed were: upper body including temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular; upper extremity including shoulder, elbow, wrist (radiocarpal, carpal and carpometacarpal considered as 1 unit), metacarpophalangeals (MCP I, II, III, IV, V), thumb interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeals (PIP II, III, IV, V), and distal interphalangeals (DIP II, III, IV, V); lower extremity including hip, knee, ankle, tarsus (subtalar, transverse tarsal and tarsometatarsal considered as 1 unit), metatarsophalangeals (MTP I, II, III, IV, V), great toe interphalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeals combined (PIP and DIP II, III, IV, V).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count: Period 1
Description
Sixty-six (66) joints were assessed for swelling, the same as those listed for tender joint count, excluding the right and left hip joints.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count: Period 2
Description
Sixty-six (66) joints were assessed for swelling, the same as those listed for tender joint count, excluding the right and left hip joints.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count: Period 3
Description
Sixty-six (66) joints were assessed for swelling, the same as those listed for tender joint count, excluding the right and left hip joints.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGAA): Period 1
Description
The investigator assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease symptoms, functional capacity and physical examination, and independent of the participant's reported assessments of PGA (patient's global assessment of arthritis) and PAAP (patient's assessment of arthritis pain). The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "None" and the 100 mm end labeled "Extreme".
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGAA): Period 2
Description
The investigator assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease symptoms, functional capacity and physical examination, and independent of the participant's reported assessments of PGA (patient's global assessment of arthritis) and PAAP (patient's assessment of arthritis pain). The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "None" and the 100 mm end labeled "Extreme".
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGAA): Period 3
Description
The investigator assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease symptoms, functional capacity and physical examination, and independent of the participant's reported assessments of PGA (patient's global assessment of arthritis) and PAAP (patient's assessment of arthritis pain). The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "None" and the 100 mm end labeled "Extreme".
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP): Period 1
Description
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP): Period 2
Description
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP): Period 3
Description
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA): Period 1
Description
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "Very Well" and the 100 mm end labeled "Very Poorly".
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA): Period 2
Description
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "Very Well" and the 100 mm end labeled "Very Poorly".
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA): Period 3
Description
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), with the 0 mm end labeled "Very Well" and the 100 mm end labeled "Very Poorly".
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Period 1
Description
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device would adjust to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Period 2
Description
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device would adjust to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Period 3
Description
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Any activity that required assistance from another individual or required the use of an assistive device would adjust to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 representing "no difficulty", 1 as "some difficulty", 2 as "much difficulty", and 3 as "unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Period 1
Description
Serum samples were analyzed to determine the level of hs-CRP, which was an acute-phase reactant.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Period 2
Description
Serum samples were analyzed to determine the level of hs-CRP, which was an acute-phase reactant.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Period 3
Description
Serum samples were analyzed to determine the level of hs-CRP, which was an acute-phase reactant.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (4 Components Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28-4 [CRP]): Period 1
Description
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. Higher score indicate more disease activity. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (4 Components Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28-4 [CRP]): Period 2
Description
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. Higher score indicate more disease activity. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (4 Components Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28-4 [CRP]): Period 3
Description
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. Higher score indicate more disease activity. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Number of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 1
Description
EULAR response was based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria. Good response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 =<3.2. Moderate response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 =<5.1; or DAS improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 >3.2. No response was achieved if DAS improvement from baseline =<0.6 (no matter present DAS28 score); or DAS improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 >5.1.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 2
Description
EULAR response was based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria. Good response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 =<3.2. Moderate response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 =<5.1; or DAS improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 >3.2. No response was achieved if DAS improvement from baseline =<0.6 (no matter present DAS28 score); or DAS improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 >5.1.
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 3
Description
EULAR response was based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria. Good response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 =<3.2. Moderate response was achieved if DAS28 improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 =<5.1; or DAS improvement from baseline >1.2 and DAS28 >3.2. No response was achieved if DAS improvement from baseline =<0.6 (no matter present DAS28 score); or DAS improvement from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 and DAS28 >5.1.
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Remission (DAS <2.6): Period 1
Description
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L). Higher score indicate more disease activity; DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 indicates remission.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Remission (DAS <2.6): Period 2
Description
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L). Higher score indicate more disease activity; DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 indicates remission.
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Remission (DAS <2.6): Period 3
Description
The DAS assessment is a continuous composite measure derived using differential weighting given to each component. The components of the DAS28-4 (CRP) assessment included: tender joint count with 28 joints assessed, swollen joint count with 28 joints assessed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and patient's global assessment of arthritis (PGA). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated as 0.56 sqrt (DAS 28 tender joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (DAS 28 swollen joint count) + 0.36 ln(CRP [mg/L] +1) + 0.014 (PGA [mm]) + 0.96. The possible lowest score is 0.96. The possible highest score is difficult to be determined, due to indeterminable nature of hs-CRP level; assuming hs-CRP level is 0 to 500 mg/L, the possible highest score would be 6.8 (when hs-CRP is 0) to 9.04 (when hs-CRP is 500 mg/L). Higher score indicate more disease activity; DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 indicates remission.
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response:Period 1
Description
Participants were considered to be in ACR/EULAR remission when either of the following criteria was met: scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, hs-CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0-10 cm scale) were all =<1; or the score on the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) was =<3.3. SDAI score was the sum of tender joint count (28), swollen joint count (28), PGA (0-10 cm scale), physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA, 0-10 cm scale) and hs-CRP (mg/dL).
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 2
Description
Participants were considered to be in ACR/EULAR remission when either of the following criteria was met: scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, hs-CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0-10 cm scale) were all =<1; or the score on the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) was =<3.3. SDAI score was the sum of tender joint count (28), swollen joint count (28), PGA (0-10 cm scale), physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA, 0-10 cm scale) and hs-CRP (mg/dL).
Time Frame
Weeks 26, 30, 36, 44 and 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response: Period 3
Description
Participants were considered to be in ACR/EULAR remission when either of the following criteria was met: scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, hs-CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0-10 cm scale) were all =<1; or the score on the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) was =<3.3. SDAI score was the sum of tender joint count (28), swollen joint count (28), PGA (0-10 cm scale), physician's global assessment of arthritis (PGAA, 0-10 cm scale) and hs-CRP (mg/dL).
Time Frame
Weeks 52, 56, 66, 76 and 78
Title
Serum Concentration Versus Time Summary: Period 1
Time Frame
Pre-dose on Days 1, 15, 43, 85 and 183, and at any time during Day 8 visit
Title
Serum Concentration Versus Time Summary: Period 2
Time Frame
Pre-dose on Days 183, 211, 253 and 365
Title
Serum Concentration Versus Time Summary: Period 3
Time Frame
Pre-dose on Days 365, 393, 463, 547 and 575
Title
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb): Period 1
Description
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of ADA using a semi-quantitative electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, and ADA positive was defined as ADA titer >=1.88. Serum samples tested positive for ADA were further analyzed for the presence or absence of NAb using a semi-quantitative cell-based assay, and NAb positive was defined as NAb titer >=0.70.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb): Period 2
Description
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of ADA using a semi-quantitative electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, and ADA positive was defined as ADA titer >=1.88. Serum samples tested positive for ADA were further analyzed for the presence or absence of NAb using a semi-quantitative cell-based assay, and NAb positive was defined as NAb titer >=0.70.
Time Frame
Week 26 dosing up to Week 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb): Period 3
Description
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of ADA using a semi-quantitative electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, and ADA positive was defined as ADA titer >=1.88. Serum samples tested positive for ADA were further analyzed for the presence or absence of NAb using a semi-quantitative cell-based assay, and NAb positive was defined as NAb titer >=0.70.
Time Frame
Week 52 dosing up to follow-up visit (Week 92)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment Related TEAEs: Period 1
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs for Period 1 were events between first dose of study drug in Period 1 and up to Week 26 pre-dose assessments that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Treatment-related TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment Related TEAEs: Period 2
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs for Period 2 were events between first dose of study drug in Period 2 and up to Week 52 pre-dose assessments that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to prior state. Treatment-related TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame
Week 26 dosing up to Week 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment Related TEAEs: Period 3
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs for Period 3 were events between first dose of study drug in Period 3 and up to Week 92 visit that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to prior state. Treatment-related TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame
Week 52 dosing up to follow-up visit (Week 92)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Period 1
Description
Laboratory evaluation included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Each parameter was evaluated against commonly used and widely accepted criteria. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality during Period 1 (without regard to baseline abnormality) is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 26 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Period 2
Description
Laboratory evaluation included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Each parameter was evaluated against commonly used and widely accepted criteria. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality during Period 2 (without regard to baseline abnormality) is presented.
Time Frame
Week 26 dosing up to Week 52 (pre-dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Period 3
Description
Laboratory evaluation included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Each parameter was evaluated against commonly used and widely accepted criteria. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality during Period 3 (without regard to baseline abnormality) is presented.
Time Frame
Week 52 dosing up to follow-up visit (Week 92)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Delivery Success in Sub-study
Description
A sub-study was conducted to determine whether participants or their non-healthcare professional caregivers could safely and effectively administer PF-06410293 with the sponsor's prefilled pen (PFP) device.
Time Frame
Weeks 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis based on 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for at least 4 months.
At least 6 tender (of 68 assessed) and 6 swollen (of 66 assessed) joints at screening and baseline.
Hs-CRP equal or greater than 8 mg/L.
Must have received methotrexate for at least 12 weeks and been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first study dose.
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence of untreated or inadequately treated latent or active TB.
Evidence of uncontrolled, clinically significant diseases, including moderate or severe heart failure (NYHA Class III/IV) or malignancy in the previous 5 years.
History of infection requiring hospitalization or parenteral antimicrobial therapy within 6 months prior to first dose of study drug.
May have received no more than 2 doses of one biologic therapy (other than adalimumab or lymphocyte depleting therapy).
Any second DMARD must be washed out prior to the first study dose.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ArthroCare, Arthritis Care & Research P.C.
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85234
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, PC
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, PC
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85032
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92835
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
City
San Leandro
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94578
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westlake Medical Research
City
Thousand Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Upland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91786
Country
United States
Facility Name
Desert Valley Medical Group
City
Victorville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92395
Country
United States
Facility Name
Javed Rheumatology Associates, Inc
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Specialties
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert W. Levin, MD, PA
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33765
Country
United States
Facility Name
International Medical Research
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32117
Country
United States
Facility Name
SIMED Arthritis Center
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Integrated Medical, PL, d/b/a Florida Medical Research
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, P.A.
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alastair C. Kennedy, MD
City
Vero Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32960
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indian River Primary Care
City
Vero Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32960
Country
United States
Facility Name
St Luke's Intermountain Research Center
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83702
Country
United States
Facility Name
St Luke' s Clinic
City
Meridian
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physician's Clinic of Iowa, P.C.
City
Cedar Rapids
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Graves-Gilbert Clinic Bowling Green
City
Bowling Green
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42101
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20902
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bronson Internal Medicine and Rheumatology
City
Battle Creek
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49015
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Mississippi Medical Clinics, Inc. - Clinical Research
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westroads Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis, Rheumatic & Back Disease Associates, P.A.
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Manhattan Medical Research
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Buffalo Rheumatology and Medicine PLLC
City
Orchard Park
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14127
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians East PA
City
Greenville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27834
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of Reading, LLC
City
Wyomissing
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Low Country Rheumatology, PA
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regional Health Clinical Research
City
Rapid City
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regional Medical Clinic - Rheumatology
City
Rapid City
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57701
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Tennessee Research Institute
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ramesh C Gupta, M.D.
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38119
Country
United States
Facility Name
Amarillo Center for Clinical Research, Ltd.
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79124
Country
United States
Facility Name
Austin Regional Clinic
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Clinical Research Institute of Houston, LLC
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Accurate Clinical Research
City
League City
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77573
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC
City
Mesquite
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwest Diagnostic Clinic, PA
City
Shenandoah
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77380
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, P.C.
City
Chesapeake
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23320
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wenatchee Valley Hospitals & Clinics
City
Wenatchee
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology and Pulmonary Clinic
City
Beckley
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
25801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paradise Arthritis & Rheumatology Pty Ltd
City
Southport
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4215
Country
Australia
Facility Name
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
City
Woodville South
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
RK Will Pty Ltd
City
Victoria Park
State/Province
Western Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
6100
Country
Australia
Facility Name
EDUMED Educação em Saúde S/S Ltda
City
Curitiba
State/Province
Paraná
ZIP/Postal Code
80440-080
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
MHAT Plovdiv AD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment (UMHAT) Kaspela EOOD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1612
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1612
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Fundacion Instituto de Reumatologia Fernando Chalem
City
Bogota
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Lekarna Na vrsku
City
Bruntal
ZIP/Postal Code
792 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologie Bruntal, s.r.o.
City
Bruntal
ZIP/Postal Code
792 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
L.K.N. Arthrocentrum, s.r.o.
City
Hlucin
ZIP/Postal Code
748 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Lekarna Vesalion
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
702 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Benu Lekarna
City
Pardubice
ZIP/Postal Code
530 02
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR-SYNARC, a.s.
City
Pardubice
ZIP/Postal Code
530 02
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Lekarna Hradebni s.r.o.
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MEDICAL PLUS, s.r.o.
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Innomedica OÜ
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
East Tallinn Central Hospital
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
11312
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
LTD "Unimed Adjara"
City
Batumi
State/Province
Ajaria
ZIP/Postal Code
6010
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
Unimedi Kakheti Ltd, Telavi Referral Hospital
City
Telavi
State/Province
Kakheti
ZIP/Postal Code
2200
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
V.Tsitlanadze Scientifically-Practical Rheumatology Center LTD
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0102
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
V.Tsitlanadze Scientifically-Practical Rheumatology Center
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0105
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
LTD Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic Helsicore"
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0112
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
LTD Cardio-Reanimation Center
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0159
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
Tbilisi Heart and Vascular Clinic LTD
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0159
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
LTD Altravita
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0160
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
LTD.MediClubGeorgia
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0160
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
JSC Medical Corporation Evex
City
Tbilisi
ZIP/Postal Code
0177
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
Schlosspark-Klinik
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
14059
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. von Hinüber/Dr. Demary
City
Hildesheim
ZIP/Postal Code
31134
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Universität München
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
80336
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81541
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumapraxis Dr. Martin Welcker und Kollegen
City
Planegg
ZIP/Postal Code
82152
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Knappschaftsklinikum Saar GmbH
City
Püttlingen
ZIP/Postal Code
66346
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumazentrum Ratingen
City
Ratingen
ZIP/Postal Code
40878
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ
City
Debrecen
State/Province
Hajdú-bihar
ZIP/Postal Code
H-4032
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Qualiclinic Kft.
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogorvosi Kozpont
City
Veszprem
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Anjo Kosei Hospital
City
Anjo-shi
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
446-8602
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Inoue Hospital
City
Takasaki
State/Province
Gunma
ZIP/Postal Code
370-0053
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Asahikawa Medical Center
City
Asahikawa
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
070-8644
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Katayama Orthopaedic Rheumatology Clinic
City
Asahikawa
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
078-8243
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Sapporo City General Hospital
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8604
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Hokkaido University Hospital
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8648
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Matsubara Mayflower Hospital
City
Kato
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
673-1462
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center
City
Omura
State/Province
Nagasaki
ZIP/Postal Code
856-8562
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Saitama Medical Center
City
Kawagoe
State/Province
Saitama
ZIP/Postal Code
350-8550
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Hirose Clinic
City
Tokorozawa
State/Province
Saitama
ZIP/Postal Code
359-1111
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kondo clinic for rheumatism and orthopaedics
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
810-0001
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
810-8563
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Chonnam National University Hospital
City
Gwangju
ZIP/Postal Code
61469
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Konkuk University Medical Center
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
05030
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
133-817
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
LSMUL Kauno klinikos
City
Kaunas
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-50161
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Klaipedos universitetine ligonine
City
Klaipeda
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-92288
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Vilniaus universiteto ligonines Santariskiu klinikos
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-08661
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Consultorio Medico Privado de Reumatologia
City
Mexicali
State/Province
BAJA California
ZIP/Postal Code
21100
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Consultorio de Reumatologia
City
Ciudad de Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
CP 07760
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
MedLab
City
Timaru
State/Province
South Canterbury
ZIP/Postal Code
7940
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Timaru Hospital
City
Timaru
State/Province
South Canterbury
ZIP/Postal Code
7940
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Timaru Rheumatology Studies
City
Timaru
State/Province
South Canterbury
ZIP/Postal Code
7940
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Waikato Hospital
City
Hamilton
ZIP/Postal Code
3204
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Wellington Hospital, Capital Coast District Health Board
City
Wellington
ZIP/Postal Code
6021
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Oficina administrativa
City
Arequipa, Arequipa
ZIP/Postal Code
04020
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Unidad de Investigacion en Medicina Interna y Enfermedades Criticas
City
Arequipa
ZIP/Postal Code
CP656
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Oficina Administrativa
City
Lima, Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 33
Country
Peru
Facility Name
ABK REUMA SRL-Medicentro Biociencias Peru SRL
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 21
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 31
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Centro de Investigación para el Estudio de Enfermedades Reumáticas
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 33
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Instituto de Ginecología y Reproducción & Cirugía Mínimamente Invasiva
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 33
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Gabinet Internistyczno-Reumatologiczny Piotr Adrian Klimiuk
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-099
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Zdrowie Osteo-Medic s.c.
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze J.Brzezicki, B. Gornikiewicz-Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Lek. med. Barbara Bazela
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Gdyni
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-537
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Katowicach
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-040
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Katowice
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-081
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych "REUMED" Filia nr 2
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-582
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED. S.C.
City
Nadarzyn
ZIP/Postal Code
05-830
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM Dr Hab. Med. Pawel Hrycaj
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-397
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej ''Nasz Lekarz''
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Warszawie
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-192
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne AMED
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-518
Country
Poland
Facility Name
MTZ Clinical Research Sp. z o.o.
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-106
Country
Poland
Facility Name
''Rheuma Medicus'' Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-118
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddział we Wroclawiu
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-381
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GBUZ Republican hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov
City
Petrozavodsk
State/Province
Republic OF Karelia
ZIP/Postal Code
185019
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
LLC Alliance Biomedical Ural group
City
Izhevsk
ZIP/Postal Code
426035
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GAUZ of Kemerovo Region "Regional clinical hospital for war veterans"
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GMU Kursk Regional Clinical Hospital of the Healthcare Committee of the Kursk Region
City
Kursk
ZIP/Postal Code
305007
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1 Named after N.I. Pirogov
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
119049
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GBUZ of city of Moscow City clinical hospital n.a. A.K.Eramishantsev of Ministry of Healthcare of
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
129327
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Orenburg State Medical Academy
City
Orenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
460000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Orenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
460018
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GBOU VPO Ryazan State Medical University Named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
City
Ryazan
ZIP/Postal Code
390026
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GBU of Ryazan region Regional clinical cardiology dispanser
City
Ryazan
ZIP/Postal Code
390026
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Spb GBUZ "Clinical rheumatology hospital # 25" City CDC prevention of osteoporosis
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
190068
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GUZ " Regional clinical hospital"
City
Saratov
ZIP/Postal Code
410053
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GBUZ VO Regional clinical hospital
City
Vladimir
ZIP/Postal Code
600023
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GBKUZ of Yaroslavl region "City hospital n. a. N.A. Semashko"
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150002
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Institute of Rheumatology
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Military Medical Academy,
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Institute for Treatment and Rehabilitation Niska Banja
City
Niska Banja
ZIP/Postal Code
18205
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Special Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Novi Sad
City
Novi Sad
ZIP/Postal Code
21112
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital
City
Johannesburg
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
2193
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Clinresco Centres (Pty) Ltd
City
Kempton Park
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
1619
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
St. Augustine's Hospital
City
Durban
State/Province
Kwa-zulu Natal
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Arthritis Clinical Research Trials, Dr. C.E Spargo and Dr. R.B Bhorat Practice
City
Cape Town
State/Province
Western CAPE
ZIP/Postal Code
7405
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Panorama Medical Centre
City
Cape Town
State/Province
Western CAPE
ZIP/Postal Code
7500
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
City
Fuenlabrada
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28942
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Cruces
City
Barakaldo
State/Province
Vizcaya
ZIP/Postal Code
48903
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario A Coruña
City
A Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Infanta Luisa
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
40201
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
China Medical University Hospital
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
40447
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Taipei Medical University Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
11031
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Kyivska miska klinichna likarnia #6
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
03680
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Lvivskyi oblasnyi klinichnyi diahnostychnyi tsentr,
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79010
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Komunalna 4-a miska klinichna likarnia m. Lvova,
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79011
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Komunalnyi zaklad okhorony zdorovia "Kharkivska miska klinichna likarnia #8"
City
M. Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61176
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Komunalnyi zaklad Kyivskoi oblasnoi rady "Kyivska oblasna klinichna likarnia",
City
M. Kyiv,
ZIP/Postal Code
04107
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Bahatoprofilnyi medychnyi tsentr (Universytetska klinika #1)
City
Odesa
ZIP/Postal Code
65026
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Komunalnyi zaklad Sumskoi oblasnoi rady "Sumska oblasna klinichna
City
Sumy
ZIP/Postal Code
40022
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Vinnytska oblasna klinichna likarnia im. M.I.Pyrohova revmatolohichne viddilennia
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21018
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Komunalna ustanova "Zaporizka oblasna klinichna likarnia" Zaporizkoi oblasnoi rady
City
Zaporizhzhia
ZIP/Postal Code
69600
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Basingstoke
State/Province
Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
RG24 9NA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Wirral
State/Province
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
CH49 5PE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Foundation Trust ,Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
City
Bath
State/Province
Somerset
ZIP/Postal Code
BA1 1RL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine
City
Leeds
State/Province
WEST Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
LS7 4SA
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36180101
Citation
Kay J, Bock AE, Rehman M, Zhang W, Zhang M, Iikuni N, Alvarez DF. Use of multibiomarker disease activity scores in biosimilarity studies for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2022 Sep;8(2):e002423. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002423.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35304684
Citation
Fleischmann RM, Bock AE, Zhang W, Godfrey CM, Vranic I, Cronenberger C, Dokoupilova E. Usability Study of PF-06410293, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, by Prefilled Pen: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Sub-Study of a Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Jun;9(3):839-850. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00439-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34563243
Citation
Fleischmann RM, Alvarez DF, Bock AE, Cronenberger C, Vranic I, Zhang W, Alten R. Long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the adalimumab biosimilar, PF-06410293, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after switching from reference adalimumab (Humira(R)) or continuing biosimilar therapy: week 52-92 data from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Sep 25;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02626-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33883254
Citation
Fleischmann RM, Alvarez DF, Bock AE, Cronenberger C, Vranic I, Zhang W, Alten R. Randomised study of PF-06410293, an adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar, compared with reference ADL for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: results from weeks 26-52, including a treatment switch from reference ADL to PF-06410293. RMD Open. 2021 Apr;7(2):e001578. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001578.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33263165
Citation
Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30111357
Citation
Fleischmann RM, Alten R, Pileckyte M, Lobello K, Hua SY, Cronenberger C, Alvarez D, Bock AE, Sewell KL. A comparative clinical study of PF-06410293, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab reference product (Humira(R)) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Aug 15;20(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1676-y.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=B5381002&StudyName=A%20Study%20Of%20PF-06410293%20%28Adalimumab-Pfizer%29%20And%20Adalimumab%20%28Humira%29%20In%20Combination%20With%20Methotrexate%20In%20Subjects%20With%20Active%20Rheumatoid
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Learn more about this trial
A Study Of PF-06410293 (Adalimumab-Pfizer) And Adalimumab (Humira®) In Combination With Methotrexate In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (REFLECTIONS B538-02).
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs