INfusion VErsus STimulation in Parkinson's Disease (INVEST)
Primary Purpose
Parkinson's Disease
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa
deep brain stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson's Disease focused on measuring Parkinson, Parkinson's Disease, Deep Brain Stimulation, levodopa-carbidopa, Duodopa, continuous intrajejunal infusion
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease with bradykinesia and at least two of the following signs; resting tremor, rigidity, and asymmetry;
- Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, at least one of the following symptoms: severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonia or bradykinesia;
- A life expectancy of at least two years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age below 18 years
- Previous PD-neurosurgery (e.g., DBS, pallidotomy, thalamotomy);
- Previous CLI (through a PEG-tube or Nasal Jejuna| tube);
- Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 at the best moment during the day;
- Other severely disabling disease;
- Dementia or signs of severe cognitive impairment
- Psychosis;
- Current depression;
- Contraindications for DBS surgery, such as a physical disorder making surgery hazardous;
- Contraindications for PEG surgery such as interposed organs, ascites and oesophagogastric varices, or for Duodopa;
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and women of child bearing age not using a reliable method of contraception;
- No informed consent;
- Legally incompetent adults;
Sites / Locations
- Academic Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
continuous levodopa infusion
deep brain stimulation
Arm Description
continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa
Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Cost effectiveness in costs per changed unit on PDQ-39
The costs per changed unit on the PDQ-39.
Cost-utility in costs per changed Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY, years)
The costs per QALY. The EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D; 5 questions, each score 1-3, providing a health state, to be translated with provided Valuation set) will be applied as the utility measure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Quality of life (on PDQ-39)
Changes from Baseline on Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39; score 0-100, higher score is lower quality of life)
Quality of life (on EQ-5D)
Change from Baseline on EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D; 5 questions, each score 1-3, providing a health state, to be translated with provided Valuation set)
Motor symptoms
Score changes from Baseline in off and on state on Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS part 3; 0-132, high score is more motor symptoms)
Motor symptoms: time in off and on-state
Change from Baseline in time in off-state, on-state without dyskinesias, on-state without troublesome dyskinesias and on-state with troublesome dyskinesias measured with motor symptom diary
Motor experiences of daily living
Changes from Baseline on MDS-UPDRS part 2 (Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS part 2; score 0-52, high score is more worse health)
Dyskinesia
Change from Baseline on clinical Dyskinesia Rating Scale (CDRS; score 0-28, high score is more dyskinesia)
PD-medication (levodopa-equivalent dose)
Change from Baseline expressed in levodopa-equivalent dose
Functional health status
Change from Baseline on Amsterdam Linear Disability Score (ALDS, 29 items; 0-100, high score is high level of functional status)
Non-motor symptoms (Non Motor Symptom Checklist)
Changes from Baseline on Non Motor Symptom Checklist
Non-motor symptoms (Rotterdam Symptom Checklist
Change from Baseline on Rotterdam Symptom Checklist
Non-motor symptoms (SCOPA-AUT)
Change from Baseline on SCOPA-AUT (SCales for Outcomes in PArkinson's Autonomic symptoms; score 0-92, higher score is more symptoms)
Disability
Change from Baseline in Hoehn and Yahr stage (H&Y stage; 1-5: a higher score is more disease progression)
Cognitive functioning
Change from Baseline on Parkinson's Disease Cognition Rating Scale (PD-CRS; 0-134, higher score is a result of better cognitive performance)
Cognitive functioning Mattis
Change from Baseline in Mattis Dementia Rating score (score 0-144, higher score is better cognitive function)
Neuropsychologic functioning BNT
Change from Baseline in Boston Naming Test (range 0-30, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Letter Fluency
Change from Baseline in Letter Fluency (score 0-100, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning WAIS IV
Change from Baseline in WAIS IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV - subsection similarities; score 0-36, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Reading
Change from Baseline in Dutch Reading Test (0-100, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Word Test
Change from Baseline in 15 word test (0-75, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Memory
Change from Baseline in Rivermead Behavioral memory test (subsection stores; score 0-42, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Trail making
Change from Baseline in Trail making test (score 10-500, higher score is longer time, i.e. worse score)
Neuropsychologic functioning Color Word
Change from Baseline in Stroop Color Word Test (score 10-1000, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Line Orientation
Change from Baseline in Judgement of line orientation (score 0-30, higher is better)
Neuropsychologic functioning Clock
Change from Baseline in Clock construction (score 0-14, higher is better)
Psychiatric disease
Change from Baseline in Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
Apathy
Change from Baseline in Starkstein's Apathy Scale (SAS; score 0-42, high score is more signs of apathy)
Compulsive Disorders
Change in presence of Compulsive Disorder from Baseline assessed with Parkinson's Disease Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders Questionnaire (QUIP, utilizing established thresholds)
Anxiety
Changes from Baseline on Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A; 0-56, high score is worse outcome)
Depression
Change from Baseline on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS; 0-68, higher score is worse outcome)
Suicidality
Changes from Baseline on Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (range 0-25, higher score is worse outcome)
Adverse effects
Number of participants with adverse effects and description of these
Complications and description of complications
Number of participants with complications and description of these
Stopping allocated treatment
Number of participants who stopped treatment
Treatment failure
Number of participants with treatment failure
Treatment cross-over
Number of participants with treatment cross-over
Patient satisfaction
Descriptive questionnaire, no scale applied, descriptive statistics
Patients attitude to treatment
Change from Baseline on Patient Reported Outcome Scale (range 0-128, high score is worse outcome)
Medical costs
Calculation of the total costs in euro by means of iMCQ (iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire)
Non-medical care costs
Calculation of the total costs in euro by means of iPCQ (iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire)
Caregiver burden
Descriptive questionnaire, no scale applied, descriptive statistics
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02480803
First Posted
May 4, 2015
Last Updated
August 18, 2023
Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02480803
Brief Title
INfusion VErsus STimulation in Parkinson's Disease
Acronym
INVEST
Official Title
Treatment in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: Continuous Intrajejunal Levodopa INfusion VErsus Deep Brain STimulation
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
December 19, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 7, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Both Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are accepted therapies for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). To date, no comparative studies have been executed. The INVEST study is an open label randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness as primary outcome. The main clinical outcome is quality of life; secondary outcomes are motor symptoms and neurological impairments, among others.
Detailed Description
Rationale: Both Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are accepted therapies for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). As directly comparative studies are lacking, it is unknown whether one of the therapies is more effective. Besides, CLI seems to be more expensive. To determine the optimal treatment in advanced PD, a comparative study of CLI and DBS is warranted.
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CLI is a more expensive therapy in advanced PD than DBS and that the surplus in costs is not cost-effective with regard to benefits for the patient and caregivers in quality of life, PD symptoms and adverse events.
Objective: To realize a cost-effective treatment strategy in advanced PD. Study design: Prospective, randomized, open label multicentre trial, with two additional patient preference treatment arms ("patient preference randomized trial").
Study population: Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonia, or bradykinesia. A total of 66 patients will be randomized, at least 120 patients will be included in the patient preference arms.
Intervention: Patients will be randomized to DBS or CLI. For DBS treatment, 2 electrodes will be implanted in the brain. The electrodes are connected to an implanted pulse generator, which will be placed subcutaneously in the subclavian area. For CLI treatment, a tube will be placed in the jejunum via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). This tube is connected to an external pump that delivers the levodopa-gel.
Main study parameters: There are 8 specified assessment visits: at baseline, and 1 week, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 36 months after start of the study treatment. The primary health economic outcomes are the costs per changed unit on the PDQ-39 (and the costs per changed QALY for the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, respectively. The EQ-5D will be applied as the utility measure. Change in quality of life (expressed in the between group difference in change from baseline to 12 months on the PDQ-39 summary index score) is the main clinical outcome. Among the secondary outcomes are functional health, complications and adverse effects, use of care and perceptions of patients and neurologists regarding both treatments.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson's Disease
Keywords
Parkinson, Parkinson's Disease, Deep Brain Stimulation, levodopa-carbidopa, Duodopa, continuous intrajejunal infusion
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized Clinical Trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
66 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
continuous levodopa infusion
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa
Arm Title
deep brain stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa
Other Intervention Name(s)
Duodopa infusion, Intestinal levodopa-carbidopa infusion
Intervention Description
Continuous delivery of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel through an intrajejunal percutaneous tube (Duodopa, CLI, CILI)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
deep brain stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
DBS, DBS-STN
Intervention Description
Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost effectiveness in costs per changed unit on PDQ-39
Description
The costs per changed unit on the PDQ-39.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Cost-utility in costs per changed Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY, years)
Description
The costs per QALY. The EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D; 5 questions, each score 1-3, providing a health state, to be translated with provided Valuation set) will be applied as the utility measure.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of life (on PDQ-39)
Description
Changes from Baseline on Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39; score 0-100, higher score is lower quality of life)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Quality of life (on EQ-5D)
Description
Change from Baseline on EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D; 5 questions, each score 1-3, providing a health state, to be translated with provided Valuation set)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Motor symptoms
Description
Score changes from Baseline in off and on state on Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS part 3; 0-132, high score is more motor symptoms)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Motor symptoms: time in off and on-state
Description
Change from Baseline in time in off-state, on-state without dyskinesias, on-state without troublesome dyskinesias and on-state with troublesome dyskinesias measured with motor symptom diary
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Motor experiences of daily living
Description
Changes from Baseline on MDS-UPDRS part 2 (Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS part 2; score 0-52, high score is more worse health)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Dyskinesia
Description
Change from Baseline on clinical Dyskinesia Rating Scale (CDRS; score 0-28, high score is more dyskinesia)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
PD-medication (levodopa-equivalent dose)
Description
Change from Baseline expressed in levodopa-equivalent dose
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Functional health status
Description
Change from Baseline on Amsterdam Linear Disability Score (ALDS, 29 items; 0-100, high score is high level of functional status)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Non-motor symptoms (Non Motor Symptom Checklist)
Description
Changes from Baseline on Non Motor Symptom Checklist
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Non-motor symptoms (Rotterdam Symptom Checklist
Description
Change from Baseline on Rotterdam Symptom Checklist
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Non-motor symptoms (SCOPA-AUT)
Description
Change from Baseline on SCOPA-AUT (SCales for Outcomes in PArkinson's Autonomic symptoms; score 0-92, higher score is more symptoms)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Disability
Description
Change from Baseline in Hoehn and Yahr stage (H&Y stage; 1-5: a higher score is more disease progression)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Cognitive functioning
Description
Change from Baseline on Parkinson's Disease Cognition Rating Scale (PD-CRS; 0-134, higher score is a result of better cognitive performance)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Cognitive functioning Mattis
Description
Change from Baseline in Mattis Dementia Rating score (score 0-144, higher score is better cognitive function)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning BNT
Description
Change from Baseline in Boston Naming Test (range 0-30, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Letter Fluency
Description
Change from Baseline in Letter Fluency (score 0-100, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning WAIS IV
Description
Change from Baseline in WAIS IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV - subsection similarities; score 0-36, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Reading
Description
Change from Baseline in Dutch Reading Test (0-100, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Word Test
Description
Change from Baseline in 15 word test (0-75, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Memory
Description
Change from Baseline in Rivermead Behavioral memory test (subsection stores; score 0-42, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Trail making
Description
Change from Baseline in Trail making test (score 10-500, higher score is longer time, i.e. worse score)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Color Word
Description
Change from Baseline in Stroop Color Word Test (score 10-1000, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Line Orientation
Description
Change from Baseline in Judgement of line orientation (score 0-30, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Neuropsychologic functioning Clock
Description
Change from Baseline in Clock construction (score 0-14, higher is better)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Psychiatric disease
Description
Change from Baseline in Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Apathy
Description
Change from Baseline in Starkstein's Apathy Scale (SAS; score 0-42, high score is more signs of apathy)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Compulsive Disorders
Description
Change in presence of Compulsive Disorder from Baseline assessed with Parkinson's Disease Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders Questionnaire (QUIP, utilizing established thresholds)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Anxiety
Description
Changes from Baseline on Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A; 0-56, high score is worse outcome)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Depression
Description
Change from Baseline on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS; 0-68, higher score is worse outcome)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Suicidality
Description
Changes from Baseline on Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (range 0-25, higher score is worse outcome)
Time Frame
12 and 36 months
Title
Adverse effects
Description
Number of participants with adverse effects and description of these
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Complications and description of complications
Description
Number of participants with complications and description of these
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Stopping allocated treatment
Description
Number of participants who stopped treatment
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Treatment failure
Description
Number of participants with treatment failure
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Treatment cross-over
Description
Number of participants with treatment cross-over
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Patient satisfaction
Description
Descriptive questionnaire, no scale applied, descriptive statistics
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Patients attitude to treatment
Description
Change from Baseline on Patient Reported Outcome Scale (range 0-128, high score is worse outcome)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Medical costs
Description
Calculation of the total costs in euro by means of iMCQ (iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Non-medical care costs
Description
Calculation of the total costs in euro by means of iPCQ (iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
Title
Caregiver burden
Description
Descriptive questionnaire, no scale applied, descriptive statistics
Time Frame
12, 24 and 36 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease with bradykinesia and at least two of the following signs; resting tremor, rigidity, and asymmetry;
Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, at least one of the following symptoms: severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonia or bradykinesia;
A life expectancy of at least two years.
Exclusion Criteria:
Age below 18 years
Previous PD-neurosurgery (e.g., DBS, pallidotomy, thalamotomy);
Previous CLI (through a PEG-tube or Nasal Jejuna| tube);
Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 at the best moment during the day;
Other severely disabling disease;
Dementia or signs of severe cognitive impairment
Psychosis;
Current depression;
Contraindications for DBS surgery, such as a physical disorder making surgery hazardous;
Contraindications for PEG surgery such as interposed organs, ascites and oesophagogastric varices, or for Duodopa;
Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and women of child bearing age not using a reliable method of contraception;
No informed consent;
Legally incompetent adults;
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joke M Dijk, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1100ZZ
Country
Netherlands
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32005175
Citation
van Poppelen D, Sisodia V, de Haan RJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Schuurman PR, Geurtsen GJ, Berk AEM, de Bie RMA, Dijk JM. Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study. BMC Neurol. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://investamc.nl/english
Description
English version of Study Website
URL
http://www.investamc.nl/
Description
Study Website
Learn more about this trial
INfusion VErsus STimulation in Parkinson's Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs