search
Back to results

Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis

Primary Purpose

Acute Anterior Uveitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution
Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution
LME636 Vehicle
Sponsored by
Alcon Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Anterior Uveitis focused on measuring Acute anterior uveitis, LME636

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide written informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of non-infectious AAU in at least 1 eye.
  • Anterior chamber cell score of 2+ or 3+ as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) in at least one eye.
  • Able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of child-bearing potential unwilling to use effective contraception methods as defined in the protocol.
  • AC cell score of 4+ (SUN) or hypopyon.
  • Onset of anterior uveitis more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment in the study.
  • Presence of intermediate-, posterior-, or panuveitis in either eye.
  • Administration of stable doses >10 mg daily systemic prednisone or corticosteroids as described in the protocol.
  • Recurrent corneal abrasion or ulceration in either eye (past or present).
  • Tuberculosis (past or present).
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    LME636

    Dexamethasone

    Arm Description

    LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 1 week (Week 3) and 1 week of masked Vehicle administration (Week 4)

    Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 2 weeks (Weeks 3 and 4)

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of Responders at Day 15
    Response was defined as a two-step decrease or more from baseline in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). Baseline was defined as the measurement taken before drug administration on Day 1. Subjects receiving rescue treatment on or before Day 15 were considered non-responders. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Visit
    Visual Acuity (VA) with the subject's best spectacles or other visual corrective devices was measured using an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or Snellen visual acuity chart and reported in letters read correctly. An increase (gain) in letters read indicates improvement. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Visit
    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Number of Subjects With Increase From Baseline in Slit Lamp Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit
    Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (examination) was performed to evaluate the anterior segment of the eye, including lids/lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber (cells and flare), iris, and lens. Ocular signs were categorized as Aqueous Flare, Aqueous Inflammatory Cell Grade, Keratic Precipitates, Lens, Limbal Injection, Status of Lens, Peripheral Anterior Synechia, and Posterior Synechia. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Number of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in Dilated Fundus Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit
    The dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the vitreous, optic disc, retinal vessels, macula, and retinal periphery. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Number of Subjects With IOP Change From Baseline to Last On-Treatment Assessment
    IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA at Each Visit
    Visual Acuity (VA) was measured with the participant's best spectacles or other visual corrective device in place using an ETDRS or Snellen visual acuity chart. Improvement of BCVA was defined as an increase (gain) in letters read from the baseline assessment. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time-to-Response
    Time-to-Response was defined as the number of days from baseline to the first scheduled visit when a two-step decrease or more from baseline in AC Cell Grade (as per SUN) was observed. Time-to-Response is reported as number of subjects presenting time-to-response by visit. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Use of Rescue Treatment
    Use of rescue treatment is presented as the number of subjects with first use of rescue treatment by visit. Subjects receiving rescue medication were not considered withdrawn and the collection of data continued after discontinuation of study treatment. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Mean Serum Concentration of Total LME636 at Each Visit
    Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ), defined as 0.25 ng/mL, were reported as NA with no imputation for missing data.
    Number of Subjects With Anti-LME636 Antibodies Present at Each Visit
    Serum samples were collected and assessed for anti-LME636 antibodies. Samples collected from subjects in the LME636 dose group were analyzed for anti-LME636 antibodies. For subjects in the dexamethasone group, only the samples collected on Day 1 (ie, prior to the start of treatment) were analyzed for anti-LME636 antibodies.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    June 23, 2015
    Last Updated
    May 31, 2018
    Sponsor
    Alcon Research
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02482129
    Brief Title
    Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis
    Official Title
    A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in Patients With Acute Anterior Uveitis
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    July 17, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 21, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    March 21, 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Alcon Research

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of the study is to determine whether topical ocular administration of LME636 60 mg/mL is efficacious in resolving the ocular inflammation in the anterior chamber (AC) associated with acute anterior uveitis (AAU).
    Detailed Description
    Eligible subjects will be randomized to LME636 or Dexamethasone in a 3:1 ratio at the time they present to the trial site with the AAU flare and will enter treatment for 28 full days. Subjects with worsening disease from Visit 2/Day 4 onward or subjects without improvement after 14 days of treatment will be discontinued from treatment, unmasked and treated with a rescue regimen at the discretion of the investigator.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Acute Anterior Uveitis
    Keywords
    Acute anterior uveitis, LME636

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigator
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    45 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    LME636
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 1 week (Week 3) and 1 week of masked Vehicle administration (Week 4)
    Arm Title
    Dexamethasone
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 2 weeks (Weeks 3 and 4)
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    LME636 Vehicle
    Intervention Description
    Inactive ingredients used for masking purposes
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Responders at Day 15
    Description
    Response was defined as a two-step decrease or more from baseline in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). Baseline was defined as the measurement taken before drug administration on Day 1. Subjects receiving rescue treatment on or before Day 15 were considered non-responders. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 15
    Title
    Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Visit
    Description
    Visual Acuity (VA) with the subject's best spectacles or other visual corrective devices was measured using an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or Snellen visual acuity chart and reported in letters read correctly. An increase (gain) in letters read indicates improvement. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
    Title
    Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Visit
    Description
    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
    Title
    Number of Subjects With Increase From Baseline in Slit Lamp Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit
    Description
    Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (examination) was performed to evaluate the anterior segment of the eye, including lids/lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber (cells and flare), iris, and lens. Ocular signs were categorized as Aqueous Flare, Aqueous Inflammatory Cell Grade, Keratic Precipitates, Lens, Limbal Injection, Status of Lens, Peripheral Anterior Synechia, and Posterior Synechia. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
    Title
    Number of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in Dilated Fundus Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit
    Description
    The dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the vitreous, optic disc, retinal vessels, macula, and retinal periphery. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Subjects With IOP Change From Baseline to Last On-Treatment Assessment
    Description
    IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Up to Day 29
    Title
    Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA at Each Visit
    Description
    Visual Acuity (VA) was measured with the participant's best spectacles or other visual corrective device in place using an ETDRS or Snellen visual acuity chart. Improvement of BCVA was defined as an increase (gain) in letters read from the baseline assessment. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
    Title
    Time-to-Response
    Description
    Time-to-Response was defined as the number of days from baseline to the first scheduled visit when a two-step decrease or more from baseline in AC Cell Grade (as per SUN) was observed. Time-to-Response is reported as number of subjects presenting time-to-response by visit. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Up to Day 15
    Title
    Use of Rescue Treatment
    Description
    Use of rescue treatment is presented as the number of subjects with first use of rescue treatment by visit. Subjects receiving rescue medication were not considered withdrawn and the collection of data continued after discontinuation of study treatment. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
    Time Frame
    Day 4, Day 8, Day 15
    Title
    Mean Serum Concentration of Total LME636 at Each Visit
    Description
    Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ), defined as 0.25 ng/mL, were reported as NA with no imputation for missing data.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
    Title
    Number of Subjects With Anti-LME636 Antibodies Present at Each Visit
    Description
    Serum samples were collected and assessed for anti-LME636 antibodies. Samples collected from subjects in the LME636 dose group were analyzed for anti-LME636 antibodies. For subjects in the dexamethasone group, only the samples collected on Day 1 (ie, prior to the start of treatment) were analyzed for anti-LME636 antibodies.
    Time Frame
    Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Provide written informed consent. Diagnosis of non-infectious AAU in at least 1 eye. Anterior chamber cell score of 2+ or 3+ as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) in at least one eye. Able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study. Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply. Exclusion Criteria: Women of child-bearing potential unwilling to use effective contraception methods as defined in the protocol. AC cell score of 4+ (SUN) or hypopyon. Onset of anterior uveitis more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment in the study. Presence of intermediate-, posterior-, or panuveitis in either eye. Administration of stable doses >10 mg daily systemic prednisone or corticosteroids as described in the protocol. Recurrent corneal abrasion or ulceration in either eye (past or present). Tuberculosis (past or present). Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Clinical Scientist NIBR, Alcon
    Organizational Affiliation
    Alcon Research
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs