search
Back to results

Comparison of Two Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques

Primary Purpose

Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane Cytoplast
human amniotic-tissue derived membrane BioXclude
Ridge Preservation with overlay graft
Ridge Preservation without overlay graft
Sponsored by
Eisenhower Army Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction focused on measuring dental, extraction, socket preservation, ridge preservation, implant site preparation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All active duty military patients (age 18-65) referred to the investigators' facility's periodontics department for diagnosis of "hopeless" tooth with documented confirmation of diagnosis by periodontal staff
  • Eligible for extraction and ridge preservation (adequately healthy and not otherwise disqualified)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • History of allergy to involved products
  • Current acute infection at the site (chronic periapical infections will not exclude the patient)
  • Elian Type 3 extraction sockets
  • Sites not treatment planned for implant therapy
  • Third molar sites
  • American Society of Anesthesiology Category III patients (medically compromised)
  • Active duty military patients in a student status

Sites / Locations

  • Tingay Dental Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Cytoplast

BioXclude

Arm Description

Patients will receive ridge preservation procedure with a Cytoplast barrier membrane

Patients will receive ridge preservation procedure with a BioXclude barrier membrane

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Alveolar Ridge Width
Alveolar ridge dimensional change (horizontal) from Cone beam CT
Alveolar Ridge Height
Alveolar ridge dimensional change (vertical) from cone beam CT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Post-operative pain perception
self-report by patient on visual analog scale
Platform size of implant placed
Whether or not the originally intended implant size could be placed
Keratinized tissue width (baseline)
Keratinized tissue width (final)
Elian classification (anticipated)
Operators will report an anticipated socket preservation classification according to Elian 2007
Elian classification (actual)
Operators will report the actual socket preservation classification according to Elian 2007
Buccal plate thickness
intra-operative measurements, presence or absence of a dehiscence / fenestration
Buccal plate fenestration
determined at time of extraction surgery, and noted as a possible confounding variable
Complications after surgery (infection)
infection, determined by presence of purulence, lymphadenopathy and/or febrile status
Complications after surgery (membrane exfoliation)
dichotomous variable, presence or absence of the membrane for the duration of the study
Peri-operative clinician's report (extraction difficulty)
subjective extraction difficulty, as reported by the clinician

Full Information

First Posted
June 19, 2015
Last Updated
February 6, 2017
Sponsor
Eisenhower Army Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02482987
Brief Title
Comparison of Two Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques
Official Title
Comparison of Two Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
July 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2018 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Eisenhower Army Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two barrier membrane products, Cytoplast (dPTFE) and BioXclude (human amnion chorion allograft), for their relative efficacies in dental socket preservation procedures, both when the socket is filled and overfilled with freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA).
Detailed Description
This single-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to compare two different, commercially available materials to assess their relative efficacies in socket preservation procedures after tooth extraction. Patients presenting with single teeth deemed clinically hopeless and treatment planned for removal in the normal course of clinical dentistry will be considered for this study. If eligible, a ridge/socket preservation procedure will be performed at the time of extraction. Periodontics residents will perform the procedure under the supervision of board certified staff. Patients will be randomized via concealed random number sequence into one of four groups, based on a combination of materials and graft placement techniques. Patients will be equally distributed into the following groups: (1) dense polytetrafluoroethylene (Cytoplast) (2) Cytoplast with additional buccal augmentation/onlay graft, (3) human amniotic-tissue derived membrane (BioXclude), and (4) BioXclude with additional buccal augmentation/onlay graft. All four treatment groups are consistent with the current standard of care, and this study seeks to compare techniques and materials as part of routine, clinical/periodontal therapy in order to determine superiority. Approximately 150 patients will be enrolled and distributed equally among the four groups. Any post-operative complications will be managed and documented during follow-up appointments at 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be used as the primary assessment tool, and scans will be compared between a pre-operative baseline time point and a scan taken after 4 months of healing to prepare for implant placement. The primary dependent variables will be (1) percent of baseline alveolar ridge changes (both horizontal and vertical) and (2) whether or not the anticipated dental implant could be placed appropriately. Secondary outcomes include ease of use, perceptions of pain, complications, cost-effectiveness, and changes in keratinized tissue.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Keywords
dental, extraction, socket preservation, ridge preservation, implant site preparation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cytoplast
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will receive ridge preservation procedure with a Cytoplast barrier membrane
Arm Title
BioXclude
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will receive ridge preservation procedure with a BioXclude barrier membrane
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane Cytoplast
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cytoplast
Intervention Description
ridge preservation intervention using the dPTFE membrane device
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
human amniotic-tissue derived membrane BioXclude
Other Intervention Name(s)
BioXclude
Intervention Description
ridge preservation intervention using the dPTFE membrane device
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ridge Preservation with overlay graft
Intervention Description
ridge preservation intervention with additional freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA) placed buccal to the socket
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ridge Preservation without overlay graft
Intervention Description
ridge preservation without overlay graft / traditional FDBA placement into the socket only
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Alveolar Ridge Width
Description
Alveolar ridge dimensional change (horizontal) from Cone beam CT
Time Frame
from baseline to final cone beam CT scan (approximately 4 months)
Title
Alveolar Ridge Height
Description
Alveolar ridge dimensional change (vertical) from cone beam CT
Time Frame
from baseline to final cone beam CT scan (approximately 4 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Post-operative pain perception
Description
self-report by patient on visual analog scale
Time Frame
1 week after surgical extraction procedure
Title
Platform size of implant placed
Description
Whether or not the originally intended implant size could be placed
Time Frame
Implant surgery, approximtely 4 months after baseline
Title
Keratinized tissue width (baseline)
Time Frame
pre-op / baseline assessment (after randomization)(prior to time=0)
Title
Keratinized tissue width (final)
Time Frame
from pre-op assessment at time of randomization to implant surgery (4 months)
Title
Elian classification (anticipated)
Description
Operators will report an anticipated socket preservation classification according to Elian 2007
Time Frame
pre-op / baseline assessment (after randomization)(prior to time=0)
Title
Elian classification (actual)
Description
Operators will report the actual socket preservation classification according to Elian 2007
Time Frame
intra-operative surgical finding (extraction surgery)(time=0)
Title
Buccal plate thickness
Description
intra-operative measurements, presence or absence of a dehiscence / fenestration
Time Frame
intra-operative surgical finding (extraction surgery)(time = 0)
Title
Buccal plate fenestration
Description
determined at time of extraction surgery, and noted as a possible confounding variable
Time Frame
intra-operative surgical finding (extraction surgery)(time = 0)
Title
Complications after surgery (infection)
Description
infection, determined by presence of purulence, lymphadenopathy and/or febrile status
Time Frame
0-4 months
Title
Complications after surgery (membrane exfoliation)
Description
dichotomous variable, presence or absence of the membrane for the duration of the study
Time Frame
0-4 months
Title
Peri-operative clinician's report (extraction difficulty)
Description
subjective extraction difficulty, as reported by the clinician
Time Frame
intra-operative surgical finding (extraction surgery)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Sedation utilization
Description
presence or absence of sedation drugs during the procedure
Time Frame
intra-operative surgical variable (determined in advance, at baseline)
Title
Cost
Description
cost/benefit for each product
Time Frame
0-4 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All active duty military patients (age 18-65) referred to the investigators' facility's periodontics department for diagnosis of "hopeless" tooth with documented confirmation of diagnosis by periodontal staff Eligible for extraction and ridge preservation (adequately healthy and not otherwise disqualified) Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or breastfeeding History of allergy to involved products Current acute infection at the site (chronic periapical infections will not exclude the patient) Elian Type 3 extraction sockets Sites not treatment planned for implant therapy Third molar sites American Society of Anesthesiology Category III patients (medically compromised) Active duty military patients in a student status
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brandon Coleman, DDS,MS
Organizational Affiliation
US Army Fort Gordon DENTAC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tingay Dental Clinic
City
Fort Gordon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30905
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Two Different Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs