search
Back to results

A Study of Pertuzumab in Participants With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pertuzumab
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Breast Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females at least 18 years of age
  • Histologically-confirmed metastatic breast cancer with low HER2 expression and at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
  • Karnofsky performance status at least 80%
  • Disease progression on/after up to 2 different chemotherapy regimens, including an anthracycline-containing therapy
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 50%
  • Adequate liver function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pleural effusions, ascites, or bone lesions as the only manifestation(s) of cancer
  • Pulmonary or central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks; or hormone therapy within 2 weeks of Day 1
  • Previous treatment with any drug that targets the HER2 receptor family
  • Previous treatment with corticosteroids as cancer therapy
  • History of significant cardiac disease
  • Major surgery or trauma within 4 weeks of Day 1
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Pertuzumab 1050 mg

Pertuzumab 420 mg

Arm Description

Participants will not receive a loading dose, but will receive pertuzumab 1050 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

Participants will receive a loading dose of 840 mg via IV infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Objective tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Time to response was defined as the time from treatment start to first documented response (ie, CR or PR). Participants with stable disease (SD) were censored from the last tumor assessment, and those with progressive disease (PD) or death were assigned an artificial censoring time of 1000 days. Time to response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR or PR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were to be censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier.
Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Death
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD.
Time to Progression
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD. Time to progression was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Withdrew From the Study Early
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment.
Time to Treatment Failure
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or early withdrawal from the study for death, toxicity, refusal/noncompliance, insufficient therapeutic response, or failure to return. Participants who did not experience PD or who did not withdraw from the study early were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to treatment failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Percentage of Participants Who Died
The percentage of participants who died was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from treatment start to death. Participants who did not die during follow-up were to be censored from the last known alive date. Overall survival was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of SD
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of SD was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Apparent Half-Life (t1/2) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment using a receptor-binding, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the apparent t1/2 by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the time elapsed for pertuzumab concentrations to decrease by 50%. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days.
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Cmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL).
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The time of maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Tmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in days.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine AUC to the last measurable observation (AUClast) and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) by non-compartmental analysis. The derived values were averaged among all participants and expressed in days by micrograms per milliliter (days*mcg/mL).
Systemic Clearance (CL) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine CL by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the rate at which pertuzumab was removed from the body. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters per day (mL/day).
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the Vss by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the theoretical volume at which the total amount of pertuzumab would be uniformly distributed to produce the desired concentration. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters (mL).
Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Pertuzumab
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the MRT by non-compartmental analysis. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days.
Number of Participants Experiencing a Drop in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) to a Value of Less Than 50%
Echocardiography was performed to determine LVEF, defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle as a percentage of end-diastolic volume. Theoretically, LVEF may range from 0 to 100%. The number of participants experiencing a drop in LVEF greater than or equal to (≥) 10 or 15 percentage points to a final LVEF of less than (<) 50% is reported here.

Full Information

First Posted
June 11, 2015
Last Updated
August 24, 2015
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02491892
Brief Title
A Study of Pertuzumab in Participants With Metastatic Breast Cancer
Official Title
Open-Label, Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety for Two Different Doses of a Recombinant Humanized Antibody to HER2 (rhuMAb 2C4) Administered Every 3 Weeks to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer With Low Expression of HER2
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2003 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2005 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4) in participants with metastatic breast cancer which has progressed during or after standard chemotherapy and which is not amenable to curative therapy. Those who are maintaining a response to therapy or who have stable disease at the end of the formal study period will continue treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Approximately 120 participants will be enrolled.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
79 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pertuzumab 1050 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will not receive a loading dose, but will receive pertuzumab 1050 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Arm Title
Pertuzumab 420 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive a loading dose of 840 mg via IV infusion at the first infusion of pertuzumab, followed by a maintenance dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pertuzumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
rhuMAb 2C4
Intervention Description
Participants will receive one of two IV treatment regimens with pertuzumab: either 420 mg every 3 weeks, with an initial 840-mg loading dose, or 1050 mg every 3 weeks with no loading dose administered.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Time to response was defined as the time from treatment start to first documented response (ie, CR or PR). Participants with stable disease (SD) were censored from the last tumor assessment, and those with progressive disease (PD) or death were assigned an artificial censoring time of 1000 days. Time to response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and confirmed PR was defined as at least at 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR or PR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Duration of Response Among Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. Confirmed CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Response was to be confirmed at follow-up assessment completed within 4 weeks of the first documented response. Duration of response was defined as the time from first documented response (ie, CR) to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were to be censored from the last tumor assessment. Duration of response was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Death
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Time to Progression
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Participants who withdrew from the study early for insufficient therapeutic response without tumor assessment for PD were also included within the definition of PD. Time to progression was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or death. Participants who did not experience PD or death were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced PD or Withdrew From the Study Early
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Time to Treatment Failure
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. PD was defined as the appearance of new lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum obtained at Screening or during treatment. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from treatment start to PD or early withdrawal from the study for death, toxicity, refusal/noncompliance, insufficient therapeutic response, or failure to return. Participants who did not experience PD or who did not withdraw from the study early were censored from the last tumor assessment. Time to treatment failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and expressed in weeks.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Description
The percentage of participants who died was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 2 years (from start of treatment until death)
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from treatment start to death. Participants who did not die during follow-up were to be censored from the last known alive date. Overall survival was to be estimated using Kaplan-Meier.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 2 years (from start of treatment until death)
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of SD
Description
Objective tumor response was assessed using RECIST. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. The percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of SD was calculated as [number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed] multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; every 6 weeks for the first 8 cycles, then every 12 weeks until progression or death; and up to 4 weeks after initial response)
Title
Apparent Half-Life (t1/2) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment using a receptor-binding, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the apparent t1/2 by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the time elapsed for pertuzumab concentrations to decrease by 50%. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days.
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Cmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL).
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. The time of maximum observed pertuzumab concentration across all collection points was documented. Tmax was averaged among all participants and expressed in days.
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine AUC to the last measurable observation (AUClast) and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) by non-compartmental analysis. The derived values were averaged among all participants and expressed in days by micrograms per milliliter (days*mcg/mL).
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Systemic Clearance (CL) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine CL by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the rate at which pertuzumab was removed from the body. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters per day (mL/day).
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the Vss by non-compartmental analysis, defined as the theoretical volume at which the total amount of pertuzumab would be uniformly distributed to produce the desired concentration. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in milliliters (mL).
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Pertuzumab
Description
Serum samples were obtained for PK assessment using a receptor-binding ELISA. Pertuzumab concentrations at each collection point were used to determine the MRT by non-compartmental analysis. The derived value was averaged among all participants and expressed in days.
Time Frame
Pre-dose and within 15 minutes of the end of infusion on Day 1 of each cycle, and on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing a Drop in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) to a Value of Less Than 50%
Description
Echocardiography was performed to determine LVEF, defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle as a percentage of end-diastolic volume. Theoretically, LVEF may range from 0 to 100%. The number of participants experiencing a drop in LVEF greater than or equal to (≥) 10 or 15 percentage points to a final LVEF of less than (<) 50% is reported here.
Time Frame
Up to approximately 1 year (at Baseline; at the end of Cycles 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16; and up to 7 weeks following the last infusion)

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Females at least 18 years of age Histologically-confirmed metastatic breast cancer with low HER2 expression and at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Karnofsky performance status at least 80% Disease progression on/after up to 2 different chemotherapy regimens, including an anthracycline-containing therapy Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 50% Adequate liver function Exclusion Criteria: Pleural effusions, ascites, or bone lesions as the only manifestation(s) of cancer Pulmonary or central nervous system (CNS) metastases Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks; or hormone therapy within 2 weeks of Day 1 Previous treatment with any drug that targets the HER2 receptor family Previous treatment with corticosteroids as cancer therapy History of significant cardiac disease Major surgery or trauma within 4 weeks of Day 1 Pregnant or lactating women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
City
Camperdown
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
City
Fitzroy
ZIP/Postal Code
3065
Country
Australia
City
Geelong
ZIP/Postal Code
3220
Country
Australia
City
Namur
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Belgium
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00029
Country
Finland
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
33520
Country
Finland
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
City
Herne
ZIP/Postal Code
44625
Country
Germany
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
City
Parma
ZIP/Postal Code
43100
Country
Italy
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46009
Country
Spain
City
Edinburgh
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 9RT
Country
United Kingdom
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M20 4BX
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Pertuzumab in Participants With Metastatic Breast Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs