Combination of Mesenchymal and C-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells as Regenerative Therapy for Heart Failure (CONCERT-HF)
Primary Purpose
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)
c-kit+ cells
Placebo (Plasmalyte A)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy focused on measuring Heart Failure, Ischemia, Autologous Stem Cells, LV dysfunction, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, c-kit+ Cells, Combination Cell Therapy, LV function, Functional status
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be ≥ 21 and <80 years of age
- Have documented coronary artery disease (CAD) with evidence of myocardial injury, LV dysfunction, and clinical evidence of HF
- Have a "detectable" area of myocardial injury defined as ≥ 5% LV involvement (infarct volume) and any subendocardial involvement by cMRI
- Have an EF ≤ 40% by cMRI
- Be receiving guideline-driven medical therapy for heart failure at stable and tolerated doses for ≥ 1 month prior to consent. For beta-blockade "stable" is defined as no greater than a 50% reduction in dose or no more than a 100% increase in dose.
- Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization
- Have NYHA class I, II, or III heart failure symptoms
- If a female of childbearing potential, be willing to use one form of birth control for the duration of the study, and undergo a pregnancy test at baseline and within 36 hours prior to injection
Exclusion Criteria:
- Indication for standard-of-care surgery (including valve surgery, placement of left-ventricular assist device, or imminent heart transplantation), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure, and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of ischemic and/or valvular heart disease. Subjects who require or undergo PCI should undergo these procedures a minimum of 3 months in advance of randomization. Subjects who require or undergo CABG should undergo these procedures a minimum of 4 months in advance of randomization. In addition, subjects who develop a need for revascularization following enrollment should undergo revascularization without delay. Indication for imminent heart transplantation is defined as a high likelihood of transplant prior to collection of the 12 month study endpoint. Candidates cannot be UNOS status 1A or 1B, and they must have documented low probability of being transplanted
- Valvular heart disease including 1) mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve; or 2) severe (any valve) insufficiency/regurgitation within 12 months of consent
- Aortic stenosis with valve area ≤ 1.5 cm2
- History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 90 days of consent
- History of a left ventricular remodeling surgical procedure utilizing prosthetic material
Presence of a pacemaker and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator with any of the following limitations/conditions:
- manufactured before the year 2000
- leads implanted < 6 weeks prior to consent
- non-transvenous epicardial, or abandoned leads
- subcutaneous ICDs
- leadless pacemakers
- any other condition that, in the judgment of device-trained staff, would deem an MRI contraindicated
- Pacemaker-dependence with an ICD (Note: pacemaker-dependent candidates without an ICD are not excluded)
- A cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implanted less than 3 months prior to consent
- Other MRI contraindications (e.g. patient body habitus incompatible with MRI)
- An appropriate ICD firing or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia within 30 days of consent
- Ventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 consecutive beats without an ICD within 3 months of consent, or symptomatic Mobitz II or higher degree atrioventricular block without a functioning pacemaker within 3 months of consent
- Presence of LV thrombus
- Evidence of active myocarditis
- Baseline maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) greater than 75% of age and gender based predictive values
- Baseline eGFR <35 ml/min/1.73m2
- Blood glucose levels (HbA1c) >10%
- Hematologic abnormality evidenced by hematocrit < 25%, white blood cell < 2,500/ul or platelet count < 100,000/ul
- Liver dysfunction evidenced by enzymes (AST and ALT) ˃ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Coagulopathy (INR ≥ 1.3) not due to a reversible cause (e.g., warfarin and/or Factor Xa inhibitors). Subjects who cannot be withdrawn from anticoagulation will be excluded.
- HIV and/or active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV)
- Allergy to radiographic contrast material that cannot adequately be managed by premedication
- Known history of anaphylactic reaction to penicillin or streptomycin
- Received gene or cell-based therapy from any source within the previous 12 months
- History of malignancy within 5 years (i.e., subjects with prior malignancy must be disease free for 5 years), excluding basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ which have been definitively treated
- Condition that limits lifespan to < 1 year
- History of drug abuse (illegal "street" drugs except marijuana, or prescription medications not being used appropriately for a pre-existing medical condition) or alcohol abuse (≥ 5 drinks/day for ˃ 3 months), or documented medical, occupational, or legal problems arising from the use of alcohol or drugs within the past 24 months
- Participation in an investigational therapeutic or device trial within 30 days of consent
- Cognitive or language barriers that prohibit obtaining informed consent or any study elements
- Pregnancy or lactation or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months
- Any other condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, would impair enrollment, study product administration, or follow-up
Sites / Locations
- Stanford University School of Medicine (Falk Cardiovascular Research Center)
- University of Florida-Department of Medicine
- University of Miami-Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute
- Indiana Center for Vascular Biology and Medicine
- University of Louisville
- Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
- Texas Heart Institute
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)
c-kit+ cells
Combination Cells (MSC and c-kit+ cells)
Placebo (Plasmalyte A)
Arm Description
Target dose of 150 million MSCs
Target dose of 5 million c-kit+ cells
Target dose of 150 million MSCs and 5 million c-kit+ cells
Plasmalyte A
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)
Change in global circumferential strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)
Change in regional longitudinal strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)
Change in left ventricular end diastolic volume index as measured via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index
Change in left ventricular sphericity as assessed via cardiac MRI. Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Change From Baseline in Scar Size Percent (DEMRI)
Change in scar size percent as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Scar Tissue Mass (DEMRI)
Change in scar tissue mass as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (Peak VO2)
Change in maximal oxygen consumption (peak V02) as assessed via treadmill
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)
Change in distance walked (in meters) as measured by the 6 minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 minutes). The average distance of the two walk tests was used for analysis.
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Score
Change in the quality of life summary score as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Minimum and maximum scores for the scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcomes.
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Change in N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) as measured via laboratory blood draw
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index-Trajectory
Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Scar Size Percent (DEMRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Scar Tissue Mass (DEMRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (Peak VO2)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)-Trajectory
Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 minutes). The average distance of the two walk tests was used for analysis. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Score-Trajectory
Minimum and maximum scores for the scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcomes. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The 2nd and 3rd set of results represent differences for varying slopes from the interaction model.
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-Trajectory
Log transformation used. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Number of participants with adjudicated events including death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and/or other exacerbation of heart failure (non-hospitalization).
Participants Experiencing Other Significant Clinical Events
Number of participants experiencing other significant adjudicated clinical events including: non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, coronary artery revascularization, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, and pericardial tamponade
Cumulative Days Alive and Out of Hospital for Heart Failure
Days alive and out of hospital during the study evaluation period. Subjects were allotted a visit window extending 30 days past their anticipated 12-month visit. Some participants had extended 12-month visit windows due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02501811
First Posted
July 15, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2021
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02501811
Brief Title
Combination of Mesenchymal and C-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells as Regenerative Therapy for Heart Failure
Acronym
CONCERT-HF
Official Title
A Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety, Feasibility, & Efficacy of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells & C-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells, Alone or in Combination, Administered Transendocardially in Subjects With Ischemic HF
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 25, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 22, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to assess feasibility, safety, and effect of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and c-kit+ cells both alone and in combination (Combo), compared to placebo (cell-free Plasmalyte-A medium) as well as each other, administered by transendocardial injection in subjects with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effect of Combo, MSCs alone, and c-kit+ cells alone compared with placebo as well as each other in subjects with heart failure of ischemic etiology. Following a successful lead-in phase, a total of one hundred forty-four (144) subjects will be randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive Combo, MSCs, c-kit+ cells, or placebo. After randomization, baseline imaging, relevant harvest procedures, and study product injection, subjects will be followed up at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post study product injection. All subjects will receive study product injection (cells or placebo) using the NOGA® XP Mapping and Navigation System. Subjects will have delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI) scans to assess scar size and LV function and structure at baseline and at 6 and 12 months post study product administration. All endpoints will be assessed at the 6 and 12 month visits which will occur 180 ±30 days and 365 ±30 days respectively from the day of study product injection (Day 0). For the purpose of the endpoint analysis and safety evaluations, the Investigators will utilize an "intention-to-treat" study population, however an as treated analysis will also be conducted.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Keywords
Heart Failure, Ischemia, Autologous Stem Cells, LV dysfunction, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, c-kit+ Cells, Combination Cell Therapy, LV function, Functional status
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
125 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Target dose of 150 million MSCs
Arm Title
c-kit+ cells
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Target dose of 5 million c-kit+ cells
Arm Title
Combination Cells (MSC and c-kit+ cells)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Target dose of 150 million MSCs and 5 million c-kit+ cells
Arm Title
Placebo (Plasmalyte A)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Plasmalyte A
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)
Intervention Description
15 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml MSCs administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
c-kit+ cells
Intervention Description
15 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml c-kit+ cells administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo (Plasmalyte A)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Plasmalyte A
Intervention Description
15 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml placebo administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Description
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)
Description
Change in global circumferential strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)
Description
Change in regional longitudinal strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)
Description
Change in left ventricular end diastolic volume index as measured via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)
Description
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index
Description
Change in left ventricular sphericity as assessed via cardiac MRI. Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Scar Size Percent (DEMRI)
Description
Change in scar size percent as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Scar Tissue Mass (DEMRI)
Description
Change in scar tissue mass as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (Peak VO2)
Description
Change in maximal oxygen consumption (peak V02) as assessed via treadmill
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)
Description
Change in distance walked (in meters) as measured by the 6 minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 minutes). The average distance of the two walk tests was used for analysis.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Score
Description
Change in the quality of life summary score as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Minimum and maximum scores for the scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcomes.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Description
Change in N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) as measured via laboratory blood draw
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index-Trajectory
Description
Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Scar Size Percent (DEMRI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Scar Tissue Mass (DEMRI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (Peak VO2)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)-Trajectory
Description
Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 minutes). The average distance of the two walk tests was used for analysis. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Score-Trajectory
Description
Minimum and maximum scores for the scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcomes. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The 2nd and 3rd set of results represent differences for varying slopes from the interaction model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-Trajectory
Description
Log transformation used. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). The first set of results reflects the model within each arm and represents change per 6 months within that treatment arm. The second set of results reflects an overall model with all patients and the results represent the change per 6 months irrespective of treatment arm.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Description
Number of participants with adjudicated events including death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and/or other exacerbation of heart failure (non-hospitalization).
Time Frame
Baseline to End of 12 Month Visit Window, an average of 395 days following study product injection
Title
Participants Experiencing Other Significant Clinical Events
Description
Number of participants experiencing other significant adjudicated clinical events including: non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, coronary artery revascularization, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, and pericardial tamponade
Time Frame
Baseline to End of 12 Month Visit Window, an average of 395 days following study product injection
Title
Cumulative Days Alive and Out of Hospital for Heart Failure
Description
Days alive and out of hospital during the study evaluation period. Subjects were allotted a visit window extending 30 days past their anticipated 12-month visit. Some participants had extended 12-month visit windows due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Time Frame
Baseline to End of 12 Month Visit Window, an average of 395 days following study product injection
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Subjects With Events Between Randomization and Study Product Injection (SPI) That Preclude the Receipt of Product
Description
Number and percent of subjects with events between randomization and study product injection (SPI) that preclude the subject from receiving product. Reasons include those who did not undergo harvest (n=6; death, subject withdraw, subject changed mind) and those who did not undergo SPI (n=9; death, LVAD placement, episodes of ventricular tachycardia, and cancelled procedures)
Time Frame
Randomization to SPI, an average of 14 weeks
Title
Subjects Who Have a Failed Bone Marrow Aspiration Procedure
Description
Number and percent of subjects who do not successfully undergo bone marrow aspiration
Time Frame
During bone marrow aspiration procedure
Title
Subjects Who Have a Failed Endomyocardial Biopsy Procedure
Description
Number and percent of subjects who do not successfully undergo endomyocardial biopsy procedure. Note only participants who were assigned to MSC+CPC or to CPC groups had endomyocardial biopsy procedures attempted.
Time Frame
During endomyocardial biopsy procedure
Title
Subject MSC Products Which Failed Release Criteria
Description
Number and percent of subjects who have MSC products which failed release criteria
Time Frame
Harvest to Study Product Injection Procedure
Title
Subject CPC Products Which Failed Release Criteria
Description
Number and percent of subjects who have CPC products which failed release criteria
Time Frame
Harvest to Study Project Injection procedure
Title
Subjects Who Receive Less Than 15 Injections During SPI
Description
Number and percent of subjects who received less than 15 injections during SPI
Time Frame
During SPI procedure
Title
Subjects Who Have at Least One Cardiac MRI Endpoint Measure That is Uninterpretable
Description
Number and percent of subjects who have at least one cardiac MRI endpoint measure that is uninterpretable due to issues related to the device, including, but not limited to, inability to undergo the procedure
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
79 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Be ≥ 21 and <80 years of age
Have documented coronary artery disease (CAD) with evidence of myocardial injury, LV dysfunction, and clinical evidence of HF
Have a "detectable" area of myocardial injury defined as ≥ 5% LV involvement (infarct volume) and any subendocardial involvement by cMRI
Have an EF ≤ 40% by cMRI
Be receiving guideline-driven medical therapy for heart failure at stable and tolerated doses for ≥ 1 month prior to consent. For beta-blockade "stable" is defined as no greater than a 50% reduction in dose or no more than a 100% increase in dose.
Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization
Have NYHA class I, II, or III heart failure symptoms
If a female of childbearing potential, be willing to use one form of birth control for the duration of the study, and undergo a pregnancy test at baseline and within 36 hours prior to injection
Exclusion Criteria:
Indication for standard-of-care surgery (including valve surgery, placement of left-ventricular assist device, or imminent heart transplantation), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure, and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of ischemic and/or valvular heart disease. Subjects who require or undergo PCI should undergo these procedures a minimum of 3 months in advance of randomization. Subjects who require or undergo CABG should undergo these procedures a minimum of 4 months in advance of randomization. In addition, subjects who develop a need for revascularization following enrollment should undergo revascularization without delay. Indication for imminent heart transplantation is defined as a high likelihood of transplant prior to collection of the 12 month study endpoint. Candidates cannot be UNOS status 1A or 1B, and they must have documented low probability of being transplanted
Valvular heart disease including 1) mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve; or 2) severe (any valve) insufficiency/regurgitation within 12 months of consent
Aortic stenosis with valve area ≤ 1.5 cm2
History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 90 days of consent
History of a left ventricular remodeling surgical procedure utilizing prosthetic material
Presence of a pacemaker and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator with any of the following limitations/conditions:
manufactured before the year 2000
leads implanted < 6 weeks prior to consent
non-transvenous epicardial, or abandoned leads
subcutaneous ICDs
leadless pacemakers
any other condition that, in the judgment of device-trained staff, would deem an MRI contraindicated
Pacemaker-dependence with an ICD (Note: pacemaker-dependent candidates without an ICD are not excluded)
A cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implanted less than 3 months prior to consent
Other MRI contraindications (e.g. patient body habitus incompatible with MRI)
An appropriate ICD firing or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia within 30 days of consent
Ventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 consecutive beats without an ICD within 3 months of consent, or symptomatic Mobitz II or higher degree atrioventricular block without a functioning pacemaker within 3 months of consent
Presence of LV thrombus
Evidence of active myocarditis
Baseline maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) greater than 75% of age and gender based predictive values
Baseline eGFR <35 ml/min/1.73m2
Blood glucose levels (HbA1c) >10%
Hematologic abnormality evidenced by hematocrit < 25%, white blood cell < 2,500/ul or platelet count < 100,000/ul
Liver dysfunction evidenced by enzymes (AST and ALT) ˃ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
Coagulopathy (INR ≥ 1.3) not due to a reversible cause (e.g., warfarin and/or Factor Xa inhibitors). Subjects who cannot be withdrawn from anticoagulation will be excluded.
HIV and/or active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Allergy to radiographic contrast material that cannot adequately be managed by premedication
Known history of anaphylactic reaction to penicillin or streptomycin
Received gene or cell-based therapy from any source within the previous 12 months
History of malignancy within 5 years (i.e., subjects with prior malignancy must be disease free for 5 years), excluding basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ which have been definitively treated
Condition that limits lifespan to < 1 year
History of drug abuse (illegal "street" drugs except marijuana, or prescription medications not being used appropriately for a pre-existing medical condition) or alcohol abuse (≥ 5 drinks/day for ˃ 3 months), or documented medical, occupational, or legal problems arising from the use of alcohol or drugs within the past 24 months
Participation in an investigational therapeutic or device trial within 30 days of consent
Cognitive or language barriers that prohibit obtaining informed consent or any study elements
Pregnancy or lactation or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months
Any other condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, would impair enrollment, study product administration, or follow-up
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Simari, MD
Organizational Affiliation
CCTRN Steering Committee Chair
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford University School of Medicine (Falk Cardiovascular Research Center)
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida-Department of Medicine
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami-Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Center for Vascular Biology and Medicine
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Louisville
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Heart Institute
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23588961
Citation
Hare JM, Bolli R, Cooke JP, Gordon DJ, Henry TD, Perin EC, March KL, Murphy MP, Pepine CJ, Simari RD, Skarlatos SI, Traverse JH, Willerson JT, Szady AD, Taylor DA, Vojvodic RW, Yang PC, Moye LA; Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network. Phase II clinical research design in cardiology: learning the right lessons too well: observations and recommendations from the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN). Circulation. 2013 Apr 16;127(15):1630-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000779. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19121814
Citation
Nazarian S, Halperin HR. How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jan;6(1):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.021. Epub 2008 Oct 22. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29703749
Citation
Bolli R, Hare JM, March KL, Pepine CJ, Willerson JT, Perin EC, Yang PC, Henry TD, Traverse JH, Mitrani RD, Khan A, Hernandez-Schulman I, Taylor DA, DiFede DL, Lima JAC, Chugh A, Loughran J, Vojvodic RW, Sayre SL, Bettencourt J, Cohen M, Moye L, Ebert RF, Simari RD; Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN). Rationale and Design of the CONCERT-HF Trial (Combination of Mesenchymal and c-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells As Regenerative Therapy for Heart Failure). Circ Res. 2018 Jun 8;122(12):1703-1715. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312978. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34315432
Citation
Kato Y, Kizer JR, Ostovaneh MR, Lazar J, Peng Q, van der Geest RJ, Lima JAC, Ambale-Venkatesh B. Extracellular volume-guided late gadolinium enhancement analysis for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: The Women's Interagency HIV Study. BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00649-6.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.cctrn.org
Description
Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network
URL
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
Description
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
URL
https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-turning-discovery-into-health/stem-cells
Description
Information on stem cells from the National Institutes of Health
Learn more about this trial
Combination of Mesenchymal and C-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells as Regenerative Therapy for Heart Failure
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs