search
Back to results

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GSK3196165
MTX
Folic acid
Placebo
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Arthritis, Rheumatoid focused on measuring DMARD-IR, GSK3196165, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=18 years at the time of signing informed consent.
  • Meets ACR/EULAR 2010 RA Classification Criteria, with disease duration of >=12 weeks.
  • Swollen joint count of >=4 (66-joint count) and tender joint count of >=4 (68-joint count).
  • DAS28(CRP) >=3.2.
  • CRP >=5.0 milligram per litre (mg/L) at screening.
  • Must have previously received MTX (15-25 mg weekly) for at least 12 weeks before screening, with no change in route of administration, with a stable and tolerated dose for >=4 weeks prior to Day 1. A stable dose of MTX >=7.5 mg/week is acceptable, if the MTX dose has been reduced for reasons of documented intolerance to MTX, e.g. hepatic or hematologic toxicity, or per local requirement.
  • Weight >=45 kilogram (kg).
  • Male or female subjects are eligible to participate so long as they meet and agree to abide by the contraceptive criteria.
  • Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >=60% predicted; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >=70% predicted
  • No evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of other inflammatory rheumatological or autoimmune disorders, other than Sjögren's syndrome secondary to RA.
  • History of any respiratory disease which (in the opinion of the investigator) would compromise subject safety or the ability of the subject to complete the study (e.g. significant interstitial lung disease, such as pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate-severe asthma, bronchiectasis, previous pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [PAP]).
  • Clinically-significant or unstable (in the opinion of the investigator) persistent cough or dyspnea that is unexplained.
  • Significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
  • A history of malignancy.
  • Hereditary or acquired immunodeficiency disorder, including immunoglobulin deficiency.
  • Current/previous Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 or 2 infection.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

GSK3196165, Dose 1 + MTX and Folic acid

GSK3196165, Dose 2 + MTX and folic acid

GSK3196165, Dose 3 + MTX and folic acid

GSK3196165, Dose 4 + MTX and folic acid

GSK3196165, Dose 5 + MTX and folic acid

Placebo + MTX and folic acid

Arm Description

Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 1 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.

Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 2 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.

Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 3 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.

Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 4 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.

Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 5 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.

Subjects will receive placebo (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score for 28 Different Joints With C-reactive Protein Value (DAS28{CRP}) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at Week 24
DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 millimeter [mm] visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in [milligrams/liter] mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). ITT population comprised of all participants who were randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study treatment (GSK3196165 or placebo).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at All Time Points
DAS28(CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 score of <2.6 points. The DAS index combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints. The DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome).
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at All Assessment Time Points
DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline.
Time to First DAS28(CRP) Remission
The DAS index combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints. The DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Median time, to remission has been presented.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Categorical DAS28(CRP) Response (Moderate/Good [European League Against Rheumatism] EULAR Response) at All Assessment Time Points
DAS28(CRP) scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as follows: Current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2=good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = moderate response) and (<=0.6 =no response). Current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2 =moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = moderate response) and (<=0.6 =no response). Current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2=moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = no response) and (<=0.6 =no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28(CRP) score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) 20/50/70 Response Rates at All Assessment Time Points
The ACR definition for calculating improvement in rheumatoid arthritis is calculated as a 20% improvement (ACR20) in both tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures: participant and physician global assessments, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, disability, and an acute-phase reactant (i.e. CRP value). Similarly, ACR50 and ACR70 were calculated with the respective percent improvement. The specific components of the ACR assessments are as follows: Tender/Painful Joint count 68 (TJC68), Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66), Participant's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Participant's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, CRP (mg/L) and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For all visits, if any of the component scores were missing, then those scores were considered as not having met the criteria for improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Index-based ACR/EULAR Remission Rates at All Assessment Time Points
Index-based remission was achieved if the following requirement was met: SDAI <= 3.3. If the SDAI value was missing at an individual assessment point, Index-based remission for that assessment was set to missing.
Percentage of Participants With Boolean-based ACR/EULAR Remission Rates at All Assessment Time Points
Boolean-based remission was achieved if all of the following requirements were met at the same time: TJC68 <= 1,SJC66 <= 1,CRP <= 1mg/dL, PtGA <= 10. If one of the components was missing at an individual assessment point, Boolean-based remission for that assessment was set to missing.
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission
CDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician. CDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: CDAI =TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity and GP=physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 cm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst). It ranges between 0 and 76. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Remission was achieved for a non-missing CDAI value <=2.8.
Change From Baseline in SDAI at All Assessment Time Points
SDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician and acute phase reactants. The SDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal-phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees. It is calculated using the following formula: SDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP + CRP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment, GP= physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 centimetre [cm] visual analogue scale [VAS] with 0 = best, 10 = worst), and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.1 and 86. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at All Assessment Time Points
CDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician. CDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: CDAI =TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity and GP=physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 cm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst). It ranges between 0 and 76. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at All Assessment Time Points
HAQ-DI is 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas;dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Each functional area contains at least two questions. For each question, there is a four level response set that is scored from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). If aids or devices or physical assistance are used for a specific functional area and the maximum response of this functional area is 0 or 1 the according value is increased to a score of 2. HAQ-DI is only calculated if there are at least 6 functional area scores available. The average of these non-missing functional area scores defines the continuous HAQ-DI score ranging from 0 to 3. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Pain Score at All Assessment Time Points
Participants assessed the severity of their current arthritis pain using a 100 unit visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponds to the magnitude of their pain. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Physical and Mental Component Scores (PCS, MCS) and in Domain Scores of Short Form 36 (SF-36) at All Assessment Time Points
SF-36 is a generic health survey containing 36 questions covering 8 domains of health. SF-36 yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as PCS and MCS health summary scores. The version 2, 1-week recall questionnaire was used. Recoding, calculations and standardization were done as per the User's manual of SF-36. Domain scores were only calculated if less than half of the item scores were missing. All raw domain scores were transformed on a 0-100 scale (transformed domain scores) and then standardized into norm-based scores using Z-score. Following the transformation of the 8 domain scores into z-scores, the MCS and PCS were aggregated (AGG) using weights as PCS/MCS = 50 + (AGG_PHYS *10/AGG_MENT *10). High score (worse outcome) and low score (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at All Assessment Time Points
The FACIT-fatigue questionnaire is a participant reported measure developed to assess fatigue consisting of 13 statements regarding feeling fatigue using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 4. For only two of the items (i.e. Answer 5 [An5] and An7) a higher value represents a lower fatigue; 11 of the item scores (i.e. HI7, HI12, An1, An2, An3, An4, An8, An12, An14, An15, An16) have to be reversed by subtracting the captured value from 4 (0 is turned to a 4; 1 into 3; 3 into 1; 4 into 0). After performing the reversals the sum of the non-missing individual items were multiplied by 13 and divided by the number of the non-missing individual items. The final score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue (i.e. a better quality of life). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Question 3 at All Assessment Time Points
BFI is a self-reported instrument consisting of nine questions which correlate well with quality-of-life measures. For this study, Question 3 only was used which asked about fatigue severity at its worst in the last 24 hours. A discrete 11 unit numeric reporting scale was used where 0 =No fatigue, and 10=As bad as you can imagine. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other situations as per Medical or Scientific judgment. Overall AEs and SAEs for the entire study duration until follow-up have been presented.
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious infections were categorized as AE of special interest. The number of participants with overall serious infections have been presented.
Number of Participants With Opportunistic Infections
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Opportunistic infections were categorized as AE of special interest. The number of participants with overall opportunistic infections have been presented.
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Events
Pulmonary assessments were performed to determine the number of participants with pulmonary events including persistent cough, persistent dyspnea, and persistent Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Persistent is defined as any event with duration >=15 days. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. The number of participants experiencing pulmonary events have been reported.
Number of Participants With Worst-case Post-Baseline Results for Pulse Oximetry
Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen, that is called as blood oxygen saturation. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. The number of participants with blood oxygen level < 80%, 80% to <90% and >=90% have been reported.

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2015
Last Updated
December 10, 2020
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02504671
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
A Phase IIb, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Adaptive, Study of the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Combination With Methotrexate Therapy, in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 23, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 22, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 29, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a randomised, Phase IIb, dose-adaptive, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study with the primary objective to assess the efficacy of GSK3196165, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in subjects with active moderate severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX. Approximately 210 subjects will be randomised into the study, following a screening period of up to four weeks. The total treatment period is up to 52 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up period after the last dose (Week 50). Subjects will be randomised (1:1:1:1:1:1) to placebo or one of five subcutaneous (SC) GSK3196165 doses, in combination with MTX (at a weekly dose between 15-25 milligram [mg]), previously received for at least 12 weeks, with a stable and tolerated dose and route of administration for >=4 weeks. Escape therapy is provided at specified timepoints in the protocol for subjects that do not achieve adequate disease improvement.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Keywords
DMARD-IR, GSK3196165, Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
222 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
GSK3196165, Dose 1 + MTX and Folic acid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 1 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Arm Title
GSK3196165, Dose 2 + MTX and folic acid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 2 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Arm Title
GSK3196165, Dose 3 + MTX and folic acid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 3 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Arm Title
GSK3196165, Dose 4 + MTX and folic acid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 4 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Arm Title
GSK3196165, Dose 5 + MTX and folic acid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 5 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Arm Title
Placebo + MTX and folic acid
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will receive placebo (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
GSK3196165
Intervention Description
GSK3196165 is supplied as liquid and will be administered as SC injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
MTX
Intervention Description
MTX will be supplied as capsule, tablet or liquid and will be administered orally or as SC injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Folic acid
Intervention Description
Folic acid will be supplied as capsule, tablet or liquid and will be administered orally.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo is supplied as liquid as sterile 0.9% weight by volume (w/v) sodium chloride solution and will be administered as SC injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score for 28 Different Joints With C-reactive Protein Value (DAS28{CRP}) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at Week 24
Description
DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 millimeter [mm] visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in [milligrams/liter] mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). ITT population comprised of all participants who were randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study treatment (GSK3196165 or placebo).
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
Description
DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at All Time Points
Description
DAS28(CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 score of <2.6 points. The DAS index combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints. The DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome).
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at All Assessment Time Points
Description
DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Title
Time to First DAS28(CRP) Remission
Description
The DAS index combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints. The DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Median time, to remission has been presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 62
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Categorical DAS28(CRP) Response (Moderate/Good [European League Against Rheumatism] EULAR Response) at All Assessment Time Points
Description
DAS28(CRP) scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as follows: Current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2=good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = moderate response) and (<=0.6 =no response). Current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2 =moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = moderate response) and (<=0.6 =no response). Current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2=moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = no response) and (<=0.6 =no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28(CRP) score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)
Title
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) 20/50/70 Response Rates at All Assessment Time Points
Description
The ACR definition for calculating improvement in rheumatoid arthritis is calculated as a 20% improvement (ACR20) in both tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures: participant and physician global assessments, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, disability, and an acute-phase reactant (i.e. CRP value). Similarly, ACR50 and ACR70 were calculated with the respective percent improvement. The specific components of the ACR assessments are as follows: Tender/Painful Joint count 68 (TJC68), Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66), Participant's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Participant's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, CRP (mg/L) and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For all visits, if any of the component scores were missing, then those scores were considered as not having met the criteria for improvement.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Index-based ACR/EULAR Remission Rates at All Assessment Time Points
Description
Index-based remission was achieved if the following requirement was met: SDAI <= 3.3. If the SDAI value was missing at an individual assessment point, Index-based remission for that assessment was set to missing.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Boolean-based ACR/EULAR Remission Rates at All Assessment Time Points
Description
Boolean-based remission was achieved if all of the following requirements were met at the same time: TJC68 <= 1,SJC66 <= 1,CRP <= 1mg/dL, PtGA <= 10. If one of the components was missing at an individual assessment point, Boolean-based remission for that assessment was set to missing.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)
Title
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission
Description
CDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician. CDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: CDAI =TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity and GP=physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 cm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst). It ranges between 0 and 76. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Remission was achieved for a non-missing CDAI value <=2.8.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)
Title
Change From Baseline in SDAI at All Assessment Time Points
Description
SDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician and acute phase reactants. The SDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal-phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees. It is calculated using the following formula: SDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP + CRP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment, GP= physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 centimetre [cm] visual analogue scale [VAS] with 0 = best, 10 = worst), and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.1 and 86. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at All Assessment Time Points
Description
CDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician. CDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: CDAI =TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity and GP=physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 cm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst). It ranges between 0 and 76. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at All Assessment Time Points
Description
HAQ-DI is 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas;dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Each functional area contains at least two questions. For each question, there is a four level response set that is scored from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). If aids or devices or physical assistance are used for a specific functional area and the maximum response of this functional area is 0 or 1 the according value is increased to a score of 2. HAQ-DI is only calculated if there are at least 6 functional area scores available. The average of these non-missing functional area scores defines the continuous HAQ-DI score ranging from 0 to 3. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Pain Score at All Assessment Time Points
Description
Participants assessed the severity of their current arthritis pain using a 100 unit visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponds to the magnitude of their pain. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Physical and Mental Component Scores (PCS, MCS) and in Domain Scores of Short Form 36 (SF-36) at All Assessment Time Points
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey containing 36 questions covering 8 domains of health. SF-36 yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as PCS and MCS health summary scores. The version 2, 1-week recall questionnaire was used. Recoding, calculations and standardization were done as per the User's manual of SF-36. Domain scores were only calculated if less than half of the item scores were missing. All raw domain scores were transformed on a 0-100 scale (transformed domain scores) and then standardized into norm-based scores using Z-score. Following the transformation of the 8 domain scores into z-scores, the MCS and PCS were aggregated (AGG) using weights as PCS/MCS = 50 + (AGG_PHYS *10/AGG_MENT *10). High score (worse outcome) and low score (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at All Assessment Time Points
Description
The FACIT-fatigue questionnaire is a participant reported measure developed to assess fatigue consisting of 13 statements regarding feeling fatigue using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 4. For only two of the items (i.e. Answer 5 [An5] and An7) a higher value represents a lower fatigue; 11 of the item scores (i.e. HI7, HI12, An1, An2, An3, An4, An8, An12, An14, An15, An16) have to be reversed by subtracting the captured value from 4 (0 is turned to a 4; 1 into 3; 3 into 1; 4 into 0). After performing the reversals the sum of the non-missing individual items were multiplied by 13 and divided by the number of the non-missing individual items. The final score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue (i.e. a better quality of life). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Question 3 at All Assessment Time Points
Description
BFI is a self-reported instrument consisting of nine questions which correlate well with quality-of-life measures. For this study, Question 3 only was used which asked about fatigue severity at its worst in the last 24 hours. A discrete 11 unit numeric reporting scale was used where 0 =No fatigue, and 10=As bad as you can imagine. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other situations as per Medical or Scientific judgment. Overall AEs and SAEs for the entire study duration until follow-up have been presented.
Time Frame
Up to 62 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious infections were categorized as AE of special interest. The number of participants with overall serious infections have been presented.
Time Frame
Up to 62 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Opportunistic Infections
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Opportunistic infections were categorized as AE of special interest. The number of participants with overall opportunistic infections have been presented.
Time Frame
Up to 62 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Events
Description
Pulmonary assessments were performed to determine the number of participants with pulmonary events including persistent cough, persistent dyspnea, and persistent Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Persistent is defined as any event with duration >=15 days. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. The number of participants experiencing pulmonary events have been reported.
Time Frame
Up to 62 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Worst-case Post-Baseline Results for Pulse Oximetry
Description
Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen, that is called as blood oxygen saturation. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. The number of participants with blood oxygen level < 80%, 80% to <90% and >=90% have been reported.
Time Frame
Up to 62 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age >=18 years at the time of signing informed consent. Meets ACR/EULAR 2010 RA Classification Criteria, with disease duration of >=12 weeks. Swollen joint count of >=4 (66-joint count) and tender joint count of >=4 (68-joint count). DAS28(CRP) >=3.2. CRP >=5.0 milligram per litre (mg/L) at screening. Must have previously received MTX (15-25 mg weekly) for at least 12 weeks before screening, with no change in route of administration, with a stable and tolerated dose for >=4 weeks prior to Day 1. A stable dose of MTX >=7.5 mg/week is acceptable, if the MTX dose has been reduced for reasons of documented intolerance to MTX, e.g. hepatic or hematologic toxicity, or per local requirement. Weight >=45 kilogram (kg). Male or female subjects are eligible to participate so long as they meet and agree to abide by the contraceptive criteria. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >=60% predicted; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >=70% predicted No evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB). Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or lactating women. History of other inflammatory rheumatological or autoimmune disorders, other than Sjögren's syndrome secondary to RA. History of any respiratory disease which (in the opinion of the investigator) would compromise subject safety or the ability of the subject to complete the study (e.g. significant interstitial lung disease, such as pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate-severe asthma, bronchiectasis, previous pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [PAP]). Clinically-significant or unstable (in the opinion of the investigator) persistent cough or dyspnea that is unexplained. Significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk. A history of malignancy. Hereditary or acquired immunodeficiency disorder, including immunoglobulin deficiency. Current/previous Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 or 2 infection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6T 0G1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barrie
ZIP/Postal Code
L4M 6L2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
602 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bruntal
ZIP/Postal Code
792 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 5
ZIP/Postal Code
150 06
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha
ZIP/Postal Code
130 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
13419
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Koeln
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Doberan
ZIP/Postal Code
18209
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
14059
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
D-20095
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kistarcsa
ZIP/Postal Code
2143
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Veszprém
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bologna
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44650
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cuernavaca
State/Province
Morelos
ZIP/Postal Code
62170
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cuernavaca
State/Province
Morelos
ZIP/Postal Code
62290
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatán
ZIP/Postal Code
97000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Luis Potosí
ZIP/Postal Code
78213
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-168
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bytom
ZIP/Postal Code
41-902
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
ZIP/Postal Code
05-825
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
91-347
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-582
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-518
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-653
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
119049
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630099
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Omsk
ZIP/Postal Code
644111
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ryazan
ZIP/Postal Code
390026
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
192177
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tver
ZIP/Postal Code
170036
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vladimir
ZIP/Postal Code
600023
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150023
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pretoria
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
1
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Panorama / Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7500
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stellenbosch
ZIP/Postal Code
7600
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ivano-Frankivsk
ZIP/Postal Code
76008
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61029
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61039
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kryvyi Rih
ZIP/Postal Code
50056
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79013
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Odesa
ZIP/Postal Code
65026
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poltava
ZIP/Postal Code
36011
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sumy
ZIP/Postal Code
40022
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21018
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsya
ZIP/Postal Code
21029
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zhytomyr
ZIP/Postal Code
10002
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2TH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS7 4SA
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (copy the URL below to your browser)
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/Posting.aspx?ID=20744
Citations:
Citation
C Buckley, J Simon Campos, V Zhdan, K Davy, D Inman, E Fisheleva, A Gupta, M Layton, N Mitchell, J Patel, R Williamson, D Saurigny, P-P Tak, C Hawkes, B Becker. A Phase IIb Dose-Ranging Randomised Study of Efficacy, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Safety of the Anti-Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Antibody Otilimab (GSK3196165) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020; DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30229-0
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs