search
Back to results

Intrapartum Rapid GBS Testing in Patients Presenting With Threatened Preterm Labor

Primary Purpose

Group B Streptococcus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GBS culture and real time PCR
Sponsored by
MemorialCare Health System
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Group B Streptococcus focused on measuring GBS, GBS culture, GBS PCR, GBS colonization

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Pregnant women presenting for unplanned obstetrical care at a participating clinical study site
  • Gestational age between 21 6/7 and 36 6/7 weeks
  • Subject has not participated in the study before
  • Subject agrees to complete all aspects of the study and provide informed consent in accordance with applicable regulations
  • Signs and/or symptoms suggestive of preterm labor, whereby the managing clinician suspects preterm labor
  • Uterine contractions (with or without pain)
  • Intermittent lower abdominal pain, dull backache, pelvic pressure
  • Vaginal bleeding during the second and third trimester
  • Menstrual-like intestinal cramping (with or without diarrhea)
  • Change in vaginal discharge (amount, color, or consistency)
  • Vague sense of discomfort characterized as "not feeling right"
  • Change in cervical exam (cervical dilation, effacement, or consistency)
  • Signs and symptoms necessitating preterm delivery (i.e abruption, preeclampsia, hemolysis elevated liver enzymes, low platelet (HELLP) syndrome, ruptured membranes, chorioamnionitis, fetal indications)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exposure to antibiotics within 1 week prior to enrollment (15)
  • Known GBS bacteriuria at the time of enrollment
  • Prior history of neonatal GBS sepsis

Sites / Locations

  • Miller Children's & Women's Hospital Long Beach

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

single arm

Arm Description

All patients will have GBS culture and real time PCR performed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Sensitivity of intrapartum GBS real time PCR compared to intrapartum GBS culture
Positive predictive value of GBS Real time PCR performed intrapartum
Negative predictive value of GBS real time PCR performed intrapartum
Specificity of intrapartum GBS real time PCR compared to intrapartum GBS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Neonatal GBS septicemia
Composite neonatal morbidity
number of neonatal intensive care unit days
Neonatal mortality rate
necrotizing enterocolitis
Gestational age at delivery
vaginal delivery
Postpartum hemorrhage
Maternal intrapartum chorioamnionitis
Maternal postpartum endometritis
Neonatal respiratory distress

Full Information

First Posted
July 23, 2015
Last Updated
November 18, 2022
Sponsor
MemorialCare Health System
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02511444
Brief Title
Intrapartum Rapid GBS Testing in Patients Presenting With Threatened Preterm Labor
Official Title
Intrapartum Rapid GBS Testing in Patients Presenting With Threatened Preterm Labor
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
MemorialCare Health System

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the test characteristics of a rapid intrapartum real- time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) compared to the intrapartum GBS culture as the standard in preterm patients presenting with threatened preterm labor or with obstetric indications for preterm delivery.
Detailed Description
Group B streptococcus (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae is a gram-positive bacterium that colonizes 10-40% of maternal gastrointestinal and urogenital tract sites. Maternal colonization remains the primary risk factor and the leading cause of early onset GBS disease in infants in the United States. Transmission of GBS to the neonate in early onset GBS cases occurs at the time of labor and delivery, with a transmission rate of 52.5% if no intrapartum antibiotics are used. Of those neonates, 1-2% term infants and 8% of preterm infants will develop early onset disease. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends universal screening at 35-37 weeks via culture of the vagina and rectum. If this is performed ≤5 weeks before delivery, it has a sensitivity of 85% and a negative predictive value of 95-98%. There is a downside to screening remote from delivery however; vaginal GBS colonization fluctuates in the same woman over time, thus rendering possibly inaccurate GBS results. It has been reported that at least 10% of antenatal GBS negative women turned positive at the time of labor. This may suggest that screening at the time of delivery is a more accurate method of predicting actual GBS colonization status. In fact, a majority of neonatal GBS sepsis occurs in infants born to mothers with a negative antepartum screening culture. Currently, a standard GBS culture may take up to 3 days to obtain results. A rapid diagnostic test has more recently been studied as a possible method of GBS screening - real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Prior studies of RT-PCR, specifically the Cepheid GeneXpert GBS assay used at Miller's Children's and Women's Hospital, have reported sensitivity from 85-98.5% and specificity of 96-99.6% using data from term gestations. The CDC currently permits the use of RT-PCR as a rapid screening test for those with unknown status at term. Several reports demonstrate that RT-PCR is a rapid, more sensitive method than standard culture for determining the intrapartum GBS colonization status. Some studies have also demonstrated the ability of RT-PCR to identify patients who would otherwise be missed by traditional GBS culture. A study by Mueller et al demonstrated that out of 64 patients with positive RT-PCR results, 10 were actually negative on culture. A cost-effectiveness analysis has demonstrated that PCR intrapartum screening strategy is not any less cost-effective than traditional culture and confers a significant decrease in early onset GBS disease in term gestations. Preterm infants suffer the highest rate of mortality from GBS infection, with up to 30% mortality in those < 33 weeks affected by GBS sepsis. Identifying GBS colonization is thus imperative in the 7-11% of all pregnancies affected by preterm labor, given that they will not have undergone universal screening yet (which typically occurs at 35-37 weeks). While the CDC recommends giving antibiotics to patients with unknown GBS status at substantial risk for preterm delivery, implementation of this recommendation is poor. Advantages of the RT-PCR are that its results will come back much more rapidly than the standard culture and may assist in management of these critical patients, 75 min vs 3 days, respectively. Accurate screening for GBS in a rapid fashion, especially in preterm infants, where the risk of GBS infection is most serious, can potentially allow antibiotics to be used appropriately. The investigators seek to evaluate the utility of RT-PCR for screening of GBS in women at risk of preterm labor with an unknown GBS status. The investigators also aim to identify the ability of RT-PCR to identify GBS colonization in patients who would have otherwise been missed by culture.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Group B Streptococcus
Keywords
GBS, GBS culture, GBS PCR, GBS colonization

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
342 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
single arm
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All patients will have GBS culture and real time PCR performed.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
GBS culture and real time PCR
Intervention Description
patients with signs and symptoms of threatened preterm labor, or indications for preterm delivery will have GBS colonization screened by culture and real time PCR.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensitivity of intrapartum GBS real time PCR compared to intrapartum GBS culture
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Positive predictive value of GBS Real time PCR performed intrapartum
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Negative predictive value of GBS real time PCR performed intrapartum
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Specificity of intrapartum GBS real time PCR compared to intrapartum GBS
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Neonatal GBS septicemia
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Composite neonatal morbidity
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
number of neonatal intensive care unit days
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Neonatal mortality rate
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
necrotizing enterocolitis
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Gestational age at delivery
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
vaginal delivery
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Postpartum hemorrhage
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Maternal intrapartum chorioamnionitis
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Maternal postpartum endometritis
Time Frame
up to one and a half year
Title
Neonatal respiratory distress
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Title
Neonatal pneumonia
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Title
Neonatal osteomyelitis
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Title
Neonatal bacteremia
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Title
Neonatal meningitis
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Title
cesarean delivery
Time Frame
up to one and half year
Title
composite maternal morbidity
Time Frame
up to one and half year

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Pregnant women presenting for unplanned obstetrical care at a participating clinical study site Gestational age between 21 6/7 and 36 6/7 weeks Subject has not participated in the study before Subject agrees to complete all aspects of the study and provide informed consent in accordance with applicable regulations Signs and/or symptoms suggestive of preterm labor, whereby the managing clinician suspects preterm labor Uterine contractions (with or without pain) Intermittent lower abdominal pain, dull backache, pelvic pressure Vaginal bleeding during the second and third trimester Menstrual-like intestinal cramping (with or without diarrhea) Change in vaginal discharge (amount, color, or consistency) Vague sense of discomfort characterized as "not feeling right" Change in cervical exam (cervical dilation, effacement, or consistency) Signs and symptoms necessitating preterm delivery (i.e abruption, preeclampsia, hemolysis elevated liver enzymes, low platelet (HELLP) syndrome, ruptured membranes, chorioamnionitis, fetal indications) Exclusion Criteria: Exposure to antibiotics within 1 week prior to enrollment (15) Known GBS bacteriuria at the time of enrollment Prior history of neonatal GBS sepsis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alex Fong, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Maternal Fetal Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Miller Children's & Women's Hospital Long Beach
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21088663
Citation
Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ; Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18460666
Citation
Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, Craig AS, Schaffner W, Zansky SM, Gershman K, Stefonek KR, Albanese BA, Zell ER, Schuchat A, Schrag SJ; Active Bacterial Core surveillance/Emerging Infections Program Network. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005. JAMA. 2008 May 7;299(17):2056-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.17.2056.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7045248
Citation
Dillon HC Jr, Gray E, Pass MA, Gray BM. Anorectal and vaginal carriage of group B streptococci during pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 1982 Jun;145(6):794-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.6.794.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2002986
Citation
Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP. The epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization in pregnancy. Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Apr;77(4):604-10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18669720
Citation
Turrentine MA, Ramirez MM. Recurrence of group B streptococci colonization in subsequent pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;112(2 Pt 1):259-64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817f5cb9. Erratum In: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;112(5):1183.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10428995
Citation
Hickman ME, Rench MA, Ferrieri P, Baker CJ. Changing epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization. Pediatrics. 1999 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):203-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.2.203.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16026920
Citation
Valkenburg-van den Berg AW, Sprij AJ, Oostvogel PM, Mutsaers JA, Renes WB, Rosendaal FR, Joep Dorr P. Prevalence of colonisation with group B Streptococci in pregnant women of a multi-ethnic population in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Feb 1;124(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.007. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17904971
Citation
Gavino M, Wang E. A comparison of a new rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction system to traditional culture in determining group B streptococcus colonization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):388.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15867030
Citation
Puopolo KM, Madoff LC, Eichenwald EC. Early-onset group B streptococcal disease in the era of maternal screening. Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1240-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2275.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21864820
Citation
Young BC, Dodge LE, Gupta M, Rhee JS, Hacker MR. Evaluation of a rapid, real-time intrapartum group B streptococcus assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):372.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.087. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20502293
Citation
Goins WP, Talbot TR, Schaffner W, Edwards KM, Craig AS, Schrag SJ, Van Dyke MK, Griffin MR. Adherence to perinatal group B streptococcal prevention guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1217-1224. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dd916f.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19535801
Citation
Van Dyke MK, Phares CR, Lynfield R, Thomas AR, Arnold KE, Craig AS, Mohle-Boetani J, Gershman K, Schaffner W, Petit S, Zansky SM, Morin CA, Spina NL, Wymore K, Harrison LH, Shutt KA, Bareta J, Bulens SN, Zell ER, Schuchat A, Schrag SJ. Evaluation of universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2626-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806820.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20860701
Citation
de Tejada BM, Pfister RE, Renzi G, Francois P, Irion O, Boulvain M, Schrenzel J. Intrapartum Group B streptococcus detection by rapid polymerase chain reaction assay for the prevention of neonatal sepsis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Dec;17(12):1786-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03378.x. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18515517
Citation
Edwards RK, Novak-Weekley SM, Koty PP, Davis T, Leeds LJ, Jordan JA. Rapid group B streptococci screening using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1335-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817710ee.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19580414
Citation
El Helali N, Nguyen JC, Ly A, Giovangrandi Y, Trinquart L. Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for universal intrapartum group B streptococcus screening. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 1;49(3):417-23. doi: 10.1086/600303.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16307558
Citation
Convert M, Martinetti Lucchini G, Dolina M, Piffaretti JC. Comparison of LightCycler PCR and culture for detection of group B streptococci from vaginal swabs. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Dec;11(12):1022-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01275.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15486835
Citation
Davies HD, Miller MA, Faro S, Gregson D, Kehl SC, Jordan JA. Multicenter study of a rapid molecular-based assay for the diagnosis of group B Streptococcus colonization in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;39(8):1129-35. doi: 10.1086/424518. Epub 2004 Sep 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17509794
Citation
Goodrich JS, Miller MB. Comparison of culture and 2 real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to detect group B Streptococcus during antepartum screening. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;59(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 May 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16517846
Citation
Rallu F, Barriga P, Scrivo C, Martel-Laferriere V, Laferriere C. Sensitivities of antigen detection and PCR assays greatly increased compared to that of the standard culture method for screening for group B streptococcus carriage in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):725-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.725-728.2006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24680393
Citation
Mueller M, Henle A, Droz S, Kind AB, Rohner S, Baumann M, Surbek D. Intrapartum detection of Group B streptococci colonization by rapid PCR-test on labor ward. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 May;176:137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.039. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22433346
Citation
El Helali N, Giovangrandi Y, Guyot K, Chevet K, Gutmann L, Durand-Zaleski I. Cost and effectiveness of intrapartum group B streptococcus polymerase chain reaction screening for term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):822-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824b1461.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19732424
Citation
Wernecke M, Mullen C, Sharma V, Morrison J, Barry T, Maher M, Smith T. Evaluation of a novel real-time PCR test based on the ssrA gene for the identification of group B streptococci in vaginal swabs. BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 4;9:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-148.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Intrapartum Rapid GBS Testing in Patients Presenting With Threatened Preterm Labor

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs