search
Back to results

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Persons With Knee Pain (Knee Pain and tDCS): Randomized Pilot Study

Primary Purpose

Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active tDCS
Sham tDCS
Sponsored by
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Knee Osteoarthritis

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • they have self-reported unilateral or bilateral knee OA pain according to American College of Rheumatology criteria
  • they can understand, speak and read English
  • they are able to walk for 6-minutes
  • they are willing to be randomized to either the intervention or control group
  • they are available for five consecutive daily sessions and for a follow-up phone interview each week for three weeks post-stimulation sessions
  • they have no plan to change medication regimens for pain throughout the trial
  • they are willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • knee replacement or non-arthroscopic surgery to the affected knee
  • serious medical illness, such as uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., Systolic Blood Pressure/Diastolic Blood Pressure of ≥ 150/95), congestive heart failure, pacemaker, or history of acute myocardial infarction
  • peripheral neuropathy
  • systemic rheumatic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia
  • alcohol/substance abuse
  • cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Exam score ≤ 23)
  • history of brain surgery, tumor, seizure, stroke, or intracranial metal implantation
  • pregnancy or lactation for females
  • hospitalization within the preceding year due to psychiatric illness

Sites / Locations

  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active tDCS

Sham tDCS

Arm Description

This group will receive five daily sessions of 2mA, 20 minutes of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The anode electrode will be placed over M1 (C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 system for EEG electrode placement) of the hemisphere contralateral to the affected knee, and the cathode electrode will be placed over the supraorbital region (SO) ipsilateral to the affected knee (M1-SO montage). In addition, the following test will performed: X-Rays, Walking Test, Assessment of Physical Performance, Assessment of Sensitivity to Heat, Assessment of Sensitivity to Pressure, Assessment of Sensitivity to Mechanical Stimulation, Assessment of balance, chair stand, and gait speed, Assessment of conditioned pain modulation, and Blood test.

This group will receive five daily sessions of 2mA, current for 30 seconds tDCS. The anode electrode will be placed over M1 (C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 system for EEG electrode placement) of the hemisphere contralateral to the affected knee, and the cathode electrode will be placed over the supraorbital region (SO) ipsilateral to the affected knee (M1-SO montage). In addition, the following test will performed: X-Rays, Walking Test, Assessment of Physical Performance, Assessment of Sensitivity to Heat, Assessment of Sensitivity to Pressure, Assessment of Sensitivity to Mechanical Stimulation, Assessment of balance, chair stand, Assessment of conditioned pain modulation, and gait speed and Blood test.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Numeric Rating Scale for pain is an 101-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no pain at all and 100 being the worst pain imaginable. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Numeric Rating Scale for pain is an 101-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no pain at all and 100 being the worst pain imaginable. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale
This is a index to rate the activity of pain, stiffness, and physical function based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme; subscales are added up for a summation score. The higher the score, the worse the pain.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale
This is a index to rate the activity of pain, stiffness, and physical function based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme; subscales are added up for a summation score. The higher the score, the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Continuous Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Continuous Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Intermittent Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Intermittent Pain Subscale
This is a index to rate the activity of pain based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme. The higher the score, the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Neuropathic Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Neuropathic Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Affective Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Affective Pain Subscale
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Six-minute Walk Test
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The lower the score the worse the condition.
Six-minute Walk Test
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The lower the score the worse the condition.
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
This is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand, and balance tests. The score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
This is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand, and balance tests. The score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).
Heat Pain Threshold
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Heat Pain Threshold
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Heat Pain Tolerance
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Heat Pain Tolerance
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Pressure Pain Threshold
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using pressure pain delivered by a hand-held algometer.
Pressure Pain Threshold
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using pressure pain delivered by a hand-held algometer.
Punctate Mechanical Pain Sensitivity
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using punctate mechanical pain delivered by a calibrated nylon monofilament.
Punctate Mechanical Pain Sensitivity
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using punctate mechanical pain delivered by a calibrated nylon monofilament.
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be done by using a cold pressor procedure on the skin. The measure is scored on a scale, which ranges from zero to infinity. A higher CPM score indicates higher pain inhibition.
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be done by using a cold pressor procedure on the skin. The measure is scored on a scale, which ranges from zero to infinity. A higher CPM score indicates higher pain inhibition.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Endorphin Level
Endorphin Level
Cortisol Level
Cortisol Level
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level
Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Level
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Level
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Level
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Level

Full Information

First Posted
July 29, 2015
Last Updated
June 7, 2017
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
University of Florida
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02512393
Brief Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Persons With Knee Pain (Knee Pain and tDCS): Randomized Pilot Study
Official Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Persons With Knee Pain: Randomized Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
University of Florida

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to study the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on clinical pain, mobility disability, and pain sensitivity to gain a better understanding of the factors that cause pain and disability in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). In particular, people from different ethnic and racial groups may experience OA pain differently which is why the focus will be on older Asian Americans and non-Hispanic whites. It is important to find a reason for such difference so that a better treatment can be found for all OA patients. In addition, the research study will examine if there is any ethnic differences in pain and mobility disability. The investigator hypothesize that Asian Americans will report greater pain and mobility disability than non-Hispanic whites, and that active tDCS will result in improvement in pain and disability compared to sham tDCS.
Detailed Description
If you participate in the study, the following will happen: Randomized into one of two groups. Which will either receive the full length session of brain stimulation or a much shorter session of brain stimulation. The shorter version of stimulation looks like and is performed in the same way as the longer electrical stimulation session, but stimulation is stopped before it can have much of an effect on the brain. You will not know which group you have been assigned to while participating in the research, but you may find out at the completion of the research study. X-Rays will be done on both knees while standing up. Questionnaires about arthritis pain you are having, your thoughts and feelings about it, and any stress that you may have experienced. Walking Test will be performed on a flat surface for 6 minutes at a fast pace without help from an assistive device (cane or walker) or another person. Assessment of Physical Performance requires walking at short distance (about 13 feet), stand up from a chair 5 times without using your arms, and stand in 3 different positions while keeping your balance. Assessment of Sensitivity to Heat. Heat pain sensitivity will be tested using a commercially available thermal sensory testing machine (Medoc, Inc.) used widely in clinical settings. This machine has a small (about 1 inch by 1 inch) square piece that is used to apply heat to the skin. Heat will be applied to the knees and arms. The amount of heat is controlled by a computer. One or more of the following types of heat stimuli will be delivered: 1) a slowly increasing heat that can be stopped by pressing a button when it becomes warm, painful, or intolerable; 2) a series of 5-10 heat pulses that are brief (less than 2 seconds in duration), and rate how painful each heat pulse feels; and 3) a few longer heat pulses (15-30 seconds) at different temperatures to rate how painful each heat pulse feels. The procedures can be stop at any time. Assessment of Sensitivity to Pressure will be done using a handheld device with a small rubber tip to apply pressure to the knee, thigh, and shoulder. Assessment of Sensitivity to Mechanical Stimulation will be done using a handheld probe that has a small nylon tip to tap both the knee and hand. Blood Draw: Blood will be taken at the baseline visit and at the last visit. Brain Stimulation: The stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and it involves placing two sponge-like electrodes on your head and delivering a very weak electrical current to your scalp, which is generated by a 9 volt battery. In addition, weekly phone calls will be done for the next 3 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knee Osteoarthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active tDCS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group will receive five daily sessions of 2mA, 20 minutes of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The anode electrode will be placed over M1 (C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 system for EEG electrode placement) of the hemisphere contralateral to the affected knee, and the cathode electrode will be placed over the supraorbital region (SO) ipsilateral to the affected knee (M1-SO montage). In addition, the following test will performed: X-Rays, Walking Test, Assessment of Physical Performance, Assessment of Sensitivity to Heat, Assessment of Sensitivity to Pressure, Assessment of Sensitivity to Mechanical Stimulation, Assessment of balance, chair stand, and gait speed, Assessment of conditioned pain modulation, and Blood test.
Arm Title
Sham tDCS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive five daily sessions of 2mA, current for 30 seconds tDCS. The anode electrode will be placed over M1 (C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 system for EEG electrode placement) of the hemisphere contralateral to the affected knee, and the cathode electrode will be placed over the supraorbital region (SO) ipsilateral to the affected knee (M1-SO montage). In addition, the following test will performed: X-Rays, Walking Test, Assessment of Physical Performance, Assessment of Sensitivity to Heat, Assessment of Sensitivity to Pressure, Assessment of Sensitivity to Mechanical Stimulation, Assessment of balance, chair stand, Assessment of conditioned pain modulation, and gait speed and Blood test.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active tDCS
Other Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Intervention Description
This group will receive tDCS with a constant current of 2 mA intensity will be applied for 20 minutes once a day for five consecutive days using a pair of thick (0.3 cm) rectangular surface sponge electrodes (5 cm x 7 cm) saturated with 10 mL of saline solution. The anode electrode will be placed over M1 (C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 system for EEG electrode placement) of the hemisphere contralateral to the affected knee, and the cathode electrode will be placed over the supraorbital region (SO) ipsilateral to the affected knee (M1-SO montage).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham tDCS
Intervention Description
This group will receive tDCS with a constant current of 2 mA intensity will be applied for 30 seconds once a day for five consecutive days using a pair of thick (0.3 cm) rectangular surface sponge electrodes (5 cm x 7 cm) saturated with 10 mL of saline solution. The anode electrode will be placed over M1 (C3 or C4 according to the 10-20 system for EEG electrode placement) of the hemisphere contralateral to the affected knee, and the cathode electrode will be placed over the supraorbital region (SO) ipsilateral to the affected knee (M1-SO montage).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Description
Numeric Rating Scale for pain is an 101-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no pain at all and 100 being the worst pain imaginable. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Description
Numeric Rating Scale for pain is an 101-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no pain at all and 100 being the worst pain imaginable. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale
Description
This is a index to rate the activity of pain, stiffness, and physical function based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme; subscales are added up for a summation score. The higher the score, the worse the pain.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale
Description
This is a index to rate the activity of pain, stiffness, and physical function based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme; subscales are added up for a summation score. The higher the score, the worse the pain.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Continuous Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Continuous Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Intermittent Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Intermittent Pain Subscale
Description
This is a index to rate the activity of pain based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme. The higher the score, the worse the pain.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Neuropathic Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Neuropathic Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Affective Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Affective Pain Subscale
Description
This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible. The higher the score the worse the pain.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Six-minute Walk Test
Description
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The lower the score the worse the condition.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Six-minute Walk Test
Description
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The lower the score the worse the condition.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Description
This is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand, and balance tests. The score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Description
This is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand, and balance tests. The score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Heat Pain Threshold
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Heat Pain Threshold
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Heat Pain Tolerance
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Heat Pain Tolerance
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Pressure Pain Threshold
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using pressure pain delivered by a hand-held algometer.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Pressure Pain Threshold
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using pressure pain delivered by a hand-held algometer.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Punctate Mechanical Pain Sensitivity
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using punctate mechanical pain delivered by a calibrated nylon monofilament.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Punctate Mechanical Pain Sensitivity
Description
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using punctate mechanical pain delivered by a calibrated nylon monofilament.
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
Description
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be done by using a cold pressor procedure on the skin. The measure is scored on a scale, which ranges from zero to infinity. A higher CPM score indicates higher pain inhibition.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
Description
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be done by using a cold pressor procedure on the skin. The measure is scored on a scale, which ranges from zero to infinity. A higher CPM score indicates higher pain inhibition.
Time Frame
day 5
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Endorphin Level
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Endorphin Level
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Cortisol Level
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Cortisol Level
Time Frame
day 5
Title
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Time Frame
baseline
Title
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Level
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Level
Time Frame
day 5
Title
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Level
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Level
Time Frame
day 5
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
NIH PROMIS-cognition Will be Compared Between the Two Groups for a Change Between Baseline and Day 5
Description
A score of 50 is the average and a score of 60 is better than average. A score of 40 is the worse score.
Time Frame
Change from baseline and day 5
Title
Safety Questionnaire Will be Compared Between the Two Groups for a Change Between Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Days.
Description
This is a questionnaire to assess the presence and severity of adverse events such as headache, tingling, itching, and fatigue, on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being not at all and 10 being a highest degree.
Time Frame
Change from baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days
Title
Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised Will be Compared Between the Two Groups for a Change Between Baseline and Day 5
Description
This is a questionnaire to assess pain coping strategies, such as distancing from pain, using a 7-point scale that ranges from never do that to always do that. The higher the scale the greater use.
Time Frame
Change from baseline and day 5
Title
Positive and Negative Affect Scale Will be Compared Between the Two Groups for a Change Between Baseline and Day 5
Description
This is a questionnaire using a 5-point scale that ranges from very slightly or not at all to extremely. The lower the scale the negative the affect and the higher the scare the positive the affect.
Time Frame
Change from baseline and day 5
Title
Pain Attitudes Questionnaire-Revised Will be Compared Between the Two Groups for a Change Between Baseline and Day 5
Description
This is a questionnaire to assess pain attitudes, such as stoicism, using a 5-point scale that ranges from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The higher the scale the more stoic.
Time Frame
Change from baseline and day 5

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: they have self-reported unilateral or bilateral knee OA pain according to American College of Rheumatology criteria they can understand, speak and read English they are able to walk for 6-minutes they are willing to be randomized to either the intervention or control group they are available for five consecutive daily sessions and for a follow-up phone interview each week for three weeks post-stimulation sessions they have no plan to change medication regimens for pain throughout the trial they are willing and able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: knee replacement or non-arthroscopic surgery to the affected knee serious medical illness, such as uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., Systolic Blood Pressure/Diastolic Blood Pressure of ≥ 150/95), congestive heart failure, pacemaker, or history of acute myocardial infarction peripheral neuropathy systemic rheumatic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia alcohol/substance abuse cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Exam score ≤ 23) history of brain surgery, tumor, seizure, stroke, or intracranial metal implantation pregnancy or lactation for females hospitalization within the preceding year due to psychiatric illness
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hyochol Ahn, PhD, ARNP
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28566193
Citation
Ahn H, Woods AJ, Kunik ME, Bhattacharjee A, Chen Z, Choi E, Fillingim RB. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 19.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Persons With Knee Pain (Knee Pain and tDCS): Randomized Pilot Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs