search
Back to results

Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases

Primary Purpose

Spinal Metastases

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
20 Gy in 5 fractions
Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions
Sponsored by
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Spinal Metastases

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of cancer (excluding seminoma, small cell lung cancer and hematologic primaries).
  • Spinal metastasis documented with MRI and suitable for treatment with radiotherapy with the following characteristics:

    • Painful, as defined by a pain score ≥ 2 for worst pain in the planned target treatment volume;
    • ≤ 3 consecutive spinal segments involved by tumour to be included in the planned target volume. The patient may have other spinal metaastases to be treated as per the radiation oncologist's discretion, but the eligible spinal metastatic site has to be one where there is pain and no more than 3 consecutive segments to be included as clinical target volume and appropriate for either 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 24 Gy in 2 fractions per the randomization.
  • There is no plan to change the pain medication on the first day of protocol treatment with radiotherapy.
  • ECOG Performance Status 0-2.
  • Seen by a radiation oncologist and judged to be appropriate for participation in this study including ability to tolerate protocol radiotherapy (SBRT or CRT).
  • Age of 18 years or older.
  • Patient is able and willing to complete the Patient Diary (pain and analgesic use).
  • Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaire in either English or French. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines, prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible.
  • Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrollment in the trial to document their willingness to participate.
  • Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.
  • In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 3 weeks of patient randomization. From the time of successful treatment planning, no more than 12 days can elapse before the first fraction of radiotherapy is delivered.
  • Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.
  • Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a pacemaker, such that MRI cannot be performed or treatment cannot be delivered safely.
  • Patients with prior treatment with any radionuclide within 30 days prior to randomization.
  • Patients with prior radiation to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy such that the protocol therapy cannot be delivered as intended.
  • Patients with prior surgery to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy.
  • Patients who have received chemotherapy within 1 week prior to administration of protocol radiotherapy or who are expected/planned to receive chemotherapy within one week of completing protocol radiotherapy. Centre guidelines regarding administration of targeted non-cytotoxic therapy must be followed with the proviso that no systemic anticancer therapy should be administered within 24 hours prior to and post-radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy may be administered during radiotherapy as per the discretion of the treating physician.
  • Patients with spine instability as judged by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of more than 12.
  • Patients with symptomatic spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome resulting from bony compression or epidural compression of the spinal cord and cauda equina, respectively. Symptomatic refers to neurolic deficit in the form of motor, bowel or bladder dysfunction.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.

Sites / Locations

  • Auckland City Hospital
  • Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Peter McCallum Cancer Institute
  • Peter Mac - Sunshine Hospital
  • Canberra Hospital
  • Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital
  • Tom Baker Cancer Centre
  • Cross Cancer Institute
  • BCCA - Centre for the North
  • BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre
  • BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
  • CancerCare Manitoba
  • Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
  • London Regional Cancer Program
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Odette Cancer Centre
  • University Health Network
  • CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
  • CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard Conventional Radiotherapy

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Arm Description

Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Phase III: Complete Pain Response at 3 Months Post-radiation
A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) .

Secondary Outcome Measures

Complete Pain Response at 6 Months Post Radiation Based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party Criteria
A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) .
Radiation Site Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months Using MRI Imaging
Radiation site progression was defined as: Gross unequivocal increase in tumor volume or linear dimension > 20%. Any new or progressive tumor within the epidural space. Neurologic deterioration attributable to pre-existing epidural disease with equivocal increased epidural disease dimensions on MRI.
Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
Proportion of participants who were alive at 6 months in study.

Full Information

First Posted
July 27, 2015
Last Updated
August 3, 2023
Sponsor
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Collaborators
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02512965
Brief Title
Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases
Official Title
A Randomized Phase II/III Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy(SBRT) Versus Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Patients With Spinal Metastases
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 4, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 8, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 16, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Collaborators
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to find out if SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain in the spine 3 months after receiving treatment.
Detailed Description
This research is being done because while there is some evidence suggesting that SBRT may improve treatment for patients with spine metastases, more research is needed to determine if it is better than CRT. The first part of the randomized trial (phase II) looked at whether it was possible (feasible) to provide these treatments in cancer centres across Canada, by aiming to recruit 54 participants within 18 months. This part of the study was successfully completed in early 2017. The second component of this study, called a randomized phase III trial, is now underway. It involves recruiting another 124 participants to receive either CRT or SBRT, using the same study procedure as in the feasibility study. We will continue to obtain information about whether SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Metastases

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
229 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard Conventional Radiotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions
Arm Title
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
20 Gy in 5 fractions
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Phase III: Complete Pain Response at 3 Months Post-radiation
Description
A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) .
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete Pain Response at 6 Months Post Radiation Based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party Criteria
Description
A Complete Pain Response is defined as a pain score of zero (0) at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalent) .
Time Frame
6 months post radiation
Title
Radiation Site Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months Using MRI Imaging
Description
Radiation site progression was defined as: Gross unequivocal increase in tumor volume or linear dimension > 20%. Any new or progressive tumor within the epidural space. Neurologic deterioration attributable to pre-existing epidural disease with equivocal increased epidural disease dimensions on MRI.
Time Frame
6 months.
Title
Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
Description
Proportion of participants who were alive at 6 months in study.
Time Frame
6 months post radiation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of cancer (excluding seminoma, small cell lung cancer and hematologic primaries). Spinal metastasis documented with MRI and suitable for treatment with radiotherapy with the following characteristics: Painful, as defined by a pain score ≥ 2 for worst pain in the planned target treatment volume; ≤ 3 consecutive spinal segments involved by tumour to be included in the planned target volume. The patient may have other spinal metaastases to be treated as per the radiation oncologist's discretion, but the eligible spinal metastatic site has to be one where there is pain and no more than 3 consecutive segments to be included as clinical target volume and appropriate for either 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 24 Gy in 2 fractions per the randomization. There is no plan to change the pain medication on the first day of protocol treatment with radiotherapy. ECOG Performance Status 0-2. Seen by a radiation oncologist and judged to be appropriate for participation in this study including ability to tolerate protocol radiotherapy (SBRT or CRT). Age of 18 years or older. Patient is able and willing to complete the Patient Diary (pain and analgesic use). Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaire in either English or French. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines, prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible. Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrollment in the trial to document their willingness to participate. Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up. In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 3 weeks of patient randomization. From the time of successful treatment planning, no more than 12 days can elapse before the first fraction of radiotherapy is delivered. Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures. Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who have a pacemaker, such that MRI cannot be performed or treatment cannot be delivered safely. Patients with prior treatment with any radionuclide within 30 days prior to randomization. Patients with prior radiation to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy such that the protocol therapy cannot be delivered as intended. Patients with prior surgery to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy. Patients who have received chemotherapy within 1 week prior to administration of protocol radiotherapy or who are expected/planned to receive chemotherapy within one week of completing protocol radiotherapy. Centre guidelines regarding administration of targeted non-cytotoxic therapy must be followed with the proviso that no systemic anticancer therapy should be administered within 24 hours prior to and post-radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy may be administered during radiotherapy as per the discretion of the treating physician. Patients with spine instability as judged by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of more than 12. Patients with symptomatic spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome resulting from bony compression or epidural compression of the spinal cord and cauda equina, respectively. Symptomatic refers to neurolic deficit in the form of motor, bowel or bladder dysfunction. Pregnant or lactating women.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arjun Sahgal
Organizational Affiliation
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto ON
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Auckland City Hospital
City
Grafton
State/Province
Aucklund
ZIP/Postal Code
1023
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital
City
Liverpool
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2170
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Princess Alexandra Hospital
City
Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4102
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Adelaide Hospital
City
Adelaide
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Peter McCallum Cancer Institute
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3002
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Peter Mac - Sunshine Hospital
City
St Albans
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3021
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Canberra Hospital
City
Garran
ZIP/Postal Code
ACT 2605
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital
City
Herston
ZIP/Postal Code
4029
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4N2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Cross Cancer Institute
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 1Z2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
BCCA - Centre for the North
City
Prince George
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V2M 7E9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V8R 6V5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CancerCare Manitoba
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 0V9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8V 5C2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Regional Cancer Program
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5W9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Odette Cancer Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University Health Network
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X 3E4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
City
Quebec City
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1R 2J6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34126044
Citation
Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30003994
Citation
Tseng CL, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Lee YK, Ruschin M, Atenafu EG, Campbell M, Maralani P, Yang V, Yee A, Sahgal A. Imaging-Based Outcomes for 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions for Patients with de Novo Spinal Metastases Treated With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 1;102(3):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.047. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs