search
Back to results

Humeral Shaft Pseudoarthrosis Treated With Bone Autograft Versus Platelet Rich Plasma

Primary Purpose

Pseudoarthrosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Mexico
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
bone autograft of iliac crest
Platelet Rich Plasma plus bone autograft
Sponsored by
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pseudoarthrosis focused on measuring platelet-rich plasma, bone grafting, pseudoarthrosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • evolution of 3 months
  • initial orthopedic management
  • without mental illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • osteoporosis
  • contralateral or ipsilateral fractures
  • previous fracture in same place at least 3 month
  • hematologic problems
  • liver disease
  • cardiac, renal or lung disease

Sites / Locations

  • Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Bone autograft

platelet rich plasma plus Bone autograft

Arm Description

The investigator it will obtain bone autograft of iliac crest ipsilateral of each patient. And apply into the pseudoarthrosis focus at the moment of the fixation with a locking compression plates.

Other group of patients it will be extracted 40 mL of peripheric blood sample, and processed with a double-centrifugation technique to obtain 5 mL of platelet rich plasma, and collocated into the focus of pseudoarthrosis after standard fixation with locking compression plates and Bone Autograft of Iliac Crest.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Stans Scale
The evaluation of the radiographic extent of the bony callus (consolidation grade) will be assessed via anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of the arm and classified in different levels, as follows: Grade 0, no identifiable bony callus . Grade 1, primary bony callus formation with little or no new periosteal bone. Grade 2, new periosteal bone formation on two sides of the humerus. Grade 3, new periosteal bone formation on three or four sides of the humerus.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
It is designed to measure physical function and symptoms in patients with any or several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Where the better evaluation is equal to 0, and the worst evaluation is equal to 100.

Full Information

First Posted
August 3, 2015
Last Updated
October 17, 2017
Sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02520089
Brief Title
Humeral Shaft Pseudoarthrosis Treated With Bone Autograft Versus Platelet Rich Plasma
Official Title
Comparison of Treatment of Humeral Shaft Pseudoarthrosis Between Bone Autograft Versus Platelet Rich Plasma. Randomized, Blinded Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients with humeral shaft pseudoarthrosis is going to be treated with a standard protocol with a locking compression plate and bone autograft, and other group of patients treated with platelet rich plasma. Posteriorly all the patients it will evaluated radiographically and with functional scales for a period of one year.
Detailed Description
Pseudarthrosis is a condition characterized by the absence of union from 3-4 months of the start of a fracture. It usually has symptoms manifested by pain and loss of function of the affected extremity. In addition to radiographic data with lack of consolidation in the fracture. The surgical indications in patients with pseudoarthrosis data are the presence of pain and the mobility of the fracture taking account the time evolution. The humeral shaft fracture represent 3% of the general fractures, appearing around 66,000 cases per year in the United States. The conservative treatment with a brace has been used since the 1970's. Mostly of the humeral shaft fractures are managed with this option. Contraindications are those fractures which are bilateral or in polytraumatized patients who do not have the ability to roam. Surgical treatment seeks to provide a stable fixation providing an early mobilization. The union of these fractures occurs in a period ranging from 12 to 24 weeks. The use of a Locking Compression Plate where there must be at least six cortical fixation on both fragments is actually recommended, besides is necessary applies also bone autograft to promote ossification has osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties, with an radiographic union between the nineteen weeks. The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is obtained from a sample of autologous blood, and after processing it have growth factors that stimulate angiogenesis and cell proliferation. It has been used since 1990 to treat jaw fracture with bone autograft and tendon injury in rotator cuff with a good evolution. It has been bone consolidation from 8 to 24 weeks. Preparation of platelet-rich plasma A 40-ml volume of whole blood was taken from the basilic or antecubital vein of the upper limb in sterile tubes and vacuum sealed with 3.8% sodium citrate as an anticoagulant. The samples were transported to the Tissue Engineering Laboratory of the Bone and Tissue Bank where they were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1800 rpm to separate the cellular parts corresponding to the erythrocytes and leukocytes. The upper plasma layer was removed from each of the tubes (taking care not to remove the buffy coat) and collected into a 50-ml sterile conical polypropylene tube for a second centrifugation step for 12 min at 3400 rpm. The plasma supernatant, or platelet poor plasma, was removed, leaving a volume of 3 ml in which the platelets were resuspended. The 3 ml of PRP obtained was transferred to a sterile glass tube and vacuum sealed without anticoagulant. An aliquot of the final PRP was sent to the laboratory to quantify the number of platelets. Manipulation of the samples was performed in a sterile environment within a class II biosafety cabinet. Prior to the administration of PRP to the patient, activation of the platelets was induced by adding 0.45 ml of 10% calcium gluconate and inverting the sample several times to ensure a homogeneous mixture. Then, the activated PRP was aspirated with a 5-ml syringe for application to the patient using the technique described above after asepsis and the application of 2 ml of lidocaine into the application site. The patient must sign the format of informed consent to the authorization of the surgery and the use of platelet-rich plasma. After signing informed consent, will divide the patients in two randomized groups to make the comparative and longitudinal study. A control group of patients who will receive treatment with surgery on the basis of open reduction with locking compression plate and autologous bone of iliac crest. The experimental group of patients will receive the above-mentioned treatment more the application of plasma rich platelets at the level of the fracture focus. After the surgery all the patients will be assessed at outpatient at 10 days for evaluation, pendulum exercises and the first radiographic evaluation. The patient will be attending consultation to continue his post-surgical evolution. During the follow-up visits, the radiographic extent of the bony callus was assessed via anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of the arm as follows grade 0, no identifiable bony callus; grade 1, primary bony callus formation with little or no new periosteal bone; grade 2, new periosteal bone formation on two sides of the humerus,; and grade 3, new periosteal bone formation on three or four sides of the humerus. The follow-up is for one year. Sample size calculation Using a formula to test hypothesis and two mean difference, with a value of zα of 1.96 with significance level of 95 for two tails, and a value zβ of 0.84 with an output of 80, a sample was obtained of 7 participants per group, whereas an average of 19 weeks for group control with a standard deviation of 3 hoping to reduce up to 4 weeks the start of consolidation with the application of PRP.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pseudoarthrosis
Keywords
platelet-rich plasma, bone grafting, pseudoarthrosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
23 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Bone autograft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The investigator it will obtain bone autograft of iliac crest ipsilateral of each patient. And apply into the pseudoarthrosis focus at the moment of the fixation with a locking compression plates.
Arm Title
platelet rich plasma plus Bone autograft
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Other group of patients it will be extracted 40 mL of peripheric blood sample, and processed with a double-centrifugation technique to obtain 5 mL of platelet rich plasma, and collocated into the focus of pseudoarthrosis after standard fixation with locking compression plates and Bone Autograft of Iliac Crest.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
bone autograft of iliac crest
Intervention Description
The investigators will take bone autograft of iliac crest of the patient and then apply into the site of pseudoarthrosis, this graft have osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Platelet Rich Plasma plus bone autograft
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biomet GPS III, MTF Cascade
Intervention Description
Sample of 40 mL of peripheric blood and processed to obtain 5 mL of platelet rich plasma, and collocated into pseudoarthrosis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stans Scale
Description
The evaluation of the radiographic extent of the bony callus (consolidation grade) will be assessed via anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of the arm and classified in different levels, as follows: Grade 0, no identifiable bony callus . Grade 1, primary bony callus formation with little or no new periosteal bone. Grade 2, new periosteal bone formation on two sides of the humerus. Grade 3, new periosteal bone formation on three or four sides of the humerus.
Time Frame
9th month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
Description
It is designed to measure physical function and symptoms in patients with any or several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Where the better evaluation is equal to 0, and the worst evaluation is equal to 100.
Time Frame
9th months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: evolution of 3 months initial orthopedic management without mental illness Exclusion Criteria: osteoporosis contralateral or ipsilateral fractures previous fracture in same place at least 3 month hematologic problems liver disease cardiac, renal or lung disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos Acosta-Olivo, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
City
Monterrey
State/Province
Nuevo Leon
ZIP/Postal Code
64480
Country
Mexico

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22751161
Citation
Carroll EA, Schweppe M, Langfitt M, Miller AN, Halvorson JJ. Management of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jul;20(7):423-33. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-07-423.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10780604
Citation
Lin J, Hou SM, Hang YS. Treatment of humeral shaft delayed unions and nonunions with humeral locked nails. J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):695-703. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12699371
Citation
Pugh DM, McKee MD. Advances in the management of humeral nonunion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;11(1):48-59. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200301000-00007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16141726
Citation
Celebi L, Dogan O, Muratli HH, Yagmurlu MF, Yuksel HY, Bicimoglu A. [Treatment of humeral pseudarthroses by open reduction and internal fixation]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39(3):205-10. Turkish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15712985
Citation
Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):77-86.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22768374
Citation
Ahmad Z, Howard D, Brooks RA, Wardale J, Henson FM, Getgood A, Rushton N. The role of platelet rich plasma in musculoskeletal science. JRSM Short Rep. 2012 Jun;3(6):40. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011148. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Humeral Shaft Pseudoarthrosis Treated With Bone Autograft Versus Platelet Rich Plasma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs